Date of download: 10/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Simulation of Wake Interactions in Wind Farms Using an Immersed Wind Turbine Model J. Turbomach. 2013;136(6):061018-061018-7. doi:10.1115/1.4025762 Figure Legend: Schematic of the immersed wind turbine model superposed on the Cartesian grid. The immersed body is a streamtube around the rotor plane of a wind turbine. The predicted near-wake velocity field is mapped at the outlet plane (plane O) onto the RANS computational domain. The far-wake region is resolved on the computational grid by the RANS solver.

Date of download: 10/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Simulation of Wake Interactions in Wind Farms Using an Immersed Wind Turbine Model J. Turbomach. 2013;136(6):061018-061018-7. doi:10.1115/1.4025762 Figure Legend: Predicted velocity profiles downstream of single turbine compared to measurements in wind tunnel for three operating conditions (a) TSR = 2.9, (b) TSR = 4.0, and (c) TSR = 5.1

Date of download: 10/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Simulation of Wake Interactions in Wind Farms Using an Immersed Wind Turbine Model J. Turbomach. 2013;136(6):061018-061018-7. doi:10.1115/1.4025762 Figure Legend: Predicted turbulence intensity profiles downstream of a single turbine compared to measurements in a wind tunnel for three operating conditions (a) TSR = 2.9, (b) TSR = 4.0, and (c) TSR = 5.1

Date of download: 10/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Simulation of Wake Interactions in Wind Farms Using an Immersed Wind Turbine Model J. Turbomach. 2013;136(6):061018-061018-7. doi:10.1115/1.4025762 Figure Legend: Layout of the Sexbierum wind farm located in the north of the Netherlands

Date of download: 10/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Simulation of Wake Interactions in Wind Farms Using an Immersed Wind Turbine Model J. Turbomach. 2013;136(6):061018-061018-7. doi:10.1115/1.4025762 Figure Legend: The view of the computational grid with local clustering in the z direction and around the immersed turbine used for the single wake simulations at the Sexbierum wind farm

Date of download: 10/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Simulation of Wake Interactions in Wind Farms Using an Immersed Wind Turbine Model J. Turbomach. 2013;136(6):061018-061018-7. doi:10.1115/1.4025762 Figure Legend: Predictions of the velocity profiles at two positions downstream of a full-scale wind turbine compared to measurements. (a) 2.5D and (b) 8D.

Date of download: 10/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Simulation of Wake Interactions in Wind Farms Using an Immersed Wind Turbine Model J. Turbomach. 2013;136(6):061018-061018-7. doi:10.1115/1.4025762 Figure Legend: Predictions of the turbulence intensity at two positions downstream of a full-scale wind turbine compared to measurements. (a) 2.5D and (b) 8D.

Date of download: 10/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Simulation of Wake Interactions in Wind Farms Using an Immersed Wind Turbine Model J. Turbomach. 2013;136(6):061018-061018-7. doi:10.1115/1.4025762 Figure Legend: Side view of contour plots of wind speed and turbulent kinetic energy downstream of the turbine in operation in an atmospheric boundary layer simulated using IWTM

Date of download: 10/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Simulation of Wake Interactions in Wind Farms Using an Immersed Wind Turbine Model J. Turbomach. 2013;136(6):061018-061018-7. doi:10.1115/1.4025762 Figure Legend: Plan view of contour plots of wind speed showing the wake interactions for two different wind directions

Date of download: 10/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Simulation of Wake Interactions in Wind Farms Using an Immersed Wind Turbine Model J. Turbomach. 2013;136(6):061018-061018-7. doi:10.1115/1.4025762 Figure Legend: Power versus wind direction compared to measurements for two downstream turbines, T37 and T36, at the Sexbierum wind farm