Smart Nanosatellite Attitude Propagator ssl.engineering.uky.edu/snap

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Unit 3, Chapter 9, Lesson 9: Space Systems Engineering 1 The Systems-engineering Process Trading Requirements We use the requirements loopa necessary and.
Advertisements

Attitude Control of the CubeSail Solar Sailing Spacecraft Victoria Coverstone, Andy Pukniel University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Rod Burton, Dave.
Plasmas in Space: From the Surface of the Sun to the Orbit of the Earth Steven R. Spangler, University of Iowa Division of Plasma Physics, American Physical.
Attitude Determination and Control
Karla Vega University of California, Berkeley Attitude Determination and Control 6/9/2015.
Attitude Estimation Thomas Bak Institute of Electronic Systems
FIREBIRD Ian Lyon Engineering and Physics Carroll College Simulation of the Precise Separation of a Two-Nanosatellite System using Differential Drag.
The flight dynamics standpoint Alejandro Blazquez (CNES)‏ LSWT Venice, 30/03-01/04/2009.
Hyperspectral Satellite Imaging Planning a Mission Victor Gardner University of Maryland 2007 AIAA Region 1 Mid-Atlantic Student Conference National Institute.
DC motor model ETEC6419. Motors of Models There are many different models of DC motors that use differential equations. During this set of slides we will.
The Pursuit for Efficient S/C Design The Stanford Small Sat Challenge: –Learn system engineering processes –Design, build, test, and fly a CubeSat project.
Gravity I: Gravity anomalies. Earth gravitational field. Isostasy.
Integrated Orbit and Attitude Control for a Nanosatellite with Power Constraints Bo Naasz Matthew Berry Hye-Young Kim Chris Hall 13th Annual AAS/AIAA Space.
1 Project Name Solar Sail Project Proposal February 7, 2007 Megan Williams (Team Lead) Eric Blake Jon Braam Raymond Haremza Michael Hiti Kory Jenkins Daniel.
ReVeal Passive Illumination by Radar (PAIR). Overview Payload / Mission Communication Launch Orbit Power Thermal Attitude Propulsion Finance.
Attitude Determination and Control System (ADCS)
Different Coverage Patterns for a Single Satellite and Constellation of Satellites in Real Time with the STK Pedro A. Capó-Lugo Graduate Student Dr. Peter.
Lec 3. System Modeling Transfer Function Model
Gravity Gradient Boom Sponsor: John Hines In Collaboration with:
The Next 100 Years Projection of Debris in GEO Space Systems Dynamics Laboratory Yuya Mimasu 1st March, 2007.
Air-launched Earth-observing Ground Information System Carleton University’s 4 th Satellite Design Team Introduction to AEGIS.
Single-slew manoeuvres for spin-stabilized spacecraft 29 th March 2011 James Biggs Glasgow In collaboration with.
Satellite Passive Attitude Stabilization Using Permanent Magnets – Dynamic Model and Simulation Darren Pais and Dr. Sanjay Jayaram Parks College, Saint.
M.S. Thesis Defense Jason Anderson Electrical and Computer Engineering Dept. Clemson University.
29 August, 2011 Beijing, China Space science missions related to ILWS in China
Guidance, Navigation and Controls Subsystem Winter 1999 Semester Review.
University Nanosat Competition Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University: SWESat Team Presented by: Stephanie Lengyel AZ Space Grant Symposium April 17 and.
Slide 1 Satellite Drag Modeling using Direct Simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) Piyush M. Mehta and Craig A. McLaughlin The University of Kansas Acknowledgement:
ADCS Review – Attitude Determination Prof. Der-Ming Ma, Ph.D. Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Tamkang University.
1 Honors Physics 1 Summary and Review - Fall 2013 Quantitative and experimental tools Mathematical tools Newton’s Laws and Applications –Linear motion.
1 Weekly Summary Weekly Summary Formation Flight AEM4332 Spring Semester March 7,2007 Masao SHIMADA.
ANSYS/LS-DYNA Drop Test Module
The Solar System Missions. planets not shown to scale >> MercuryVenusEarthMarsJupiterSaturnUranusNeptunePluto Mean Distance from the Sun (AU)
Introduction: The on-board measurements available for control are a dual-slit sensor to find the elevation of the sun and a magnetometer to measure the.
Categories of Satellites
GLAST Science Support Center July 16, July Ground Software Workshop The Spacecraft Simulator David S. Davis, GSSC.
The Solar System Missions. Comparative Planetology * The study of the similarities and dissimilarities of the constituents of the solar system. * Provides.
C H A P T E R 21 Magnetic Forces and Magnetic Fields.
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 ACS Dave Auslander, Dave Pankow, Han Chen, Yao-Ting Mao, UC Berkeley Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
The Development of Flight Operations: Improvement of ERAU Cube-Sat’s Ground System Interface and Research of the Satellite’s Orbital Decay Presented by.
CH21: Magnetic Forces and Magnetic Fields Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) uses magnetic field in a noninvasive way to provide physicians with a powerful.
Fundamentals of Electromagnetics: A Two-Week, 8-Day, Intensive Course for Training Faculty in Electrical-, Electronics-, Communication-, and Computer-
Velocity Propagation Between Robot Links 3/4 Instructor: Jacob Rosen Advanced Robotic - MAE 263D - Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering - UCLA.
USNA Standard CubeSat Bus USNA-P1 CubeSat (USNA-14)
Generation of Magnetic Field
Environment Simulator
Aerodynamic Attitude Control for CubeSats
Lunar Trajectories.
Figure 2: Definition of the potential
The Aero Club QUASAR.
MSU Solar Physics NSF REU Final Presentation
Manipulator Dynamics 1 Instructor: Jacob Rosen
Star Detection and Tracking Embedded Linux Hardware
02/04/17 1.
Kentucky Space Facilities for satellite development, testing and operation Twyman Clements1, David Jones1 ,Jason Bratcher1, Jessamyn Delgado2, Daniel Erb1,
ACS UC Berkeley Space Sciences Laboratory
Chapter 3 Simulation for BLDC Motor Drives
LRO Mission Baseline Ephemeris v10.0
EagleSat-1: Flight Operations
Adaptive Computing for Spacecraft
Virginia CubeSat Constellation
Gravitational Potential energy Mr. Burns
Matthew Prevallet 4/26/16 Arizona/NASA Space Grant Symposium
Kletskous Magnetic Stabilization
RIT Space Exploration Group (SPEX)
PROBA 2 orbits and conditions of EUV observations V. Slemzin P. N
Attitude Determination Overview
Adaptive Computing for Spacecraft
Sub-Orbital CubeSat Experimental Mission
Chapter 1. Introduction to Control System
Presentation transcript:

Smart Nanosatellite Attitude Propagator ssl.engineering.uky.edu/snap Samir Rawashdeh, James E. Lumpp, Jr. Space Systems Laboratory Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Kentucky Contact: snap.samir@gmail.com Smart Nanosatellite Attitude Propagator ssl.engineering.uky.edu/snap Release Date: May 2011 Overview Features Nano-satellites such as CubeSats pose volume, mass, and power limitations on all components and modules within the satellite. Passive attitude stabilization techniques such as Passive Magnetic Stabilization and Gravity Gradient stabilization are effective and relatively simple methods to control the attitude of small satellites and provide basic pointing control. The Smart Nanosatellite Attitude Propagator (SNAP) was developed in MATLAB and Simluink to address the design questions of these stabilization systems. This is achieved by modeling all the major environmental effects of the desired orbit to study the on-orbit behavior and the effectiveness of the stability system in overcoming the disturbance torques. Orbit parameters, gravity gradient torque, the Earth’s magnetic field, magnetic torque, and magnetic hysteresis material behavior are all modeled in SNAP. The Smart Nanosatellite Attitude Propagator incorporates the major environmental torques from a small-satellite perspective, as well as magnetic hysteresis material which is a passive solution to angular rate damping. The Simulink model essentially propagates the satellite’s attitude given its mass properties and orbit parameters. At each time step, the various environmental torques are calculated given the magnetic field at that point, the velocity, position in orbit, and the satellite orientation. The satellite position and orientation are modeled by a 6-DOF body model. Simulink offers a variety of differential equation solvers to propagate the models and obtain attitude reports for analysis and animation. Capabilities - Satellite Passive Magnetic Stabilization Design - Satellite Gravity Gradient Stabilization Design - Studying Magnetic Hysteresis Material Performance - Attitude Propagation (Gravity Gradient, Magnetic, and Hysteresis) - Generation of STK (Satellite Tool Kit) Attitude Files for Animation - Future Extension to Active Attitude Control Systems Verification In order to verify the accuracy of the Orbital Environment Simulator, several launched satellites employing passive stabilization techniques were simulated. Given the satellite design parameters, the orbital conditions, and the initial tumble rate, the actual on-orbit observations were compared to the simulation results. The results of the simulator were within the scope of the actual observations. The set of figures show PAMS: the Passive Aerodynamically Stabilized Magnetically Damped Satellite, which was an experiment on STS-77 in 1996. The attitude profile provided by NASA resembles to simulated profile to the same initial conditions. This scenario was simulated using an extended version of SNAP that incorporates an aerodynamic torque model. S. Rawashdeh, J. Lumpp, “Nano-Satellite Passive Attitude Stabilization Systems Design by Orbital Environment Modeling and Simulation”, AIAA Infotech@Aerospace 2010, Atlanta, GA Passive Magnetic Stabilization The screenshot highlights the use of permanent magnets and magnetic hysteresis material to stabilize KySat-1, the first CubeSat developed by Kentucky Space. Unfortunately, KySat-1 was lost due to a contingency on the NASA Glory mission in March 2011. The simulation assumes a polar sun-synchronous orbit having an altitude of about 700 km and an inclination of 98˚ . Underlying Simulink® Model Design Summary Parameter Details Description Magnets Magnet Material Alnico-5 Total Volume 0.59 cm3 Total Magnetic Dipole 0.5869 Am2 (calculated) North Pole CubeSat -Z face Hysteresis Material Type HyMu80 0.15 cm3 (0.075 cm3 per axis) Coercivity 1.59 A/m Saturation 0.73 Tesla Remanence 0.35 Tesla Orbit Parameters Orbit Altitude 700 km Inclination 98˚