WG1 Report Osiris Lander delivery Support and Science activities during Comet approach.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Texas Department of Information Resources Presents

Advertisements

Grant Writing Creating a toolbox for raising capital.

Solar System Division DVK, 10 Jul 2001 Rosetta Science Operations The planning concept - current status Detlef Koschny Space Science Department ESA/ESTEC.

$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300.

Philae Science Team Meeting Venice, 30 Mar. – 1 Apr Rita Schulz - Rosetta - Mission Status.

Dr. Barbara M. Wheeling Associate Professor College of Business Director of Accreditation and Assessment MSUB Coordinator of Institutional Assessment.

IceBridge Program Overview Tom Wagner IceBridge Program Scientist.

Science Operations Plan NGAO - Meeting 10 D. Le Mignant W. M. Keck Observatory 09/17/2007.

Phase Difference = Phase Difference = 0.05.

Spacecraft working group report SuperDARN workshop 2011 Rob Fear, Jim Wild & the spacecraft working group.

Chandra X-Ray Observatory CXC ACIS Ops team October 17, ACIS Changes Starting in Cycle 8 1) Selection of Optional CCDs 2) Revised Energy-to-PH conversion.

Project Prioritization Process ASPCC Update December 14, 2005.

S chool I mprovement P lan A Living Document of School Growth.

Field Project Planning, Operations and Data Services Jim Moore, EOL Field Project Services (FPS) Mike Daniels, EOL Computing, Data and Software (CDS) Facility.

NASA’s Earth Science Division Flight Overview Bradley D. Doorn Program Manager Earth Science Division, Science Mission Directorate PECORA 18.

General strategy. Introduction Global “financial crisis” Beginning to cascade into GBIF Now thinking about the forward strategy and next work programme.

$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300.

…to advocate with legislators! Priorities: – Funding at School Finance Formula Level Give us our $15 million back! Governor’s Budget continued last year’s…

Arizona Early Intervention Program IDEA 2011 Requirements -Screening-

RECITE A PRAYER…(15 SECONDS). ATM TOPIC 1. INTRODUCTION TO AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT,TYPE OF CONTROL AREAS & FLIGHT PLAN 2. AERODROME CONTROL 3. AREA CONTROL.

SOWG # 6, 20/01/2015 ESAC Agenda  Finalization of the service 20 specifications  Test plans for the service20 at spacecraft level  Instruments.

World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water WMO OMM WMO WMO STRATEGIC PLAN Timelines and expectations.

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Records Appraisal Tool Presented at the Ensuring the Long-Term.

Solar System Division DVK, 10 Jul 2001 Rosetta Science Operations Experimenter to RSOC interfaces Detlef Koschny Space Science Department ESA/ESTEC

UCAR Office of Programs University Corporation for Atmospheric Research Overview of NAME Field Catalog NAME Special Session José Meitín NAME Project Office.

Next-day Study Task Force Jason Ausmus NDSTF Chair W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.

WEEK 6 Introduction to Project Management. Agenda Phase 4: Controlling.

NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory Payload Operations and Integration Function Overview Payload Operations.

Creation of the Archiving Component of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Template for International Missions IPDA MOU project members.

By Manish Shrotriya CSE MS Spiral Model of Software development Boehm 1988.

Planetary Missions Division Miguel Almeida David Frew Mehran Sarkarati RSSD/STOC A Comparison of Two Science Operations Planning Concepts Decentralized.

WG 2/3 Splinter meeting Dec. 6, 2010 ESOC Darmstadt for WG2 & WG3: D. Bockelée-Morvan C. Engrand E. Grün H. Krueger.

Working Group II Terms of Reference Presented to CGMS Plenary and Working Group II CGMS-44 CGMS-WP-30.

Payload Integration POIWG July 2015 Ana L. Lopez

Mission Planning Concepts

Rosetta Science Working Team Meeting #26 Working Group #1

OSIRIS Full Team Meeting Welcome, Introduction, Agenda

19 May 2010, ESOC Eberhard Grün and Harald Krüger

RSOC Overview at SWT #26, 11/12 June 2009

Test Executive Trades (1)

ROSETTA SWT 27th ESOC, 2-4 December 2009

Dear Andrea, Regarding the discussion at the closed SWT, we would like to pose the following question to flight dynamics to clarify the situation on lander.

Pre-landing Orbiter Observations

Observatory Control System

I&T&C Organization Chart

OSIRIS Coma WG report Hans Rickman.

Post-Operation Status: Archiving, Calibration & Science

Summary of the science planned per mission phase

Detlef Koschny Research and Scientific Support Department ESA/ESTEC

OSIRIS Full Team Meeting

GLAST Large Area Telescope:

WG – Chemistry – mineralogy elemental

Programme Board 6th Meeting May 2017 Craig Larlee

Post Trip Inspection (Delivery)

Philae status 21st Rosetta Science Team meeting

WMO WIGOS is an all-encompassing, holistic approach to the improvement and evolution of the present WMO global observing systems into … (the next slide)

Data Collection Learning Objectives

Jim Aloise System Programmer

Recent activities of OCR-VC

GFOI Plenary Breakout Groups: GFOI priorities

Helping Active Missions Convert to PDS4

OSIRIS-REx: The Origins, Spectral Interpretation, Resource Identification, Security, Regolith Explorer is a.

RIS3 of North-West Development Region (RO)

Composition of eXTP mission

Before Training Request to LL LL Does Needs Analysis

PDS4 Geometry Model Project

Overview of Program Review Categories

Integration & Test Instrument Operations Coordination

What are the constraints Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Trial 4

Presentation transcript:

WG1 Report Osiris Lander delivery Support and Science activities during Comet approach

WG1 Report WG1 considered as forum to collect/coordinate activities up to Lander Delivery This phase is under control of MOC Top priority is to ensure safe arrival at the comet and delivery of the Lander All Science is considered a “Bonus” Last part of the mission with global view on the Comet (and its Coma)! → Advantage if Science is aligned with Lander delivery support

WG1 Report WG1/MOC requested a revision-controlled document from each instrument in which Lander support and Science activities are collected → RO-RIS-MPAE-TN-062 Shall be a container for science “wish-list” in order to keep in sync with the flight-ops driven part of the prime mission

WG1 Report The idea is to build a list of observations before lander delivery, including constraints like - Distance to the Comet - Phase angle requirements - Data budget - Pointing requirements - Coordinated observations with other Instruments - etc. Important to start the collection as early as possible!