Discussion paper – Major Issues

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 Japan September / 2012 Informal document GRRF (73rd GRRF, September 2012,
Advertisements

Hazard and Incident Warning « Majority of events occurring on the road represent a danger for road users » By transmitting road events and road status.
OICA/CLEPA Homework Part I HMI, Driver in/out of the Loop Submitted by the experts of OICA/CLEPA Tokyo, June 2015 Informal Document ACSF
ACSF Informal Group Industry proposals 1 st Meeting of ACSF informal group April 29 and 30, 2015 in Bonn 1 Informal Document ACSF
Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology Document No. ITS/AD (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Submitted by Japan.
Presentation for Document ACSF-03-03_rev1 Oliver Kloeckner September rd meeting of the IG ASCF Munich, Airport Informal Document.
IntelliDriveSM Update
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Possible Example of Split of Regulation ~ Split of R79 and The New Regulation of Driving Assistance.
Difference for "Automatically commanded steering function", "Corrective steering function" and " Autonomous Steering System " Informal Document: ACSF
Vehicle Safety - (R)Evolution of Driving Assist Systems Jochen Schäfer Heiner Hunold Submitted by the experts from Informal document GRRF th GRRF,
1 ACSF Test Procedure Draft proposal – For discussion OICA and CLEPA proposal for the IG Group ACSF Tokyo, 2015, June Informal Document ACSF
Identification of regulatory needs for ACSF Oliver Kloeckner 16-17th June nd meeting of the IG ASCF Tokyo – Jasic Office Informal Document.
Protective Braking for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
Minimum Risk Manoeuvres (MRM)
Safety Distances and Object Classifications for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
5 th ACSF meeting French views Bonn January 2016 Informal Document - ACSF Submitted by the expert of France.
CLEPA Position Special GRRF Session on Automatic Emergency Braking and Lane Departure Warning Systems Brainstorming Meeting 9 Dec UN Palais des.
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles Excerpts from the relevant sections of the ToR: II. Working items to be covered (details.
ACSF - Traffic Jam Assist on all roads OICA and CLEPA proposal for the IG Group ACSF Tokyo, 2015, June Informal Document ACSF
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
Data Storage System for ACSF (DSSA) Informal Document: ACSF Oliver Klöckner 19-21th April th meeting of the IG ASCF Tokyo, Ichigaya.
Transmitted by the Experts of TRL (EC)
Hand-off Warning Time of LKA
Informal document GRRF-84-32
Informal Document: ACSF-06-16
DIRECTOR, ROAD SAFETY ANALYSIS
7th ACSF meeting London, June 28-30, 2016
Presentation of ACSF C tests
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles
Informal Working Group on ACSF
Submitted by the expert form Japan Document No. ITS/AD-09-12
Industry proposal Driver availability recognition system
Informal Document: ACSF Rev.1
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
Lane change driver reaction times
Timing to be activated the hazard lights
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
Informal document GRRF-86-36
Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C
Industry Homework from AEB 02
ACSF-19, September 03-05, 2018, Paris
Submitted by the Expert of Sweden
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Informal document GRSG
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Signalling of information and warnings
Quintessences Proposal for Category C of Germany and Japan
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C
AEB IWG 02-XX Industry Position
Informal Document: ACSF-10-08
Terms of Reference (AEBS Rev.1)
Safety considerations on Emergency Manoeuver
Submitted by the Secretary
Maximum allowable Override Force
Emergency Steering Function
Interpretation of CSF warnings #2
ACSF-17 – Industry Preparation
Dr. Hans Holdik Dongseok CHOI / Ph.D.
“Class IX Front and Close-proximity Passenger-side”
ACSF B2 SAE Level 2 and/or Level 3
ACSF B2 and C2 Industry expectations from ACSF IG Tokyo meeting
Hands-off detection versus Start of Lane Change Manoeuvre
6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Regulation ECE R79-03 ACSF C 2-Step HMI
Automated Lane Keeping Systems
Presentation transcript:

Discussion paper – Major Issues Informal Document: ACSF-06-15 Discussion paper – Major Issues Oliver Klöckner 19-21th April 2016 6th meeting of the IG ASCF Tokyo, Ichigaya Conference Center

Boundary between ACSF and CSF Examples for applications currently homologated as CSF Corrective Steering Function (CSF) Lane keep assist Side wind compensation Short time steering angle correction to prevent lane departure Pictorial Sources: Trucar, Krafthand, Bosch

Boundary between ACSF and CSF Aim: Clear Boundary between CSF and ACSF Current Lane Keep Assist (LKAS) shall be covered by Cat. B1 Results of the SDG „LKAS“ should be the Basis for Cat. B1 Solution: Amendment of the definitions (see UK-Proposal ACSF-06-07) CSF = only short time steering interventions [less than x s] e.g. side wind compensation ! no lane keep function ! ACSF = low speed manoeuvering (Cat. A) Lane Keeping (Cat. B1, B2) Lane changing (Cat. C, D, E)

ACSF Categories and permitted combinations Stand alone Categories A B1 B2 Permitted Combinations B1 C B2 C B1 D B2 D B2 B2 E E

Permissible field of application Beyond Highway* Highway* A yes (yes) B1 B2 no C D E Any combination out of the categories B2, C, D and E can be only used on Highways* * road section which is not dedicated to pedestrians or bicyclists and which has a [physical or constructional] separation of traffic moving in opposite directions

Comparison of category B1 and B2 - Continious Lane Keeping - Operating on Highways and other roads - Detection that the driver is in control of the vehicle - Warning after 30s inactivity - Deactivation after 60s inactivity - Continious Lane Keeping - Operating on Highways - Driver Recognition system - Warning after [15]min inactivity - Transition Demand if no reaction to the warning - Minimal Risk Manoeuvre - Emergency Manoeuvre - Protective Braking It is important to discuss the time values of the drivers activity detection

Major issues to be clarified Following issues should be discussed now to get a common position of the IWG: Does the group agree to cover the current LKAS systems in future under Cat. B1? 2) Which combinations of the ACSF categories should be permitted ? What should be the permissible field of application of each category ? 4) What should be the time intervall for the drivers activity detection for the categories B1 and B2?

Thank you for your attention! Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure Robert-Schuman-Platz 1 D-53175 Bonn