phosphate- buffered saline pH 7.4

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Table 2. Borehole water parameters compared with WHO standards and Flood water results © The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Advertisements

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1
Chauveteau 1982 [49], Berry & Russell 1987 [50]
Intermediate-level learner
Table 1. Empirical MSE to estimate the CP distribution parameter λ
Table 1. Change in parameters during fermentation in Hydrolysate A
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Hospital live Deliveries
Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education
Table 4. Filter Sand Sieve Analysis
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 2. Parameters of the transmission line
Table 2. Result of intention to use
SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community
Total Energy Consumed (%)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 1. Iterative calculation procedure, M is standard at 25°C
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 1. Commercial Characteristics of Canned White Asparagus
Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language
S.P. Leibo, Ph.D., Thomas B. Pool, Ph.D.  Fertility and Sterility 
Table 3. Summary of Intrinsic Viscosity Data
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Rating of Water Quality
% of inhibition of hydrolysis (INH)
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)
Table 1. Characteristics (age, height, and weight) of the participants
Table 2. Modal parameters estimated by Pulse Reflex®
Precaution Statements Possibility of Chemical Accident
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.
Interpass temperature
Table 2. Air-water flow cases
Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Simulation Frequency(Hz)
Number of questionnaires sent out
Average Hardness value (HRC)
Table 6. The effect of porosity on pore velocity
Fermentation time (hr)
Table 1. Measurements of LEDs
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Electrode ν (mm/s) I (A) V (V) HI (J/mm) HI average AWS E309L
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
chemistry that are involved in peer group
Oil Absorption capacity(g/g)
Table 5. Water quality A3 well during pumping test
Table 9. Water quality of DiSi- Mudawarra groundwater resources
Nat. Rev. Mater. doi: /natrevmats
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 1. Classification of plastics
20 %(v/v) Aqueous Methanol Systems
Table 2. Summary of the Solubility Parameters for the Solvents
Data from present research
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 1. Summary of Physical Properties for the Solvents
Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Average Execution Time in seconds
Equation Tem. (°C) Specific heat Thermal conductivity
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Education, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, doi: /wjce-4-1-4
Presentation transcript:

phosphate- buffered saline pH 7.4 Table 1. Intrinsic viscosity, molecular weight, Mark-Houwink parameters dates of various studies released with dextrans at different temperatures T (°C) Solvent M (Da) [η] (cm3/g) a kM-H (cm3/g) σ2 Reference 25 Water 20000 - 100000 - 0.5000 0.0974 [27] f 20 10000 -500000 0.4300 0.0443 [28] f Formamide 2000 - 32000 0.4900 0.0165 [29] f 0.5M NaOH 500000 - 2000000 0.4780 0.0132 [30] f 30 0.1M NaNO3 / 0.025M K2HPO4 0.05M Na2SO4 97000 – 1750000 0.3440 0.2780 0.0476 0.1130 [31] g 0.2M NaNO3 40000 - 590000 0.3900 0.0485 0.8800 [32] a 0.4M NaCH3COOH / 0.4M CH3COOH 9500 - 2000000 11.0 – 140.0 0.4800 0.0138 [33] b 17.8 - 48.2 0.5330 0.07337 0.9817 31 17.3 - 45.9 0.5190 0.08268 0.9804 34 29500* - 191500* 17.1 - 44.8 0.5150 0.08474 0.9783 [34] f 40 16.6 - 42.9 0.5080 0.08600 0.9875 43 16.3 - 41.6 0.09462 0.9854 25.1 - 68.3 0.1050 0.9996 23.9 - 63.4 0.5250 0.1070 0.9995 35 Dimethyl- sulfoxide 21.9 - 57.8 0.2085 0.9991 [35] e 21.0 - 55.1 0.5170 0.1040 0.9994 45 18.2 - 47.7 0.5140 0.0919 17.8 - 50.9 0.5620 0.0551 0.9895 15.4 - 50.9 0.5490 0.0548 0.9691 Ethylene-glycol 13.6 - 37.6 0.5430 0.0511 0.9871 [36] b 12.6 - 34,7 0.5400 0.0486 0.9893 11,7 - 31.8 0.5340 0.9879 Water - NaOH 0.5M 9000 - 506000 8.6 - 53.1 0.4363 0.1900 0.9662 [1] a 40000 - 500000 21.0 - 50.0 0.3311 0.6066 [37] b 9000 -600000 12.0 - 60.0 0.3775 0.3685 0.9922 [3] d phosphate- buffered saline pH 7.4 19500 - 500000 10.97 - 50.50 0.4500 0.1361 0.9863 [8] c 12000 - 520000 11.8 - 51.6 0.3873 0.3197 0.9975 [16] b 65 39000 20.0 16.5 15.3 [38] b 37 42973 - 1988000 17.8 - 76.5 0.3888 0.2628 0.9887 [5] b 1270 – 676000 180 – 158000 226000 – 1360000 1907000 - 5900000 2.8 - 70.8 1.2 – 35.0 46.3 – 91.8 73.6 – 104.5 0.5060 0.5120 0.4250 0.2730 0.0901 0.0832 0.2297 1.4300 0.9870 0.9950 0.9170 0.8260 [39] b With permission: a- American Chemical Society. b- Elsevier Science B.V. c- Biophysical Society, Elsevier Science B.V. d- Amersham Biosciences AB. e- Springer-Verlag. f- John Wiley and Sons. g- Unilever Research. * Dates calculated from number average molecular weight. Martin Alberto Masuelli et al. Dextrans in Aqueous Solution. Experimental Review on Intrinsic Viscosity Measurements and Temperature Effect. Journal of Polymer and Biopolymer Physics Chemistry, 2013, Vol. 1, No. 1, 13-21. doi:10.12691/jpbpc-1-1-3 © The Author(s) 2013. Published by Science and Education Publishing.