City of Huber Heights Public Opinion Survey

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
City of Alamosa Customer Satisfaction & Residents Priorities Survey By: Dr. Melissa L. Freeman Assistant Professor Adams State College.
Advertisements

Connect Nevada Residential Technology Assessment Results.
City of Victoria Presentation of Results - January 11, Business Survey.
Survey Results September Survey Information There is an error margin of ±3.6 on this survey. South Ogden City sent out 5,300 surveys and received.
BOWLING GREEN CITIZEN CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY Fall 2010 – National Citizen Survey.
December 2014 © 2014 Ipsos. All rights reserved. Contains Ipsos' Confidential and Proprietary information and may not be disclosed or reproduced without.
COMMUNITY SATISFACTION SURVEY BAYSIDE CITY COUNCIL JUNE RESEARCH REPORT - Coordinated by the Department of Planning and Community Development On.
Hays City Services Survey 2002 By Brett Zollinger, Ph.D. University Center for Survey Research Fort Hays State University Hays, Kansas
Attitudes Toward the Kansas Forest Service Conservation Tree and Shrub Seedling Program By Brett Zollinger, Ph.D. Docking Institute of Public Affairs.
2008 Citizen Satisfaction Survey Results May 29, 2009.
2014 National Citizen Survey Results Citizen Survey results Implementing Our Vision Background Areas of Significant Change Trends over Time Special.
Albemarle County 2004 Citizen Survey October 6, 2004.
Kimball Area Community Survey Results. Methodology Mail survey Sample included Kimball, Banner and western Cheyenne Counties  Random sample of 649 households.
Survey conducted by: National Research Center, Inc th St. Boulder, CO (303) The National Citizen Survey™ LOWER PROVIDENCE.
2012 CITY OF MIDDLETON SATISFACTION SURVEY WORKING DRAFT - PROPOSAL.
City of Sarasota 2008 National Citizen Survey Conducted by the National Research Center (NRC) for the City of Sarasota.
2009 Lane County Community Survey Demographic Breakdown.
Responsible Electricity Transmission for Albertans (RETA) November 2, 2009 Responsible Electricity Transmission for Albertans (RETA)
September 2015 Town of the Blue Mountains Citizen Satisfaction Survey.
Citizens’ Survey Presentation of Results for Total Sample February 25, 2003 Prepared By: 831 E. Morehead Street, Suite 150 Charlotte, North Carolina
Guilford County Schools Parent and Community Surveys Presentation January 24, 2015 Prepared By Nancy Burnap, Ph.D Research Strategies, Inc. Presented By.
OPP COMMUNITY SATISFACTION SURVEY 2009 Huronia West Detachment.
Community Attitude Study Village of Glen Ellyn.
JUNE 2015 REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY ANNUAL PERCEPTIONS RESEARCH.
2012 Citizen Survey Results Presentation City of Twin Falls, Idaho.
National Citizen Survey 2010 Results. City of Decatur Citizen Survey Results Contracted with the National Research Center, Inc. for third time Survey.
CITY AND COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD 2015 CITIZEN SURVEY PRESENTATION OF RESULTS.
Citizen Survey Hampton City Council July 8, 2009.
Citizen Satisfaction Survey March 2003 Results Office of the Mayor Program Management Office March 28, 2003.
Orland Park, IL Key Findings 2016 The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA.
City of Decatur National Citizen Survey 2012 Results City Commission Work Session July 16, 2012.
City of Decatur Citizen Survey Results  Contracted with the National Research Center, Inc. for second time  Survey conducted by mail  1200 randomly.
The National Citizen Survey™ Ashland, VA Summary of Findings November 29, 2011 ©2011 Survey conducted by: National Research Center, Inc th St.
Data to be released after chamber annual meeting and Methodology Statement.
Survey Conducted May 11-22, Methodology Telephone survey (landline and cell phones) of a random sample of 295 voters registered to vote.
1 City of Virginia Beach 2007 Citizens’ Survey Objective: To learn how residents feel about their community and the services provided by the City of Virginia.
Survey: How Old Is Too Young?
Troy community opinions analytical report
Methodology – Phone Survey
2017 Community Survey City of Mountain Brook, Alabama
Young, Uninsured and In Debt:
Summary of Findings January, 2009
City of Washougal 2016 Community Survey Findings
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Plymouth Community Parks and Recreation
DirectionFinder® Survey
Winnipeg Regional Health Authority Tissue Bank – April 2016
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Tissue Bank Manitoba Proposed Legal Changes in Manitoba October 2016
Fall Community Survey Summary Conducted for the City of Port Hueneme
2014 National Citizen Survey Results
Privacy concerns and sharing data
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Flash Eurobarometer 366   PERCEPTION of the Quality of life in European cities Survey conducted for Directorate-General for Regional Policy and coordinated.
Innovation and the online payment realm A market study
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Islington Residents’ Survey 2018 March 2018
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
2010 DirectionFinder® Survey City of Blue Springs, Missouri
HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE 2017 CUSTOMER RAGE SURVEY:
Third International Seville Conference on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis (FTA): Impacts and implications for policy and decision-making 16th- 17th.
Survey: How Old Is Too Young?
Waste Management By-Law A quantitative survey with Guelph residents about updates to the Waste Management By-Law Metroline Research Group Inc Duke.
11th Annual Parents, kids & money survey
How the Affordable Care Act Has Improved Americans’ Ability to Buy Health Insurance on Their Own Findings from the Commonwealth Fund Biennial Health Insurance.
Customer Satisfaction Survey Report For City of El Segundo – Residents
Context and Methodology
Presentation transcript:

City of Huber Heights Public Opinion Survey Conducted by: Wright State University Center for Urban and Public Affairs

Methodology 600 citizens were surveyed via a telephone survey of Huber Heights residents 95 % confidence, +/- 4 % margin of error citywide At least 83 respondents from each ward Survey conducted from May 7, 2009 through June 11, 2009 77 question survey developed by CUPA in partnership with City staff.

Methodolgy Random digit dial (RDD) sampling method utilized Any household with landline telephone could participate Does exclude HHs that are cell phone only (estimated at 12%) Quota sampling method used to closely approximate sample with demographics of City (age, gender)

Geocoding Respondents were asked to provide their street and hundred block for the purpose of analyzing responses by Ward. 7 respondents were purged from the database because they did not live in the City limits. No identifying information was recorded pertaining to any individual respondent.

General Public Sentiment Overall satisfaction with the City as a place to live: Beavercreek (2007): 94.2 percent Yellow Springs (2005): 94.2 percent Moraine (2008): 94.0 percent Franklin (2007): 93.6 percent Huber Heights (2009): 92.3 percent Urbana (2007): 90.5 percent Clayton (2005): 83.6 percent Trotwood (2007): 74.5 percent Dayton (2007): 71.1 percent

General Public Sentiment Very high level of overall city satisfaction Regression: Satisfaction with specific service provision are primary indicators Demographic differences: Those 65 and older most likely to be “Very Satisfied” with the City Respondents in Ward Three were most likely to be satisfied (96.1 percent)

Paramedic and Fire Services Very high levels of satisfaction with fire and EMS services in Huber Heights 98.7 percent satisfied with fire and EMS 98.0 percent are satisfied with response time Respondents who expressed dissatisfaction were asked why- most comments related to response time.

Police Services Most respondents (94.5 percent) are satisfied with police services in Huber Heights. 95.1 percent satisfied with response time 91.2 percent satisfied with how often they see police on the street No differences among demographic groups, likely due to high percentage of satisfied respondents.

Waste Collection Most residents contract with Rumpke (259) or Waste Management (226) for waste collection services 62.9 percent would support the city consolidating to one hauler. Most would prefer that their hauler be the sole provider 78.3 percent satisfied with residential leaf collection

Yard Waste Disposal 45.5 percent of respondents have used yard waste disposal site Almost all are satisfied (94.5 percent) Respondents were asked about a seasonal pass to the waste disposal site 141 respondents said nothing 110 wouldn’t use the site Of the remaining respondents, $10-20 was the average response

City Pool 15.2 percent of respondents have used the city pool Younger respondents more likely to have used the pool, but also more likely to be dissatisfied When asked to rate the pool, more than half of respondents (51.7 percent) could not respond Of those who did respond, 77.9 percent were satisfied Despite non-use, 77.3 percent believe the city should continue to own the pool

Parks and Recreation Respondents are generally satisfied with all attributes of parks in Huber Heights 90.9 percent are satisfied with the appearance of city parks 90.7 percent satisfied with the safety of city parks Older respondents more likely to be satisfied with appearance and safety of parks Most respondents are satisfied with YMCA programming 28.7 percent unfamiliar with programming Of those who are familiar, 86.0 percent are satisfied

Water Two thirds of respondents (68.3 percent) are satisfied with the quality of drinking water Significant differences by Ward: 79.6 percent satisfied in Ward Three, 73.2 percent in Ward Four 58.8 percent in Ward Two, 63.4 percent in Ward One Respondents 25-44 most likely to be dissatisfied 59.4 percent of residents have a water softener Of those with a softener, 59.3 percent would prefer their home softener.

Water, cont. 15.2 percent of residents have contacted customer service regarding their water Of those, two thirds are satisfied with the service that they received

City Income Tax More than three-quarters of respondents (76.4 percent) indicated that using RITA was easy or very easy 73.7 percent are satisfied with the service Those who were dissatisfied discussed: Having trouble understanding forms Opposition to regional tax collection Difficulty having questions answered One in five respondents contacted city with questions 84.5 percent were satisfied

Zoning More than two-thirds (69.7 percent) are satisfied with zoning codes Views of zoning codes: Too strict: 20.5 percent About right: 57.8 percent Not strict enough: 21.7 percent After the move to complaint-based enforcement, respondents were asked about changes 65.9 percent perceived no change, 16.1 percent perceived improvement

Neighborhood Variables 87.2 percent satisfied with the appearance of their neighborhood No differences by Ward 83.9 percent satisfied with housing quality in their neighborhood 89.2 percent in Ward One 75.9 percent in Ward Four

Neighborhood Variables

Service Cuts Respondents were asked a question pertaining to what services they would be willing to cut as a result of the reduction in the city income tax More than half chose not to answer Of those who did answer, the most common responses were: Leaf pick-up (41 respondents) Parks and Recreation Streets Views pertaining to education

Internet Access 84.8 percent of respondents have residential Internet access. Most using DSL / cable 8.3 percent with dial-up 42.9 percent have visited the City’s website Of those, 85.1 percent found it easy to navigate 88.7 percent found information useful

Contact with City Employees 29.4 percent of respondents have had contact with a City employee in the past year Almost all were satisfied with that contact and felt that the employee treated them with respect.

Volunteerism 13.7 percent of respondents have volunteered with the City in the past 38.2 percent (219 respondents) are interested in volunteering in the future 50.0 percent of those 18-24 50.5 percent of those 25-34 Volunteer opportunities involving: Children Parks and recreation, including clean-up

Summary Most residents are satisfied with the City. Respondents provided, through open-ended comments, numerous specific suggestions for improvements that they would like to see. Most respondents are satisfied with RITA Strong levels of satisfaction with emergency services, police, parks and recreation, contact with city employees.

Opportunities Internet Volunteer opportunities Education of residents Specific neighborhood problems more prevalent in some Wards than others General positive views of government 73.3 percent believe government pays attention 84.2 percent believe government does the right thing Less than half believes government wastes money

Questions? For more information, please contact: David Jones Survey Research Director Wright State University, Center for Urban and Public Affairs (937) 775-2941 David.jones@wright.edu