Modelling in Physical Geography Martin Mergili, University of Vienna

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Course : S0705 – Soil Mechanic
Advertisements

Hillslope morphology Ch 8. Hillslope Types Soil-mantled Soil-mantled –Transport-limited –Shape: smooth, rounded Bare bedrock or thin soils Bare bedrock.
Sensitivity Analysis In deterministic analysis, single fixed values (typically, mean values) of representative samples or strength parameters or slope.
降雨誘發淺層山崩模型土壤強 度參數逆分析之比較與驗證 Adviser: 董家鈞、劉家男 Student: 陳麒任.
SCHEDULE OUTLINE In Class Exam 2 Landsliding Types Mechanics Sensitivity Probability.
INFINITE SLOPE ANALYSIS THE SIMPLEST WAY TO MODEL LANDSLIDES!
Mechanically stabilized earth wall in Northwest Greece
降雨誘發廣域山崩模型之力學 參數逆分析實際案例 報告者:陳麒任 指導教授:董家鈞. Introduction Classification of landslide assessment: Qualitative analysis Empirical method Quantitative analysis.
Bearing Capacity Theory
1 Assessment of Imprecise Reliability Using Efficient Probabilistic Reanalysis Farizal Efstratios Nikolaidis SAE 2007 World Congress.
4. Phase Relations (Das, Chapter 3) Sections: All except 3.6
1 Specific Gravity. 2 Specific Gravity Gs 3 Phase Material.
LOGO Soil slope stability analysis combining shear strength reduction and slip line method Supervisor: Yongchang Cai Ph.D. candidate: Jie Wu School of.
FACTOR OF SAFETY Determining slope stability in Holtwood, PA in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy Kristina Lofman November 27, 2012 EPS 109.
Terrain Stability Mapping Using the ArcView SINMAP extension David G Tarboton, Robert T Pack, Craig N Goodwin Acknowledgements n The SINMAP software was.
DRAINMOD APPLICATION ABE 527 Computer Models in Environmental and Natural Resources.
5-1 ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary © 2009 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved. May 28, 2009 Inventory # Chapter 5 Six Sigma.
A Deterministic Bank-Stability and Toe-Erosion Model (BSTEM Version 5.4) Andrew Simon, Robert Thomas, Andrea Curini and Natasha Bankhead USDA-ARS National.
1 / 12 Michael Beer, Vladik Kreinovich COMPARING INTERVALS AND MOMENTS FOR THE QUANTIFICATION OF COARSE INFORMATION M. Beer University of Liverpool V.
International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC) ISL 2004 Exercise 3: Landslide susceptibility assssment using bivariate.
L10 – Map labeling algorithms NGEN06(TEK230) – Algorithms in Geographical Information Systems L10- Map labeling algorithms by: Sadegh Jamali (source: Lecture.
1/17/2016CS225B Kurt Konolige Probabilistic Models of Sensing and Movement Move to probability models of sensing and movement Project 2 is about complex.
4. Properties of Materials Sediment (size) Physical States of Soil Concepts of Stress and Strain Normal and Shear Stress Additional Resistance Components.
Structural & Multidisciplinary Optimization Group Deciding How Conservative A Designer Should Be: Simulating Future Tests and Redesign Nathaniel Price.
ISRIC Spring School – Hand’s on Global Soil Information Facilities, 9-13 May 2016 Uncertainty quantification and propagation Gerard Heuvelink.
Probabilistic Slope Stability Analysis with the
Chapter 8 Confidence Interval Estimation Statistics For Managers 5 th Edition.
Yandell – Econ 216 Chap 8-1 Chapter 8 Confidence Interval Estimation.
Compaction Of Soil GANDHINAGAR INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Group Members
Mapping of lateral spread Displacement hazard, Weber County, Utah
Modelling of landslide release
Deterministic landslide hazard assessment
Faculty Of Civil engineering department BMCET,SURAT.
Discrete ABC Based on Similarity for GCP
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING Slope Stability
12. Principles of Parameter Estimation
Under supervision of: Dr. Sami A. Hijjawi
CHAPTER FOUR LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE. 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Definitions of Key Terms 3.2 Lateral Earth Pressure at Rest 3.3 Active and Passive Lateral Earth.
Chapter 8 Civil Engineering Part 2: Geotechnical Engineering
Modelling in Physical Geography Martin Mergili, University of Vienna
Imprecise Probabilistic and Interval Approaches Applied to
How Good is a Model? How much information does AIC give us?
Study Evaluation of Random Set Method on Results from Reliability analysis of Finite Element in Deep Excavation Article Code: 443 Presenter Mehdi Poormousavian.
MAIERATO, ITALY LANDSLIDE (2010)
Reliability based design optimization
5. WEIGHT VOLUME RELATIONSHIPS
Precision Dimensioning
James K Beard, Ph.D. April 20, 2005 SystemView 2005 James K Beard, Ph.D. April 20, 2005 April 122, 2005.
Rutgers Intelligent Transportation Systems (RITS) Laboratory
108th OGC Technical Committee
Soil Mechanics-II Soil Stabilization and Improvement
Range Imaging Through Triangulation
Interval Estimation.
REMOTE SENSING Multispectral Image Classification
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CONSEPT OF GRE PF RETAINING WALL
Open Portal Slope and Support Design:
Random Heading Angle in Reliability Analyses
Discussers (alphabetical order):
Modeling Landscapes - Force Balance
Example 3.1 A square foundation is 1.5m x 1.5m in plan. The soil supporting the foundation has a friction angle ǿ = 20o, &
Po Shan Road, Hong Kong, 18 June 1972
OBJECTIVES Evaluation of;
Precision Dimensioning
Chapter 15 (2) Slope Stability
Information Theoretical Analysis of Digital Watermarking
Numerical Analysis of slopes
12. Principles of Parameter Estimation
Propagation of Error Berlin Chen
Civil Engineering Dept.
Presentation transcript:

Modelling in Physical Geography Martin Mergili, University of Vienna Parameter uncertainties Martin Mergili, University of Vienna

Model results will never be better than the input parameters Model parameters Every model relies on input parameters These can be raster maps, tabular data or single values Some parameters, such as the derivatives of DEMs generated from laser scans, are often well constrained and their uncertainties are small However, many other parameters – particularly those which cannot be directly derived from remotely sensed data – are highly uncertain in space Model results will never be better than the input parameters Parameters Strategies Probability Instructions 2 2

Strategies to deal with uncertainties In principle, three key strategies are available to deal with uncertain model parameters Strategy Example Most conservative assumption Engineering purposes Scenario analysis Climate modelling Probabilistic approaches Landslide susceptibility modelling Parameters Strategies Probability Instructions 3 3

Geotechnical parameters Strategies Probability Instructions 4 4

Result of laboratory tests Textbook (Prinz & Strauss, 2011) Broad range of parameter values Poorly related to mapped lithology Corresponds well to published ranges of values „Simple“ Factor of safety? NO! Probability density functions necessary c' =-485.24x φ' + 17,321 + ec R² = 0.395 Parameters Strategies Probability Instructions 5 5

Slope failure probability Maximum Minimum Maximum φ‘ Minimum c‘ Random sampling of c‘ and ϕ‘ within defined constraints Pf ~ fraction of parameter combinations with FS < 1 Parameters Strategies Probability Instructions 6 6

Instructions We will extend our slope stability script to work with ranges of the cohesion, the angle of internal friction and the soil depth instead of single values The values will be determined randomly between user-defined lower and upper thresholds. We will compute a slope failure probability in the range 0–1 from the FOS values of a large number of model runs Python 2.7 documentation: https://docs.python.org/2.7/ ArcPy documentation: https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/desktop/latest/analyze/arcpy/a-quick-tour-of-arcpy.htm Parameters Strategies Probability Instructions 7 7

Instructions Start with the following parameter values/ranges (you may vary them later on): Symbol Parameter name Value d depth of slip surface 0.5 – 5.0 m dw saturated depth γd specific weight of dry soil 18,000 N/m³ γw specific weight of water 9,810 N/m³ c cohesion soil + roots 0 – 10,000 N/m² φ angle of internal friction 15 – 45° θs saturated water content 40% (0.4) n number of model runs 1000 DEM: Sant‘Anna test area (raster sa_elev) Parameters Strategies Probability Instructions 8 8

Have fun! martin.mergili@univie.ac.at http://www.mergili.at 9 9