INEQUALITY ACROSS THE US STATES

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PAI786: Urban Policy Class 16: Welfare Programs and Principles of Welfare Policy.
Advertisements

Child Support Cost Avoidance: 2004 NCSEA 57th Annual Training Conference and Exposition San Francisco, California August 6, 2008 Laura Wheaton The Urban.
Expenditure Programs. Table 8.1 shows that welfare spending is a shared expense between the federal and state/local governments. Subsidized medical care.
Overview of Income Redistribution Programs
Unit 1 Economic Concepts
19. Income Distribution and Poverty Income Inequality in the U.S. Poverty in the U.S. Income Inequality in the U.S. Poverty in the U.S.
Chapter 12 Poverty, Welfare, and Women Poverty in the U.S. Welfare  programs  incentives  reform EITC Poverty in the U.S. Welfare  programs  incentives.
Poverty: Facts, Causes and Consequences Hilary Hoynes University of California, Davis California Symposium on Poverty October 2009.
Poverty, Welfare, and Women Chapter 12. Measuring Poverty Absolute Measure of Poverty –People living below a certain threshold Relative Income Poverty.
The Poverty Reduction Success of Public Transfers For Working Age Immigrants and Refugees In the United States Christopher R. Bollinger Paul Hagstrom University.
The social safety net for children and families Jane Waldfogel.
Chapter 12: Low-Income Assistance Chapter 12 Low-Income Assistance Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Geographic Inequality in Social Provision and Redistribution Sarah K. Bruch - University of Iowa INEQUALITY ACROSS THE US STATES Inequality Workshop The.
A Few Facts 1.Federal spending in FY 2000 and 2001 as a percent of GDP is the lowest since Federal government spending (not including social security,
16 Social Policy. What Is Social Policy? Programs that promote a range of public goals: –Ameliorate risk and insecurity –Promote equality of opportunity.
Government Subsidies and Income Support for the Poor
EXPENDITURE PROGRAMS FOR THE POOR
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2005 Facts About Income Inequality The Lorenz Curve Causes of Income Inequality Trends in Income Inequality Equality.
Chapter 3.4: Government Income Redistribution Programs
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 13 EXPENDITURE PROGRAMS FOR THE POOR.
© SOUTH-WESTERNCONTEMPORARY ECONOMICS: LESSON 3.4  12.1 Students understand common terms & concepts and economics reasoning. Standard Address 1.
Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies 20-1 Facts About Income Inequality Causes of Income Inequality Equality Versus Efficiency The Economics of Poverty.
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002 Facts About Income Inequality The Lorenz Curve Causes of Income Inequality Trends in Income Inequality Equality.
Chapter 3 section 4 Providing a Safety Net Income and Poverty In a Market economy, income depends primarily on earnings, which depend on the value of each.
The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C. Overview of the 1996 Welfare Reform Law: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program Reduction.
Final Video Alicia M. SW4710-Shapiro, Wayne State University, 12/15/12.
Income Security and Programs Why was the Social Security Act of 1935 so controversial? What are the two cornerstones of social welfare policy in the US?
Providing a Safety Net. The Poverty Problem The wealth has spread unevenly throughout society as the free market has generated wealth. Some people are.
3.4 Providing a Safety Net NCEE Standard 13: Role of Resources in Determining Incomes.
Chapter 16. Poverty in America: The Nature of the Problem The poor: who and how many? The poverty line Children; single-parent families headed by females.
Chapter 3 Section 4.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Chapter 26 Poverty and Welfare.
Promoting Work Supports: Background, Issues, Opportunities June 17, 2005 Mark Greenberg Director of Policy Center for Law and Social Policy th.
Providing a Safety Net. Why Households Differ One of the main reasons why household income differs is because the number of household members who work.
Chapter 3: American Free Enterprise Section 4. Slide 2 Copyright © Pearson Education, Inc.Chapter 3, Section 4 Objectives 1.Explain the U.S. political.
Public Policy A purposeful and consistent course of action taken by government to address a particular problem.
Chapter 17: Domestic Policy Part II (pp ).
Slide 1 Copyright © Pearson Education, Inc.Chapter 3, Section 4 Essential Question What role should government play in a free market economy?
Chapter 3: American Free Enterprise Section 4. Slide 2 Copyright © Pearson Education, Inc.Chapter 3, Section 4 Objectives 1.Explain the U.S. political.
Domestic Policy Mr. Stroman AP Government. Social Welfare Domestic policy is often more contentious than economic policy, because it gets to the essence.
Fiscal Policy. Clear Target Students will be able to explain how fiscal policy is used to influence our economy.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 13 EXPENDITURE PROGRAMS FOR THE POOR.
© SOUTH-WESTERNCONTEMPORARY ECONOMICS: LESSON 3.41 LESSON 3.4 Providing a Safety Net  Determine why incomes differ across households, and identify the.
ork ork Work – Part 261 ä Individual Responsibility ä State Accountability ä Work Activities ä Caseload Reduction Credit ä Work Penalties ä Waivers ä.
Chapter 16. Poverty in America: The Nature of the Problem The poor: who and how many? The poverty line Children; single-parent families headed by females.
Chapter 3.4 Providing a Safety Net Shea Carrington 5 th period.
CONTEMPORARY ECONOMICS© Thomson South-Western 3.4Providing a Safety Net  Determine why incomes differ across households, and identify the main source.
CHAPTER 13 Expenditure Programs for the Poor Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Geographic Inequality in Social Provision and Redistribution Sarah K. Bruch - University of Iowa INEQUALITY ACROSS THE US STATES Inequality Workshop The.
Politics in States and Communities (15 Ed.)
Social Welfare Policymaking
What groups of Americans are affected by poverty?
Overview of Income Redistribution Programs
21 C H A P T E R INCOME INEQUALITY AND POVERTY.
EXPENDITURE PROGRAMS FOR THE POOR
32 Income Inequality and Poverty.
Haksoon Ahn, PhD Associate Professor
Social Welfare Policymaking
Chapter 3: American Free Enterprise Section 4
Social Welfare Policymaking
Haksoon Ahn, PhD Associate Professor
Welfare and Education Policy: Providing for Personal Security and Need
Chapter 3: American Free Enterprise Section 4
Chapter 3: Section 4 The Social Safety Net
Providing a Safety Net.
Chapter 3: American Free Enterprise Section 4
EXPENDITURE PROGRAMS FOR THE POOR
ECONOMICS Chapter 16.2: The Functions of Government Learning Target: Understand the responsibilities and functions of government Success Criteria.
Poverty and the Governments Role
Anti-Poverty Effect of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program
Presentation transcript:

INEQUALITY ACROSS THE US STATES Geographic Inequality in Social Provision and Redistribution Sarah K. Bruch - University of Iowa Inequality Workshop The Graduate Center, CUNY June 9, 2017

State Variation in Provision & Redistribution How does social safety net provision vary across US states? How does economic redistribution vary across US states?

Unequal by Design: Social Provision in the US Welfare State Discretionary Targeted Standardized Broad Coverage

Motivation A decentralized state-based social safety net creates fertile ground for unequal responses to citizen needs. Equity arguments suggest that all citizens should have access to equivalent public assistance when in need, while economic rights arguments claim that access to basic economic resources should have the same standing as citizenship rights (Blank 1997: 193). IRP

Motivation A decentralized state-based social safety net creates fertile ground for unequal responses to citizen needs. The most vulnerable victims of the Recession confronted “a jumble of disconnected programs that reach some and reject others, often for reasons of geography or chance rather than difference in need” (Jason DeParle 2009). IRP

State-Level Safety Net 11 programs that provide support for economically vulnerable families with children. CA: cash assistance (AFDC/TANF) FS: food assistance (Food Stamps/SNAP) HI: health insurance (Medicaid and SCHIP) CS: child support (enforcement and collections) CC: child care (subsidies – CCBG/CCDF and TANF) EE: early childhood education (Head Start and public pre-k) UI: unemployment insurance WA: work support (JOBS w/ AFDC and TANF work support) SS: disability assistance (SSI for disabled children) HS: housing assistance (Section 8) ST: state income taxes (liability threshold and credits)

Key Dimensions of Safety Net Policies: Adequacy Adequacy of benefits = what recipients receive on average. Direct expenditures for recipient benefits Program caseload or recipients Adjusted for inflation (in constant $2012)

Key Dimensions of Safety Net Policies: Inclusion Inclusiveness of receipt = proportion of potentially needy that get assistance. Program caseload or recipients Potentially needy population Potentially needy population estimated with Census household survey data (ASEC/March CPS).

INEQUALITY ACROSS STATES SOCIAL PROVISION DIFFERENCES

Cross-State Variation: Magnitude and State Discretion Q1: What is the magnitude of cross-state variation in the adequacy of benefits and inclusiveness of receipt in safety net provision? Q2: Does the magnitude of cross-state variation correspond to the extent or type of state discretion?

Cross-State Variation: Magnitude Q1: What is the extent of cross-state variation in the adequacy of benefits and inclusiveness of receipt in safety net provision? Variation in Levels Coefficient of Variation (COV) Standard Deviation / Mean 10th percentile 90th percentile

Decentralization Policy Design Features Structures that Modify State Discretion Implications for Inequality in Social Provision Program Financing State share of financing; options for supplementation; restrictions on use of federal funds; automaticity, incentive & emergency funding Variation in availability and stability of funding; political and fiscal constraints on funding Policymaking Authority Federal mandates or individual entitlements; specificity of rules and regulations for use of Federal funds & receipt of incentives Variation in eligibility criteria, benefit levels, time limits on receipt, service content & quality Administrative Authority Delegation of authority for intake, eligibility certification, benefit determination and service provision; oversight of operations Variation in vigor of outreach, application burden, accuracy of eligibility determinations, discretion of front-line workers

State Discretion: Program Typology Financing Policy Administration Supplemental Security Income Low Medium Food Assistance Child Support Low/Medium High Unemployment Insurance Medium/High Housing Assistance Child Health Insurance Cash Assistance Child Care Preschool/Early Education Targeted Work Assistance State Income Taxes Note: Program categorizations are based on qualitative analysis of current policies.

Cross-State Variation: Policy Design Expectations Adequacy of benefits: Less cross-state variation in programs for which states have low levels of discretion in financing and policy authority

Cross-State Variation: Policy Design Expectations Inclusiveness of receipt: Greater cross-state variation in programs for which states have high levels of authority for policy and administration More cross-state variation in inclusiveness than adequacy.

Cross-State Differences in Levels of Adequacy Program Mean 10th Percentile 90th Percentile Cash Assistance $3,933 $1,957 $5,811 Targeted Work Assistance $11,365 $1,318 $28,953 Food Assistance $3,124 $2,727 $3,438 Unemployment Insurance $4,782 $3,266 $6,247 Supplemental Security Income $7,260 $6,929 $7,462 State Income Taxes $241 -$131 $1,019 Preschool/Early Education $6,583 $4,254 $8,897 Child Care $5,881 $4,026 $8,026 Child Support $2,861 $2,251 $3,677 Child Health Insurance $2,278 $1,631 $3,055 Housing Assistance $6,617 $4,766 $9,663 Note: Values are reported in 2012 constant dollars. Source: Table 2, Bruch et al. 2016. Separate and Unequal: The Dimensions and Consequences of Safety Net Decentralization in the US 1994-2014. IRP Discussion Paper No. 1432-16.

Cross-State Differences in Levels of Adequacy Program Mean 10th Percentile 90th Percentile Cash Assistance $3,933 $1,957 $5,811 Targeted Work Assistance $11,365 $1,318 $28,953 Food Assistance $3,124 $2,727 $3,438 Unemployment Insurance $4,782 $3,266 $6,247 Supplemental Security Income $7,260 $6,929 $7,462 State Income Taxes $241 -$131 $1,019 Preschool/Early Education $6,583 $4,254 $8,897 Child Care $5,881 $4,026 $8,026 Child Support $2,861 $2,251 $3,677 Child Health Insurance $2,278 $1,631 $3,055 Housing Assistance $6,617 $4,766 $9,663 Note: Values are reported in 2012 constant dollars. Source: Table 2, Bruch et al. 2016. Separate and Unequal: The Dimensions and Consequences of Safety Net Decentralization in the US 1994-2014. IRP Discussion Paper No. 1432-16.

Cross-State Differences in Levels of Adequacy Program Mean 10th Percentile 90th Percentile Cash Assistance $3,933 $1,957 $5,811 Targeted Work Assistance $11,365 $1,318 $28,953 Food Assistance $3,124 $2,727 $3,438 Unemployment Insurance $4,782 $3,266 $6,247 Supplemental Security Income $7,260 $6,929 $7,462 State Income Taxes $241 -$131 $1,019 Preschool/Early Education $6,583 $4,254 $8,897 Child Care $5,881 $4,026 $8,026 Child Support $2,861 $2,251 $3,677 Child Health Insurance $2,278 $1,631 $3,055 Housing Assistance $6,617 $4,766 $9,663 Note: Values are reported in 2012 constant dollars. Source: Table 2, Bruch et al. 2016. Separate and Unequal: The Dimensions and Consequences of Safety Net Decentralization in the US 1994-2014. IRP Discussion Paper No. 1432-16.

Cross-State Differences in Levels of Adequacy Program Mean 10th Percentile 90th Percentile Cash Assistance $3,933 $1,957 $5,811 Targeted Work Assistance $11,365 $1,318 $28,953 Food Assistance $3,124 $2,727 $3,438 Unemployment Insurance $4,782 $3,266 $6,247 Supplemental Security Income $7,260 $6,929 $7,462 State Income Taxes $241 -$131 $1,019 Preschool/Early Education $6,583 $4,254 $8,897 Child Care $5,881 $4,026 $8,026 Child Support $2,861 $2,251 $3,677 Child Health Insurance $2,278 $1,631 $3,055 Housing Assistance $6,617 $4,766 $9,663 Note: Values are reported in 2012 constant dollars. Source: Table 2, Bruch et al. 2016. Separate and Unequal: The Dimensions and Consequences of Safety Net Decentralization in the US 1994-2014. IRP Discussion Paper No. 1432-16.

Cross-State Differences in Levels of Adequacy Program Mean 10th Percentile 90th Percentile Cash Assistance $3,933 $1,957 $5,811 Targeted Work Assistance $11,365 $1,318 $28,953 Food Assistance $3,124 $2,727 $3,438 Unemployment Insurance $4,782 $3,266 $6,247 Supplemental Security Income $7,260 $6,929 $7,462 State Income Taxes $241 -$131 $1,019 Preschool/Early Education $6,583 $4,254 $8,897 Child Care $5,881 $4,026 $8,026 Child Support $2,861 $2,251 $3,677 Child Health Insurance $2,278 $1,631 $3,055 Housing Assistance $6,617 $4,766 $9,663 Note: Values are reported in 2012 constant dollars. Source: Table 2, Bruch et al. 2016. Separate and Unequal: The Dimensions and Consequences of Safety Net Decentralization in the US 1994-2014. IRP Discussion Paper No. 1432-16.

Cross-State Variation in Adequacy Note: Values are Coefficient of Variation (COV). Source: Table 2, Bruch et al. 2016. Separate and Unequal: The Dimensions and Consequences of Safety Net Decentralization in the US 1994-2014. IRP Discussion Paper No. 1432-16.

Cross-State Variation in Adequacy Note: Values are Coefficient of Variation (COV). Source: Table 2, Bruch et al. 2016. Separate and Unequal: The Dimensions and Consequences of Safety Net Decentralization in the US 1994-2014. IRP Discussion Paper No. 1432-16.

Cross-State Variation in Adequacy Note: Values are Coefficient of Variation (COV). Source: Table 2, Bruch et al. 2016. Separate and Unequal: The Dimensions and Consequences of Safety Net Decentralization in the US 1994-2014. IRP Discussion Paper No. 1432-16.

Cross-State Differences in Levels of Inclusion Program Mean 10th Percentile 90th Percentile Cash Assistance 0.19 0.06 0.37 Targeted Work Assistance 0.09 0.29 Food Assistance 0.93 1.11 Unemployment Insurance 0.35 0.23 0.49 Supplemental Security Income 0.04 0.02 0.05 State Income Taxes 0.46 0.59 Preschool/Early Education 0.07 0.43 Child Care 0.17 0.08 0.28 Child Support 0.85 0.57 1.21 Child Health Insurance 0.68 1.00 Housing Assistance 0.27 0.44 Note: Values are proportions of “potentially needy” population receiving assistance. Source: Table 2, Bruch et al. 2016. Separate and Unequal: The Dimensions and Consequences of Safety Net Decentralization in the US 1994-2014. IRP Discussion Paper No. 1432-16.

Cross-State Differences in Levels of Inclusion Program Mean 10th Percentile 90th Percentile Cash Assistance 0.19 0.06 0.37 Targeted Work Assistance 0.09 0.29 Food Assistance 0.93 1.11 Unemployment Insurance 0.35 0.23 0.49 Supplemental Security Income 0.04 0.02 0.05 State Income Taxes 0.46 0.59 Preschool/Early Education 0.07 0.43 Child Care 0.17 0.08 0.28 Child Support 0.85 0.57 1.21 Child Health Insurance 0.68 1.00 Housing Assistance 0.27 0.44 Note: Values are proportions of “potentially needy” population receiving assistance. Source: Table 2, Bruch et al. 2016. Separate and Unequal: The Dimensions and Consequences of Safety Net Decentralization in the US 1994-2014. IRP Discussion Paper No. 1432-16.

Cross-State Differences in Levels of Inclusion Program Mean 10th Percentile 90th Percentile Cash Assistance 0.19 0.06 0.37 Targeted Work Assistance 0.09 0.29 Food Assistance 0.93 1.11 Unemployment Insurance 0.35 0.23 0.49 Supplemental Security Income 0.04 0.02 0.05 State Income Taxes 0.46 0.59 Preschool/Early Education 0.07 0.43 Child Care 0.17 0.08 0.28 Child Support 0.85 0.57 1.21 Child Health Insurance 0.68 1.00 Housing Assistance 0.27 0.44 Note: Values are proportions of “potentially needy” population receiving assistance. Source: Table 2, Bruch et al. 2016. Separate and Unequal: The Dimensions and Consequences of Safety Net Decentralization in the US 1994-2014. IRP Discussion Paper No. 1432-16.

Cross-State Differences in Levels of Inclusion Program Mean 10th Percentile 90th Percentile Cash Assistance 0.19 0.06 0.37 Targeted Work Assistance 0.09 0.29 Food Assistance 0.93 1.11 Unemployment Insurance 0.35 0.23 0.49 Supplemental Security Income 0.04 0.02 0.05 State Income Taxes 0.46 0.59 Preschool/Early Education 0.07 0.43 Child Care 0.17 0.08 0.28 Child Support 0.85 0.57 1.21 Child Health Insurance 0.68 1.00 Housing Assistance 0.27 0.44 Note: Values are proportions of “potentially needy” population receiving assistance. Source: Table 2, Bruch et al. 2016. Separate and Unequal: The Dimensions and Consequences of Safety Net Decentralization in the US 1994-2014. IRP Discussion Paper No. 1432-16.

Cross-State Differences in Levels of Inclusion Program Mean 10th Percentile 90th Percentile Cash Assistance 0.19 0.06 0.37 Targeted Work Assistance 0.09 0.29 Food Assistance 0.93 1.11 Unemployment Insurance 0.35 0.23 0.49 Supplemental Security Income 0.04 0.02 0.05 State Income Taxes 0.46 0.59 Preschool/Early Education 0.07 0.43 Child Care 0.17 0.08 0.28 Child Support 0.85 0.57 1.21 Child Health Insurance 0.68 1.00 Housing Assistance 0.27 0.44 Note: Values are proportions of “potentially needy” population receiving assistance. Source: Table 2, Bruch et al. 2016. Separate and Unequal: The Dimensions and Consequences of Safety Net Decentralization in the US 1994-2014. IRP Discussion Paper No. 1432-16.

Cross-State Variation in Inclusion Note: Values are Coefficient of Variation (COV). Source: Table 2, Bruch et al. 2016. Separate and Unequal: The Dimensions and Consequences of Safety Net Decentralization in the US 1994-2014. IRP Discussion Paper No. 1432-16.

Cross-State Variation in Inclusion Note: Values are Coefficient of Variation (COV). Source: Table 2, Bruch et al. 2016. Separate and Unequal: The Dimensions and Consequences of Safety Net Decentralization in the US 1994-2014. IRP Discussion Paper No. 1432-16.

Cross-State Variation in Inclusion Note: Values are Coefficient of Variation (COV). Source: Table 2, Bruch et al. 2016. Separate and Unequal: The Dimensions and Consequences of Safety Net Decentralization in the US 1994-2014. IRP Discussion Paper No. 1432-16.

Cross-State Variation in Adequacy & Inclusion Note: Values are Coefficient of Variation (COV). Source: Table 2, Bruch et al. 2016. Separate and Unequal: The Dimensions and Consequences of Safety Net Decentralization in the US 1994-2014. IRP Discussion Paper No. 1432-16.

Cross-State Variation in Adequacy & Inclusion Note: Values are Coefficient of Variation (COV). Source: Table 2, Bruch et al. 2016. Separate and Unequal: The Dimensions and Consequences of Safety Net Decentralization in the US 1994-2014. IRP Discussion Paper No. 1432-16.

Cross-State Variation in Adequacy & Inclusion Note: Values are Coefficient of Variation (COV). Source: Table 2, Bruch et al. 2016. Separate and Unequal: The Dimensions and Consequences of Safety Net Decentralization in the US 1994-2014. IRP Discussion Paper No. 1432-16.

Cross-State Variation in Adequacy & Inclusion Note: Values are Coefficient of Variation (COV). Source: Table 2, Bruch et al. 2016. Separate and Unequal: The Dimensions and Consequences of Safety Net Decentralization in the US 1994-2014. IRP Discussion Paper No. 1432-16.

INEQUALITY ACROSS STATES CHANGE OVER TIME

Change Over Time: Cross-State Variation Has there been increasing divergence or convergence in safety net provision across the states? IRP

Change Over Time Adequacy Variation Program 1994 2014 Change Cash Assistance 0.37 0.40 0.03 Targeted Work Assistance 0.46 0.87 0.41 Food Assistance 0.10 0.00 Unemployment Insurance 0.30 0.24 -0.06 Supplemental Security Income 0.05 -0.02 State Income Taxes 0.53 0.71 0.18 Preschool/Early Education 0.25 0.26 0.01 Child Care 0.32 0.27 -0.05 Child Support 0.21 -0.03 Child Health Insurance Housing Assistance Note: Values are Coefficient of Variation (COV). Source: Table 4, Bruch et al. 2016. Separate and Unequal: The Dimensions and Consequences of Safety Net Decentralization in the US 1994-2014. IRP Discussion Paper No. 1432-16.

Change Over Time Adequacy Variation Program 1994 2014 Change Cash Assistance 0.37 0.40 0.03 Targeted Work Assistance 0.46 0.87 0.41 Food Assistance 0.10 0.00 Unemployment Insurance 0.30 0.24 -0.06 Supplemental Security Income 0.05 -0.02 State Income Taxes 0.53 0.71 0.18 Preschool/Early Education 0.25 0.26 0.01 Child Care 0.32 0.27 -0.05 Child Support 0.21 -0.03 Child Health Insurance Housing Assistance Note: Values are Coefficient of Variation (COV). Source: Table 4, Bruch et al. 2016. Separate and Unequal: The Dimensions and Consequences of Safety Net Decentralization in the US 1994-2014. IRP Discussion Paper No. 1432-16.

Change Over Time Inclusion Variation Program 1994 2014 Change Cash Assistance 0.28 0.63 0.35 Targeted Work Assistance 0.47 0.37 -0.10 Food Assistance 0.15 0.00 Unemployment Insurance 0.30 0.29 -0.01 Supplemental Security Income 0.36 0.34 -0.02 State Income Taxes 0.24 Preschool/Early Education 0.38 0.58 0.20 Child Care 0.49 0.13 Child Support 0.39 Child Health Insurance 0.21 -0.06 Housing Assistance 0.01 Note: Values are Coefficient of Variation (COV). Source: Table 4, Bruch et al. 2016. Separate and Unequal: The Dimensions and Consequences of Safety Net Decentralization in the US 1994-2014. IRP Discussion Paper No. 1432-16.

Change Over Time Inclusion Variation Program 1994 2014 Change Cash Assistance 0.28 0.63 0.35 Targeted Work Assistance 0.47 0.37 -0.10 Food Assistance 0.15 0.00 Unemployment Insurance 0.30 0.29 -0.01 Supplemental Security Income 0.36 0.34 -0.02 State Income Taxes 0.24 Preschool/Early Education 0.38 0.58 0.20 Child Care 0.49 0.13 Child Support 0.39 Child Health Insurance 0.21 -0.06 Housing Assistance 0.01 Note: Values are Coefficient of Variation (COV). Source: Table 4, Bruch et al. 2016. Separate and Unequal: The Dimensions and Consequences of Safety Net Decentralization in the US 1994-2014. IRP Discussion Paper No. 1432-16.

Change Over Time Inclusion Variation Program 1994 2014 Change Cash Assistance 0.28 0.63 0.35 Targeted Work Assistance 0.47 0.37 -0.10 Food Assistance 0.15 0.00 Unemployment Insurance 0.30 0.29 -0.01 Supplemental Security Income 0.36 0.34 -0.02 State Income Taxes 0.24 Preschool/Early Education 0.38 0.58 0.20 Child Care 0.49 0.13 Child Support 0.39 Child Health Insurance 0.21 -0.06 Housing Assistance 0.01 Note: Values are Coefficient of Variation (COV). Source: Table 4, Bruch et al. 2016. Separate and Unequal: The Dimensions and Consequences of Safety Net Decentralization in the US 1994-2014. IRP Discussion Paper No. 1432-16.

STATE CHANGE OVER TIME SOCIAL PROVISION

State Change Over Time in Safety Net Benefits

State Change Over Time in Safety Net Benefits

CURRENT SNAPSHOT REDISTRIBUTION

Data: Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS) Estimate series of Gini coefficients: market income; centralized/federal transfers; decentralized transfers; state taxes; federal taxes. Household level income measures: adjusted for household size (square root of hh size) inflation (CPI-U-RS), and cost of living differences across states (BEA all items RPP). Dollar figures reported are per equivalized person in the household in 2012 dollars. Household type: working-aged households (head age 18-64) with children Use three year moving average estimates at state level

No inequality reduction

Decentralized transfers overall reduction Decentralized transfers State taxes Do over time graph? Federal taxes

Conclusions The decentralized nature of the social safety net for economically vulnerable families with children is one of the most important and least carefully studied structural features of the U.S. welfare state. The extent of cross-state variation in safety net provision is substantively large and meaningful for economically needy families. This represents a form of geographic inequality in the treatment of similar needs and claims. IRP

Conclusions Policy design in the 11 major safety net programs shapes the extent the extent to which financing, policy and administrative authority are devolved in each program. The extent and type of devolved authority is correlated with the magnitude of state variation. Following the devolution of greater authority under PRWORA, states diverged and inequalities increased in several TANF- related programs. Make backslides with measure definitions