Public Meeting For Scoping Of An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) For The Perham Resource Recovery Facility: Introductions Agenda Good evening, my.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Veolia Environmental Services Rolling Hills Mixed Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Project Rolling Hills Mixed Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Project Wright.
Advertisements

Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing Fiscal Estimate.
Environmental Impact Statement Process Development Services Department Carol Helland, Land Use Director/SEPA Official (DSD) David Pyle, Senior Land Use.
1 Workshop for the Proposed Gregory Canyon Landfill California Department of Resources Recycling & Recovery (CalRecycle) June 27, 2011 Fallbrook Public.
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
Topic 6 Environmental Impact Assessments. EIA – Introduction The start Effectiveness?
Title V Site Operating Permits (SOPs)
BY DANNY BEER INTRO INTO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT.
January Goals: Streamline permitting process for certain solid waste facilities and activities Expand use of 3 rd party inspectors to allow MassDEP.
1 State Water Resources Control Board Environmental Review for State Bond Funded Grant Projects Presented by Lisa Lee, Environmental Review Unit.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
Tribal Benefits from State Implementation Plan (SIP) Process Involvement Rosanne Sanchez New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau.
Lassen Lodge Hydroelectric Project Public Scoping Meetings November 5, 2014 (Sacramento and Red Bluff) State Water Resources Control Board Division of.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
Enforcement Overview Melissa Cordell, P.G. Enforcement Division Office of Compliance and Enforcement Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
LIGHT RAIL PERMITTING ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMITTEE MEETING March 18-3:00PM | ROOM 1E-113.
Steps in the Hazardous Waste Permit Reissuance Process December 10, 2014.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) UPDATE ON PROPOSED SMUD ANNEXATION Presented to Yolo LAFCo September 19, 2005.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
Energy, Environmental Impacts, and Sustainable Development Presented by Cat Shrier, Ph.D., P.G. Water Resources Planner (403)
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
Governor’s Ethanol Conference The Minnesota Fuel Ethanol Industry: Regulatory and Permitting Perspectives from the Public Sector. James E. Sullivan Kansas.
Big Sandy Rancheria Band of Western Mono Indians Casino and Resort Project Draft EIS Public Hearing Wednesday, February 2, p.m. – 9 p.m. Foothill.
LIGHT RAIL PERMITTING ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMITTEE MEETING Jan. 21-3:00PM | ROOM 1E-113.
1 CEQA and CEQA-Plus Presented by Cookie Hirn, Lisa Lee, and Michelle Jones Regional Programs Unit July 2008.
Winery Ordinance Update Scoping Meeting for the Environmental Impact Report County of Santa Barbara July 16, 2014.
Kilarc-Cow Creek Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning FERC Project No. 606 Shasta County Board of Supervisors March 4, 2008.
1 Identify Preferred Alternative and Finalize Plan Planning Steps 7 & 8.
CALENDAR ITEM 101 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) S A N F R A N C I S C O B A Y A N D D E L T A S A N D M I N I N G P R O J E C T STATE CLEARINGHOUSE.
CHAPTER 4 ALTERNATIVES. --- “The driving impetus for conducting environmental impact studies is to comparatively present the effects of proposed alternatives.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
1 Waste Discharge Authorization Application - British Columbia WG6 Application Process WG Document Review presented by Helga Harlander October x, 2008.
1 Responding to Comments Janet Cox TMDL/Planning Communications Region 2.
CEQA and the Delta Plan Presentation to Delta Stewardship Council February 24, 2011.
Horse Creek Wind Farm Community Review Workshop #1: Introductory Meeting April 21, 2011—6:30pm at the Paynter Center.
Responsibilities of Lead Agency Pages 7-8 of Training Guide 1. Preliminary review a) Determine if activity is a project as described by CEQA b) May require.
Grant County Zoning Ordinance Review Public Comment Forum Todd Kays:Executive Director – 1 st District Association of Local Governments.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 Harbor Bridge Project Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Public.
Enforcement Overview Melissa Cordell, P.G. Enforcement Division Office of Compliance and Enforcement Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental.
MPCA Citizens’ Board Meeting: United States Steel Corporation-Keetac Air Emissions Permit Owen Seltz Industrial Division September 13, 2011.
Office of the State Fire Marshal Pipeline Safety Division
Ascending to IED compliance
The Plaza at Santa Monica Project PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING
1828 Ocean Ave & 1921 Ocean Front Walk PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING
HB 328 SITING OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMNT FACILITIES
Scoping Meeting April 20th 6:00 pm
Pre-Proposal Conference
Providence Saint John’s Health Center Phase II Project
La Mesa Climate Action Plan Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Scoping Meeting May 31, 2017.
The Development Process
Status of the Planning Working Group’s (PWG) Efforts
Facebook Campus Expansion Project EIR
Overview What is the CEQA environmental review process?
Ascending to IED compliance
Fifth Standard Solar Project Complex
SEQRA as a Tool to Review Energy Projects
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Indian Policies and Procedures (IPPs) OASIS December 7, 2017
Scott Nester SJVUAPCD Planning Manager November 4, 2003
United Nations Statistics Division
Vista Verde Residential Project Environmental Impact Report Public Scoping Meeting May 19, 2010 Michael Brandman Associates.
Session Law Water Quality Permitting for Composters
Environmental Requirements and planning grants
Standards Development Process
REPUBLIC OF CROATIA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMANTAL AND NATURE PROTECTION
Land Use 101: The Design Process
Presentation transcript:

Public Meeting For Scoping Of An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) For The Perham Resource Recovery Facility: Introductions Agenda Good evening, my name is Denise Leezer and I am the project manager assigned to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed expansion at the Olmsted-Waste-to-energy Facility. Other MPCA staff present this evening include: Dennis Becker, Air Dispersion Modeling Shelley Burman, Air Emission Risk Assessment Carolina Schutt, Air Quality Permitting Rich Sandberg, Section Manager, Industrial Division Olmsted County Staff Craig Diekvoss, Regulatory Compliance Coordinator Agendas for this evening’s meeting are located at the back of the room along with a sign-in sheet and a fact sheet discussing the EIS process. I will give a brief overview of the EIS process and Craig Diekvoss will give a brief overview of the proposed project. We will then open the meeting up for questions. After, we will again be available at the back of the room and in the room for one-to-one questions.

Purpose Of Scoping Meeting: Become Familiar With The Proposed Project And The Staff Become Familiar With The EIS Process Respond To Process-related Questions The purpose of the meeting this evening is: To help you become familiar with the proposed project and some of the staff working on the project To help you become familiar with the EIS process and opportunities during the process for the public to comment. And to help you become familiar with the documents currently available for your review. We will not be taking verbal comments or answering technical questions this evening, just answering process-related questions and taking written comments.

EIS Development Process FEIS revision DEIS preparation Scoping EIS public review Public meeting & comment period The First Step in the EIS Development Process is: SCOPING or deciding what impacts and alternatives will be covered by the EIS and the extent of effort and depth of analysis to be devoted to each topic. The next Step in process is the actual preparation of the EIS report. Notification that an EIS is being prepared will be published in the EQB Monitor A draft EIS, based on the work outlined in the Scoping Decision Document, will be prepared. After the draft EIS report has been prepared, there will be a 30-day public review period. The third step in the process is the preparation of a final EIS that includes a response to any comments received during the public comment period An additional two-week notice will be published in the EQB Monitor notifying the public that the final EIS has been prepared. And Finally: The MPCA Board will Determine if the EIS adequately evaluates the topics outlined in the final Scoping Decision Document Public meeting and comment period Notice of Final EIS availability EIS preparation notice MPCA Board Adequacy Determination Notice of Draft EIS availability Proposed EIS scope MPCA Board

EIS Scoping Process Scoping EAW Draft Scoping Decision Document Project Information Identify Potentially Significant Topics Draft Scoping Decision Document Topics to be Evaluated Describes Method for Evaluation The Scoping EAW uses the standard EAW form to provide information about the project and its setting in order to identify potentially significant environmental impacts. The Draft Scoping Document identifies the topics to be evaluated in the EIS and describes how those issues will be evaluated. The purpose is to scope – or narrow down the topics to be covered by the EIS to those most needed for the project decisions

Final Scoping Decision Document Narrow Down The Topics Adopted By The MPCA Board As The “Blueprint” For The EIS No Additional Information May Be Included. Once the comment period has ended, a final scoping document is prepared that includes a response to comments received, and the document is presented to the MPCA Board for a decision on the EIS scope. The final Scoping Decision Document is the basis for the work plan and cost estimates developed for the EIS. After the Scoping Decision Document is approved by the MPCA Citizen’s Board, it will be used as the “blueprint” for the EIS and no additional information may be included.

Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) Not An Approval Process Voluntary EIS for The Project Provide Information About The Potential Impacts And Mitigation The EIS is not a means to approve or disapprove a project, but simply a source of information to be used by permitting and other regulatory decision makers, when making their decisions. The MPCA is the Responsible Governmental Unit responsible for preparing an Environmental Impact Statement on the proposed expansion at the Olmsted Waste-To-Energy Facility. Although the proposed project, at a planned capacity of 200 tons per day of input, will not meet or exceed the threshold requiring the mandatory preparation of an EIS, Olmsted County has voluntarily agreed to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed project instead of going through the more limited EAW process. The EIS will provide information about the extent of the potential impacts and how they may be avoided or minimized. It also discusses environmental and socio-economic issues

Written Comments Public Comment Period For Scope Of EIS Written Comments Must Be Received At The MPCA By 4:30pm, January 5, 2012. Kevin Kain, Environmental Review Unit, MPCA, 520 Lafayette Rd. N., St. Paul, MN 55155-4194 Fax (651) 297-2343 Or Kevin.kain@state.Mn.Us Submitted, in Writing, During the Tonight’s Meeting For development of the final scoping decision document, staff will consider written comments received during the comment period, including those written comments received at tonight’s meeting. Once the Board approves a final scoping document, again, no additional information may be included in the scope of the review and preparation of the actual EIS process begins. There are forms in the back of the room that may be used to provide comments or you may use your own paper. You may submit your comments in writing to MPCA staff this evening or mail/fax/e-mail them - to be received by 4:30pm on August 8, 2005 Please use the sign-in sheet provided at the back of the room if you would like to be included on the mailing list for this project.