Pedestrian Safety & Mobility Study

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
January 23, 2006 FAIRFAX COUNTY PEDESTRIAN TASK FORCE FAIRFAX COUNTY PEDESTRIAN TASK FORCE FINAL REPORT.
Advertisements

Presented by Nazir Lalani P.E TRAFFIC SAFETY EVALUATIONS (Pedestrians and Bicyclists)
January 8, 2014 FMATS College Road Corridor Study FMATS Technical Committee Update.
HSM: Celebrating 5 Years Together Brian Ray, PE Casey Bergh, PE.
Titusville to Edgewater Bike Loop PD&E Study
Safety at Signalized Intersections. Signalized Intersections FHWA Safety Focus Areas 2.
Pedestrian Safety Master Plan. This Presentation Similarities and Differences with Other Areas No Magic Bullet Site, Corridor Specific Multiple, Complementary.
December 13, 2010 Developing Bicycle Performance Measures for Integrated Multi-Modal Corridor Management.
Building Innovative Facilities for a Multimodal Future 2014 BICYCLE MASTER PLAN UPDATE FINAL PUBLIC REVIEW Baltimore City Department of Transportation.
FDOT Bicycle/Pedestrian Focused Initiative & Complete Streets Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Billy L. Hattaway, PE District One Secretary.
Oregon Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Implementation Plan.
Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency Kamm’s Corners Development Corporation.
Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan June 2010 Steering Committee - January 28, 2010 Polk Transportation Planning Organization.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
May 1, 2014 East Gude Drive Pedestrian Road Safety Audit Stakeholder Pedestrian Safety Meeting.
Regional Trails Corridor Assessment. Project Goals »Complete the regional trails network in the TPO Planning Area and advance the Florida Greenways and.
Titusville to Edgewater Bike Loop PD&E Study FDOT Project Number: Volusia County, Florida FDOT Project Number: Brevard County,
What is a TSP? Provides City with guidance for operating and improving a multimodal transportation system Focuses on priority projects, policies, and programs.
Regional Trails Corridor Assessment. Presentation Outline »Project Overview – Study Limits – Project Goals »Stakeholder Outreach – Stakeholder Contact.
Comparative Crash Data Analysis Pasco County, FL US 19 Corridor.
Safety Data Initiatives in Reauthorization – What Can We Expect? Kathy Krause, FHWA Office of Safety 30 th Annual International Traffic Records Forum July.
BROOKS BRIDGE REPLACEMENT STUDY February 18, 2016 Project Briefing for Presenters: April Williams, P.E. (FDOT Project Manager) Steve Schnell, AICP (HDR.
S.R. 30A / U.S. 98 / Panama City Beach Parkway Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study F ROM M ANDY L ANE TO T HOMAS D RIVE I NTERSECTION B AY C.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
Congestion Management Process / Performance Measures Report
Pedestrian Facility Improvement Program
Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Action Plan
What's in the 2009 MUTCD For Bicyclists?
Saving the King Street Bicycle Boulevard
NE Pasco (The Hills) Multimodal Safety Action Plan Pasco County, FL
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO Board October 26, 2016.
STWG is in the Know What is Vision Zero Why It Makes Sense Here
S.R. 44 Corridor Management Plan S.R. 44 Corridor Management Plan
PROJECT INFORMATION SESSION Small Business Enterprise
Project Overview – Phase 1
S.R. 30A / U.S. 98 / Panama City Beach Parkway
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO BPAC November 9, 2016.
River to Sea TPO - CAC/TCC
US 92 Pedestrian Connectivity & Safety Assessment Study
North Lamar Boulevard Project
Pedestrian Safety.
PROJECT LOCATION Project begins at Garden Lane (East of I-4)
Pedestrian & Bicyclist Crash Analysis
Ad Hoc Advisory Group presentation, August 3, 2016
SR 60/Kennedy Boulevard and Jackson Street Resurfacing Projects
STREETS & STORMWATER DEPARTMENT
River to Sea TPO Meeting US 92/International Speedway Boulevard
US 92 Pedestrian Connectivity & Safety Assessment Study
Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations
Beachside Traffic/Crosswalk Update
Meeting of the Hillsborough MPO Board December 5, 2017
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
Transportation Alternatives (TA) Set-aside
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO Board May 27, 2015.
Highway Safety Team Staff Meeting SMART Portal HSIP Application Demonstration Systemic Safety Improvement (SSI) November 21,2017.
Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Vision/Goals/Objectives
Sarno Road Corridor Study
LRTP Modeling Status Update
TELL THE TPO Community Transportation Survey
LRTP Modeling Status Update
Protected Bicycle Lanes Finally Pedal Their Way to KC…
Infrastructure Strategy 1: Implement roadway improvements that compensate for impacts of aging on safe driving Strategy 2: Implement improvements to.
MPO Board Presentation
Parks Highway Reconstruction: Lucas Road to Big Lake Road
ODOT Region 1 Lents Neighborhood
Alex Henry FDOT District Seven Safety Office
STATE ROAD 61/369 CRAWFORDVILLE HIGHWAY
New Hanover Comprehensive Plan
Project Location: 35th Ave HSIP8
West Cervantes Traffic Feasibility Study Jill Lavender, Transportation Planner Cory Wilkinson, AICP CEP, Project Manager Mary Morgan, PE, Engineer.
Presentation transcript:

Pedestrian Safety & Mobility Study CR/SR A1A RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION Pedestrian Safety & Mobility Study Technical Coordinating Committee/Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting | October 20, 2015

PROJECT OVERVIEW + SCHEDULE

Project Overview Study Limits Primary Goal Secondary Goal Bethune Beach (Volusia County) to just south of Marineland (Flagler County) – 56.5 total miles in length Primary Goal Recommend implementable pedestrian/bicycle safety improvements/countermeasures at strategic locations along A1A Secondary Goal Expand countermeasures to be applicable along other sections of A1A in a systemic manner

Project Schedule Previous Studies Research & Crash Data Analysis | August – September Stakeholder Meeting | Today Focus Areas Crash Analysis/Field Reviews | October – December Stakeholder Involvement Systemic Countermeasure Identification | December – January Steering Committee Workshop | January Prioritize Systemic Countermeasures | February Draft Report | February – March R2CTPO + Stakeholder Review Final Report | April Previous Studies Research & Crash Data Analysis | August – September Stakeholder Meeting | Today Focus Areas Crash Analysis/Field Reviews | October – December Stakeholder Involvement Systemic Countermeasure Identification | December – January Steering Committee Workshop | January Prioritize Systemic Countermeasures | February Draft Report | February – March R2CTPO + Stakeholder Review Final Report | April

SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS STUDIES

Previous Studies Review Four studies performed along A1A between 2008 and 2015: SR A1A Pedestrian Safety Study, Daytona Beach Shores (2015) Recommendations included adding new mid-block crosswalks, adding Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs), and modifying markings/signs at existing crossings Pedestrian Safety Audit Report, Daytona Beach (2014) FDOT performed a pedestrian road safety audit from Earl Street to Oakridge Boulevard, proposing short, near, and long-term countermeasures along corridor Pedestrian Safety Study for CR A1A, New Smyrna Beach (2012) Recommendations included installing continuous bike facilities, sidewalks where missing, RRFBs, median refuge islands, among others CR A1A Sidewalk Feasibility Study, Daytona Beach Shores (2008) Recommendations included road diet, constructing 8’ sidewalk, consolidating driveways, and installing crosswalks

LAW ENFORCEMENT COORDINATION

Law Enforcement Coordination Uniform Traffic Citation (UTC) UTC data does not have location information that lends itself to mapping Sorted through data by jurisdiction, narrowed non-crash citations to relevant hazardous moving violations Pedestrian and bicycle citations accounted for 1.1% of overall citation data (role of warnings) Pedestrian/bicycle citation detail revealed specific subsections and violations

Law Enforcement Coordination Face-to-face meetings or phone calls with Police Chiefs and traffic supervisors of law enforcement agencies along A1A High degree of interest in the project Consensus that this is a high priority traffic safety issue Nature of the problem differs among jurisdictions (road users, roadway conditions, pedestrian features) Enthusiasm for future participation in project and FDOT HVE funding

CRASH DATA + FOCUS AREAS

Crash Data Collection Six years of pedestrian/bicycle crash data collected 2009 – 2014 95 pedestrian and 63 bicycle totaling 158 crashes 14 fatal, 128 injury, and 16 property damage only 39% occurred at night, 14% alcohol and/or drug related 20% occurred with a pedestrian/bicyclist under the age of 20 and 18% occurred with 65 and older Under 20 was highest of all age groups.

Crash Data Analysis Sliding Window Analysis 0.25 mi. 1 mile 1 mile Mapped all crashes and reviewed each 1 mile segment of A1A, 0.25 miles at a time Ex: MP 0.00 to MP 1.00, then 0.25 to 1.25, etc. 228 individual 1 mile segments analyzed ($10.1M for fatal, $275,400 for injury, and $7,600 for property damage) Analyzed top 32 one mile segments – segments with >9 crashes Analyzed top 55 one mile segments – segments with 1 or more fatal crashes, or in top 5 for crash frequency 4 crashes 3 crashes Reviewed each segment for total crash frequency and crash severity weighted by crash costs Grouped nearby 1 mile segments together to identify focus areas

Crash Data Analysis Risked Based Analysis Reviewed roadway and land use metrics that potentially factor into pedestrian/bicycle crashes: 50% of crashes on segments between 15,000 and 20,000 AADT (11.4 miles/20% of corridor length) 62% of crashes with 30 or 35 mph posted speed 67% of crashes on 4 lane divided (6 miles/11% corridor length) or 5 lane with two-way left-turn lane (10.6 miles/19% corridor length) 32% of crashes away from marked crossings (both with and without active control device) 39% of crashes under dusk, dark without street light, or dark with street light conditions Reviewed crashes relative to ped/bike facilities, bus stops, beach parking, parks, and civic land uses In relation to Figure 9, some of the lighting was not on in Flagler Beach during the field review. Possibly due to turtle restrictions.

Focus Areas Overview Bring in Figure 10 We are choosing 3 to perform field reviews on. Notice that south of Area A and south of SR 421 we are not proposing any focus areas because of the low crash frequency, number of pedestrian crossings currently in place

Potential Field Review Locations Recommend focus areas D, E, and G for field review D – Daytona Beach/Ormond Beach: 16 crashes, 4 ln divided/5 ln section E – Ormond Beach/Ormond-by-the-Sea: 10 crashes (3 fatal), 2 ln undivided/3 ln section G – Flagler Beach: 9 crashes (1 fatal), 2 ln undivided section Could also look into reviewing focus areas A and C A – New Smyrna Beach: 9 crashes, 4 ln divided/5 ln section C – Daytona Beach: 37 crashes (2 fatal), 9 total crashes, 4 ln divided/5 ln section Segment from Earl St. to Oakridge Blvd. previously studied, 11 crashes from study included in data set

NEXT STEPS

Next Steps Project briefing presentations to TPO Board next week Field reviews for three focus areas – October through December Local law enforcement participate in field reviews Preparation work includes: Corridor specific data collection Crash analysis (historical, school related, pedestrian/bicycle facility) Crash diagram generation

PROJECT CONTACT INFORMATION R2C TPO PROJECT MANAGER: Stephan C. Harris Bicycle & Pedestrian Coordinator 2570 W. International Speedway Blvd. Suite 100 Daytona Beach, FL 32114 Phone: 386.226.0422; Ext. 20428 sharris@r2ctpo.org CONSULTANT PROJECT MANAGER: Adam M. Burghdoff, P.E. 225 E. Robinson St. Suite 450 Orlando, FL 32801 Phone: 386.226.0422; Ext. 20428 aburghdoff@kittelson.com