CalACT 2017 Spring Conference

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting September 30, 2013.
Advertisements

Connecting with Greyhound CalACT Conference April 15, 2015.
Keeping Harris County Moving.. Background Transit needs study in Commissioned by H-GAC and Harris County Transportation Coordinated Council.
 City of Hamilton – Transportation Sustainable Mobility Summit – October 27, 2013.
Innovations in Transit Planning and Financing Presentation to the 2003 MPO Conference, Muncie IN October 16, 2003.
U.S. DOT T3 Webinar Mobile Device Technology TCRP Synthesis 91 April 10, 2012 Case Study LeeTran – Lee County, FL Mike Horsting, AICP 1.
Rod Weis, Texas A&M University Lana Wolken, Texas A&M University Joe Richmond, University of North Texas Operating Your Own System Versus Contracting.
Transport.tamu.edu TAMING WILD BRONCOS Transit Management Changes, Financing, Training, Staffing Rod Weis, Texas A&M University Lana Wolken, Texas A&M.
1 Update on Transit in West Kelowna District of West Kelowna - November 12, 2013 Matthew Boyd – Senior Transit Planner Steve Harvard – Senior Regional.
Transportation Fee FY2016 January 16, Services Provided by Transportation Stinger Buses - Three routes with 10 buses operating weekdays and two.
E XPANDING M OBILITY O PTIONS IN M ARIN Marin Transit’s Paratransit and Mobility Management Programs 1.
The Partnership between Transportation and Technology Jennifer Mitchell, Director Department of Rail and Public Transportation ITSVA Conference.
Public Transit & Transportation Network Companies
Multi Agency Exchange May 16, 2017.
Implementing a Veterans Fare AKA: Rebranding a Discount
The BART System Map.
Summary of Outreach Webpage with video & comment form Public meetings
Move New Haven CEC Meeting #2:
Modular Transit Technology CalACT April 2017
Thank you for bringing us to where we are
Gunnison Valley Transportation Authority (RTA) 2016 Transit Planning Process Funded through a Section 5304 Planning Grant 5/23/2018.
Light Rail Enhancement Project
CET Service Proposal.
Transportation Options in Pinellas County
CET Service Proposal.
and Transportation Impacts
WILMOT COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION PILOT PROJECT
Capital Metro Long-Range Financial Forecast ( )
Service Routes and Community Transit Hubs: Right Sizing Transit
Propose March 2018 Service Improvements
Propose March 2018 Service Improvements
Autonomous Vehicle Pilot Project
What is OCACCESS Online?
Dial-A-Ride Service Report to the Community
Autonomous Vehicle Pilot Project
Orange County Transportation Authority Micro-Transit Pilot Program
IS NOW. . . The Center for Mobility Equity.
Transportation Management Plan Modernization Project
Paratransit Fare Increase
Promoting Shared Rides: Where do Transit Agencies Fit?
Microtransit Pilot In Sacramento
Transit Competitiveness and Market Potential
different Approaches different generations
Bus Rapid Transit Study
PARTNERSHIPS An experiment! Public Private Partnership
Status Report on Rochester’s DMC Transportation Plan
Technology In Action Session: An On-Demand Sunday Transit Application
Paratransit Fare Increase
Where’s My Ride William Tsuei Director of IT.
Introduction to Micro-Transit / Demand Responsive Transit
Mass Transit Usage According to IBISWorld, the public transportation industry increased 14.3%, from $63 billion during 2013 to $72 billion for 2017,
April 23, 2018.
Partnering with Cities
M14A/D Select Bus Service
CUTRIC: Specialized and Conventional Transit Integration Project
Paratransit Update April 2019
Annual Performance Summary – 2017/18 City of Cranbrook
Seattle Transportation Benefit District
OCTA’s Microtransit Pilot Project
RTC RIDE Service Improvement Recommendations
Central Avenue Rapid Transit
GoDublin! LAVTA’s TNC Partnership: From Here to Mass Transit
Mobility Management: Do you save money by allowing paratransit customers to ride free on fixed-route? CalACT Conference April 2019.
Program History Grant award 2010 Program launch 2013
Reimagine RTS Public Hearing
FREEdom and Volunteer Incentive Program (VIP)
Draft Fiscal Year Bus Service Plan
Putnam County Transportation 2019 Report
Planning for Microtransit
Presentation transcript:

CalACT 2017 Spring Conference Speaker: Aaron Vogel

Background 6-month pilot testing the Bay Area’s first on-demand bus service Flexible service model supported by dynamic dispatch software to respond to customer trip requests in real time Fill in gaps in service, address first/last mile access, offer enhanced customer experience

+ Program Goals Increase ridership on VTA bus and light rail network; Provide service that achieves cost per passenger and fare recovery rates that are better than that of existing VTA services; and Use technology to be a nationwide leader in delivering dynamic transit service +

Timeline Fall 2015 - VTA completes market analysis to develop the FLEX Pilot Project (Core Connectivity Study Phase 1). January 2016 - VTA launches FLEX, a 6-month on-demand transit pilot service with optimized pick-up and drop off stops in North San Jose. April 2016 - FLEX service area expands. One-time ride credits are introduced. June 2016 - FLEX ridership averages 41 requests per day. July 2016 - FLEX pilot program ends. August/September 2016 – Staff presents findings to VTA Committees and Board of Directors.

FLEX Service Details Monday – Friday, 5:30a-8:30p 5.5 square miles Flat fare: $2 midday, $3 peak hours Request rides within designated FLEX service area FLEX stops marked by sidewalk decals FLEX Stop Decal (16” x 16”)

16.3 Average Daily Boardings 33.1 Average Daily Boardings Ridership Jan. 11 - Apr. 08 16.3 Average Daily Boardings Apr. 11 - June 20 33.1 Average Daily Boardings Total Completed Trips 2714 Canceled Trips 556 No-Shows 80

Ridership by Hour Total % AM Peak 640 23% Off Peak 1344 48% PM Peak 838 30% Total Boardings 2822 100%

Ridership by Stop Top 10 Ridership Stops Rivermark Village Seely at River Oaks 1st at River Oaks LRT station Renaissance at Enclave Apt Tasman at Champion LRT station (EB) Montague & River Oaks 1st at Rio Robles Agnew at Sun Fire Tasman at Champion LRT station (WB) Seely at Cadence

Other Performance Measures Total Registered Accounts 2,677 Total Distinct Riders 313 Regular Riders (20+trips) 42 Average Driver Arrival Time 7.5 min. Average Trip Time 8.5 min. Number of Bike Rack Uses 11 Number of ADA Lift Uses 1

Marketing and Promotion

Marketing and Promotion Digital Ads – Free Ride Credit Promo Facebook Digital Ads Free FLEX rides on Earth Day

Rider Survey – Key Takeaways 84% rated their experience with FLEX as “Good” or “Excellent” High marks for nearly all aspects of service, esp. drivers & payment 25% said they rode transit more, 56% reported no change 35% of trips were reported as to/from another VTA bus/rail service 41% would pay up to $3-$4 for a ride, 42% would pay $1-$2 About $1 higher since pre-pilot market research Awareness/learning through outdoor advertising and website 43% saw vehicles, 41% saw posters/billboards, 24% used VTA website

Non-Rider Survey – Key Takeaways Non-riders didn’t follow through because service area didn’t meet their needs Higher incomes than bus/rail riders: 42% earn $150k+, 21% earn $75- $124k 65% of non-riders have their own car, 24% don’t Largely Millennial men: 41% were 25-34, 75% men

FLEX Operators’ Feedback FLEX Operators said: Great Service; great pilot program Ended too fast Smaller vehicles would have worked better Buses are not pleasant to drive Some stops interfere with bike lanes Serve larger area and include service to seniors Has potential if operated at night Passengers really liked the service and were disappointed for shutting it down Failed to get feedback from the public and make necessary changes to reflect their feedback Encountered many app issues Suggestions for expansion: Great Mall, Old Ironsides, Alviso, Great America

Key Pilot Findings FLEX pilot didn’t achieve ridership goals but was well received by the public Short pilot limits the flexibility to adjust service parameters and collect additional data points; service didn’t have the chance to fully mature Service area expansion led to increased ridership Accurate data communication required redundant coverage from AT&T and Verizon The option to schedule a ride in advance would have made FLEX more attractive (70% of respondents)

Key Pilot Findings Short implementation timeline led to minimum advance marketing Partnership agreements must be signed in advance of revenue service Need to select vehicles of the appropriate size and type for operational flexibility and better passenger experience Union contract was not flexible to shift with passenger demand VTA cost structure combined with inherent low productivity of on-demand services result in high cost per passenger metric

Next Steps Peery Park Rides Pilot (MTC grant) First and last mile solution to public transit hubs Trip reduction for businesses while serving local residents Free fares Deviated shuttle program Subsidizes Taxi/TNC trips Electric Autonomous Vehicle (Federal grant) VA Hospital Almaden Valley Multi-provider approach (Core, Taxi, AV, Paratransit, & TNCs) On-Demand in real time Meet on and off peak demand Mobile ticketing Leverage Paratransit contract

Thank You