D. Ramos, H. Prin, M. Moretti, C. Eymin, A. Temporal, V. Parma, S

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
19th – 20th of September 2007Cryogenic Expert Meeting at GSI, Jan Patrick Meier1/11 Cryogenic Experts Meeting at GSI, 2007 The SIS 100 Cryogenic Jumper.
Advertisements

MICE RF and Coupling Coil Module Outstanding Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 26, 2004.
ColUSM #51 30 th January, 2015 D. Duarte Ramos, C. Mucher, L. Gentini, T. Sahner, H. Prin, R. Wawrowski, Q. Deliege, V. Baglin, F. Savary.
Vacuum Vessel Production Readiness Review
4m Undulator Design Concepts Amanda J Brummitt CCLRC RAL On behalf of the HeLiCal Collaboration.
F. Savary on behalf of the WP11 team Input from V. Baglin, D. Ramos.
MICE RF and Coupling Coil Module Integration Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 27, 2004.
1 Update on Focus Coil Design and Configuration M. A. Green, G. Barr, W. Lau, R. S. Senanayake, and S. Q. Yang University of Oxford Department of Physics.
1 Integration of collimators in the dispersion suppressors Status of 11 T cryo- assembly integration Dec 17, 2013
1 Presented at ColUSM by D. Ramos on behalf of the Cold Collimator Feasibility Study Working Group Longitudinal.
Alignment and assembling of the cryomodule Yun He, James Sears, Matthias Liepe MLC external review October 03, 2012.
1 Cryostat assembly, integration and commissioning procedures M.Olcese Version: 07 May 2008.
R&D Status and Plan on The Cryostat N. Ohuchi, K. Tsuchiya, A. Terashima, H. Hisamatsu, M. Masuzawa, T. Okamura, H. Hayano 1.STF-Cryostat Design 2.Construction.
MQXF Cold-mass Assembly and Cryostating H. Prin, D. Duarte Ramos, P. Ferracin, P. Fessia 4 th Joint HiLumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting November 17-21, 2014.
H. Prin, F. Savary, D. Duarte Ramos, L. Grand- Clement, C. Mucher, A. Temporal.
FP 420 Connection Cryostat Design and Integration Keith Potter, Jaak Lippmaa, Guido Ryckwaert, Benoit Florin, Thierry Renaglia, Thierry Colombet, Shrikant.
1 Hi-Lumi WP3 meeting Update on the Q1 to D1 cryostat Jan 28, 2014  Outline  Cryostat cross section options  Elliptical interconnect.
SCU Segmented Cryostat Concept M. Leitner, S. Prestemon, D. Arbelaez, S. Myers September 2 nd, 2014.
Arnaud Vande Craen (TE-MSC) 27/02/20131 EUCARD : ESAC Review – CEA Saclay.
Brookhaven - fermilab - berkeley US LHC ACCELERATOR PROJECT LHC IRQ Inner Triplet Review Q1, Q2, and Q3 Mechanics T. Nicol April 24-25, 2007.
C. Garion Presentation Outline  Overview of the inner triplet interconnections  Q1/Q2, Q2/Q3 interconnections  General view  Working conditions  Compensation.
FP420 R&D Project – Brainstorming session on mechanics 28 March 06 1 D. D. INFN To/CERN PH CMM FP420 Integration Environment.
LMQXFA Cold Mass Assembly Antonios Vouris Fermilab February 3, 2016.
MICE Prototype Coupling Coil Fabrication Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CM38 - Napa California February 25, 2014 February.
Carlo Pagani University of Milano INFN Milano-LASA & GDE ILC and XFEL Cryomodules Preliminary thoughts for convergence ILC EDR Kick-off Meeting DESY,
Vacuum, Surfaces & Coatings Group Technology Department 22 nd January 2015 C. Garion2 Beam Line Interconnection: snapshot of present design principles.
The integration of 420 m detectors into the LHC
Mike Struik / LHC-CRI INSTRUMENTATION FEEDTHROUGH SYSTEM FOR LHC MACHINE ARC QUADRUPOLE MAGNETS. 123rd LHC Vacuum Design Meeting 19 April 1999.
HL-LHC 11 T Dipole for DS Collimation 8 th to10 th December, 2014 D. Duarte Ramos, C. Mucher, L. Gentini, T. Sahner, H. Prin, R. Wawrowski, F. Savary,
Quadrupoles and orbit correctors bus bars routing along the inner triplet string MQXF Workshop at CERN– February the 3 rd 2016 H. Prin With acknowledgements.
MQXFB design, assembly plans & tooling at CERN J.C Perez On behalf of MQXF collaboration team MQXF Workshop on Structure, Alignment and Electrical QA.
SPL cryomodule specification meeting, CERN 19th October 2010 SPL cryomodule specification: Goals of the meeting SPL cryomodule specification: Goals of.
CW Cryomodules for Project X Yuriy Orlov, Tom Nicol, and Tom Peterson Cryomodules for Project X, 14 June 2013Page 1.
Thermal screen of the cryostat Presented by Evgeny Koshurnikov, GSI, Darmstadt September 8, 2015 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (Dubna)
ColUSM #63 18 th September, 2015 D. Ramos, C. Mucher, L. Gentini, H. Prin, Q. Deliege, A. Bastard, J. Hrivnak.
QXF magnet integration Paolo Ferracin Joint LARP/CM20 HiLumi meeting Napa Valley, CA, USA 8-10 April, 2013.
Inner Triplet Review 1 H. Prin AT/MEL Activities on the triplets at CERN Reception and Acceptance Triplet String Assembly in Building 181 Handling and.
Inner Triplet Review 1 H. Prin AT/MEL Activities on the triplets at CERN Reception and Acceptance Triplet String Assembly in Building 181 Handling and.
F LESEIGNEUR / G OLIVIER LUND January 9th, ESS HIGH BETA CRYOMODULE ESS CRYOMODULE STATUS MEETING HIGH BETA CRYOMODULE LUND JANUARY 9TH, 2013 Unité.
Cryostats for superconducting magnets
ALIGNMENT OF THE NEW TRIPLETS
SPL RF coupler: integration aspects
Cold mass design, assembly plans and QA/QC at CERN
Stress and cool-down analysis of the cryomodule
HL-LHC IT STRING and Series test of SC link
SLHC –PP WP6 LHC IR Upgrade - Phase I.
Roadmap for triplet cryostats
Status of triplet cryostat and magnet support scheme
HFM Test Station Main Cryostat
Status of design and production of LEP connection cryostat
A. Vande Craen, C. Eymin, M. Moretti, D. Ramos CERN
Cryo-assembly design D. Ramos, V. Parma, C. Mucher, H. Prin, M. Souchet, J. Hrivnak, M. Moretti, L. Mora, F. Savary, L. Gentini Review of the 11T Dipoles.
Feasibility and implication of installation of the string test in SM18 with a slope M. Bajko WP16.
Status of cryostat integration and conceptual design
Cedric Garion, TE-VSC-DLM, WP12
FRESCA2 Update on the dipole design and new calculations
Parts exchange for HL-LHC AUP Q1&Q3
The 11T cryo-assembly: summary of design and integration aspects
Design of Distribution Feedbox at LHC P7
MICE Coupling Coil Update
The Quench Detection-Wire-Feedthrough Plug-In of W7-X
WP3 Meeting – December the 10th 2015 H. Prin
PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET
Cryostats Some ideas for the new Q1 to Q3 Hi-Lumi WP3 meeting
Cryomodule Assembly Plan
Work Unit AIK 11.2 CDR of the CDS-SL Mechanics
Magnetic shielding and thermal shielding
Status of QQXF cryostat
F.Pasdeloup, H.Prin, L. Williams
J. Fleiter, S. C. Hopkins, A. Ballarino
Presentation transcript:

Status of Q1 to D1 cryostat design, interconnects and cold mass interfaces D. Ramos, H. Prin, M. Moretti, C. Eymin, A. Temporal, V. Parma, S. Feher 6th HL-LHC Collaboration meeting, 14-16 Nov. 2016

A concept of cryostat and cold mass that… Fits in the tunnel (same width as other LHC cryostats) and encloses all the cryogenic piping running along the string, including phase separators. Interconnects based on all welded seals (LHC solution), including space required for cutting and welding machines. Minimises work in the tunnel, by design. Corrector busbars, trims and CLIQ circuit cables may be routed on auxiliary lines along the cryostat. Cold mass supports based on LHC dipole and SSS concept. Sledge on rails cryostating principle. Isostatic support of the cryo-assembly, designed to accomodate pressure end loads (vacuum and quench) and allow remote alignment. Aims at alignment stability requirements comparable to those of the LHC SSS. Minimises the number of component and assembly variants.

Based on preliminary cryo flowscheme (WP9) Slope dependent! https://edms.cern.ch/document/1710017/0.3

and size estimations (WP9) Integration inside the cryostat is driven by the Ø100 mm pumping lines And… Free longitudinal cross section for HeII: 150 cm2 (100 cm2 btw. CP and D1) Size of phase separators: 12.5 L for Q1 to Q3; 5.5 L for CP and D1 https://edms.cern.ch/document/1710017/0.3 Heat loads: https://edms.cern.ch/document/1610730/1.1 Static heat loads: https://edms.cern.ch/document/1690235/0.1

Referring to present circuit for busbar routing As of October 2016 The approach being to route the larger and stiffer 18 kA busbars inside the cold masses and the remaining in auxiliary lines

Standard cryostat cross section Radial gap at the top required for cryostating sledge Offset creates space for piping inside the cryostat Aluminium thermal shield 40-60K Carbon steel vacuum vessel Cryo pipe diameters take into account cryo parameters and industrial availability GFRE column type supports (3x) with intermediate heat intercept Sledge on rail cryostating method More details on drawing: LHCQQX__0001

Trim+Correctors / CLIQ Cold mass interfaces Distance between lines compatible with existing cutting machines Trim+Correctors / CLIQ or Trim / Correctors Heat exchangers (2x) 18 kA busbars HeII inlet Beam line Beam screen bellows HeII cross section 2x75 cm2 located the at same radius as the heat exchanger Alternative: HeII cross section 150 cm2. Less work in the tunnel but too close to beam line and large (rigid) bellows! More details on drawing: LHCQQX__0001

The simplest magnet interconnect config. (Q1/Q2a or Q2b/Q3 or CP/D1) Splice box Universal expansion joints for lower interc forces Q1 Q2a Q2b Q3 CP D1

Full scale mockup being built Busbar splices and routing Welding clearances Envelope for cutting tools

Complete interconnect Vacuum vessel sleeve opens towards the IP Service module Q1 Q2a Q2b Q3 CP D1

Phase separators and pumping lines Reservation for level gauge (if needed) Pumping manifold requires locally enlarged diameter: service module Lower than heat exchanger 2x 6.5 L of liquid volume Q1 Q2a Q2b Q3 CP D1

Jumper between Q3 and CP Larger diameter and height than today in the LHC Standardised position of phase sepatators and pumping manifold Q1 Q2a Q2b Q3 CP D1

Interconnect and service module Q3-CP Would not be possible if the heat exchangers of MQXF and CP and D1 were not aligned! Pumping line if reverse slope Phase separator is always in same position but connected to IP or non-IP magnet depending on slope BPM cable feedthroughs Beam line pumping port (only on CP) Q1 Q2a Q2b Q3 CP D1

Before interconnecting Sliding sleeves 2 orbital welds per line to be done in the tunnel: up to 20 welds in total Q1 Q2a Q2b Q3 CP D1

2 feedthroughs per cold mass: Instrumentation CLIQ (to be decided) Opening direction of vacuum vessel sleeve Feedthroughs are preferably on the connection side of the main magnet Q1 Q2a Q2b Q3 CP D1

Q2a/Q2b: both are connection side CP D1

The most compact interconnect Service module at the IP extremity of every cryoassembly Q1 Q2a Q2b Q3 CP D1

CP to D1 D1 cold mass diameter is 570 mm. The heat exchangers and HeII lines will be close to the edge – End covers of same design as other magnets may be required Similar to what exists today in LHC SSS Q1 Q2a Q2b Q3 CP D1

Q1 IP end RF bellows inside cryostat Cold to warm transition Module required for integration of phase separators and pumping line BPM Q1 Q2a Q2b Q3 CP D1

D1-DFX extremity (non-IP side) Various configurations under discussion taking into account integration, accessibility, pressure loads, etc. See talk by Yann Leclercq on WP6a Ex. in this configuration the vacuum force is taken by the D1 vacuum vessel and its supports. Q1 support scheme may be used. Q1 Q2a Q2b Q3 CP D1

This is probably not the last iteration… Pressure drop calculations must now be updated taking into account proposed diameters, bends, bellows, etc. We need to design the bellows in order to evaluate the distances available for tooling and estimate interconnect forces. Some interconnect lines will need stiffening supports. CAD is not enough for the design of interconnects - we build mockups. Finding a solution for the busbar routing and splicing is very much related to the circuit and busbar characteristics. Very compact interconnects – intervention time and accessibility will be a challenge when minimising radiation doses to personnel. There will be opportunities for improvement - let’s give ourselves some more time before agreeing on the cold mass interfaces.

MQXFS1c – shell design validation In the short model program the plan is to verify the shell design by using MQXFS1c Goal for the test of MQXFS1c: Verify the welding procedure X-ray examination of the weld Leak check Stress measurement and analysis using strain gauges Quench test of the magnet – no mechanical induced degradation Interference between the shell and coil will be controlled The test is planned to be performed in February-March, 2017 using Fermilab’s VMTF

Weld Test Results Welding Sample: Material 304 St Stl 5/16” (8 mm) thk. Procedure - Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) in DC Pulse mode 3 passes (1 root & 2 cover) Filler Wire used: .035” Dia. 308LSi Travel speeds: 1st: 8.75 IPM (222 mm/m) 2nd: 10.50 IPM (267 mm/m) 3rd : 11.25 IPM (286 mm/m   Before Welding First Pass Final Pass Width @ A 12.04” (305.8 mm) 11.970” (304.0 mm) 11.965” (303.9 mm) Width @ B 12.06” (306.3 mm)  12.000” (304.8 mm)  11.960” (303.8 mm) Width @ C 12.05” (306.1 mm)  12.026” (305.5 mm) 12.000” (304.8 mm)

Stress requirements on the Shell Shell Design Stress requirements on the Shell Maximum 100 MPa No Minimum contact required. Tolerances based on stress requirements and weld test results With SS skin RT modulus of 198 Gpa, a +/-2.3 mm circumferential tolerance will equal a +/-37MPa variation in shell pre-stress (Heng Pan, LBNL). Fermi experimental Shrinkage=0.200” (5.1 mm) Set Shell Circumference +0.11” (2.8 mm) for an interference fit of 0.09”(2.3 mm). At +2.3 mm, assume Max pre-stress = 74MPa & still touching at -2.3 mm.

Shell Design

Thank you for your attention!

Reinforcing rings to prevent ovalisation Vacuum vessel Minimum length for opening of interconnect sleeve Reinforcing rings to prevent ovalisation 3 cold support posts Fixed support post in the middle for better cold mass stability when handling + lower sliding stroke on other supports Optimum distance ~3500 mm Isostatic vacuum vessel supports (3 points) postioned for minimum cold mass bending Low carbon steel certified resilience down to -50 ºC for pressure applications Flanges from 304L forged rings

Dealing with vacuum and pressure end loads “Vacuum force” (~80 kN, @ Q1 and DFX) (free,free,0) (0,free,0) (0,free,0) Tie rod for longitudinal loads (free,0,free) Pressure end effect from cold mass interconnect (depends on interconnect design)

Static heat loads in the cryostat https://edms.cern.ch/document/1690235/0.1

Cold mass position monitoring Mateusz Sozin

Cryostating tooling: sledge on rails The principle currently used in dipoles and long SSS Cold mass supported on at least 3 points at all times Minimum gaps for cold mass insertion and removal of sledges must be accounted for

Cold mass+shield lifted wrt nominal Cryostating tooling Cold mass+shield lifted wrt nominal Sledge on rails Lifting jack Lifting jack Support assembly Tooling removal

Cold mass support posts Two-part GFRE column Aluminium heat intercept plate (perfect heat intercept) Fixed support in the centre of cold mass rigidly connects the cold mass to vacuum vessel Sliding support bolted to the cold mass and sliding on vacuum vessel Bolted assembly using invar washers and lock tab washers to ensure preload maintained at cold Thermal shield is supported by the heat intercept plates, thus without additional heat load Thermalization straps on sliding support for independent movement between cold mass and thermal shield Fixed support Sliding support (2x)