Presenter : Geewanath Sharma

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technology Use Plan Methacton School District Patty McGinnis ED TECH 501.
Advertisements

School Leadership Team Fall Conference West Virginia Department of Education Division of Educator Quality and System Support Bridgeport Conference Center.
Mathematics Matters Xu Jiangyong Math Education in China #Maths Matters.
FRANKLIN PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHOOL COMMITTEE MAY 27, 2014 Massachusetts Kindergarten Entry Assessment (MKEA)
Alberta’s Kindergarten to Grade 12 Education System with Waldemar Riemer.
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP: CLASSROOM WALKTHROUGHS
Professional Learning in the Learning Profession Effective Practice  Increased Student Learning Frederick Brown Director of Strategy.
Healthy School-Healthy City Participatory Planning and Project Management for Health Promotion in the context of International Development 5 May 08.
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Orienting Extension Faculty that are Volunteer Administrators.
Freedom and Control in Education Autonomy and Accountability Focus of International Discourse R. Govinda National University of Educational Planning and.
High Stakes Testing EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
1 PROVINCIAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT CENTRE(PEACE) Bureau of Curriculum and Extension & Extension Centre Quetta.
THE SECONDARY SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMME CURRICULUM MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT Prof Raj Mestry.
Segment 5: Sample Activities Federal Accountability Requirements School Leadership Instructional Supervision 1.
RESULTS AND PERFORMANCE Rapid Assessment of Form 4 Results 2010 by Mr. C. Philemon, Director (Ag) of Secondary Education.
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting Marks Elementary Dos Palos Oro-Loma JUSD.
Natalia Junior High Cross Curriculum Education- the key to our success.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Leadership Team July 24, Learning Targets 1. Familiarize and use The Framework of Teaching in the areas of engagement and questioning to observe.
© Copyright Wadhwani Foundation Principal and District Coordinator role.
Assessing Intended Learning Outcomes. What We Have Done.
Practice of INSET in Mathematics and Science Teachers and its Impact on Quality of Basic Education in Kenya By ADEA-WGMSE.
Moon Area School District.  tml tml 
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
August 21 st, 2014 Louise Roachford-Gould, Principal Annual Title I Meeting John Reith Elementary School.
EMB/REO Making Use of Assessment Results in School Development Planning School Development Division, EMB February 2006.
Relating Foreign Language Curricula to the CEFR in the Maltese context
Dr Ang Wai Hoong Singapore
AdvancED Accreditation External Review October 23-26, 2016
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
Annual Title I Meeting John Reith Elementary School
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
Merit & Incentive Pay Based on High Stakes Testing
Huntsville City Schools
Presenter : Khishigbayar BADAMSAMBUU /Hishge/
Alignment between Curriculum, Teaching & Assessment
Mesa Union School District “A Day in the Life of Data”
Targeted District Review Report
European Network on teacher Education Policies
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
A Guaranteed, Viable, and Engaging Curriculum
JET Education Services: Innovations in Teacher Support and Curriculum Development Presentation to the Care and Support for Teaching and Learning Regional.
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Supporting Beginning Teachers
Zanzibar Education Development Plan ZEDP II (2017/18 – 2021/22)
Draft OECD Best Practices for Performance Budgeting
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
Planning for Continuous Improvement: The importance of goal setting
Colchester Public Schools
WE CREATE A SUCCESSFUL SCHOOL TOGETHER
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
What have we learned, where do we need to go?
Joann Hooper Patty Rooks Paulette Richmond Gary Wenzel
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Welcome to <School Name> School
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
The role of internal and external evaluation in an autonomous system
Federal states of Germany: Multitude of educational systems
Title I Annual Meeting Pinewood Elementary, August 30, 2018.
What it IS, What it means, What it Offers
Strategic Plan: Heards Ferry Elementary
Sequence IDB Assisted Projects Objectives of the BEA Project
EFFECTIVE trilingual EDUCATION: LESSONS for SCHOOL PRINCIPALS
Christy Jones Professional Learning Program Specialist
Meet and Greet/Open House A Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Presenter : Geewanath Sharma Presentation title : Alignment between Curriculum, Teaching and Assessment in Bhutan Presenter : Geewanath Sharma

Areas 1 Current policies or frameworks that guide Curriculum, Teaching and Assessment Agencies responsible for Curriculum, Teaching and Assessment How implementation of policies related to Curriculum, Teaching and Assessment are ensured Issues and Challenges related to Curriculum, Teaching and Assessment Accountability of School Leaders and Teachers 2 3 4 5

1 Current policies or frameworks that guide Curriculum, Teaching and Assessment Most subjects (Science, Mathematics and Language) have curriculum frameworks in place. Development of curriculum frameworks is going on for other subjects. The mode of assessment both for the school level as well as the national level is developed by the REC along with the development of the curriculum. Teachers are provided orientation to the new curriculum and on-going professional support. Teacher Guides are provided for some subjects for supporting curriculum implementation Minimum number of 180 instructional days required for completing required curriculum for a particular class

1 Current policies or frameworks that guide Curriculum, Teaching and Assessment Assessment is carried out both at the school level as well as the national level. At the school level the focus is more on the formative assessment at the primary level and it gradually changes to summative assessment by the end of grade ten. At the national level, the Bhutan Council for School Examination and Assessment (BCSEA) – an autonomous body outside the MoE, manages and conducts the high stake summative examinations for grades 10 and 12 and sends competency based assessment papers for grades 3 and 6 which are evaluated at the school level. It also conducts the National Education Assessment every 3-5 years.

2 Agencies Responsible for Curriculum, Teaching and Assessment Curriculum Royal Education Council involving relevant stakeholders Teaching Teacher Professional Development Centre, REC for professional development support and Education Monitoring and Support Service Division, MoE, for monitoring and support.   Assessment Royal Education Council mainly for school based assessment and BCSEA for high stake (grades 10 and 12), competency based ( grades 3 and 6), and National Education Assessment for grades 4, 6, 8 and 10

3 How implementation of policies related to Curriculum, Teaching and Assessment are ensured? For every new curriculum to be implemented, teachers are provided orientation to the new curriculum and its delivery.   Teachers are provided professional support through workshops; direct link with the relevant curriculum officer through a toll free number; broadcast through SMS and through relevant websites. All matters related to curriculum also involve assessment aspects, therefore both REC and BCSEA liaise with each other to share, and support curriculum and assessment matters. Each subject committee under the aegis of the REC comprise of officials from REC, BCSEA, school and other relevant agencies. BCSEA involves officials from REC and school teachers to develop question banks for high stake examinations. Officials from the EMSSD and the District Education Office visit schools to observe practices and provide support.

4 Issues and Challenges related to Curriculum, Teaching and Assessment Providing orientation to the new curriculum to all teachers teaching a particular subject, and providing continuous professional development is subject to budget availability. There is no system/structure in place to ensure professional development is provided as per need.   In the primary classes, especially grades PP – 3 general teachers teach all subjects. Teacher competency is of concern in this type of practice. Large number of students in classes and inadequate teachers limit carrying out the assessment requirements. Inadequate infrastructure for ICTisation

5 Accountability of School Leaders and Teachers Teachers are required to make year, month and weekly/daily plans and carryout assessments as per the requirements in the Teacher Guides or other curriculum implementation guidelines.   At the schools Principals are required to provide instructional leadership to the schools besides administration. The subject department heads are required to ensure teachers practice what is required. The teachers’ annual work plans and their rating is based on the work output. Subject heads/Academic Vice Principals/Principals observe classes as required. The EMSSD of the MoE carries out school based monitoring and ranks schools annually where curriculum implementation and student achievement is one aspect.

Thank You