Dr. Hatem Elaydi Digital Control, EELE 4360 Dec. 16, 2014

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Design with Root Locus Lecture 9.
Advertisements

Feedback Control Systems Dr. Basil Hamed Electrical & Computer Engineering Islamic University of Gaza.
Lect.7 Steady State Error Basil Hamed
Loop Shaping Professor Walter W. Olson
Feedback Control Systems
Modern Control Systems (MCS)
Lect. 5 Lead-Lag Control Basil Hamed
Design of Control Systems Cascade Root Locus Design This is the first lecture devoted to the control system design. In the previous lectures we laid the.
PID Control and Root Locus Method
f(t) m x(t) fd(t) LINEAR CONTROL C (Ns/m) k (N/m)
2-1 (a),(b) (pp.50) Problem: Prove that the systems shown in Fig. (a) and Fig. (b) are similar.(that is, the format of differential equation is similar).
INC341 Design with Root Locus
Professor Walter W. Olson Department of Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering University of Toledo Loop Shaping.
INC341 Design Using Graphical Tool (continue)
Modern Control System EKT 308
MESB374 System Modeling and Analysis PID Controller Design
Modern Control System EKT 308 Root Locus and PID controllers.
Chapter 6 Root-Locus Analysis 6.1 Introduction - In some systems simple gain adjustment may move the closed- loop poles to desired locations. Then the.
Exercise 1 (Root Locus) Sketch the root locus for the system shown in Figure K 1 (
Stability Analysis . A system is BIBO stable if all poles or roots of
Dr. Hatem Elaydi EE Department, Islamic University of Gaza Feb 18, 2012.
Automatic Control Theory School of Automation NWPU Teaching Group of Automatic Control Theory.
Modern Control Systems (MCS) Dr. Imtiaz Hussain Assistant Professor URL :
Professor Walter W. Olson Department of Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering University of Toledo Lecture 27a: Problem Session.
TUTORIAL EKT 308 Computer Network. Question 1 1. a) Differentiate between open loop and closed loop control systems. b) Explain positive features of feedback.
SKEE 3143 Control Systems Design Chapter 2 – PID Controllers Design
Lecture 11/12 Analysis and design in the time domain using root locus North China Electric Power University Sun Hairong.
Lecture 9\10 Analysis in the time domain (III) North China Electric Power University Sun Hairong.
Feedback Control Systems (FCS) Dr. Imtiaz Hussain URL :
Exercise 1 Suppose we have a simple mass, spring, and damper problem. Find The modeling equation of this system (F input, x output). The transfer function.
Page : PID Controller Chapter 3 Design of Discrete- Time control systems PID C ontroller.
Salman Bin Abdulaziz University
Control Systems EE 4314 Lecture 12 March 17, 2015
Chapter 7 The Root Locus Method The root-locus method is a powerful tool for designing and analyzing feedback control systems The Root Locus Concept The.
Chapter 5 Root Locus.
Design via Root Locus (Textbook Ch.9).
Lecture 20: Root Locus for Design
Lec 14. PID Controller Design
Examples on Compensator Design Spring 2011
Modern Control Systems (MCS)
PID Controller.
LINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS
Basic Design of PID Controller
University of Virginia
Chapter 9 Design via Root Locus <<<4.1>>>
Chapter 9 Design via Root Locus <<<4.1>>>
What damping ratio range do we typically want?___0.4~1____
Root-locus Technique for Control Design
Modern Control Systems (MCS)
Digital Control Systems (DCS)
Feedback: Principles & Analysis
LAG LEAD COMPENSATOR.
Root Loci Analysis (3): Root Locus Approach to Control System Design
Frequency Response Techniques
Compensators.
HW-03 Problem Kuo-95 (p. 377) Find the steady-state errors for step, ramp and parabolic inputs. Determine the type of the system. ) s ( R Problem.
Frequency Response Techniques
Nyquist Stability Criterion
Figure Contributions of characteristic equation roots to closed-loop response.
Root Locus Techniques CH 8: Islamic University of Gaza
ECE 576 POWER SYSTEM DYNAMICS AND STABILITY
Root-Locus Analysis (2)
Design via Root Locus Techniques
Root Locus Techniques CH 8: Islamic University of Gaza
Modern Control Systems (MCS)
CH. 6 Root Locus Chapter6. Root Locus.
HOMEWORK-03 Problem Kuo-95 (p. 377)
Frequency Response Techniques
IntroductionLecture 1: Basic Ideas & Terminology
IntroductionLecture 1: Basic Ideas & Terminology
Presentation transcript:

Dr. Hatem Elaydi Digital Control, EELE 4360 Dec. 16, 2014 Islamic University of gaza electrical engineering department Control design Dr. Hatem Elaydi Digital Control, EELE 4360 Dec. 16, 2014

Lead Or Phase-lead Compensator Using Root Locus  C(s) can be designed using the root locus. A lead compensator in root locus form where the magnitude of z0 is less than the magnitude of p0

 Root Locus Based Controller Design Using MATAB Design a digital controller such that the closed loop system has zero steady state error to step input with a reasonable dynamic performance. Velocity error constant of the system should at least be 5.

Root locus of the uncompensated system

Pole zero map of the uncompensated system

One of the design criteria is that the closed loop system should have a zero steady state error for unit step input. Thus a PI controller is required  Let us take Ki = 1. With Ki = 1 , the characteristic equation becomes

Root locus of the system with PI controller The zeros of the system are 1 and - 0.9048 and the poles of the system are 1.0114 ± 0.1663 i and 0.7013 respectively.

It is clear from the figure that the system is stable for a very small range of Kp.

The figure shows that the stable range of Kp is 0. 239 < Kp < 6 The figure shows that the stable range of Kp is 0.239 < Kp < 6.31 . The best achievable overshoot is 45.5% , for Kp = 1 , which is very high for any practical system. To satisfy velocity error constant, Ki ≥ 1. If we assume 15% overshoot (corresponding to and 2 sec settling time (corresponding to the desired dominant poles can be calculated as, Thus the closed loop poles in z-plane

Pole zero map including poles of the PID controller

Let us denote the angle contribution starting from the zero to the right most pole as θ1, θ2 , θ3 , θ4and θ5 respectively. The angles can be calculated as θ1 = 9.5° , θ2 = 20° , θ3 = 99.9° , θ4 =115.7° and θ5 = 129.4°.  Net angle contribution is A = 9.5° - 20° - 99.9° - 115.7° - 129.4° = -355.5° . Angle deficiency is - 355.5° + 180° = - 175.5°  Thus the two zeros of PID controller must provide an angle of 175.5°. Let us place the two zeros at the same location, zpid .  Since the required angle by individual zero is 87.75° , we can easily say that the zeros must lie on the left of the desired closed loop pole. 

The controller is then written as This figure shows that the desired closed loop pole corresponds to K = 4.33 .