iBSc Thinking Writing workshop

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introducing Unit Specifications and Unit Assessment Support Packs Classical Studies National 3, 4 and 5.
Advertisements

 Experimental Pathology research report structure.
MN6001 REASSESSMENT (RE-SIT) Management Consultancy & Reflective Report - Prepared by Etienne Bresch, module leader JULY 2014 REVISION SESSIONS: CONTACT.
What makes a good project?.  A testing ground for concepts presented in the taught programme  An opportunity to demonstrate the ability to apply knowledge.
How well did the assessment task do what we wanted it to do? Janina Drazek Manager — Assessment & Comparability, QCAR Queensland Studies Authority.
Analysing information and being ‘critical’
What is Critical Writing? How do I criticise the work of established academics/practitioners? –By reading other established academics/ practitioners that.
WELCOME TO THE GREAT EXPLORATION! CRITICAL REFLECTION ON SELF AS LEADER AND LEADERSHIP PRACTICE.
Building Logical Arguments. Critical Thinking Skills Understand and use principles of scientific investigation Apply rules of formal and informal logic.
External Examiners’ Briefing Day Assessment Policy Tuesday 6 th January 2015.
A NN R USSELL S TUDENT L EARNING SERVICES Study Skills for University.
Session 2: Teaching Task. What Should a Good Teaching Task Have and Do?  Challenge students to engage in a substantial issue within the academic discipline.
Key messages from Verification  Use valid and reliable assessments  SQA-produced Unit Assessment Support Packs  Centre devised assessments.
Structure of Course  Written paper (25%)  Essay (30%)  Presentation (45%)
Academic Essays & Report Writing
Writing Journal articles Professor Ashok Ranchhod.
Masters Level Modules Ros Ollin School of Education and Professional Development University of Huddersfield.
R. Paul’s Eight Elements of Thought / Paul’s Wheel of Reasoning
Dr Jane Tonge Senior Examiner
Emily Danvers The aim of today’s session is: To help you:  Understand what a literature review is within the context of your dissertation.
Looking to draw a conclusion and influence change.. Why do research ?
Writing up your thesis - when writing up your thesis you should keep in mind at all times that a good thesis: 1. has question(s) underpinning the whole.
Understanding Standards: Advanced Higher Event
Approaches to Studying Critical Incidents - Reflection
Features of science revision
Moving from level 4 to level 5 academic writing
LARS MATHIASSEN Academic director J Mack Robinson College of Business
Making the step up: The transition to undergraduate writing.
Academic Writing for Social Work
Graduate Attributes in Syllabus design for EAP
A review of the literature
Understanding Standards: Advanced Higher Event
UNIT 5: NON EXAMINED ASSESSMENT
Critical Thinking Study Skills Academy 2016/17.
RSD: A Doorway to Learning
Our Assessment Strategy
Questions, Claims and Evidence: Teaching Argumentation in Science
BA1 Social Work Academic Writing Development
Strengths & Weaknesses
blended Approach to academic literacy in so100 self & society
RESE-1031 Thematic Impendent Studies
Comparative Analysis.
The Argumentative Essay:
Welcome to IBDP History
Body and Soul Key Words! In your group, write as many key words and definitions on this topic as possible!
“Unpacking” our modules-building modules that meet LDC criteria
Writing Style and Objectives
Self-Critical Writing:
Technology and Living Third Consultation
Academic Writing: Tackling essays with confidence
Assessment of NEA Assessment Objective Mark
..
Critical Analysis CHAPTER 7.
Reasoning used to analyze why events happened
Command terms with definitions.
PReSS - Top Tips for Academic Writing
Understanding Standards Modern Studies
APUSH PREWRITING SKILLS
Moral Reasoning 2.
Learning Objective (DBQ’s)
Warm Up You will have your first timed Paper 2 Exam at the end of the week. PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE familiarize yourself with Stalin’s rule in comparison.
Descriptive Analytical
IB Historical Investigation
Social Science Essay Outline
Glossary Of Command Terms
Providing feedback to learners
Learning Objective: to evaluate the Humanistic Approach
Analysing the Essay Rubric
Preparing for your PGCE year
Essay Writing Tips LAW
Presentation transcript:

iBSc Thinking Writing workshop Medical Education iBSc Thinking Writing workshop

Analysing the essay task: Task Academic Essay Considering what you have learnt from both modules: FunEd and the Theory behind Teaching and Learning, please discuss the underpinning principles and processes that ensure medical students learn what they need to know in order to practice as doctors. It is expected that you discuss and analyse information from different paradigms of the educational literature encountered within both modules. You should integrate your evidence and create a coherent referenced argument which addresses the key underpinning principles and processes of undergraduate medical education. Where appropriate you should illustrated your points with authentic examples of medical student learning.

Breaking it down … Academic Essay Considering what you have learnt from both modules: FunEd and the Theory behind Teaching and Learning:   1. The task: Discuss the underpinning principles (examples & critique) and processes (examples & critique) that ensure medical students learn what they need to know in order to practice as doctors. Questions to read back into these? What do you want to say about them or argue?

Breaking it down … 2. Guidance: It is expected that you discuss and analyse information from different paradigms of the educational literature encountered within both modules. You should integrate your evidence and create a coherent referenced argument which addresses   3. the key underpinning principles and processes of undergraduate medical education. An evaluation of the theories & practices 4. Where appropriate you should illustrated your points with authentic examples of medical student learning, Use yourself & your experience as evidence? How are you going to organize and structure the essay?

Focussing THE TASK: Discuss the underpinning principles and processes that ensure medical students learn what they need to know in order to practice as doctors.   There are underpinning principles and processes that ensure medical students learn what they need to know in order to practice as doctors. There are no underpinning principles and processes that ensure medical students learn what they need to know in order to practice as doctors. What are underpinning principles and processes that ensure medical students learn what they need to know in order to practice as doctors?

Different stances to reading and writing: Non-critical approaches: Reader/writer engages with the material ‘on its own terms’, not commenting, challenging or drawing comparison with other sources. 2. Weakly critical approaches: More attention to soundness of reasoning and strengths of conclusions drawn, but doesn’t step back from reasoning and question assumptions on which it is based. 3. Strongly critical approaches: You move to considering how the material you are engaging with is constructed, on what assumptions, according to whose values and within which historical, intellectual and political frames (paradigms)