PREMARKET EVALUATION OF THE BD MAXTM CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE PCE ASSAY

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
John Harrison, Michelle Garassi, Sara Wierzbicki, William LeBar Hospital Consolidated Laboratories-Providence Hospital, Southfield, MI, Evaluation of the.
Advertisements

Number of specimens tested
By Gracie Canales August 10, 2010
Target Curves (FAM) Corresponding competitive Internal Control curves (TxRed) [40 copies/qPCR] No Input Control (NIC) DNA polymerase extension reagents.
Molecular Laboratory Design
Validating 16 Member Pooled APTIMA® HIV-1 RNA testing Ethridge Steven F, Sullivan T, Bennett B, Parker M, Hanson D, Hilliard J, Hart C, Patel P Diagnostic.
Multi-Clean Clostridium Difficile INTRODUCTION At times, special sanitation procedures may be implemented when directed by Hospital Infection Control Personnel.
 Molecular Laboratory must have an ongoing Bio-safety SOP and also quality improvement program to monitor and evaluate objectively and systematically.
Amplification and Detection of Nucleic Acid by the Real-Time RT-PCR Procedure Janice C. Pedersen, Microbiologist Avian Section Diagnostic Virology Laboratory.
Results Interpretation and Database Management
Joan Cid, Núria Nogués, Rosa Montero, Marta Hurtado, Albert Briega and Rafael Parra. Blood and Tissue Bank. Barcelona, Spain. Comparison of three microtube.
Real-time PCR automated solution for food pathogen testing
Results Bacteria were detected at 10 3 cells/g in un-injected controls, but none were Salmonella sp. Salmonella recovery from injected controls exceeded.
Cat # SL Store at 4 0 C GenJet Plus In Vitro DNA Transfection Reagent A Protocol for generation of Lentivirus from 293T cell 100 l 500 l.
Vesicle-Mediated Transfer of Antibiotic Resistance Between Klebsiella pneumoniae and Serratia marcescens Ondraya Espenshade Department of Biological Sciences,
CE MARKING OF IVDDs - the NIBSC perspective Morag Ferguson Division of Virology.
Validating the Micro PRO™ Technology. Overview of Today’s Presentation Validation Resources Micro PRO™ Applications and Corresponding Validation Parameters.
C. Elegans Unit: Lab Activities
Point of Care Testing – Clostridium difficle Amita Patel Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust.
Julia Robbins August 11, Objectives Clinical Significance of MRSA in Healthcare Setting Principle of assay Assay Procedure Assay Perfomance.
CURRENT STATUS Consultant Microbiologist with additional responsibilities of Head of The Department and Director of National Leptospirosis Reference Unit.
HCV PCR By Henrietta Orji July 31 st, 2010 Hepatitis C Virus by Polymerase Chain Reaction.
Laboratory Procedure for bacterial transformation with pGLO It’s glowing.
Cat # SL Store at 4 0 C PolyJet In Vitro DNA Transfection Reagent A Protocol for Transfections of Mammalian Cell 100 l 500 l 1000 l
Susceptibility (Sensitivity) Testing: Results Pharmaceutical Microbiology – Practical Course Semester One_ Sensitivity Results & MIC Broth Dilution/
HRM REAL TIME PCR Presented by: Dadkhah Fahimeh SNP genotyping by HRM REAL TIME PCR.
The Factor II (Prothrombin) G20210A Detection and Genotyping
Dengue fever caused by dengue virus (DENV), a member of Flaviviridae leads to large global disease burden. Detection of immunoglobulin M (IgM) and nucleic.
Workshop on conformity assessment procedures and certification of medical devices INT MARKT Kyiv, November 2011 In Vitro Diagnostic Directive.
CONCLUSIONS Amended Abstract Detection of GBS Directly from ESwab Collected Samples Using the BD MAX™ GBS Assay Suzane Silbert, Talita T. Rocchetti, Alicia.
COMPARISON OF LABORATORY DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURES FOR DETECTION OF MYCOPLASMA PNEUMONIAE IN COMMUNITY OUTBREAKS KATHLEEN A. THURMAN, NICHOLAS D. WALTER, STEPHANIE.
Lab # 1. Antimicrobial Therapy  Natural antibiotic agents:  Produced by microorganisms:  Penicillium notatum – penicillin  Semi-synthetic antibiotic.
15283 New Sensitive and Specific Rapid HSV-2 Antibody Test Objective To describe the performance and uses of a new HSV-2 specific serological rapid test,
Title of the Change Project
Comparison of the Focus Diagnostics Simplexa™ Flu A/B & RSV Direct Assay with the Prodesse® ProFlu™ + Assay for Detection of Influenza A Virus (FluA),
Cepheid Symposium IAS 2017 Gwynn Stevens, PhD Director of Virology
One-Stage Quantitative
Development of a Novel Antibody-Based Assay for Simultaneous Identification of a Pathogen and Determination of its Antimicrobial Susceptibility Jonathan.
An Introduction to Microvolumetrics and Pipetting
The study was supported by the Hellenic Copper Development Institute
Evaluation of Various Laboratory Methods for the Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection Yousun Chung1, Ji Yeon Sung1, Ho Eun Chang2, Soon Hee Choi2,
Table 5 Characteristics of 12 patients who had 1 test of stool samples that yielded positive results in the prospective clinical assessment for investigation.
HCV by PCR Neelam Gajjar 7/26/2009.
Objectives Methods Results Conclusions Contact 64
General Approach of Haemostasis
Field Testing of OMNI-gene TB Sputum Optimizer in Malawi
A Question of Stability. Stability of GC and CT nucleic acids in Urine
Impact of the Type of Diagnostic Assay on Clostridium difficile Infection and Complication Rates in a Mandatory Reporting Program Yves Longtin, Sylvie.
Evaluation of the BD MAX™ MRSA XT Assay in a Clinical Laboratory
College of Veterinary Medicine
Discussion and Conclusions
General Approach in Investigation of Hemostasis
2011 American Society for Microbiology Meeting
Hospital acquired infections
ASM 2017 Microbe Annual Meeting Sunday-507
1Department of Esoteric Testing/R&D, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL
D th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy October 25-28, Washington, DC Evaluation of a Rapid PBP2’ Agglutination.
Detection of bacteria in blood products
Mammalian Cell l 500 l l Gaither Drive Gaithersburg, MD 20877
Title Detection of HLA-B*58:01 with TaqMan assay and its association with allopurinol-induced sCADR.
AQT90 FLEX – the product 28/11/2018.
Antibiogram By:Dr. S. S. Khoramrooz In the name of God
Laboratory Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection
Antibiotics AMANY NIAZY
Application of Isothermal Helicase-Dependent Amplification with a Disposable Detection Device in a Simple Sensitive Stool Test for Toxigenic Clostridium.
Quality Control Barbara Weberman MT(ASCP)
Antibiotics AMANY NIAZY
Scottish One Health Antimicrobial Use and Resistance in 2017 Annual Report
Challenges for Blood Donor Confirmatory Testing Algorithms
Analytical Validation of a Highly Sensitive, Multiplexed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Monitoring System Targeting BCR-ABL1 RNA  Justin T. Brown, Ion J. Beldorth,
Presentation transcript:

PREMARKET EVALUATION OF THE BD MAXTM CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE PCE ASSAY Raymond Widen, Carly Kubasek, Dominic Uy, John Markantonis and Suzane Silbert Department of Esoteric Testing/R&D, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL 2013 CVS Annual Meeting T50 Table 3. Analytical sensitivity. Tested using dilutions of a positive sample comparing LOD for GeneXpert and BD MAXTM C. difficile PCR BD MAXTM Instrument Operation Results Abstract Materials and Methods Background: C. difficile is problematic in health care institutions as an iatrogenic infection relating to overgrowth of the organism following antimicrobial therapy and as a potential nosocomially transmitted agent due to contamination of surfaces with bacterial spores. The BD MAXTM is a relatively new sample in answer out system for PCR testing that can be used with FDA cleared IVD assays and for laboratory developed tests (LDT). Objectives: To evaluate the performance of the RUO BD MAXTM Clostridium difficile toxin B PCR assay on the BD MAX instrument. Methods: For this study we evaluated a combination of residual refrigerated/frozen and fresh stool samples submitted for C. difficile toxin detection using the Genexpert C. difficile assay which was our test of record at TGH. A total of 137 samples were tested with both assays using the methods described in the manufacturer’s kit instructions. Results: We found excellent overall agreement between the Genexpert and BD MAXTM assays for C.difficile toxin B. 95 samples were negative with both methods, 37 were positive with both methods, 4 were positive with Genexpert only and 1 was positive only on the BD MAXTM. The 4 Genexpert positive/BD MAXTM negative samples had been refrigerated and then frozen for several months and all had high Ct values on initial testing (cycles 34 and higher). The sample that was positive by BD MAXTM/Genexpert was a fresh sample with Ct 36 on the BD MAXTM. The BD MAXTM RUO was tested with a panel of agents commonly associated with diarrhea and was found to demonstrate no reactivity with any of these agents. Conclusions: The results suggest that the BD MAXTM C. difficile toxin PCR will represent a sensitive and specific alternative for detection of C. difficile infection once it receives FDA IVD clearance. One manual pipetting step – use 10µL loop to transfer stool sample to a specimen tube Table 1. Evaluation of C. difficile toxin B gene detection by Genexpert and BD MAXTM PCR assays Results BD MAXTM Dilution GeneXpert BD MAXTM Undiluted Positive 1/10 1/100 1/1,000 1/10,000 1/100,000 Negative 1/1,000,000 Positive Negative 37 4 1 95 Xpert C. difficile Load reagents and specimens onto the BD MAXTM rack CONCLUSIONS Table 2. Specificity challenge results. Each of the agents in the table below was prepared in specificity challenge mixes and tested with the BD MAXTM C. difficile PCR assay. Create worklist The BD MAXTM C. difficile toxin B gene PCR assay was compared with the Cepheid GeneXpert toxin B PCR. Both assays had similar performance in detecting C. difficile toxin B genes in stool samples. There were 4 samples positive with the GeneXpert and negative with the BD MAXTM. These 4 samples had been frozen and thawed and all had cycle numbers on the GeneXpert at 35 or higher. The sample that was positive on the BD MAXTM was a fresh sample and was positive at 37 cycles. 3. The BD MAXTM assay was challenged with organisms likely to be in samples referred for testing for C. difficile. No cross reactivity was observed with any of the challenge organisms, including other Clostridium species. 4. The BD MAXTM represents an effective option for detection of C. difficile with good sensitivity and specificity. We tested the system as an RUO premarket study. It is now FDA cleared as an in vitro diagnostic test. The system allows for simple sample in – answer out processing of up to 24 samples in about 2 hours. Organism ATCC # BD MAX E. coli 35218 NEG E. faecium pt isolate Specificity 1 E. cloacae 13047 E. faecalis 51299 S. marcescens 8100 K. pneumoniae 700603 C. albicans 10321 Ps. aeruginosa 27853 Specificity 2 B. fragilis 23765 S. aureus 977 S. epidermidis 14990 S. sonnei 25931 S. Enteritica 6539 Specificity 3 V. Parahemolyticus 17802 C. jejuni 33291 Adenovirus 41 VR-930 Coxsackie A15 and Echovirus 27 VR-104 VR -1069 NEG NEG Specificity 4 L. monocytogenes C. perfringens, C. sordelii C. sporogenes 13124 9714 3584 NEG NEG NEG Place racks and cartridges on BD MAXTM 1 loose/liquid stool container was received for C. difficile PCR testing by the current standard of care procedure – Cepheid GeneXpert C. difficile. The sample was processed according to package insert instructions. The BD MAXTM C. difficile assay was performed as follows: The residual stool sample was retrieved. Using a 10µL loop the sample was mixed and then transferred to a labeled BD MAXTM sample prep tube. This was repeated for each sample to be tested. The BD MAXTM sample prep tube was vortexed on a multiposition vortex mixer for 60 seconds. The sample prep tubes were transferred to the BD MAX carriers and an extraction cartridge was placed in the rack for each sample. The reagent tube was placed into the processing strip. The entire assembly was placed in the BD MAXTM instrument along with BD MAXTM PCR reaction cards. Sample identification was loaded into the BD MAXTM software and the run started. Close door to initiate run then release results through LIS interface