INNOVATIVE POLICIES & INCENTIVES FOR INTERMODAL TRANSPORT

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DG REGIO – Unit "Thematic Development" EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN 1 Transport and Regional Policy Transport and Regional Policy Patrick.
Advertisements

The Connecting Europe Facility
TEN-T Info Day for AP and MAP Calls 2012 Multi-Modality Chris North TEN-T EA Head of Unit T3 – Air and Waterborne Transport, Logistics, Innovation and.
INTERMODADRIA Supporting intermodal transport solutions in the Adriatic area Kick-Off Meeting 7-8 February 2013 MARCHE REGION ROAD SYSTEM AND STATE PROPERTY.
TEN-T R EVIEW AND “C ONNECTING E UROPE F ACILITY ” CPMR PROPOSALS LISBON 6 March 2012.
Transport Investing in Europe's Growth The Trans-European Transport Network and Connecting Europe Facility Lia Potec, Policy Officer European Commission,
Directorate general for Energy and Transport European Commission 2 June 2004 Development of trans-European transport network in the enlarged EU Edgar Thielmann,
7 May, 2015 Green corridors in Europe; a perspective from Holland Menno M. Menist, Managing director 17 March 2010, Malmö.
Alternatives and terminals Measures to promote intermodal transport Subgroup Hans Silborn, Norway Wanda Debauche, Belgium Csaba Orosz, Hungary Jean-Charles.
Logistics 10 February 2012, Brussels Transport The TEN-T core Mediterranean Corridor EU Core Net Cities Barcelona Congress 19 June 2013 Vicenç Pedret Cuscó.
Nedim Begovic, Regional Railway Expert Railway Infrastructure th April 2015, Belgrade SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2015.
Alexio Picco, WiderMos Technical Manager
The Single Market Act: What's in it for Europe's regions and cities? Forum of the Committee of the Regions Brussels, 30 November 2010 Workshop 2: Coming.
LOG 470 Contemporary Issues in Logistics
1 Passenger Traffic Road + 67 % m/s - 7% (60%) Rail + 23% m/s - 2% (8%) Air + 133% m/s =1% (4%) Growth Total 65% ( Int 66%) GDP108% CEC 12 source.
NAPA North Adriatic Ports Association The challenge of the Southern Route The challenge of the Southern Route Zeno D’Agostino President of NAPA and Commissioner.
FREIGHT FORWARDER &INTERMODALITE in Pan-European Region Kayıhan Turan UTIKAD Board Member.
Trans-European Transport Network and the Connecting Europe Facility
TRACECA PROJECT EVALUATION. Mark the location of the project on the map with a plain, black line or dot. Constanta – Vama Veche Motorway section.
Use with Export Practice & Management Fifth Edition by Alan Branch ISBN 1–84480–081–4 © 2006 Alan Branch Chapter 3 Characteristics of international transport.
Transport Sustainable Mobility and Integrated Planning in Urban Areas: Trade Union Dialogue with Local Authorities Day 2: 5th February 2013, SESSION 1:
June 2013 Building the New Silk Road: EBRD transport infrastructure investments in Central Asia Askar Namazbayev, Infrastructure Russia and Central Asia.
Transport Financing transport infrastructure with the Connecting Europe Facility Next steps after the negotiations Matthieu Bertrand DG MOVE, Unit B4 Connecting.
1 Noise and rail What about Belgium ? Martine Serbruyns Federal Public Service Mobility and Transport Brussels - 28 april 2014.
Transport Henrik Drake "Ports and Inland Navigation" European Commission, DG Mobility and Transport (DG MOVE ) Common Issues Meeting on RIS Zagreb, 13.
FINANCING THE EU TRANSPORT POLICY AND TRANS-EUROPEAN NETWORKS. Hugh Rees. BELGRADE APRIL 2012.
THE NEW TRANS-EUROPEAN TRANSPORT NETWORK A CORE NETWORK: BLUEPRINT FOR 2030.
Directorate-general for Energy and Transport European Commission June rd Expert Group Meeting Transport Euro-Asian Linkages Sanna Kuukka.
ASEM SYMPOSIUM on Eurasia Transport and Logistics Network Seoul th September 2015 Hon.Joe Mizzi, Minister for Transport and Infrastructure - Malta.
Transport Enhancing TEN-T funding Pawel Stelmaszczyk Special Envoy for European Mobility Network DG MOVE Warsaw, 18 December 2013.
TRACECA CONSTRUCTION OF INTERMODAL TERMINAL IN THE REGION OF RUSE CITY BULGARIA Infrastructure Working Group Kiev, 11 May 2011.
MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS OF THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA Intermodal transport between Europe and Asia: opportunities and challenges of Latvia.
Transport ERTMS on the EU core network by 2015, 2020, 2030 strategic (pragmatic) approach UIC conference 2014 I. Vandoorne.
Financing of TEN-T projects via INEA
Unit C.2 Maximilian Bauernfeind 23/02/2010 Developing Inland Waterway Transport in the European Union Contributing to a sustainable Transport Network.
Transit infrastructure development: EATL, TEM and TER Projects Artur Bouten Legal officer UNECE TIR secretariat.
JASPERS for CEF Stéphane OUAKI Head Of Unit
Trans-national funding EU budget is ESIF and trans-national Trans-national issue X-border issue Local but shared issue and solution EU-wide competition.
Short term research to support European Transport policy European Transport policypart DG for Energy and Transport DG for Energy and Transport Outline.
TERMINOLOGY on COMBINED, MULTIMODAL and INTERMODAL TRANSPORT November 30 – December 1, 2015 Kayıhan Ö. TURAN UTIKAD.
Conference organized by: Union for the Mediterranean High Level Conference on the financing of the future Trans-Mediterranean Transport Network (TMN-T)
Transport Integration of cross-border transport infrastructure TEN-T strategy on large cross- border cooperation projects Gudrun Schulze, Team leader,
Key factors in the transport policy to encourage better integration Sixty-Third Session of UNECE, Geneva, 30th March 2009 "Economic Integration in the.
C4Freight. Freight Transport Corridors  Objective Demonstrate on key pan-European corridors innovative transport technologies, systems and strategies.
European Commission, Directorate General for Mobility and Transport (DG MOVE) Jose Anselmo – TEN-T Policy Officer Unit B2 – Coordination of TEN-T Priority.
Transport Results of 2014 CEF calls for proposals Stéphane Ouaki, Herald Ruijters, Bernadette Frederick CEF Coordination Committee – Transport, 10 July.
Financing LNG Investments in Energy and Transport
Innovative policies and incentives for intermodal transport in Austria
WHAT IS INTERMODAL TRANSPORT?
Promoting Motorways of the Sea
Feasibility study on infrastructural interventions in Port of Split
Development of the Intermodal Transport in Bulgaria
5th Regional TAF TSI Workshop SK, CZ, HU
European Common policies Prepared by Dr. Endre Domonkos (PhD)
Increasing competitiveness of rail freight undertakings – a business or political game? Jürgen Maier-Gyomlay Head International Affairs & Projects
Presentation by: Marios Miltiadou Greek Ministry of Transport
Baltic-Adriatic Corridor
Investing in infrastructure The Connecting Europe Facility
Hearing in the European Parliament Brussels, 13 October 2015
Smart & green mobility Workshop CEF Transport
Projects is financed By South Baltic Cross-border
Item 7 “Intermodal transport statistics” November 2013
Promoting a sustainable transport policy
The role of governments in Terminal - Hinterland transport
Marco Polo – Towards a policy revision
SECURITY MANAGEMENT ESPORG EXPERT Round Table
Prof. dr hab. Bogusław Liberadzki,
COORDINATING GROUP FOR STATISTICS ON TRANSPORT (CGST)
The role of governments in Terminal - Hinterland transport
Infrastructure investments – source of future well-being
Presentation transcript:

INNOVATIVE POLICIES & INCENTIVES FOR INTERMODAL TRANSPORT Kayıhan Ö. TURAN UTIKAD TURKEY October 31 – November 1, 2016

UTIKAD UTIKAD Association of International Forwarding and Logistics Service Providers National and International Transportation: Road, Air, Sea, Rail and Combined Transportation Logistics Services Above 400 Members & 50,000 Direct Employment & 5 USD Billion Turnover 95 % of Air Transport 70 % of Road Transport 60 % of Sea Transport 20 % of Rail Transport carried out by our members in Turkey

UTIKAD ‘’The Umbrella Organization for the Transportation and Logistics Industry’’ Presence & Organizations Projects & Cooperations Training & Publications Social Responsibilities

NATIONAL & INTERNATIONAL PLATFORMS VOICE OF INDUSTRY IN TURKEY VOICE OF INDUSTRY IN THE WORLD

International Organizations By UTIKAD PRESENCE & ORGANIZATIONS Voice of Industry Abroad with 6 Institutions FIATA, CLECAT, UNECE, ECOLPAF, TRACECA, SEESARI Founding Member of ECOLPAF & SEESARI Working Groups of 7 Sectoral Divisions Hosted 4 International Organizations International Organizations By UTIKAD 1999 2002 2011 2014 Balkan Congress FIATA World Congress 10. Southeast European Freight Forwarders & Logistics Operators Congress FIATA World Congress

From 95 Countries, 1039 Participants came together FIATA WORLD CONGRESS 2014 ISTANBUL From 95 Countries, 1039 Participants came together 15 Meetings 35 Speakers 1055 Networking Meetings 43 Exhibitors Italy Gana U.S.A India Malaysia Taiwan Nigeria Ukraine U.A.E. Belgium MAIN SPONSOR PLATIN SPONSOR PLATIN SPONSOR MAIN MEDIA SPONSOR BRONZE SPONSOR SILVER SPONSOR YIFFYA SPONSOR MEDIA SPONSORS

Publications By UTIKAD TRAINING & PUBLICATIONS FIATA Diploma in Freight Forwarding / with 25 graduate end of 1st year June - 2016 Self Improvement and Vocational Trainings Ahmet Kartal Annual Achievement Award 9 Educational Books & 2 Special Report UTIKAD Library of 368 Books Publications By UTIKAD

INNOVATIONS - I ONE OF THE MAIN TARGET OF INTERMODALIZZATION IS TO MINIMIZE TOTAL LOGISTICS COSTS TO DO SO, WE HAVE TO CARRY MORE ITUs ON RAIL WAGONS SO WHY NOT TO CARRY 2 STACK CONTAINERS ON WAGON ESPECIALLY ON ROUTES BETWEEN SEA PORTS & DRY PORTS / TERMINALS USA SINCE 1984 AUSTRALIA, CHINA, INDIA, PAKISTAN, PANAMA S. ARABIA

INNOVATIONS - II ONE OF THE MAIN TARGET OF INTERMODAL TARGET IS TO MINIMIZE TOTAL LOGISTICS COSTS TO DO SO, WE HAVE TO MINIMIZE INLAND HAULAGE COSTS FOR PRE/FINAL INLAND HAULAGE SO WHY NOT TO CARRY 2 ITUs BY ONE TRUCK LIKE SEMI TRAILERS ON ROAD

INNOVATIONS - II 2 CONTAINERS BY ONE TRUCK

INNOVATIONS - II 1x20 CONTAINER + 1 SWAP BODY BY ONE TRUCK

INNOVATIONS - II 3x30 CONTAINER BY ONE TRUCK

TECHNICAL STUDIES SHOULD BE DONE ON SUCH VEHICLES REGULATIONS EACH COUNTRY SHOULD CHECK THE LIMITS OF LENGTH & TOTAL WEIGHT OF SUCH VEHICLES ON ROADS & DECIDE ACCESSABLE ROUTES TECHNICAL STUDIES SHOULD BE DONE ON SUCH VEHICLES

1ST PROGRAME WAS «PACT» // 1997 – 2001 TOTAL BUDGET WAS € 5 MILLION INCENTIVES - I 1ST PROGRAME WAS «PACT» // 1997 – 2001 TOTAL BUDGET WAS € 5 MILLION %30 OF PROJECTS WERE FUNDED

2ND PROGRAME WAS «MARCO POLO» MP1 // 2003 – 2006 - €102 INCENTIVES - I 2ND PROGRAME WAS «MARCO POLO» MP1 // 2003 – 2006 - €102 MP2 // 2007 - 2013 - €450 TOTAL BUDGET WAS € 552 MILLION

* 125 Projects over 500 companies received fund INCENTIVES - I «MARCO POLO» MP1 // 2003 – 2006 * 125 Projects over 500 companies received fund %79 modal shift actions from road to other modes %9 common learning actions %8 catalyst actions %2 traffic avoidance Projects %2 motorways of sea projects

MP I MAX 44.5 – MİN 8.4

MP II // 2007 – 2011 5 YEARS RESULTS

INCENTIVES - I FUNDED SAMPLE PROJECTS 2003 / ANTWERP PORT -> INLAND TERMINAL / € 1.73 MİLLİON 2004 / GERMANY -> HUNGARY / € 3.07 MILLION 2005 / FRANCE GOLBEY -> BARSELONA/TARRAGONA / € 1.79 MILLION 2006 / NETHERLAND -> HUNGARY / € 1.11 MILLION 2009 / NORWAY -> BENELUX / € 4.32 MILLION 2010 / PONEZIA -> ZEEBRUDGE / € 2.91 MILLION 2012 / ROTTERDAM -> WARSOWA / € 4.94 MILLION 2013 / NORWAY/DENMARK -> NORTH FRANCE / € 3.39 MILLION

INCENTIVES – I – OTHER PROGRAMMES A core transport network on nine major corridors: 2 North–South corridors 3 East–West corridors 4 diagonal corridors The core network is to be completed by 2030

INCENTIVES – I – OTHER PROGRAMMES The Projects of the TEN-T Programme cover all transport modes – air, rail, road and waterborne ( maritime / inland waterways ) plus logistics and intelligent transport systems and involve all EU Member States. EU Funding for TEN-T At EU level, two sets of funding instruments make financial support available to projects implementing the TEN-T: 1.Connecting Europe Facility 2.CohesionFund & European Regional Development Fund .

INCENTIVES – I – OTHER PROGRAMMES

INCENTIVES – I – OTHER PROGRAMMES From the start, the TEN-T Guidelines included priority Projects. Those projects having particular importance and of a significant size. They were extended at the time of the EU’s 2004 enlargement to reflect Europe’s changed geographical space. Priority projects are now 30 in number and occupy a central position in EU initiatives

INCENTIVES – I – OTHER PROGRAMMES The Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) for Transport is the funding instrument to realise European transport infrastructure policy. It aims at supporting investments in building new transport infrastructure in Europe or rehabilitating and upgrading the existing one. CEF Transport focuses on cross-border projects and projects aiming at removing bottlenecks or bridging missing links in various sections of the Core Network and on the Comprehensive Network (link), as well as for horizontal priorities such as traffic management systems.   CEF Transport also supports innovation in the transport system in order to improve the use of infrastructure, reduce the environmental impact of transport, enhance energy efficiency and increase safety. Total budget for CEF Transport is €24.05 billion for period 2014-2020 2016 TRANSPORT CALLS & 16 OCT 16 & 7 FEB 17 TOTAL € 1.9 BILLION OF FUNDING

INCENTIVES – I – OTHER PROGRAMMES MED ATLANTIC ECOBONUS AIMING FOR MODAL SHIFT BY PROMOTING THE USE OF SEA-BASED ALTERNATIVE ROUTES & REDUCE ROAD CONGESTION ECONOMIC INCENTIVE TO ROAD HAULIERS & SHIP OWNERS COVERING UPTO %30 OPS COST, NO LONGER THAN 3 YEARS

INCENTIVES – I – OTHER PROGRAMMES HORIZON 2020

ROAD HAULIERS / SHIP OWNERS / RAIL OPERATORS INCENTIVES - I MAIN QUESTION ? WHO RECEIVED THE FUNDS? ROAD HAULIERS / SHIP OWNERS / RAIL OPERATORS IMPORTANT QUESTION ? DID PROJECTS WENT ON AFTER FUNDING WAS OVER?

INCENTIVES - I ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION IS IN «Evaluation of the Marco Polo Programme, 2003-2010, Final Report ITEM 1.32 Of 32 respondents to a survey question on the legacy of projects financed under the Marco Polo programme, 23 (i.e. 72 per cent) stated that the projects would continue (for Marco Polo II) and have continued (for Marco Polo I) following the end of the Grant Agreement of Marco Polo.

INCENTIVES - I ITEM 4.72 Of those projects that will not continue (or have not continued) once Marco Polo funds are no longer available, the most common explanation was that the project was no longer financially viable. Other comments included that the service is of general interest and requires public support in the long run (response for one common learning action); that the project was terminated due to economic hardships in the industry; and that it is too early to tell at this stage whether or not the project will continue. ITEM 4.73 The majority of respondents that stated that the project will (or did) continue further stated that the project would not change in nature when Marco Polo funds are no longer available. Ten of the 28 respondents to this question stated that the project will (or did) change in nature and the most common explanation was that a change in location of market means a change in the route.

INCENTIVES - II THE FUTURE OF INTERMODAL TRANSPORT END USERS / NOT ONLY SERVICE PROVIDERS SO FUTURE IN THE HANDS OF SHIPPER & CONSIGNEE FINALLY THESE 2 PARTIES SHOULD BE ATTRACTED HOW ? BY ECONOMICAL INCENTIVES IF THEY PREFER TO USE INTERMODAL TRANSPORT I / O ROAD TRANSPORT

Thank You Kayıhan Ö. Turan UTIKAD