Benchmarking WECC Composite load model

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Composite Load Model Implementation Update Craig Quist, PacifiCorp April 25-27, 2012 TSS Meeting.
Advertisements

Oil and it's products are used constantly in everyday life. This project is concerned with the modelling of the torsional waves that occur during the oil.
Chair: Daniel Kuraspediani - BPA POWER WORLD USER’S WORK GROUP (PWUWG)
Composed By: Angel Aquino, Ph.D. Presented by : Mark Laufenberg, Ph.D. WECC Joint User Group February 10-11, 2015 Colstrip Acceleration Trend Relay Model.
Chapter 4 Synchronous Generators
A Look into Load Modeling
EQUIVALENT CIRCUIT AND POWER EQUATION OF SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR
EPRI CIM for Dynamic Models Project Report Terry Saxton Xtensible Solutions May 13, 2009.
WECC Load Model Sensitivity Study “ An Analysis of the Sensitivity of WECC Grid Planning Models to Assumptions Regarding the Composition of Loads ” Task.
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
RARF DATA for TYPES 3 & 4 WTGs Fault Current Contribution for Current Limited Resources Ed Geer, P.E. Network Model Engineer, Sr. SPWG Meeting July 17,
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability
EET 221 Synchronous Machines Rafiqi.
BASIC ELECTRICAL TECHNOLOGY DET 211/3
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability Prof. Tom Overbye University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 1 Lecture 21: Load Models.
NERC LMTF: Current Activities Ryan Quint, PhD, PE Staff Coordinator, NERC Load Modeling Task Force WECC MVWG Meeting June 2016.
Overview Part1 - Analysis of base case (Resonant frequency ~ 6hz, excitation frequency ~ 6hz). Sensitivity analysis of eigenvalue. Proposed intuitive RCL.
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability
PowerWorld Case Validation
Modeling DER in Transmission Planning CAISO Experience
Development and Implementation of Composite Load Model in WECC
WECC Load Modeling and Validation Group Meeting
Variable Frequency Drive Test Results
HVAC Test results Anish Gaikwad Parag Mitra
BPA Air Conditioner Test Results
Drives Training Foils Encoder Module Installation
Induction motor control
Next Steps in Load Modeling
AC to DC Converters Outline 2.1 Single-phase controlled rectifier
Understanding Area Balancing
Dr. Zainal salam; Power Electronics and Drives (Version 2),2002, UTMJB
Cache Memory Presentation I
ECEN 460 Power System Operation and Control
Measured data from motor start
CMPLDW2 – Prototype Modular Structure WECC LMTF Meeting March 2017
Synchronous Condensers Transient & First Swing Periods
PSS®E Update for WECC Good morning, welcome to psse presentation for the UGM I’m glenn pietrow, PSSE product manager and GUI developer Currently manage.
Passive Shunt Compensation
Load Model Data Tool Development Update
Presentation of ELECTRIC MACHINES Title: Single Phase Motors By: Rahul Khanna{ }EC3 rd Sem Guided By: Prof. Ravi Patel.
Advanced Power Systems
Load Flow Studies Eng. Edvan Moyo BEng, MEng, MBA
Reliability Assessment Committee Reliability Workshop Priorities
Dynamic Load Modelling
CMPLDWG Composite Model with Distributed Generation Approval
NERC-WECC Coordination
BPA/GE Load Model Improvements Project
Variable Frequency Drive Test Results
NERC LMTF Update Update on Key Topics
NERC-WECC Coordination
HVAC Test results Anish Gaikwad Parag Mitra
PSS®E Update for WECC Good morning, welcome to psse presentation for the UGM I’m glenn pietrow, PSSE product manager and GUI developer Currently manage.
CMPLDW2 – Prototype Modular Structure WECC LMTF Meeting March 2017
Composite Load Model with Distributed Generation (CMPLDWG)
VFD and HVAC testing update
PSSE Playback Model Validation with PMU Data
Reliability Assessment Committee Reliability Workshop Priorities
CMPLDWG Composite Model with Distributed Generation Approval
WECC Load Modeling and Validation Group Meeting
User Experience with New Solar PV Models California ISO
AC Drives Dr. Adel A. El-Samahy Department of Electrical Engineering University of Helwan.
ECE 576 POWER SYSTEM DYNAMICS AND STABILITY
Palo Verde-COI RAS Retirement
Distance Relay Specification
Palo Verde-COI RAS Retirement
ECEN 667 Power System Stability
ECEN 667 Power System Stability
ECEN 667 Power System Stability
Power World User’s Work Group (PWUWG)
Electric Machine Design Course
Presentation transcript:

Benchmarking WECC Composite load model Parag Mitra Sr. Engineer Anish Gaikwad Sr. Project Manager

Load Model Benchmarking Versions of software used PSLF 19.02 PSS/E 33.9 PowerWorld 19 DSATools (TSAT) V16.1.27 (Release date Dec 14, 2016) Uniform implementation across all platforms Composite load model channels are now available in DSATools Channel names straightforward in Powerworld

Test system 3 bus test system proposed by Siemens PTI Generator and exciter use standard parameters GENROU IEEET1

Initialization of composite load model Possibly due to leakage reactance Xa Motor A Motor B Motor C Slip P Q PSSE 0.035 3.924 3.055 0.0195 3.347 1.962 1.673 PSLF 0.041 3.925 3.095 0.021 3.389 1.694 Powerworld  0.041 0.021   3.926  3.389  1.962  1.66 DSATools 3.045 0.02 3.246 1.623   Motor D Electronic ZIP P Q PSSE 4.906 2.37 1.96 0.95 2.94 1.43 PSLF 4.91 Powerworld  4.906  2.37 DSATools Swing Bus Mid Bus HV Bus/Substation bus Internal Load Bus V θ PSSE 1.01 1.00 -0.28 1.000 -0.84 0.999 - PSLF 1.007 Powerworld  1.01 DSATools  0 1.007   0.9986  - 

Performance of Motor A (Load torque=constant) Responses are almost identical across the 4 platforms Although similar in magnitude some fast oscillations can be seen in the TSAT output

Stalling of Motor A (WECC Recmd. Tripping/Reconnection)

Stalling of Motor A (No tripping)

Without trip and reconn. Stalling of Motor A With trip and reconn. Without trip and reconn. Had a discussion with Siemens. The difference is because the motor in PSSE starts up a little bit later. This is possibly due to difference in the value of Xa between the different vendors. PSS/E assumes a different value than PSLF and others TSAT recommends using a time step of 0.25 cycles or less for double cage IMs. Default time step is 0.5 cycles (This was causing TSAT to have numerical issues in our previous simulations)

Stalling/Restart of Motor A (Plots by Gary Thomann PTI) Xa= 0.8 times sub-transient reactance Xa= 0.6 times sub-transient reactance, Results match PSLF closely There is no standard documentation for this parameter

Reconnection of Motor B (Load torque α Speed2) Voltage at load bus Active power at load bus 100% motor tripping Reactive power at load bus Speed PSLF does not reconnect. TSAT does not let the motor to slow down as it did previously. TSAT suggested using trapezoidal integration for this simulation

Performance of Electronic Load The model response is identical across all the platforms in the current versions

Performance of ZIP Load The model response is identical across all the platforms in the current versions

Low voltage performance of ZIP Load a. Voltage at load bus b. Active power at load bus b. Reactive power at load bus 40% constant Z, 40% Constant I, 20% Constant P The differences need to be sorted out How is the low voltage behavior of the ZIP component modeled? Is this implementation uniform across all the software platforms?

Active power at load bus Reactive power at load bus Performance of Motor D Active power at load bus Reactive power at load bus PSLF output is different than the other tools. The hump is missing. Latest correspondence with Bill Price from PSLF indicates that this issue has been resolved and the updated model now matches with the other software tools

Motor D: Vstall and Vstallbrk PSS/E and Powerworld both handles a Vstall = 0, replaces it with Vstllbrk PSLF 19.0_02 has numerical issues if Vstall is small. However, if Vstall is set to 0, PSLF changes it to 0.6 TSAT generates the following message Source: Powerworld Documentation Problem is with Vstall and Tstall. Rstall and Xstall are ok

Some vendors may be doing this already (above figures from Powerworld) EPRI suggestion Some vendors may be doing this already (above figures from Powerworld) Proposed change If (Vstall<Vstallbrk) Vstall=Vstallbrk end Instructions: LMTF to supply recommended value of Vstall To prevent stalling set Vstall as recommended value and set Tstall as 9999 Motor D does not stall Motor moves on yellow marked path when voltage decreases Motor moves on yellow marked path back when voltage recovers Motor D stalls Motor moves on yellow marked path when voltage decreases Restartable part –yellow Non restartable part – green (till they trip)

  Current status PSS®E PSLF™ Powerworld TSAT Initialization Motor A, B, and C for a voltage dip Motor A, B, and C during stalled condition Tripping and reconnection capabilities of Motor A, B and C  Electronic load Static load Motor D (performance with voltage dip) Motor D (Vstall and Vstllbrk)