MDI Issues M. Sullivan For

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Panda Solenoid Timelines. General Layout constraints and HOLD POINTS.
Advertisements

M. Sullivan Mini-workshop on the MEIC design Nov 2, 2012.
Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Solenoid Magnet System
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 IR Upgrade M. Sullivan 1 PEP-II Interaction Region Upgrade M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory Workshop Hawaii.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B.
Performance of the DZero Layer 0 Detector Marvin Johnson For the DZero Silicon Group.
1 Belle II IR 2 Shuji Tanaka KEK Joint Belle II & superB Background meeting 2012//Feb/ 8-9th 1.
SuperB Meeting, May 2008 Status of the magnetic design of the first quadrupole (QD0) for the SuperB interaction region S. Bettoni on behalf of the whole.
Presented by, Brett Parker, BNL-SMD QD0 Prototype Status.
IR summary M. Sullivan Nov. 3, 2011 JLAB MEIC IR workshop.
MDI DBD Editors Report Tom Markiewicz/SLAC SiD Collaboration Meeting, SLAC 22 August 2012.
ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2004 PEP-II IR M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region of PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2005.
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
CLIC Machine-Detector Interface Working Group (MDI) Emmanuel Tsesmelis CERN TS/LEA CLIC-ACE of 3 September 2008.
ILC-GDE Meeting Beijing Feb Effect of MDI Design on BDS Collimation Depth Frank Jackson ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory Cockcroft Institute.
Hall D infrastructure and integration Elton Smith Hall D Collaboration Meeting September 9-11, 2004.
9/17/07IRENG071 Cryogenic System for the ILC IR Magnets QD0 and QF1 K. C. Wu - BNL.
1 M. Sullivan IR update IR Update M. Sullivan for the 3 rd SuperB workshop SLAC June14-16, 2006.
ILC IR FINAL FOCUS & EXTRACTION MAGNETS Prepared by Andy Marone ILC Workshop, Sept
Joint Belle SuperB Background Meeting Feb 9 – 10, 2012 SuperB SR bkgds 1 SR Backgrounds in SuperB M. Sullivan For M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni,
XVII SuperB Workshop and Kick Off Meeting - La Biodola (Isola d'Elba) Italy May 28 th June 2 nd 2011 P.Fabbricatore Sezione di Genova The air core magnets.
May 31, 2010Bill Wisniewski1 Mechanical Integration Issues.
Cryogenics for SuperB IR Magnets J. G. Weisend II SLAC National Accelerator Lab.
SuperB Meeting XVII May 28 – June 2, 2011 IR design status 1 IR Design Status and Update M. Sullivan For M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
01 June 2011F. Raffaelli1 Super B Mechanical integration. List of reference persons and institutions for the mechanic of the sub detectors. Review of the.
SuperB Gen meeting Oct 5-9, 2009 IR Interface 1 IR Interface Issues M. Sullivan For M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni, P. Raimondi, et al.
M Sullivan SuperB Workshop Elba, Italy May 31 - Jun 3, 2008
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
M. Sullivan Apr 27, 2017 MDI meeting
Yingshun Zhu Design progress of QD0 in CEPC Interaction Region
Update on PANDA solenoid design
M. Sullivan SuperB General Meeting Perugia, Italy June 15-20, 2009
KEK news ( ) S.Tanaka.
- STT LAYOUT - SECTOR F SECTOR A SECTOR B SECTOR E SECTOR D SECTOR C
M. Sullivan for the SLAC SuperB Workshop Jan , 2009
M. Sullivan International Review Committee November 12-13, 2007
The Interaction Region
SuperB General Meeting XI
M. Sullivan SuperB XIII June 1-4, 2010 Elba, Italy
Bill Wisniewski SuperB Frascati Meeting September 30, 2010
M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
Vertex Detector Mechanical R&D Design Questions and Issues
E. Paloni, S. Bettoni, R. Pantaleo, M Biagini, et al.
Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation
Conceptual Design of CEPC Interaction Region Superconducting Magnets
The IR beam pipe M. Sullivan For
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
The PEP-II Interaction e+e- Factories Workshop
IR Design Update M. Sullivan For
Challenges for FCC-ee MDI mechanical design
Integration and IR Hall
IR Summary M. Sullivan For
DET. Integration Inner detector envelope Radial clearances.
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
S.Kuroda ( KEK ) Final Focus Optics Collimeter Final Doublet
IR Upgrade Possibilities for PEP-II
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Local double ring MDI Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
IR Summary M. Sullivan For
IR Lattice with Detector Solenoid
IR Summary M. Sullivan For
M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
SuperB Accelerator Overview
IR Beam Transport Status
Summary of the FCCee IR Workshop Jan 2017 at CERN
SR Update for JLEIC June 8, 2017
Energy Changes and the IR
Some of the Points Raised During my JLAB Visit
IR/MDI requirements for the EIC
SR Background Update for JLEIC
S. Bettoni on behalf of the whole team
Presentation transcript:

MDI Issues M. Sullivan For M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni, F. Bosi, P. Fabbricatore, P. Raimondi, M. Biagini, P. Vobly, I. Okunev, A. Novokhatski, S. Weathersby, et al. SuperB Meeting XVII La Biodola, Isola d’Elba, Italy May 28 - June 2, 2011

Outline MDI Issues Next Steps Summary and Conclusions Cryostat size SVT services and cables Shielding needs Support structure for the cryostats Vibration control Rapid access to SVT Next Steps Summary and Conclusions

Cryostat size We need a first approximation of how much space the cryostat needs – especially radial This sets the inner radius of the DCH We also need to understand how to get the SVT services and signals in and out – this includes the cooling for the inner Be chamber And of course the W shielding in this area I’m guessing we may not like the answer

IR layout

Cryostat size (2) Notice in the drawing on the previous page that the beam lines are quickly diverging – much more than what we had in PEP-II We also need solenoid compensation that cancels the entire detector field out from 0.5m

Supports for the cryostats We need someone to start designing the supports for the cryostats P. Fabbricatore has done some preliminary magnetic force estimates because he needs to transfer these forces from the magnet cold masses to the cryostat body How we externally support these cryostats is connected to how we move the cryostats to obtain rapid access to the central region

Supports for the cryostats (2) The cryostat supports also need to minimize vibration transmission and should hopefully dampen ground motion We have some design criteria from Kirk Bertsche for these supports

Background hot spots We have heard that a background hot spot has been identified as coming from the beam pipe between the QD0 and QF1 magnets in the cryostat This is a very difficult region to add extra shielding so we should verify that the background calculation is correct Space inside the cryostat is very cramped already and adding shielding may in fact force an increase in the outer radius – an unwanted consequence

Bkgd hot spots (2) As background calculations improve new hot spots may show up – we will have to take a close look at these new hot spots and figure out the best way to handle each case Shielding near the hot spot Shielding near the detector Redesigning the masking and/or beam pipe Introducing more masking upstream

Next steps Engineering support for cryostat supports Background generation cross-checks with simpler programs whenever possible After getting preliminary engineering requirements for The permanent magnets The final focus magnets (QD0 and QF1) The cryostat bodies and The cryostat supports

Next steps (2) We then need to redesign the IR incorporating as many of the new engineering constraints as possible and then work together with the engineers to hammer out solutions to remaining conflicting requirements Then after this is done we should have something that can be written up in a TDR

Next steps (3) This is not the end of it though… As the engineers and designers work out the details of the design (how many bolts are needed here how does one assemble this joint there, etc.) we will together encounter more detailed problems It will also be true that background and physics simulations might uncover a problem here or there

Next steps (4) It is particularly important that the various design engineers keep in close contact with each other and with the physicists especially when a particular group is developing a design with hardware close to an agreed upon boundary Many times a group assumes that there is space just outside of where their hardware is which allows them to assemble their hardware

Next steps (5) Compromise without sacrificing performance is the name of the game When things get tight prototyping becomes an important part of the decision making process Keep in mind that although we physicists want to fill all space with something useful there are times when adding a clever fancy gizmo just because “it would fit nicely right here” is not the right answer

Summary We have a good “starting point” IR design that meets our requirements Now the engineers can come in and tell us what is impossible Then we need to decide how to change the design with the guidance of the engineers so we can still build what we want We may have to compromise some of the IR parameters…

Conclusion We are at a good starting point… Now the fun (and hard work) begins!