The LHCb Trigger System

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHCb Alignment 12 th April 2007 S. Viret Coseners Forum « LHC Startup » 1. Introduction 2. The alignment challenge 3. Conclusions.
Advertisements

Freiburg Seminar, Sept Sascha Caron Finding the Higgs or something else ideas to improve the discovery ideas to improve the discovery potential at.
Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
0 25. Sept 2006 M.Smizanska, Lancaster University, UK LHC preparations for precise measurements of muonic very rare B-decays 25. Sept 2006 M.Smizanska,
7 Nov 2002Niels Tuning - Vertex A vertex trigger for LHCb The trigger for LHCb ….. and the use of the Si vertex detector at the first and second.
A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for the ATLAS Detector Mark Sutton University College London 7 th October 2005.
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ Beauty 2005 in Assisi, June 2005 Sascha Caron for the DØ collaboration Tag beauty fast …
27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
The LHCb DAQ and Trigger Systems: recent updates Ricardo Graciani XXXIV International Meeting on Fundamental Physics.
High Level Trigger of Muon Spectrometer Indranil Das Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics.
Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire, Orsay, France and CERN Olivier Callot on behalf of the LHCb collaboration Implementation and Performance of the.
Beauty 2006 R. Muresan – Charm 1 Charm LHCb Raluca Mureşan Oxford University On behalf of LHCb collaboration.
Eduardo Rodrigues NIKHEF Seminar at CPPM, Marseille, 4 th May 2007 LHCb: a stroll from Trigger to Physics.
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
Feb. 7, 2007First GLAST symposium1 Measuring the PSF and the energy resolution with the GLAST-LAT Calibration Unit Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
2 nd Workshop on CKM Unitarity Triangle – April 5-9, 2003, DurhamMassimiliano Ferro-Luzzi 1 The LHCb trigger strategy and performance Overview Level-0Detectors,
July 22, 2002Brainstorming Meeting, F.Teubert L1/L2 Trigger Algorithms L1-DAQ Trigger Farms, July 22, 2002 F.Teubert on behalf of the Trigger Software.
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
LHCb trigger: algorithms and performance Hugo Ruiz Institut de Ciències del Cosmos March 12 th -17 th 2009, Tsukuba, Japan On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration.
3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
Trigger Strategy and Performance of the LHCb Detector Mitesh Patel (CERN) (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration) Thursday 7 th July 2005.
Electron and Photon HLT alley M. Witek K. Senderowska, A. Żurański.
Open and Hidden Beauty Production in 920 GeV p-N interactions Presented by Mauro Villa for the Hera-B collaboration 2002/3 data taking:
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
The LHCb Calorimeter Triggers LAL Orsay and INFN Bologna.
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
L0 Bandwidth Division for the TDR Eduardo Rodrigues, CERN
First collisions in LHC
The LHCb Calorimeter system
ALICE – First paper.
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
Preparation of LHCb for data taking
DAQ Systems and Technologies for Flavor Physics
ATLAS B-physics important periods
The LHCb Trigger Niko Neufeld CERN, PH
The LHC collider in Geneva
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS
The role of PS/SPD in the LHCb trigger
The Level-0 Calorimeter Trigger and the software triggers
Open heavy flavor analysis with the ALICE experiment at LHC
Status of the LHCb experiment
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 6th May 2009 Fergus Wilson, RAL.
Niels Tuning (Outer Tracker Group LHCb)
High Level Trigger for rare decays at LHCb
on behalf of the LHCb collaboration
LHCb: a stroll from Trigger to Physics
Overview of LHCb Poland Ukraine Brazil UK Switzerland France Spain
The LHCb Trigger Niko Neufeld CERN, PH.
Update on LHCb Level-1 trigger
LHCb Trigger, Online and related Electronics
Prospects for quarkonium studies at LHCb
8th International Conference on Advanced Technology and
B Physics at the LHC Neville Harnew University of Oxford.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
The LHCb L0 Calorimeter Trigger
on behalf of the LHCb collaboration
Trigger Strategy and Performance of the LHCb Detector
LHCb Trigger LHCb Trigger Outlook:
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Electron PID & trigger using EMCal
Presentation transcript:

The LHCb Trigger System Eduardo Rodrigues NIKHEF On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration Beauty 2006, Oxford, UK 25th-29th Sep 2006 LHCb Experiment and Detector Trigger strategy and overview Hardware trigger: Level-0 components, decision unit, performance Software trigger: High Level Trigger farm, alleys, exclusive and inclusive strategies, decision, performance Outlook

The LHCb Trigger System Jura Geneva 9 km diameter LHC CERN The LHCb Trigger System

Ring Imaging Cherenkov The LHCb Trigger System LHCb Detector Ring Imaging Cherenkov Calorimeters 250/300 mrad Acceptance 10 mrad pp collision (side view) Muon System « Tracking » detectors The LHCb Trigger System

The LHCb Trigger System Trigger Strategy & Overview LHC(b) Environment Trigger Overview & Strategy The LHCb Trigger System

B-hadrons are heavy and long-lived ! The LHCb Trigger System LHC(b) Environment LHC environment pp collisions at ECM = 14 TeV tbunch = 25 ns  bunch crossing rate = 40 MHz <L> = 2x1032 cm-2 s-1 @ LHCb interaction region  10-50 times lower than for ATLAS/CMS Cross sections Physical quantity Value Event rate Yield / year s total ~ 100 mb s visible ~ 60 mb ~ 12 MHz s (c-cbar) ~ 3.5 mb ~ 700 kHz ~ 7x1012 pairs s (b-bbar) ~ 0.5 mb ~ 100 kHz ~ 1012 pairs Expected B-signal rates branching ratios ~ 10-9 – 10-4  10 – 106 events / year ? B-hadrons are heavy and long-lived ! The LHCb Trigger System

The LHCb Trigger System Trigger Overview pp collisions 12 MHz custom hardware high ET particles partial detector information Level-0 1 MHz CPU farm -> software trigger high ET / IP particles full detector information HLT ~2 kHz event size ~35 kb Storage The LHCb Trigger System

The LHCb Trigger System Trigger Strategy Be alert ! Two-level Trigger L0 high ET / PT particles hardware trigger, sub-detector specific implementation pipelined operation, fixed latency of 4 ms (minimum bias) rate reduction ~12 MHz -> 1 MHz HLT: high ET/PT & high Impact Param. particles & displaced vertices & B-mass & … algorithms run on large PC farm with ~1800 nodes several trigger streams to exploit and refine L0 triggering information software reconstruction on part/all of the data  tracking / vertexing with accuracy close to offline selection and classification of interesting physics events  inclusive / exclusive streams rate reduction 1 MHz -> 2 kHz estimated event size ~ 30kb The LHCb Trigger System

The LHCb Trigger System Level-0 Trigger Pile-up system Calorimeter Muon system L0 Decision unit 1 MHz L0DU report The LHCb Trigger System

The LHCb Trigger System L0 Strategy select high ET / PT particles  hadrons / electrons / photons / p0’s / muons reject complex / busy events  more difficult to reconstruct in HLT  take longer to reconstruct in HLT reject empty events  uninteresting for future analysis L0 thresholds on ET / PT of candidates global event variables The LHCb Trigger System

The LHCb Trigger System L0 Pile-up System Detector components 2 silicon planes upstream of nominal IP, part of the Vertex Locator (VELO) Strategy : identify multi-PV events calculate z of vertices for all combinations of A & B find highest peak in histogram of z remove hits contribution to that peak find the second highest peak  2-interactions crossings identified with efficiency ~60% and purity ~95% Output for L0DU pile-up system (hit) multiplicity number of tracks on second peak/vertex The LHCb Trigger System

L0 Calorimeter Trigger (1/2) ECAL and HCAL - ECAL: ~6000 cells, 4x4 to 12x12 cm2 - HCAL: ~1500 cells, 13x13 to 26x26 cm2 Scintillator Pad Detector (SPD) Preshower (Prs) ECAL HCAL SPD-PreShower Scintillator Pad Detector (SPD) Pre-Shower Detector (PS) ECAL HCAL FE Validation cards Selection crates SPD mult e± g p0 hadr ETtot The LHCb Trigger System

L0 Calorimeter Trigger (2/2) The LHCb Trigger System Strategy identify high-ET hadrons / e’s / g‘s / p0’s using all 4 sub-detectors: ECAL and HCAL  large energy deposits <-> ET in 2x2 cells Scintillator Pad Detector (SPD) & Preshower (Prs)  used for charged/electromagnetic nature of clusters, respectively (PID) Output for L0 Decision Unit (L0DU) highest-ET candidate of each type  hadron / e / g / 2 p0‘s (“local” and “global”) global event variables  total ET in HCAL <-> rejection of empty events  SPD hit multiplicity <-> rejection of busy events The LHCb Trigger System

The LHCb Trigger System L0 Muon Trigger Detector components M1 – M5 muon stations (4 quadrants each) Strategy straight-line search in M2–M5 and extrapolation to M1 for momentum determination momentum determination from M1-M2 assuming muons from primary vertex (using a look-up table): σp/p ~ 20% for b-decays Output for L0DU 2 muon candidates per each of the 4 quadrants The LHCb Trigger System

L0 Trigger Hardware Status The LHCb Trigger System for general status / commissioning of LHCb: see LluÍs Garrido’s / Gloria Corti’s talks L0 Trigger commissioning due to start early 2007  ready for end of Summer 2007 L0 candidates selection/validation cards ready for production Muon System for L0 chambers production and tests progressing well (tests with cosmics also performed) chambers installation to start now in October … full L0-muon trigger electronics chain being tested Calorimeter for L0 all CAL parts installed; ECAL & HCAL being commissioned, SPD, Prs will follow … L0-CAL trigger tests with realistic configuration in Autumn ‘06 The LHCb Trigger System

The LHCb Trigger System L0 Decision Unit (1/2) Calorimeter total ET in HCAL SPD multiplicity highest- ET candidates: h, e, g, 2 p0‘s Muon system 2 m candidates per each of 4 quadrants Pile-up system total multiplicity # tracks in second peak L0 Decision unit cuts on global event variables thresholds on the ET candidates 1 MHz L0DU report The LHCb Trigger System

The LHCb Trigger System L0 Decision Unit (2/2) Global event variables applied first … ~ 13 ~ 8.3 3 Tracks in 2nd vertex 112 hits Pile-up multiplicity 280 hits SPD multiplicity ~ 7 5.0 GeV S ET Rate (MHz) Cut Global event cuts Redundancy: Sub-triggers overlap … and then cuts on the ET / PT candidates 130 2.6 Photon 110 4.5 po local 150 4.0 po global 280 100 2.8 Electron 700 3.6 Hadron 1.3 Di-muon 160 1.1 Muon Approx. rate (kHz) Threshold (GeV) Trigger Di-muon trigger is special - not subject to the global event selection - PTmm = PTm1 + PTm2 with PTm2 = 0 possible - “tags” clean B-signatures The LHCb Trigger System

The LHCb Trigger System L0 Performance Dedicated sub-triggers most relevant for each « channel type » Bs → Ds p B → pp B → J/Y(mm) Ks B → K* mm B → K* g B → J/Y(ee) Ks 10.6 5.6 c-cbar (%) 3.0 after L0 1.1 b-bbar (%) Generated, visible Event composition The LHCb Trigger System

The LHCb Trigger System High Level Trigger Strategy Independent alleys: Follow the L0 triggered candidate  Muon, Muon + Hadron, Hadron, ECal streams ~2 kHz Partial Reconstruction: A few tracks selected per alley (cuts e.g. on PT, Impact Parameter, mass) full reconstruction done at the end of the alleys Summary Information: decision, type of trigger fired, info on what triggered The LHCb Trigger System

Timing and Fast Control The LHCb Trigger System Trigger Farm FE FE FE Event Filter Farm with ~1800 nodes (estimated from 2005 Real-Time Trigger Challenge) Sub-divided in 50 sub-farms Readout from Level-0 at 1 MHz  50 Gb/s throughput Scalable design  possible upgrade L0 trigger Readout network Timing and Fast Control CPU CPU CPU CPU CPU permanent storage HLT algos CPU time tested on a real farn  will fit in the size of the farm foreseen The LHCb Trigger System

HLT Tracking / Reconstruction The LHCb Trigger System ~ 70 tracks/event after L0 Muon stations: σp/p ~ 20% standalone σp/p ~ 5% matched with VELO tracks VErtex LOcator (VELO): RΦ geometry Standalone muons Trigger Tracker (TT): σp/p ~ 20-40 % (using B-field before magnet) Tracker stations (T): σp/p ~1% Reconstruction strategy Do reconstruction with VELO and select tracks with Impact Parameter Fast measurement of PT (use TT or match VELO tracks with the muon stations) Refine PT measurement (use T stations) The LHCb Trigger System

Hadron Alley - Strategy The LHCb Trigger System Hadron PreTrigger Reconstruct VELO Tracks and Primary Vertices σZ ~ 60 mm, σX,Y ~ 20 mm Select tracks with IP>150μm Measure PT adding hits in Trigger Tracker: σp/p ~ 20-40% L0-Hadron Entry 700 kHz Hadron PreTrigger Hadron Trigger Select tracks with |IP|>100μm Measure PT using Tracking Stations: σp/p ~ 1% Make secondary vertices Hadron Trigger ~4 kHz The LHCb Trigger System

Hadron Alley - Performance The LHCb Trigger System Hadron PreTrigger Single hadron: IP>150μm, PT>2.5 GeV Double hadron :IP>150μm, PT1>1.1 GeV, PT2>0.9 GeV 14% b content Signal efficiency: ~80% for e.g. Bππ, Bs->DsK efficiency Hadron Trigger |IP|>100 μm, PT> 1GeV Make 2 track vertices: Dist. Of Closest Approach < 200 μm vertex “pointing” to PV 48% b content, 17% c content Signal efficiency: ~90% BsDsK, Bππ Preliminary Bs  DsK Bs  ΦΦ Bd  ππ Bd  D*π Bd  DoK* ~4 kHz Rate (kHz) The LHCb Trigger System

The LHCb Trigger System Muon Alley - Strategy Muon PreTrigger Standalone m reconstruction: σp/p ~ 20% VELO tracks reconstruction Primary vertex reconstruction Match VELO tracks and muons: σp/p ~ 5% L0-m Entry ~200 kHz Muon Pre-trigger ~20 kHz Muon Trigger Tracking of VELO track candidates in the downstream T stations: σp/p ~ 1% Refine m identification: match long (VELO-T) tracks and muons Muon Trigger ~1.8 kHz The LHCb Trigger System

Muon Alley – Performance The LHCb Trigger System Muon PreTrigger bμ ~11% Signal efficiency: ~88% ~20 kHz Muon Trigger Single muon PT> 3GeV and IPS> 3 Bm content 60% Dimuon mass >0.5GeV and IP>100mm J/y: mass>2.5GeV (no IP cut!) Signal efficiency: ~87% < 1s of LHCb J/Ψ ~1.8 kHz dimuon mass (MeV) The LHCb Trigger System

The LHCb Trigger System Inclusive Streams Strategy Full tracking reconstruction at a few kHz Select Inclusive streams (e.g. D*,Ds,Φ,…) J/y from B→J/yKS : 17 MeV width D* inclusive stream Clear signal of D*D(K) With very high statistics Useful to calibrate Particle Identification ~250 Hz Muon Inclusive streams Single Muon: enhanced b-sample: B μX 70% B-purity, enables trigger-check on unbiased other B-meson Could be used for studying the tagging performance Dimuon: J/Y, Y(2S), etc. Propertime resolution studies from prompt J/Y events Use narrow mass to study alignment, momentum calibration due to B-field Select a di-muon with no lifetime bias! The LHCb Trigger System

The LHCb Trigger System Exclusive Selections Exclusive selections Use common available reconstructed and selected particles (Ds, D0, K*, Φ,..) Wide B-mass windows (typically ~ 500 MeV) Efficiency: e.g. ~90% for Bππ Bs→Dsp Bs→ DsK 4 tracks ~200 Hz Bs → fg f →KK p, K Bs → ff Ds→KKp Bs → Dsp Off-line B → pp On-line B → pp The LHCb Trigger System

The LHCb Trigger System Outlook LHCb Triggers in good shape Level-0 strategy well defined good performance for B-decays rather flexible, robust, with built-in redundancy production of hardware components well under way commissioning early 2007 HLT strategy details being finalized exploitation of Level-0 triggering information high efficiency for B-decays flexible and robust The LHCb Trigger System