Municipality of Anchorage Department of Health and Human Services

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transportation Conformity Basics. What is Transportation Conformity? Transportation conformity (conformity) is a way to ensure that Federal funding and.
Advertisements

New Source Review NSR Reforms Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Council Presented by Matt Paque, Attorney, ODEQ - AQD April 20,
Anchorage CO Maintenance Plan (SIP) Revisions Presentation to the AMATS Air Quality Advisory Committee February 19, 2008.
“Cleaner Air Sooner” South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control Bureau of Air Quality.
Transportation Conformity and Development of Emission Budgets.
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
Presentation to Board of Forestry November 29, 2011 Alice Edwards Division of Air Quality Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation
How Ozone is Regulated under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
AMATS Air Quality Update April 2012 Municipality of Anchorage Department of Health and Human Services.
Air Pollution Control Board October 1, 2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management We Protect.
MICHELLE WILSON ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF WEIGHTS AND MEASURES SEPTEMBER 17, 2013 Stage II Vapor Recovery Update.
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
Emissions Inventory and Air Quality Planning National Urban Air Quality Workshop Lahore, Pakistan December 13, 2004.
A&WMA Georgia Regulatory Update Conference Current State of the Air in GA Jac Capp, GA EPD, Branch Chief, Air Protection Branch April 16, 2013.
Minnesota Air Quality and Attainment Status Frank Kohlasch Kari Palmer Statewide Travel Demand Coordinating Committee Meeting October 14, 2010.
Indiana Environmental Health Summit Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) June 6, 2011 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, QEP Commissioner,
Ozone Overview John Koswan July 11, OZONE SIP DEVELOPMENT: TASKS COMPLETED TO DATE.
Air Quality Planning, Metro. Washington, DC-MD-VA Joan Rohlfs, Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington COG October 27, 2005.
Air Quality and Conformity Issues James M. Shrouds, Director Office of Natural and Human Environment Federal Highway Administration AASHTO SCOE Meeting.
Our Vision – Healthy Kansans living in safe and sustainable environments.
SIP Development and Implementation in New Mexico - and Why it Matters to Tribes Rita Bates Planning Section Chief Air Quality Bureau New Mexico Environment.
Regional Issues Facing Colorado and Other Western States WESTAR Spring Business Meeting Denver, Colorado March 30, 2010 Paul Tourangeau Director Colorado.
Recent Developments in Transportation Conformity Beverly Chenausky Multimodal Planning Division – Air Quality Breakout Session: Transportation Conformity/Air.
Presentation for Air Quality Coalitions The 2015 Proposed Ozone Standard.
Transportation Conformity in North Carolina. Transportation Planning Framework Required by NCGS §136 ‑ In MPOs, includes 20 year fiscally constrained.
EPA’s New Air Quality Standards. Topics The Revised Standards Our Current Readings Benefits Versus Costs Conformity – What Is It? Sources of Our Air Pollution.
1. Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) – Naturally occurring and man- made. 5,505.2 mmts emitted in 2009, GWP = 1 Methane (CH 4 ) - Naturally occurring and man-made.
Planning for Clean Air and Conformity: Connecting the SIP to the Transportation System Jeff Riley Houston, TX May 30, 2007.
Houston-Galveston- Brazoria Conformity Commitments Shelley Whitworth H-GAC.
1 National Ambient Air Quality Standards and State Implementation Plans North Carolina Division of Air Quality National Ambient Air Quality Standards and.
ANPR: Transition to New or Revised PM NAAQS WESTAR Business Meeting March 2006.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Current Status of Air Quality Laura Boothe North Carolina Division of Air Quality MCIC Workshops March 2012.
Mobile Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13 th, 2012 Washington, DC 1.
1 SJVAPCD DRAFT SCHEDULES May 2, Hr OZONE ATTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION PLAN PM10 ATTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION PLAN.
Imperial County PM 10 SIP: Update Imperial County APCD SIP Workgroup Meeting September 24, 2008.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule Briefing for NTAA EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards April 17, 2007.
Missoula Air Quality Conformity Analysis Required by Federal and Montana Clean Air Act – Transportation-specific air quality requirements enacted in Federal.
2014 Program Priorities January 23, Outline Major 2014 Goals 2013 Accomplishments Major 2014 Activities Partnerships 2.
Anchorage CO Maintenance Plan Proposed Revision to the State of Alaska Air Quality Control Plan April 2008 Municipality of Anchorage Department of Health.
1 Improving Air Quality in the Metro. Washington Region Phil Mendelson, Chair Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Committee October 19, 2006.
Fine Particulate Matter SIP for Washington DC Special Stakeholder Meeting February 20, 2008.
Current State Issues in Title V Permitting Matthew A. Paque Environmental Attorney Supervisor Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality Office of General.
Item #11 Alternative Approaches for Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital.
Determining Attainment Dates for Different Types of Nonattainment Areas Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality and Standards June 20, 2007.
Keeping Our Air Clean Local and Regional Strategies to Improve Air Quality in Chittenden County Presentation to: CCMPO – February 17, 2010.
SO 2 NAAQS Modeling MassCAIR Stakeholder Meeting December 13, 2011.
Implementation of National Ambient Air Quality Standards Bill Harnett NACAA Fall Meeting September 22, 2009.
Dr. James Conner Fairbanks North Star Borough November 8, 2012 Dr. James Conner Fairbanks North Star Borough November 8, 2012.
1 National Standards Set for Criteria Pollutants  Particulate Matter  Sulfur Dioxide  Nitrogen Dioxide  Carbon Monoxide  Lead  Ozone.
Revised EPA Ozone Standard – Effects in the West May 15, 2008.
TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY
Anchorage CO Maintenance Plan Revision
Anchorage CO Limited Maintenance Plan
New Source Review (NSR) Program Basics
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
PM 2.5 Attainment Re-designation Approvals
Greenhouse Gas Reduction Initiative City of Wichita
Clean Air Act (CAA) Purpose
Ozone in the Tri Cities July 2018.
Maryland's Air Quality: Nitrogen Reductions and the Healthy Air Act
Bill Harnett USEPA NACAA Membership Meeting October 21, 2008
Public Review Draft CARBON MONOXIDE AND PM-10 AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY DETERMINATION FOR THE 2035 AMATS METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN Municipality of.
Anchorage CO Maintenance Plan (SIP) Revisions
Exceptional Events Rulemaking Proposal
Enforcing the NAAQS Case Study Sean Taylor
2018 State Implementation Plan For the Annual PM2.5 Standard
Proposal to Revise the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particle Pollution WESTAR Meeting March 2006.
Ozone in the Tri Cities July 2018.
Air Quality in Anchorage
2018 State Implementation Plan for the Imperial County 12 ug/m3 PM2
Presentation transcript:

Municipality of Anchorage Department of Health and Human Services Anchorage CO Maintenance Plan Proposed Revision to the State of Alaska Air Quality Control Plan April 2008 Municipality of Anchorage Department of Health and Human Services

History EPA declared Anchorage a CO nonattainment area in 1978. Air quality attainment plans were completed in 1982, 1992, and 2002. Last violation of the NAAQS occurred in 1996. EPA approved maintenance plan and designated Anchorage as an attainment area in 2004. In November 2007, Anchorage Assembly voted to discontinue I/M no later than December 2009.

AMATS review AQ/TAC/Policy CO Plan Approval Process Draft CO Plan (Apr 08) AMATS review AQ/TAC/Policy Anchorage Assembly review ADEC considers comments, revises plan (if needed), legal review, and adoption AMATS-approved Plan (May08) AMATS-approved Plan with Assembly and public comments (July 08) ADEC Public comment process ADEC-revised SIP (Nov 08) ADEC considers comments, revises Plan as needed, legal review, and adoption EPA review and approval 12 to 18 months EPA - approved SIP (Dec 2009 to June 2010)

What does the monitoring data tell us?

CO monitoring has been conducted at 8 “permanent” locations and more than 25 temporary locations in the Anchorage bowl.

CO concentrations have fallen dramatically over the past 25 years. CO Trend at Garden Monitoring Station

The highest CO concentrations are measured in residential areas. Looking north from Turnagain Station (32nd and Turnagain Boulevard)

Cold starts and warm-up idling are significant sources of CO in these neighborhoods. CO Concentration by Time-of-Day at Turnagain and Garden Stations

What impact does discontinuing I/M have on prospects for continued compliance with the federal CO standard?

Because the Turnagain station exhibits the greatest potential for exceeding the NAAQS, its data were analyzed to determine the probability of complying with the federal air quality standard without I/M.

98th Percentile Prediction Interval at Turnagain Station Statistical analysis suggests that if CO emissions in the Turnagain area remain at 2007 levels, there is a 98% chance of meeting the federal CO standard. 98th Percentile Prediction Interval at Turnagain Station

The future probability of compliance can be estimated by forecasting CO emissions in the Turnagain area. The effect of terminating I/M on future CO emissions can be estimated using the EPA MOBILE6 model.

CO emissions in the 9 km2 area surrounding the Turnagain station were projected through 2023.

CO emissions in Turnagain Area (Base Year 2007)

Projected CO Emissions Turnagain Area (2007-2023) CO emissions are projected to decline between 2007 and 2023. Because emissions decline the probability of complying with the CO standard improves slightly over time.

TOTAL CO EMISSIONS (tpd) Probability of Compliance Year  TOTAL CO EMISSIONS (tpd) Probability of Compliance 2007 5.99 98.1% 2008 5.72 98.8% 2009 5.45 99.2% 2010 5.66 99.0% 2011 5.86 98.4% 2012 5.74 2013 5.62 99.1% 2014 5.54 2015 2016 5.38 2017 5.30 99.3% 2018 5.21 99.4% 2019 5.11 2020 5.05 99.5% 2021 4.98 2022 4.93 99.6% 2023 4.89

Conclusion Even if I/M is discontinued, the probability of complying with the CO standard is 98% or higher each year between 2007 and 2023. This is well above the 90% probability targeted by the EPA for maintenance demonstrations.

What should Anchorage do to help minimize CO emissions?

Primary measures Air Quality Public Awareness Rideshare / Vanpool Promote block heater use Promote alternatives to SOV (walk, bike, bus, telecommute) Encourage trip chaining Inform public on benefits of vehicle maintenance (voluntary I/M?) Rideshare / Vanpool Transit Promotion

Contingency measures Measure or measures adopted will depend on nature of CO violation Curtail or limit fireplace and wood stove use when high CO is predicted Increase public awareness and education, transit, rideshare and van pool promotion Offer reduced transit fares for employees of companies that contribute to subsidy Reinstate block heater installation subsidy Reinstate ethanol-blended gasoline Reinstate I/M EtOH and I/M are noted in red because under the Clean Air Act they must be included in the “menu” of SIP contingency meastures.

Motor vehicle emissions budget for use in conformity analyses

Motor vehicle emissions budget is the allowable amount of CO that can be emitted by motor vehicles in the budget area. Conformity regulations require that CO emissions from future transportation plans and programs stay below the motor vehicle emission budget.

Because total CO emissions must remain below 121 Because total CO emissions must remain below 121.5 tpd, the motor vehicle budget shrinks from 87.8 tpd in 2007 to 79.7 tpd in 2023 as other sources grow.

Preliminary projections suggest that future transportation plans and programs can meet the shrinking motor vehicle budget and thus meet conformity requirements.