Proposed Space Utilization Strategy (DRAFT)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Postsecondary Budget Recommendation December 18,
Advertisements

Campus Master Plan 2012 Update University Senate November 6,
Thompson Rivers University Operating Budget 2012– 2013 Senate Presentation April 2012.
Presented by Executive Director of Facilities Management Chuck Scott.
See the Present… Know the Future…. RECAPP ® Markets Telecom Facilities Municipalities Government Transportation.
University of South Carolina FY Preliminary Budget Board of Trustees Executive Committee June 8, 2007.
University of South Carolina FY Budget Board of Trustees June 28, 2007.
1 Board of Trustees FY 2009 Budget Presentation F. John Case, Ed. D. May 19, 2008.
Manage the Facility Condition Index (FCI)
OPEN – FIN – INFO 2-42 June 13-14, 2013 OPEN – FIN – INFO 2-42 June 13-14, 2013 FY2015 Preliminary State Capital Appropriations Request and Campus Capital.
Managing the Facilities Asset Portfolio Prepared for the Tuition Policy Advisory Committee by The University of Texas Physical Plant September 10, 2003.
Faculty Senate Updated: May 7, 2008 American University Vice President of Finance and Treasurer.
State Legislative Update Faculty Senate April 3, 2013.
Office of Facilities Deferred Maintenance UTSA Strategic Resource Planning Council Deferred Maintenance UTSA Strategic Resource Planning Council March.
Facilities Maintenance Status Report John Ozurovich, Director Facilities – Saddleback College John Edwards, Director Facilities – Irvine Valley College.
Financial Skills. Objectives 1.Business strategy 2.Budget strategy 3.Calculations 4.Practice.
1 Fall 2008 and Fall 2009 Parking Permit Fee Proposal February 2008.
FY13 Student Tuition Consultation SFMC – March 22,
Budget Basics An Overview of the South Seattle Community College Budget Presented to College Council November 18, 2003.
June 18, 2009June Regular Board Meeting Tuition Increase Recommendation FY 2010 June 18, June Regular Board Meeting With the assumption that the.
Facilities Condition Assessment Initiated: February 2004 Consultant: ISES Corporation Stone Mountain, GA Scope: Identify the conditions of our facilities,
FY Budget Documents  Executive Summary Recurring Reduction Implementation Plan  Narratives  Revenue Summary  Expenditure Summary by Organizational.
Klein High School Original building built in 1963 Move KHS to HS #5 in 2011 Move back to renovated KHS in 2013.
University of Idaho Permanent Building Fund & the Annual Capital Budget Request Process Campus Planning Advisory Committee April 8, 2011 Raymond Pankopf,
Sustainable Government Symposium December 11, 2007.
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY Budget and Budget Process.
PHYSICAL FACILITIES UPDATE PURDUE ACADEMIC ADVISING ASSOCIATION December 11, 2014 Michael B. Cline, P.E., PTOE Vice President for Physical Facilities.
Office of Science (SC) Overview John Yates Office of Operations Program Management, SC-33 Office of Science Briefing for DOE FIMS Training at ANL – May.
Master Plan Update February 4, 2015 Georgetown University Hoya Roundtable Student Engagement.
AUBURN UNIVERSITY Capital Projects Program Facilities Management
Tennessee Higher Education Commission Funding Recommendations Tennessee Higher Education Commission November 18, 2015.
FY08 PARKING PERMIT FEE PROPOSAL November 20, 2006.
10/9/2003Tuition Policy Advisory Committee1 Appendix.
Dr. Les Wong, President Mr. Gavin Leach, Vice President for Finance and Administration.
Berkshire Hills Regional School District FY 17 Proposed Budget February 11, 2016.
1 Chair’s Retreat Budget Update FY 2016.
Budget Forum February Where the State Dollar Comes From (general funds) – FY16 $13.1 Billion.
The Capital Budget Game in Utah SHEEO 2006 Professional Development Conference Kevin Walthers Assistant Commissioner Utah System of Higher Education August.
Updated Facility Condition Assessment Prince George’s County Public Schools June 17, 2008.
Planning and Community Development Department FY 2015 Operating Budget June 2, 2014.
1 Capital Improvement Program FY To download this presentation, visit our website:
TCF Volunteers Conference COL G. Dewey Yeatts, Ed.D. Vice President for Facilities and Engineering 25 February 2012.
Grand Rapids Community College Board of Trustees Proposed Budget June 6, 2016.
Texas Woman’s University Fiscal Year 2017 Budget
WILMINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Fall Deans & Department Chair Meeting
Deferred Maintenance Deferred Maintenance
Manhattan College Senate
University of Oregon Financial Briefing
Please Note For faculty, staff, students, and alumni who cannot attend, this presentation and the discussion that follows are being video recorded for.
School #1 Ballot Question and Proposal
CALS Faculty Senate Financial Review – April 2017
President’s Leadership Council Budget Update
Plant & Facilities Department
East Greenwich School District
Rebalancing State Appropriations
The Size of Campus – Considerations and Analyses
Enterprise Asset Management Proposal to Expand AiM :
MIRACOSTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
Presented to the Student Fee Management Committee (SFMC)
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN (Five Year Plan)
Space Utilization Advisory Committee November 14, 2017
Dana Heiberg, Senior Planner February 5, 2018
University of Oregon Financial Briefing
Operating Budget Budget Dollar Increase
Summary – Major FY2019 E&G Fund Cost Drivers
Commission Workshop 3 Budget Presentation
Wayne State University Facilities Planning & Management
Space Removal Initiative
FY 2019 Budget Development General Operating Funds
Presentation transcript:

Proposed Space Utilization Strategy (DRAFT)

Mizzou E&G Campus E&G Buildings Mizzou North Research Park

Current MU E&G Funding FY15 Maintenance budget was $16.8M $16.8M budget represents 0.68% funding of current replacement value (CRV) $6.9M of the $16M.8 is used for Daily Service (light bulb replacement, electrical repairs, plumbing and HVAC repairs, etc.) Therefore, $9.9M is available for Building M&R – Capital Repairs $9.9M M&R budget represents 0.40% funding of CRV

MU E&G Maintenance Funding History Fiscal Year $/GSF % CRV $/GSF with 2% inflation Proactive Reactive 1998 $ 2.45 1.50%   $ 1.60 65% $ 0.85 35% 1999 $ 2.24 $ 2.50 $ 1.28 57% $ 0.96 43% 2000 $ 2.12 1.46% $ 2.55 $ 1.05 50% $ 1.07 2001 $ 2.03 1.32% $ 2.60 $ 0.87 $ 1.16 2002 $ 1.87 1.16% $ 2.65 $ 0.73 39% $ 1.14 61% 2003 $ 1.80 0.77% $ 2.70 $ 0.68 38% $ 1.12 62% 2004 $ 2.02 0.82% $ 2.76 $ 0.99 49% $ 1.03 51% 2005 $ 2.00 0.79% $ 2.81 $ 0.89 45% $ 1.11 56% 2006 $ 1.69 0.65% $ 2.87 $ 0.56 33% $ 1.13 67% 2007 $ 1.77 $ 2.93 $ 0.63 36% 64% 2008 $ 1.85 0.64% $ 2.99 $ 0.69 37% 63% 2009 $ 1.86 0.61% $ 3.05 $ 0.70 2010 $ 1.83 0.57% $ 3.11 $ 1.15 2011 $ 2.06 $ 3.17 $ 0.78 2012 $ 2.18 $ 3.23 $ 0.82 $ 1.36 2013 $ 2.33 0.67% $ 3.30 $ 0.91 40% $ 1.42 60% 2014 $ 2.42 0.68% $ 3.36 $ 0.94 $ 1.48 2015 $ 2.43 $ 3.42 $ 0.97 $ 1.46

Sightlines Introduction Independent benchmarking and analysis consultant Annual Stewardship = M&R Funding Daily Service = Ongoing daily M&R

Sightlines Results Sightlines Minimum Funding Results MU CRV = $2.473B 1.70% CRV, Annual Stewardship (M&R) target 0.30% CRV, Recommended Daily Service 2.00% CRV annually

Sightlines Funding Model Assuming 2% annual inflation FY15 Daily Service Funding FY15 M&R Funding Sightlines Proposed Daily Service Funding 0.30% of CRV Sightlines Proposed M&R Funding 1.70% of CRV

ISES Introduction Independent facility auditor Provides a list of specific deficiencies and associated corrective costs to determine a facility condition needs index (FCNI) The FCNI is a measure (in percentage) of the facility’s needs in relation to it’s CRV Example: .80 FCNI for McKee Hall indicates the identified needs are equal to 80% of the CRV of the facility

Major building renovation needed FCNI Guidelines MU’s Goal Major building renovation needed .00 .30 .40 1.0 Historically MU has set a .30 FCNI or lower as a goal and a .40 FCNI or higher indicates facility is in need of a major building renovation

ISES Results ISES Minimum Funding Results: ISES CRV $2.4B Current backlog is $715M Current growth rate of $35M ISES Minimum Funding Results: 2.04% of Current Replacement Value

ISES Funding Model Assuming 2% annual inflation Current M&R Funding $16.8M = .68% CRV Recommended ISES M&R Funding = 2.04% CRV

Mizzou E&G Campus E&G Buildings Mizzou North Research Park

E&G Buildings Requiring Renovation Mizzou North Research Park

FCNI Projections

Buildings Over .40 FCNI Research Park Development – EHS 10,496 Bldg GSF Curtis Hall 1.19 28,979 Noyes Hall 0.92 21,718 Waters Hall 0.82 49,184 McKee Gymnasium 0.79 30,778 Veterinary Science Building 0.76 40,350 McAlester Hall 0.74 41,435 Old Student Health Center 0.72 22,985 Allton Building 0.68 20,926 Columbia Professional Building 0.62 26,877 Parker Hall 0.59 27,378 Arvarh E. Strickland Hall 0.56 68,961 Crowder Hall 25,181 Building FCNI Bldg GSF Neff Hall - 1959 Addition 0.55 21,456 Eckles Hall 0.54 36,018 Fine Arts Annex 15,564 Mumford Hall 0.52 52,200 Neff Hall 18,866 MIZZOU NORTH 0.51 223,331 Hill Hall 0.5 45,377 Ellis Library 0.49 245,084 Laboratory Animal Center 12,886 Research Park Development – EHS 10,496 1110 S. College Avenue 0.48 22,060 Heinkel Building 41,257

Buildings Over .40 FCNI Total E&G Campus = 6,900,000 GSF Bldg GSF Stanley Hall & Stanley Hall Addition 0.48 35,406 Agriculture Lab 0.47 33,504 Read Hall 19,496 Veterinary Medicine West Building 73,497 LeFevre Hall 0.46 54,817 Lewis Hall 69,168 London Hall 20,181 Whitten Hall 0.44 26,071 Building FCNI Bldg GSF Gannett Hall 0.43 22,150 Green Building 15,453 Pickard Hall 24,601 Veterinary Diagnostics Laboratory Building 0.42 21,144 Chemistry Building 0.41 92,321 Fine Arts Building (Music & Dramatic Arts) 0.4 51,458 Loeb Hall 14,680 Middlebush Hall 71,180 Total E&G Campus = 6,900,000 GSF Total over .40 FCNI (40 Buildings) = 1,794,474 (26% of E&G Campus)

Space by College

Sightlines and ISES Summary MU Current 0.68% of CRV Sightlines 2.00% of CRV ISES 2.04% of CRV APPA, higher education facilities management organization: “Acknowledging variances for age and type of facilities, a recommended range for annual capital renewal funding is 1.5 to 3 percent of total replacement value of plant; some recommend even higher amounts.”

A concept…. Eliminate 250,000 GSF (or more) of campus building area through demolition. Every GSF reduced lessens the load on the Power Plant, allowing current capacity to be sufficient longer. A smaller campus will allow M&R service to be maintained, even after the FY17 budget cut.

M&R Funding P/GSF $7.46/GSF recommended

Reduced E&G Space Funding Analysis FY17 Current Replacement Value (CRV) - $2.491B FY17 Funding - $16,096,367 Current GSF Maintained – 6,900,000

Goals Always!! - Further the academic mission Reduce deferred maintenance and FCNI growth Improve or maintain Level of Service

State Appropriations plus Net Tuition & Fees Compared to Peers

ISES Funding Model Assuming 2% annual inflation Current M&R Funding $16.8M = .68% CRV Recommended ISES M&R Funding = 2.04% CRV

Change in General Operating Funding Sources 27% 70% 3 % TUITION STATE SUPPORT Similar to the information presented on page 1-19. Why is this shift so important to how we do business? Programs have different cost drivers creating the need to subsidies across programs.