Lutonix® Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon to Treat Obstructive Lesions in the Superficial Femoral and Popliteal Arteries Preliminary Six-Month Results from.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
“Real World”: SVG, De Novo or Restenotic Coronary Artery Lesions Chronic Stable Angina, Silent Ischemia, Acute Coronary Syndromes Vessel Diameters:
Advertisements

DEFINITIVE AR - Acute Outcomes -
2 Year Clinical Outcomes from the Pivotal RESOLUTE US Study Laura Mauri MD, MSc on behalf of the RESOLUTE US Investigators Brigham and Women’s Hospital.
1 Michael Dake, MD Research/Research Grants, Clinical Trial Support –W. L. Gore –Cook Medical Consulting Fees/Honoraria –W. L. Gore –Abbott Vascular Equity.
Klinikum Rosenheim Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology LINC 2014 DEFINITIVE AR Severe Ca++ Arm 30-Day Results Gunnar Tepe, MD On behalf.
Is There Still a Controversy About Stent Type for TASC C&D Lesions
SCAAR UCR SWEDEN 2007 Stefan James, Jörg Carlsson, Johan Lindbäck, Tage Nilsson, Ulf Stenestrand, Lars Wallentin and Bo Lagerqvist for the SCAAR study.
CPORT- E Trial Randomized trial comparing outcomes of non-primary PCI at hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery.
Two-Year Clinical Outcomes Yan Li MD., PhD. On behalf of FIREMAN Investigators Associated Professor of Department of Cardiology of Xijing Hospital Fourth.
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study Purpose To evaluate whether the long-acting ACE inhibitor ramipril and/or vitamin E reduce the incidence.
FRONTIER Registry The Guidant MULTI-LINK FRONTIER ™ Coronary Stent System for the Treatment of Pts with Native De Novo or Restenotic Bifurcation Coronary.
12-Month Analysis Barry T. Katzen MD, FACR, FACC Founder and Medical Director Baptist Cardiac & Vascular Institute.
A Prospective, Randomized Trial Evaluating a Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon in Patients TReated with Endothelial Progenitor Cell CapTuring Stents for De Novo.
Endovascular Treatment of Atherosclerotic Popliteal Artery Lesions – Balloon Angioplasty versus primary Stenting: A prospective, multi-centre, randomised.
Endeavor 4: A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus- Eluting Stent and a Paclitaxel- Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Martin B.
Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial Myeong-Ki.
A Comparison of the Moxy™ Drug Coated Balloon Catheter vs. Standard PTA for Femoropopliteal Disease NCT# MONTH RESULTS OF THE LEVANT I TRIAL.
Early and Late Stent Thrombosis Rates in 5,054 Real-World Patients from XIENCE V USA With and Without Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Interruptions James Hermiller,
Philippe Généreux, MD for the Tryton Bifurcation Trial Investigators Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation New York City.
Trial to Assess the Use of the Cypher Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated with Balloon Angioplasty (TYPHOON) Trial Presented at The American College.
From: Sustained Safety and Effectiveness of Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Femoropopliteal Lesions: 2-Year Follow-Up From the Zilver PTX Randomized and Single-Arm.
Global Experience with Peripheral DCBs/Stent Studies: C.R. Bard
Everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: ABSORB III Trial 2-Year Results Stephen G. Ellis, MD,
Disclosures Runlin Gao has received a research grant
Can Drug-Coated Balloons Work in Synergy with Stent Grafts?
INFRATIBIAL INTERVENTIONS Current Results with DES
Runlin Gao, M.D. On behalf of ABSORB China Investigators
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
Heavily calcified SFA lesions do not avoid the use of 4 F systems
Fem-Pop Stenting: Is ZILVER PTX DES The “De Facto” Stent to Deploy?
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study
Eric J Dippel, MD FACC Davenport, Iowa, USA February 19, 2017
LONG-DES II Trial Randomized Comparison of the Efficacy of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in the Treatment of Long Native Coronary.
Instent Restenosis and Occlusion: Time for Surgical Revision?
Insights from the IMPERIAL and MAJESTIC SFA Studies
Drug-Coated Balloons in Peripheral Artery Disease
MACE Trial Rationale, Study Design, and Current Status
PMA Analysis of the CREST Trial Approvability of the RX Acculink Carotid Stent System for Revascularization of Carotid Artery Stenosis in Standard Surgical.
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
Two-Year Extended Follow-up in Patients Receiving a Zotarolimus-eluting Stent in the E-Five Registry Martin T. Rothman, Ian T. Meredith, Keyur Parikh,
FAIR Trial design: Patients with SFA in-stent restenosis (ISR) were randomized to either a paclitaxel-coated balloon (DCB) (dose 3.5 μg/mm2) or routine.
REALITY: 8 month results
EXCITE ISR Trial design: Participants with femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis were randomized to excimer laser atherectomy + adjunctive angioplasty (n.
3-Year Clinical Outcomes From the RESOLUTE US Study
ENDEAVOR IV: 5 Year Final Outcomes
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
ILLUMENATE Trial design: Patients with superficial femoral artery (SFA) and/or popliteal arterial stenoses were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to either balloon.
Presented at ACC 2003 Late Breaking Clinical Trials
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
STENT THROMBISIS Insights on Outcomes and Impact of DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY Permanent Discontinuation SPIRIT II, SPIRIT III, SPIRIT IV and COMPARE.
Paclitaxel-coated balloon reduces target lesion revascularization compared with standard balloon angioplasty  Nicholas Candy, MBBS, Eugene Ng, MBBS, Ramesh.
Incidence and management of restenosis after treatment of unprotected left main disease with drug-eluting stents: 70 restenotic cases from a cohort of.
Potential conflicts of interest
On behalf of all principal COMPARE II investigators:
ENDEAVOR II Five-Year Clinical Follow-up
FOR DISTRIBUTION BY MEDTRONIC OFFICE OF MEDICAL AFFAIRS ONLY.
Division of Endovascular Interventions
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
ENDEAVOR III Multicenter Randomized Trial Clinical/MACE Angio/IVUS
Martin B. Leon, David R. Holmes, Dean J. Kereiakes, Jeffrey J
Maintenance of Long-Term Clinical Benefit with
ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions J. Mehilli, MD Deutsches Herzzentrum Technische.
ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions J. Mehilli, MD Deutsches Herzzentrum Technische.
TAXUS VI Randomized Trial of Moderate-Rate Release Polymer-Based Paclitaxel-Eluting TAXUS Stent for the Treatment of Longer Lesions Three Year Clinical.
Ahmed A. Khattab, MD For the German Cypher Registry Investigators
Atlantic Cardiovascular Patient Outcomes Research Team
The American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. A. Abazid
TYPHOON Trial Trial to Assess the Use of the Cypher Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated with Balloon Angioplasty (TYPHOON) Trial Presented at.
Presentation transcript:

Lutonix® Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon to Treat Obstructive Lesions in the Superficial Femoral and Popliteal Arteries Preliminary Six-Month Results from the SAFE-DCB Study Nicolas W. Shammas, MD, MS and Edward Y. Woo, MD for the SAFE-DCB Investigators

Nicolas W Shammas, MD, MS, FACC, FSCAI Disclosures Nicolas W Shammas, MD, MS, FACC, FSCAI  Relevant Conflict of Interest Research Support Bard Boston Scientific  Consultant/Honoraria

Primary Patency (KM) at 365 Days Background: LEVANT 2 Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing the Lutonix® DCB to Standard Balloon Angioplasty in Femoropopliteal Arteries LEVANT 2 resulted in: Superior Primary Patency to PTA at 12 Months Comparable Safety compared to PTA^ Numerically, but not statistically, lower TLR rate (12.3% Lutonix DCB vs. 16.8% PTA at 12 months)* 73.5% 56.8% Primary Patency (KM) at 365 Days P = 0.001 ^Freedom from primary safety event at 365 days (86.7% Lutonix DCB vs. 81.5% PTA) *TLR was a secondary endpoint. LEVANT 2 was not powered to detect TLR differences

There is a need for real-world data with the Lutonix Balloon Background: LEVANT 2 LEVANT 2 included: 92.1% claudicants (Rutherford 2 & 3) Mean lesion length: 62.8±41.0mm 97.8% TASC II A & B lesions LEVANT 2 excluded: Rutherford 5 & 6 Lesions > 15 cm in length Patients that were likely to require provisional stent placement: Patients with a major flow-limiting dissection and > 70% residual stenosis after pre-dilation were treated per standard of care Note: The bail-out stent rate was low in LEVANT 2 (2.5% Lutonix DCB vs. 6.9% PTA) Use of atherectomy, laser, cryoplasty, or scoring/focal-force balloons There is a need for real-world data with the Lutonix Balloon

LEVANT 2 vs. LEVANT Global Registry

LEVANT Global Registry* LEVANT 2 vs. LEVANT Global Registry LEVANT Global Registry* LEVANT 2# (DCB Group) 12-Month TLR Rate^, % (n/N) 6.4 (41/639) 12.3 (35/285) Freedom from TLR**, % [95% CI] (365 days) 94.2 [92.2, 95.8] 89.7 [85.7, 92.7] 12-Month Primary Patency Rate^, % (n/N) 82.5 (484/587) 65.2 (172/264) Primary Patency**, % [95% CI] (365 days) 85.1 [82.0, 87.7] 73.5 [68.0, 78.2] *Interim analysis of the Global Registry (May 2016) #Rosenfield et al. N Engl J Med 2015;373:145-153. ^Proportional-based analysis **Kaplan-Meier estimate of survival Primary Patency is defined as the absence of target lesion restenosis and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR).

SAFE-DCB Registry Objective: Assess the Lutonix Drug-Coated Balloon (DCB) to Treat Obstructive Lesions in the Superficial Femoral and Popliteal Arteries in a “Real World” US Patient Population Prospective, single arm, multicenter registry enrolled 1006 patients in 74 U.S. centers First patient enrolled: April 2015 Last patient enrolled: September 2016 Co-Principal Investigators: Nicolas Shammas, Edward Woo Oversight committee and medical monitor reviewed safety events Preliminary 30-day and 6-month outcomes are being presented today. Primary endpoint analysis at 12 months Ongoing follow up through 3 years

SAFE-DCB Recommended Procedure Steps Adequately prepare the vessel (determined by the treating physician) Recommended Procedural Step: Transit time < 30 seconds Inflation time ≥ 120 seconds Pressure > 7 atm Final Residual Stenosis < 20% Dual antiplatelet therapy: Pre-Procedure: According to current medical standards After Procedure: Minimum of 4 weeks Prolonged antiplatelet therapy (at the discretion of the physician)

Patients N = 1006 602 currently with 30-day follow up 200 currently with 6-month follow up (discrete cohort at 6 months) Indication: Obstructive de novo or restenotic lesions up to 150 mm in length in the superficial femoral or popliteal arteries (reference vessel diameters of 4-7 mm) Study requirements were broad to allow for a real-world, heterogeneous patient population Inclusion: The patient fits within the above indication for use, is willing to comply with follow-up procedures and visits, and provides written informed consent Exclusion: The patient is unwilling or unable to comply with the follow-up procedures or visits The patient has another medical condition, or is in another clinical study, that may confound the SAFE-DCB data or may prevent the patient from complying with the study requirements

Baseline Demographics 30-Day Group 6-Month Group Number of Patients 602 200 Age, years + SD 68.8 + 10.1 69.2 + 9.7 Male/Female, % 56.5/43.5 54.5/45.5 Rutherford Category, % (n/N) Category 1 1.0 (6/602) 0.0 (0/200) Category 2 13.1 (79/602) 9.0 (18/200) Category 3 42.9 (258/602) 41.5 (83/200) Category 4 15.5 (93/602) 17.0 (34/200) Category 5 14.1 (85/602) 15.0 (30/200) Category 6 3.5 (21/602) 2.5 (5/200) Unknown* 10.0 (60/602) Mean Lesion Length, mm + SD 78.5 + 53.3 74.8 + 51.9 *Not reported/not standard of care

Endpoint Definitions Primary Effectiveness: Freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months defined as the first revascularization procedure (e.g., PTA, stent) after the initial study procedure Primary Composite Safety: Freedom from device- or procedure-related perioperative death (< 30 days), target limb major amputation (above the ankle), and target vessel revascularization Secondary Endpoints: Acute Device & Procedure Success: < 30% residual stenosis of the target lesion after the index procedure and no peri-procedural complications (e.g., death, stroke, MI) prior to hospital discharge Major Flow-Limiting Dissection TLR & Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) Device- and procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs) 12-Month Primary Patency: Freedom from restenosis (> 50%) determined by DUS (PSVR < 2.4) and/or no TLR (DUS & angiographic core lab) Presented Today

Results 30-Day Group 6-Month Group Acute Device & Procedural Success, % (n/N) 91.9 (552/601*) 91.5 (183/200) Major Flow-Limiting Dissection^, % (n/N) 4.3 (26/602) 5.0 (10/200) TLR, % (n/N) 0.5 (3/595) 4.3 (8/188) TVR, % (n/N) 0.7 (4/595) 5.9 (11/188) Device-Related SAE#, % (n/N) 2.4 (14/597) 1.6 (3/190) Procedure-Related SAE, % (n/N) 5.7 (34/597) 6.8 (13/190) Periprocedural (< 30 Days) Death, (n/N) 1.2 (7/602) -- All Cause Death, (n/N) 3.3 (20/602) 6.5 (13/200) *Denominator based on evaluable patients-did not discontinue before 30 Days or have an event before discontinuation ^ Dissection Types D-F per the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) # Serious Adverse Events

Subset Analysis: Vessel Prep (30 Days) Vessel Preparation POBA only Atherectomy Specialty# Number of Patients 195 280 77 Lesion Length, mm + SD 68.8 + 46.1 83.7 + 56.5 70.7 + 55.3 Acute Device & Procedural Success, % 91.8 93.2 84.4 Major Flow-Limiting Dissection^, % (n/N) 1.0 (2/195) 4.6 (13/280) 0.0 (0/77) TLR, % (n/N) 0.5 (1/192) 0.7 (2/277) 1.3 (1/77) TVR, % (n/N) 1.1 (3/277) 2.6 (2/77) Device-Related SAE, % (n/N) 0.0 (0/192) 2.2 (6/278) Procedure-Related SAE, % (n/N) 3.7 (7/192) 4.7 (13/278) Periprocedural (< 30 Days) Death, (n/N) 1.5 (3/195) 1.1 (3/280) #Cutting, scoring, and focal-force balloons *Denominator based on evaluable patients-did not discontinue before 30 Days or have event before discontinuation ^ Dissection Types D-F per the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

Subset Analysis: Diabetic (30 Days) Non-Diabetic Number of Patients 314 288 Lesion Length, mm + SD 75.2 + 48.9 82.1 + 57.6 Acute Device & Procedural Success, % 92.0 91.7 Major Flow-Limiting Dissection^, % (n/N) 3.8 (12/314) 4.9 (14/288) TLR, % (n/N) 0.7 (2/314) 0.4 (1/288) TVR, % (n/N) 1.0 (3/314) Device-Related SAE, % (n/N) 1.9 (6/314) 2.8 (8/288) Procedure-Related SAE, % (n/N) 5.2 (16/314) 6.3 (18/288) Periprocedural (< 30 Days) Death, (n/N) *Denominator based on evaluable patients-did not discontinue before 30 Days or have event before discontinuation ^ Dissection Types D-F per the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

Case Study This is the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of primary patency. At 6 months the lines separate at the time of follow up ultrasound. This time to event analysis shows superior patency in the Lutonix DCB group and the difference is sustained through 12 months. The difference between arms at 12 months was significant, with a log rank p-value of less than 0.001.

Summary Preliminary data from the SAFE-DCB US registry demonstrate high procedural and device success with low TLR and TVR and low device-related SAE 30-Day Results (602 patients): Acute Device & Procedural Success: 91.9% TLR: 0.5% TVR: 0.7% Device-Related SAE: 2.4% 6-Month Results (200 patients): With a limited amount of data available at 6 months, acute device & procedural success remains high while TLR (4.3%), TVR (5.9%), and device-related SAEs (1.6%) remain low Confirmation of these early results await long-term, more complete data and analyses. Additional follow up is ongoing. This is the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of primary patency. At 6 months the lines separate at the time of follow up ultrasound. This time to event analysis shows superior patency in the Lutonix DCB group and the difference is sustained through 12 months. The difference between arms at 12 months was significant, with a log rank p-value of less than 0.001.

THANK YOU