Learning the Nuances of Written English by fusing the Strategies of Spoken English Learning: An Approach to EFL Students.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TEACHING WRITING.  Why and what do we write? What do people write in their real lives beyond the classroom? As said, function and purpose of writing.
Advertisements

REFERENCES WHAT DOES IT CERTIFY? Cambridge English: First, commonly known as First Certificate in English (FCE) is an exam for people who need to prove.
TrIn 3102: Consecutive Interpreting Week 5 2/15/06.
Chapter 3: The Direct Method
Chapter 12 Instructional Methods
EUROPEAN SCALES OF LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY BASIC CONCEPTS IN ASSESSMENT ASSESSING ORAL PERFORMANCE Language Assessment.
Speaking Of all the four skills (speaking , listening, reading, and writing) speaking seems intuitively the most important. Most foreign language learners.
INCORPORATING CULTURE IN DEVELOPING ENGLISH SPEAKING SKILLS FOR EFL ADULT LEARNERS: A CASESTUDY OF VIETNAMESE TEACHERS’ VOICES Mach Buu Hien SEAMEO RETRAC.
Teaching Writing. 2 Teaching objectives  By the end of this unit, Ss will be able to: 1. know what, why and how we write 2. know the communicative approach.
Textbook Analysis UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS FACULDADE DE LETRAS COURSE: The Communicative Approach PROFESSOR: Deise Prina Dutra STUDENTS: Augusto.
The Direct Approach This approach was developed initially as a reaction to the grammar-translation approach in an attempt to integrate more use of.
Journal Entry 22  Focus: Reflect on Unit 2  Please do this on a separate sheet of paper that you can add to your journals when they are returned  Take.
Practical Ideas On Alternative Assessment For ESL Students Jo-Ellen Tannenbaum, Montgomery County Public Schools (MD)
Academic Writing and Critical Thinking some ideas for the classroom Christopher Graham Russia, November 2013.
Miss Maliha Ali Khan The City School Grade 4 English Language
CLC reading program Nguyen Thi Thu Trang. In-class activities Assignment Assessment Add your text in here Reading program Objectives Contents.
Unit 3 The Direct Method.
Instructor: Chelsea Jones Teaching English in English (TEE) January 2012 Adapted from: Dr. Scott Phillabaum’s PPT Presentation on Pragmatics.
Are you ready to play…. Deal or No Deal? Deal or No Deal?
Professor : Patricia Su Presenter : Ming-Jen Tsai (Pink) Number : Date : April 19 th, 2012.
Grammar Translation Method
Facilitate Group Learning
Teaching Writing.
Introduction to Language Teaching The Grammar-Translation Method.
Developing Program Learning Outcomes To help in the quality of services.
What to Expect When Expecting ESL Students: Practical Suggestions for Accommodating English Language Learners in the Regular Classroom Created by Jenny.
English Language Practicum (1) DR. ANTAR ABDELLAH 1435.
Academic Language: The Gateway to Student Achievement Fall Susan GordonShort Version! Gaithersburg High School.
Antar Abdellah. What is speaking? Producing comprehendible sounds.
This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This courseware reflects the views only of the authors,
Objectives of session By the end of today’s session you should be able to: Define and explain pragmatics and prosody Draw links between teaching strategies.
T H E D I R E C T M E T H O D DM. Background DM An outcome of a reaction against the Grammar- Translation Method. It was based on the assumption that.
2-Minute Square Dance Speaking Extension Activity.
LAW OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS (DIN 0431) International Environmental Law I Evaluation Requirements Prof. Alberto do Amaral Jr.
25 minutes long Must write in pencil Off topic or illegible score will receive a 0 Essay must reflect your original and individual work.
Approaches to teaching English The differences between EAP and General EFL Louis Rogers.
PowerPoint & Evaluating Resources PowerPoint & Evaluating Resources Mike Spindler & Emma Purnell.
Engaging All Students in Collaborative Discussions: Building comprehension of narrative and informational texts through listening and speaking Paul Boyd-Batstone,
Teaching Plan A General Introduction. Course Description and Objective Advanced English Composition is a writing intensive course that takes a holistic.
Big success is combination of small successes. My English Teaching Methodology- TVG Theory Astha Mishra.
International & Comparative Education: Education in Majority-English-Speaking Countries Administration.
Online gaming at the GTLI: 3 encouraging initiatives
The oral Approach & situational language Teaching
English for Academic Purposes
Methods of preparing Internet based tasks for English lessons
International & Comparative Education: Education in Majority-English-Speaking Countries Administration.
ENGLISH FOR LAWYERS II INTRODUCTION.
Rhetorical Analysis Essay
An Overview Of Vision 1 Summer 1395.
Contemporary English Language 1
COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING
Language skills Four skills – L,S,R,W Receptive skills
State of Kuwait Ministry of Education E.L.T General Supervision
The Planning Chart The chart is a map or template of your writing assignment. It focuses on five important Writing Variables: 1. Central idea 2. Form 3.
THE DIRECT METHOD.
“Tell me and I forget. Show me and I remember
Session 4 Creating a safe climate for discussion
Knowing more about Integrated Humanities
Doc.dr Valentina Bošković Marković
12 Ways to Support English Learners in the Mainstream Classroom
October 22 6TH GRADE ELA – Benchmark Unit 2 -Unit 2 – Determining Importance/Sequence READING LOG Word Gen – 1.02 Intro Benchmark – Connections Chart Personal.
FCE (FIRST CERTIFICATE IN ENGLISH) General information.
AVID Standard 2.8 Refine oral language skills
Welcome to the English Department
DESIGNING CLASSROOM TESTS (Continued)
ACT English – Rhetorical Strategies Review
English Language J351/01 & J351/02 Section B
FCE IES Parque de Lisboa.
June 4-7 (Written Portion) June 10-June 14 (Speaking Portion)
Reading Bookmark- Individual Reading - Due 10/28
Presentation transcript:

Learning the Nuances of Written English by fusing the Strategies of Spoken English Learning: An Approach to EFL Students

Study conducted to enhance the written English skills of students using classroom discussions / oral activities conducted in the class

Background Majority of the courses use written English as a major parameter when it comes to assessment and interestingly while preparing the learners to examinations the ELT teachers are encouraged to use the techniques that tilt towards the spoken aspects of the language.

This paper aims to address the issue of enhancing the written skills of the engineering students who are seemingly better off in the arena of spoken English.

clustering, peer writing and project writing Methods for writing Making mind maps Brainstorming Other methods : clustering, peer writing and project writing

describing diagrams or discussing current issues Methods for Speaking describing pictures in pairs or making up a story from a series of pictures describing diagrams or discussing current issues role play group discussion, debates, refutations

Experiment An attempt to make use of the learners’ superior spoken skills and to translate them into effective written English skills

Outline of the approach Target Group: Undergraduate Engineering Students ( English medium background)   Target Skills: Vocabulary, structure and tone ( Written English) Method: The classroom is divided into groups or pairs and Group is assigned a specific topic. An oral discussion takes place where students make use of the points noted down in the paper. The group / pair is later asked to present their views on the topic in a written form as an article. The difference in the structure, vocabulary and tone is analyzed. Proposed oral activities: Group Discussions/ Debates

Sample Exercise The following exercise is a sample activity held in an undergraduate engineering (first semester) English class. Oral Activity : Panel Discussion Written Activity: Five Paragraph Essay The students were divided into five groups where each group had a total of eight members. A topic on current issue, i.e. Is reservation in education sector an injustice to merit?, is chosen for discussion.

Rules The members within a group discuss the topic and decide on a clear stand on the issue. The major points in support of the stand would be noted down by the group members. The group selects a representative to speak. The representative would express the views of the group in the panel Discussion Students assess the speech of their group in the evaluation sheet.  

Evaluation Sheet Vocabulary Sentence Structure Tone Group No: Name : Meek Erroneous Satirical Rude Non-standard Arrogant Aggressive Incomplete Dominant Refined Acceptable Moderate Appropriate Persuasive Figurative Sophisticated Controlled Group No: Name :  

Speech activity was followed by a written exercise. Every member of the group was asked to write a five paragraph essay on the same topic. Students present the arguments by using the points noted down by their group. This exercise was a take home assignment

Peer evaluation of the essay (inter group evaluation) Evaluation sheet identical to that of speech activity was given to the students procedure of assessment was repeated.

Analysis of Evaluation Great variation in vocabulary , tone and structure in written form as against speech VOCABULARY ORAL WRITTEN RUDE 05 % - AGGRESSIVE 70% 20 % APPROPRIATE 10% 60% FIGURATIVE 05% 20%

Analysis of Evaluation TONE ORAL WRITTEN Satirical 25% 10% Dominant 45% 05% Moderate 20% 60% Persuasive

Analysis of Evaluation SENTENCE STRUCTURE ORAL WRITTEN Erroneous 10% 40% Non-standard 15% 25% Acceptable 30% 20% Appropriate 45%

Conclusions Need to adopt different style in vocabulary, tone and sentence structure when one switches over from spoken to written English Teacher needs to spend a few minutes with individual student in analyzing the particular written assignment Need to translate the students’ ability to express their ideas in spoken English into effective written form of communication

Reference Cushing Weigle, Sara. Assessing Writing. London: Cambridge University Press, 2002. Davison, John and John Moss. Issues in English Teaching. London: Routledge, 2000. Hedge, Tricia. Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. Luoma, Sari. Assessing Speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Ur, Penny. A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. White, Ron and Valerie Arndt. Process writing. Harlow: Longman, 1991.