Exclusivity and non-competition obligations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMPACT ESTIMATION PROJECT h o r i z o n s c a n n i n g Anti-trust issues in on-line retailing Ed Smith Director Office of Fair Trading The views expressed.
Advertisements

Vertical agreements and competition law Doc. dr. sc. Jasminka Pecotić Kaufman University of Zagreb-Faculty of Economics and Business, Department of Law.
Management of Business risks Paulius Čerka. How do you manage the risks of international business? Consider “ The management of international business.
TRANSFER OF TECHNOLOGY BLOCK EXEMPTION REGULATION NO. 240/96 AND ITS PROPOSAL TO REFORM 24 June 2003 Valeria Falce Gianni, Origoni, Grippo.
Terminating a Franchise Agreement-
Mark Abell Partner, Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP, London 5-6 November 2008.
Dannemann.com.br COMPENSATION TO MASTER FRANCHISORS UPON TERMINATION AND NON-RENEWAL OF MASTER FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS IN BRAZIL © 2012 Dannemann Siemsen.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
The e-Commerce Sector Inquiry
INTRA-COMMUNITY ACQUISITIONS OF GOODS USING THE METHODOLOGY
© 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 40 Franchises and Special Forms of Business.
1 Is there a conflict between competition law and intellectual property rights? Edward Whitehorn Head, Competition Affairs Branch Carrie Tang Assistant.
Prohibited agreements: Article 101 (3) Julija Jerneva ( )
Chapter 40 Franchises and Special Forms of Business
Legal Aspects of Investing in a Franchise in the Dominican Republic Luis Julio Jiménez Jiménez Cruz Peña October 22, 2008.
FRANCHISING & LICENSING LexCounsel, Law Offices
KEY PROVISIONS OF FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS Claro F. Certeza SPCMBLAW.
Vertical Restraints: An Introduction
H I R S C H & P A R T N E R S A v o c a t S o l i c i t o r R e c h t s a n w a l t Pharmaceutical settlement agreements and competition law A litigation.
INNOVATION OR KNOW-HOW IN FRANCHISING ? Guy GRAS – Eurocommerce SME Day – 21/10/ Brussels 1.
Proposal for a new UNECE regulation on recyclability of motor vehicles Informal Document GRPE Reply to the Comments of the Russian Federation Informal.
Navigating the competition law aspects of franchising 2014 UIA Florence Corinne Khayat.
Franchising and Internet. Is it appropirate to apply the same principles which have been established for selective distribution André Lombart CMS DeBacker.
LEGAL ASPECTS OF FRANCHISING 18 April 2009 ALBERTO ECHARRI.
RESEARCH IN THE CONTEXT OF COMPETITION BY MOKUBUNG N. MOKUBUNG 1.
Maximizing Intangible Benefits from IPRs protection to Exploitation of IPRs: Business Strategies based on Franchising and /or Merchandising Avv. Fabrizio.
Undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) Worldbank Global Development Learning Network The Advanced Program in Accounting.
Patent License Agreements under the new EU Block Exemption Regulation H. Ulrich Dörries and David Molnia df-mp Dörries, Frank-Molnia & Pohlman Munich,
Competition Enforcement in the Recently Acceded Member States Vertical Agreements Michal Petr Office for the Protection of Competition, Czech Republic.
Section What factor could determine legal ownership of goods in the distribution process? A.Country in which the product is produced B.Availability.
SMP and dominance Pál Belényesi Verona 29 November November 2006.
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall 1 FRANCHISES AND SPECIAL FORMS OF BUSINESS © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall.
Thomas Kramler DG Competition, European Commission (The views expressed are not necessarily those of the European Commission) E-commerce and EU competition.
COMMERCIAL LAW 1 Purchase contract Definition Seller undertakes to deliver to purchaser a thing and to allow the purchaser to acquire the ownership title.
COMMERCIAL LAW 1 Purchase contract Definition Seller undertakes to deliver to purchaser a movable thing specified individually or at least in kind and.
ROMANIA NATIONAL NATURAL GAS REGULATORY AUTHORITY Public Service Obligations in Romanian Gas Sector Ligia Medrea General Manager – Authorizing, Licensing,
COMMERCIAL LAW 1 Purchase contract Definition Seller undertakes to deliver to purchaser a thing and to transfer to purchaser ownership title to such thing;
European Commission, DG Competition, Policy and Strategy, International Relations 1 New EU Competition Rules for Purchase and Distribution agreements Kris.
Agent Advantages to Seller Low Cost Quicker Entry Lower Time Commitment Can be a domestic sale US Laws pertain Disadvantages to Seller Low return Reduced.
European and International Taxation
Carl Zwisler Gray Plant Mooty Washington, DC
HOW TO DRAFT CLAUSES WHICH COMPLY WITH REGULATION 330/2010
Marek Stavinoha Legal officer DG MOVE A4 European Commission
ENTREPRENEURSHIP Unit 1.3
DISTRIBUTION AND INTERNET
The protection of know-how in franchising networks
Latest developments in Estonia
Direct control over the premises
Sales promotion via the Internet by companies with a distribution network How to avoid conflicts with the network Marco Hero TIGGES Rechtsanwälte Zollhof.
European Union Law Week 10.
Heading in the wrong direction
ENTREPRENEURSHIP Unit 1.3
Lecture 14 agency.
EU Competition Rules for Technology Transfer Agreements
Lear - Laboratorio di economia, antitrust, regolamentazione
INTERCONNECTION GUIDELINES
WHAT IS FRANCHISING? THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE USERS
ENTREPRENEURSHIP Unit 1.3
The Mutual Recognition Regulation
TYPOLOGY OF DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENTS
Investor protection and MIFID
Fabio Bortolotti Buffa Bortolotti & Mathis, Torino-Milano
Restrictions by object and effect in the digital economy
Own a Franchise or Start a Business
Management of Business risks
Vertical Agreements Casework
Internet sales under the new block exemption regulation
ENTREPRENEURSHIP Unit 1.3
THE EU LEGAL FRAMEWORK ON EMPLOYEE INVOLVEMENT
Presentation transcript:

Exclusivity and non-competition obligations How far can you go?

Motorshoe Company Limited Producer of motor clothing and shoe Well-established in the national market, accounting for 19% of the relevant market in Europe Active US distribution channel Looking to enter into the EU market, initially in three countries: Italy France Austria Interested in joining forces with prospective successful franchisees Entered into negotiation with a potential candidate

Moto World S.r.l. Company incorporated in Italy, with a certain experience in the sale of motorbike accessories Currently well established in the northern Italian market (directly operated shops in Verona, Milan and Torino) Now willing to enter into the EU market by establishing wholly owned limited liability subsidiaries in each country through which operate local shops Initially France and Austria represent interesting targets but subsequently further expansion in the EU will be considered

FRANCHISING AND COMPETITION LAW Characteristics of a franchise contract: Three traditional components: know-how, trademarks and technical or commercial assistance A fourth component inherent to franchise contracts: the network There is a franchise only because the franchisor wants to duplicate their initial success and because each franchisee wishes to profit from the duplication. The regime of restrictions must be appreciated chiefly from the perspective of the know-how and network concepts. The European legal framework of franchise contract: European case law: Yves Rocher, Pronuptia, etc. and Regulation no. 4087/88 of 30 November 1988 relating to franchising, Regulation no. 2790/1999 of 22 December 1999 on the application of article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements (Block Exemption Regulation, BER). Guidelines on vertical restraints (GVR) set out in the Commission Notice of 13 October 2000.

EC REGULATION ON VERTICAL AGREEMENTS The scope of the Regulation: The type of agreement: Any type of vertical agreement, whatever the contract type The BER globalises the regime of non-compete undertakings and territorial restrictions (exclusive supply is likened to a non-compete undertaking) The importance of the agreement: The BER does not apply where the agreement is entered into by non-competing parties holding less than 15% of the relevant market (so-called “de minimis agreements”, EC Commission Notice of 22 December 2001) The BER pertains to vertical agreement entered into by franchisors holding at most a 30% share of the relevant market The BER does not apply where the franchisor holds over 30% of the relevant market

EC REGULATION ON VERTICAL AGREEMENTS The regime introduced by the Regulation: Franchisor and franchisee are : free to negotiate and draw up a franchise contract not required to declare the franchise contract with the Community authorities liable to assess their competition-related impact themselves Agreements falling within its scope are exempted, unless they provide for: prohibited territorial restriction clauses, non-compete clauses that do not comply with the conditions set out by BER Appreciation of the validity of the clauses according to the GVR set out in the Commission Notice of 13 October 2000 There are 3 types of undertakings that could restrict competition: Exclusivity and territorial protection for the benefit of franchisee and/or franchisor Exclusive supply for the benefit of the franchisor Post-termination non-compete clause for the benefit of the franchisor

Territorial Exclusivity Want to be very successful in the market Not interested in blocking the doors for other potential franchisees Want to keep all my options open and therefore not limit my area of action by granting exclusivity to my first franchisee Want to be very successful in the market and, in order to protect my investments, want to be granted territorial exclusivity Want to be granted first refusal right to become exclusive Franchisee of Franchisor also for Spain, Portugal and Germany Aim at avoiding the ban of passive sales in order to organize an e-business activity through my own web site

TERRITORIAL RESTRICTIONS CLAUSE Principle: Article 4(b) of BER prohibits all restrictions of territory or customers aiming at making the market inaccessible; the franchisee is therefore in principle fully free to sell its services or goods to any consumer it may choose Exceptions: BER authorises vertical agreements to stipulate the restriction of active sales into the territory reserved to the franchisor or to other franchisees The Guidelines provide that all the obligations that are necessary for the protection of either the know-how, the intellectual property rights, or the network, do not fall within the scope of Article 81(1). In Practice: There is a balance to be found between the protection of the know-how, of the intellectual property rights, and of the network, and the weakening of intra-brand competition

Exclusive dealing Need to protect my image and my know-how in every country Franchisee to buy: 100% of products sold in its premises from me 100% of furniture needs for its outlets from me 90% of shoe care products from me Contract to include absolute ban for Franchisee to sell anything else than my products Need to offer my customers the whole range of motorbike accessories (including helmets, gloves, glasses etc.) Propose to Franchisor: 100% of motorbike clothing and footwear sold in my premises of Franchisor's production right to have up to 20% of the surface of my premises furnished with corners of manufacturers of other motorbike accessories right to sell up to 20% different brands' shoe care products Contract to include right of Franchisee to sell motorbike accessories not included in Franchisor's current production (limited to motorbike clothing and footwear) and a trademark licence to have part of such accessories produced in the Far East

EXCLUSIVE SUPPLY CLAUSE Definition: Any obligation laid down on the purchaser to acquire over 80% of their annual purchases from the supplier (or a third party designated by the supplier) amounts to a non-compete undertaking under the Regulation. Regime: General regime: The duration must not be indefinite or exceed 5 years. Franchise-specific regime: The duration of the obligation is not a relevant factor. The undertaking is exempted where it is “necessary to maintain the common identity and reputation of the franchised network” (§ 200 GVR). In practice: The more important the transmission of know-how, the more the vertical restraints will be eligible for exemption. The exclusive supply for products ancillary to the transmitted know-how is prohibited (e.g.: installation and equipment of a point of sale or supply of certain products). The acknowledgment that such a clause is necessary will therefore largely depend on the quality of the know-how and of the network’s maintenance but also on the objective definition of the quality specifications laid down on the franchisees, the number and range of potential suppliers (see the example given by § 201 GVR).

Post Termination Non-Competition Restriction My product is very know-how specific Worried that franchisee will exploit my know-how once the contract has expired Contract to include post-termination non competition ban and reaffiliation ban (5 years) I already have some know-how in the national sale of motorbike accessories, therefore: I consider a post-term non-competition obligation reasonable, although should be limited to Franchisor's products (motorbike clothing and footwear) and to 6 months duration I also consider acceptable the prohibition of re-affiliating with any competing network as after contact's termination I will have acquired enough technical and commercial know-how to stand alone!

POST-TERMINATION NON-COMPETE CLAUSE Principle: This clause is not deemed unlawful per se insofar as it ensures the efficacy of another undertaking : the interdiction to use the franchisor’s know-how after the termination of the franchise contract. Conditions of validity: limited only to goods or services competing with the goods or services of the franchise contract, restricted to the premises and plot of land from which the franchisor has performed the franchise contract, must be necessary to protect the know-how transmitted by the franchisor, it must not exceed 12 months. Alternative clauses: Clause prohibiting the exploitation of the know-how: no time limit unless the know-how has fallen into the public domain. Non-affiliation clause: prohibits the former franchisee from joining a network competing with that of its former franchisor; depending on the market’s structure (independents / networks), it can be likened to a non-compete clause, in which case it is subject to the relevant conditions.

Balbo di Vinadio e Associati Speakers Avv. Roberto Luzi Crivellini DINDO, ZORZI & Associati  Via Leoncino, 16 37121 VERONA Tel.(+39) 045 8001884 Fax (+39) 045 8037285 roberto.luzi@studiodindo.it www.studiodindo.it 16 Old Bailey London EC4M 7EG  Alessia Paoletto Tel: +44 (0)20 7597 6491 Fax: +44 (0)20 7597 6543 alessia.paoletto@withersworldwide.com www.withersworldwide.com Avv. Marina Motta Balbo di Vinadio e Associati Studio Legale corso G. Matteotti 17 - 10121 Torino tel. +39 011 51908 - fax +39 011 5190812 motta@bblex.it www.bblex.it Avocat au Barreau de Paris 5 rue Beaujon F- 75008  Paris Christophe HERY Tel.: +33 (0)1 53 81 53 00 – Fax: +33 (0)1 53 81 53 30 chery@lmtavocats.com www.lmtavocats.com