Panel discussion on Principles of Engagement

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
29 November Research Infrastructures in FP7 Jean-Louis Picqué European Commission DG Research.
Advertisements

Co-funded by the European Union under FP7-ICT Co-ordinated by aparsen.eu #APARSEN Welcome to the Conference !! Juan Bicarregui Chair, APA Executive.
Horizontal Research Activities involving SMEs Joachim Ball, European Commission, DG RTD B3 n Co-operative Research n Collective Research General Introduction.
EGI-Engage EGI-Engage Engaging the EGI Community towards an Open Science Commons Project Overview 9/14/2015 EGI-Engage: a project.
Procurement Innovation for Cloud Services in Europe CERN – 14 May 2014 Bob Jones (CERN) This document produced by Members of the Helix Nebula consortium.
Helix Nebula The Science Cloud CERN – 14 May 2014 Bob Jones (CERN) This document produced by Members of the Helix Nebula consortium is licensed under a.
This document produced by Members of the Helix Nebula Partners and Consortium is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Permissions.
EPHA Briefing Paper (Part 2): High Level Reflection Process on Patient Mobility in the EU - summary of final recommendations - December 2003 (See also.
A European Open Science Cloud
Networks ∙ Services ∙ People Dale Robertson GÉANT General Assembly, Luxembourg EU Liaison Update 26 November 2015 Head of EU Liaison, GÉANT.
EGI-InSPIRE RI EGI-InSPIRE EGI-InSPIRE RI EGI strategy and Grand Vision Ludek Matyska EGI Council Chair EGI InSPIRE.
Interoperability and Integration of EGI with Helix Nebula - Workshop Sergio Andreozzi Strategy and Policy Manager (EGI.eu) 11/04/2013 EGI Community.
3 nd Helix Nebula Workshop on Interoperability among e-Infrastructures and Commercial Clouds Sergio Andreozzi Strategy and Policy Manager, EGI.eu EGI Technical.
EGI-Engage is co-funded by the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Union under grant number EGI vision for the EOSC Tiziana.
Economical opportunities stemming from data and computing e- infrastructures Stakeholders consultation on computing and data for the WP Brussels,
WP9– Evaluation, roadmap & development plan Rupert Lueck EMBL – 26 June
The e-Infrastructure Commons a status report EGI Conference 2015 Sverker Holmgren e-IRG Chair.
European Perspective on Distributed Computing Luis C. Busquets Pérez European Commission - DG CONNECT eInfrastructures 17 September 2013.
The Helix Nebula marketplace 13 May 2015 Bob Jones, CERN.
The European Transport Research Alliance - ETRA Prof. G. A. Giannopoulos Chairman, ETRA.
EGI-InSPIRE EGI-InSPIRE RI EGI strategy towards the Open Science Commons Tiziana Ferrari EGI-InSPIRE Director at EGI.eu.
Work Plan for the Second Period Bob Jones, CERN First Helix Nebula Review 03 July This document produced by Members of the Helix Nebula consortium.
European Open Science Cloud Current and future EU support to the EOSC and the Commission expectations after the EOSC Summit Lorenza Saracco and Carmela.
EGI Foundation (Session Chair)
EOSC Governance Development Forum EOSC Governance Framework
Eric Peirano BRIDGE Support Team, Technofi
Services for EOSC management
Helsinki 8 May 2015, the NeIC 2015 Conference
EOSC MODEL Pasquale Pagano CNR - ISTI
EOSCpilot Service Pilots Face to Face with SDs and RPs
Defining EOSC Rules of Engagement Damien Lecarpentier (CSC)
LifeWatch, costing and funding
Skills & Capabilities (EOSCPilot WP7) Interaction with RDA
Steven Newhouse EGI-InSPIRE Project Director, EGI.eu
National planning for Open Research euroCRIS 2017, 30 May 2017
Discussion.
Wrap-up & discussion EOSC Governance Development Forum workshop:
EGI-Engage Engaging the EGI Community towards an Open Science Commons
Antonella Fresa Technical Coordinator
Vision for Open Science
Project Overview and EOSC Governance
Davor Kozmus, MHEST Steering Platform Meeting 29. October 2009, Zagreb
European Open Science Cloud All Hands Meeting Pisa 8-9 March 2018
EOSCpilot Skills Landscape & Framework
EOSC Governance Development Forum
EOSC Concepts Comparison EOSC Glossary Jesse Oikarinen (CSC)
WP2 Governance Per Öster
EOSCpilot All Hands Meeting 9 March 2018, Pisa
EOSC services architecture
WP5.2 Report & outlook Jan Bot, SURF
EOSCpilot All Hands Meeting 8 March 2018 Pisa
EOSCpilot All-hands meeting Pisa, March 8th-9th 2018
Common Authentication and Authorisation Service for Life Science Research Mikael Linden, ELIXIR Finland.
6.2 data interoperability Rafael C Jimenez ELIXIR
Skill gaps and planning for training pilots
European Open Science Cloud All Hands Meeting Pisa 8-9 March 2018
Pre-OMB meeting Preparation for the Workshop “EGI towards H2020”
Brian Matthews STFC EOSCpilot Brian Matthews STFC
EOSCpilot All Hands Meeting 9 March 2018, Pisa
Community Engagement & Competence Centre
How to make training materials discoverable
Conclusions/documents from previous work
Cross-border joint procurement
Skills Framework FAIR 4S DI4R18 Lisbon
Open Science Policy Platform
Stakeholders R. Dimper 15 January 2019
Experience of the implementation of FP6; preparations towards FP7
Interoperability and data for open science
Open Science Conference Ljubljani 22 May 2019
Common Authentication and Authorisation Service for Life Science Research Mikael Linden, ELIXIR Finland.
Presentation transcript:

Panel discussion on Principles of Engagement Andrew Smith, ELIXIR Tallinn, 2 October 2017

Format of panel discussion Short intro and scene setting (Andrew Smith) Initial statement from each panel member, addressing particular questions Yannick Legré, EGI Ari Asmi, ICOS ERIC Damien, Lecarpentier, EUDAT Bob Jones, Cern Francoise Genova, Strasbourg Astronomical Data Centre CDS Open discussion Wrap-up www.eoscpilot.eu The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & Innovation under contract no. 739563

Questions to panel How is access to your services provided currently? For users, how do you access the services you require? What are the rules/principles around using those services? Are there legal/financial/ethical/organisational bottlenecks that would hinder your participation as a service provider in EOSC? Do different service types (for example, cloud, training, databases, interoperability) require different Principles of Engagement? How can cost-recovery be managed, especially for access to services provided in a different country to where researchers are based? As a service provider, how access to services your organization is providing, is organized at the moment? As a user, how access to services the research community you are representing uses, is organized at the moment? Which kind of Principles of Engagement the service / infrastructure you are using / providing has? Which kind of legal/financial/ethical and other organizational aspects do you foresee that could become barriers for participation – either using or providing services - in the EOSC? Which kind of principles of engagement the different components of the EOSC ie. cloud/compute, databases, training, interoperability, should have? How to arrange cost recovery for trans-national access when a researcher based in another member states would like to use a national e-infrastructure? Bartering? Cloud-credits? Market? EC trans-national, and virtual access funding instruments? Open access policy? …? Are open access policies (for instance based on scientific excellence and evaluation like in the case of some research infrastructures and PRACE) possible to be applied to national e-infrastructures? www.eoscpilot.eu The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & Innovation under contract no. 739563

Rules of Engagement considerations HLEG original recommendations OSPP EOSC Declaration Others – responses to EOSC declaration Institutions own position papers and views www.eoscpilot.eu The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & Innovation under contract no. 739563

Understanding barriers to participation Legal, ethical, financial and organisational Balance the needs of ‘users’ with ‘service providers’ Rules of Engagement recommendations that fit the ‘collective’ vision of EOSC How high do we want to set the barrier to participation? High, ie, small number of potential service providers? Low, open market for all? www.eoscpilot.eu The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & Innovation under contract no. 739563

WP2 PoE - Steps so far Wide but shallow review potential Service providers, based on public documentation e-Infras Domain specific RIs, including ESFRIs and EiroForum orgs Commercial vendors (ie AWS) Other initiatives bound by Charter Deeper analysis of smaller number of potential Service providers, e.g. EGI, PRACE, GEANT, OpenAire ELIXIR, SeaDataNet… Final recommendations to follow in late 2017 www.eoscpilot.eu The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & Innovation under contract no. 739563

Findings so far – a story of variation… Large variation in the services provided Large variation in organisation type and permanence of the infrastructure/project Large variation in how they integrate service providers Large variation in how the services run by providers are evaluated and monitored Large variation in pricing policy www.eoscpilot.eu The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & Innovation under contract no. 739563

andrew.smith@elixir-europe.org www.eoscpilot.eu The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & Innovation under contract no. 739563