Lecture 05: Static Behaviour of CMOS Inverter

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Topics Electrical properties of static combinational gates:
Advertisements

ELEC 301 Volkan Kursun Design Metrics ECE555 - Volkan Kursun
Elettronica T A.A Digital Integrated Circuits © Prentice Hall 2003 Inverter CMOS INVERTER.
Power, Energy and Delay Static CMOS is an attractive design style because of its good noise margins, ideal voltage transfer characteristics, full logic.
Digital Integrated Circuits© Prentice Hall 1995 Inverter THE INVERTERS.
Mary Jane Irwin ( ) Modified by Dr. George Engel (SIUE)
Mary Jane Irwin ( ) CSE477 VLSI Digital Circuits Fall 2002 Lecture 04: CMOS Inverter (static view) Mary Jane.
Digital Integrated Circuits© Prentice Hall 1995 Inverter THE INVERTERS.
1. Department of Electronics Engineering Sahand University of Technology NMOS inverter with an n-channel enhancement-mode mosfet with the gate connected.
THE INVERTERS. DIGITAL GATES Fundamental Parameters l Functionality l Reliability, Robustness l Area l Performance »Speed (delay) »Power Consumption »Energy.
Chapter 07 Electronic Analysis of CMOS Logic Gates
Inverter Chapter 5 The Inverter April 10, Inverter Objective of This Chapter  Use Inverter to know basic CMOS Circuits Operations  Watch for performance.
Digital Integrated Circuits A Design Perspective
Introduction to MicroElectronics
FPGA-Based System Design: Chapter 2 Copyright  2004 Prentice Hall PTR Topics n Logic gate delay. n Logic gate power consumption. n Driving large loads.
Solid-State Devices & Circuits
EE141 © Digital Integrated Circuits 2nd Combinational Circuits 1 A few notes for your design  Finger and multiplier in schematic design  Parametric analysis.
Modern VLSI Design 3e: Chapter 3 Copyright  1998, 2002 Prentice Hall PTR Topics n Electrical properties of static combinational gates: –transfer characteristics;
EE415 VLSI Design THE INVERTER [Adapted from Rabaey’s Digital Integrated Circuits, ©2002, J. Rabaey et al.]
Digital Logic Inverter Clasificacion de Circuitos y frecuencia maxima.
Washington State University
Norhayati Soin 05 KEEE 4425 WEEK 3/2 7/29/2005 LECTURE : KEEE 4425 WEEK 3/2 STATIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CMOS INVERTERS.
The Devices: MOS Transistor
Chapter 6 The Field Effect Transistor
Mary Jane Irwin ( ) CSE477 VLSI Digital Circuits Fall 2003 Lecture 04: CMOS Inverter (static view) Mary Jane.
VLSI System Design DC & Transient Response
Static and Transient Analysis of Gates
IV UNIT : GATE LEVEL DESIGN
Pass-Transistor Logic
Recall Last Lecture Common collector Voltage gain and Current gain
The Inverter EE4271 VLSI Design Professor Shiyan Hu Office: EERC 518
DC Characteristics of a CMOS Inverter
VLSI Design CMOS Inverter UNIT II :BASIC ELECTRICAL PROPERTIES
Lecture 21 OUTLINE The MOSFET (cont’d) P-channel MOSFET
EE141 Chapter 5 The Inverter April 10, 2003.
Digital Integrated Circuits A Design Perspective
MOS Inverters 1.
Lecture 06: Dynamic Behaviour of CMOS Inverter
CMOS Inverter First Glance
Reading: Hambley Ch. 7; Rabaey et al. Sec. 5.2
Chapter #13: CMOS Digital Logic Circuits
CSE477 VLSI Digital Circuits Fall Lecture 07: Pass Transistor Logic
Lecture No. 7 Logic Gates Asalam O Aleikum students. I am Waseem Ikram. This is the seventh lecture in a series of 45 lectures on Digital Logic Design.
Day 20: October 17, 2014 Ratioed Logic
Mary Jane Irwin ( ) CSE477 VLSI Digital Circuits Fall 2002 Lecture 04: CMOS Inverter (static view) Mary Jane.
Notes on Diodes 1. Diode saturation current:  
Week 9a OUTLINE MOSFET ID vs. VGS characteristic
DC & Transient Response
Basic electrical properties
Prof. Hsien-Hsin Sean Lee
Introduction to CMOS VLSI Design Lecture 5: DC & Transient Response
UNIT-II Stick Diagrams
Lecture 21 OUTLINE The MOSFET (cont’d) P-channel MOSFET
Lecture 21 OUTLINE The MOSFET (cont’d) P-channel MOSFET
Week 9a OUTLINE MOSFET ID vs. VGS characteristic
The Inverter EE4271 VLSI Design Dr. Shiyan Hu Office: EERC 731
Day 5: September 17, 2010 Restoration
EMT 182 Analog Electronics I
Lecture 21 OUTLINE The MOSFET (cont’d) P-channel MOSFET
MOS Transistors CMOS Inverter and Logic Families
Lecture #17 (cont’d from #16)
CP-406 VLSI System Design CMOS Transistor Theory
Lecture 5: DC & Transient Response
Introduction to CMOS VLSI Design Lecture 4: DC & Transient Response
Reading: Hambley Ch. 7; Rabaey et al. Secs. 5.2, 5.5, 6.2.1
Lecture #18 OUTLINE Reading Continue small signal analysis
Noise Margin Definition
Lecture #16 OUTLINE MOSFET ID vs. VGS characteristic
Dr. Hari Kishore Kakarla ECE
Presentation transcript:

Lecture 05: Static Behaviour of CMOS Inverter Call the role today (since the enrollment has settled). Warn about a sheeting chart. Give a few minutes at the end of class for students to find project partners.

CMOS Inverter: A First Look VDD Vin Vout CL Inverter – the nucleus of all digital designs; foundation of more intricate gates Design metrics – cost (area); integrity and robustness (static – steady-state behavior); performance (dynamic or transient behavior); energy efficiency

CMOS Inverter: Steady State Response VOL = 0 VOH = VDD VM = f(Rn, Rp) VDD VDD Rp Vout = 1 Vout = 0 Rn Vin = 0 Vin = V DD

CMOS Properties Full rail-to-rail swing  high noise margins Logic levels not dependent upon the relative device sizes  transistors can be minimum size  ratioless Always a path to Vdd or GND in steady state  low output impedance (output resistance in k range)  large fan-out (albeit with degraded performance) Extremely high input resistance (gate of MOS transistor is near perfect insulator)  nearly zero steady-state input current No direct path steady-state between power and ground  no static power dissipation Propagation delay function of load capacitance and resistance of transistors rail-to-rail - Vdd to 0V giving good noise margins power dissipation - no path between Vdd and Gnd in steady state (ignores leakage current) ratioless - logic levels are not dependent upon relative device sizes (as in NMOS), so transistors can be minimum size single inverter can theoretically drive an infinite number of gates and still be functionally operational; fan-out increases propagation delay steady state path to Vdd or Gnd - low output impedance, so less sensitive to noise

CMOS Inverter VTC Vout (V) Vin (V) NMOS off PMOS res NMOS sat PMOS res PMOS sat Vout (V) NMOS res PMOS sat NMOS res PMOS off For lecture VTC of the inverter exhibits a very narrow transition zone; high gain during switching transient (when both PMOS and NMOS are simultaneously on and in saturation). In that region, a small change in input voltage results in a large output voltage variation. Indicate on VTC plot where VTn and VTp lie Vin (V)

CMOS Inverter: Switch Model of Dynamic Behavior VDD Rn Vout CL Vin = V DD VDD Rp Vout CL Vin = 0 For class. response determined mainly by the output capacitance of the gate, CL - drain diffusion capacitance of the NMOS and PMOS transistors; the connecting wires, and the input capacitances of the fan-out gates A fast gate is built either by keeping the output capacitance small or by decreasing the on-resistance or the transistor (or both) Decreasing the on-resistance achieved by increasing the W/L ratio of the device Be award that the on-resistance of the NMOS and PMOS transistors is not constant; rather it is a nonlinear function of the voltage across the transistor Gate response time is determined by the time to charge CL through Rp (discharge CL through Rn)

Relative Transistor Sizing When designing static CMOS circuits, balance the driving strengths of the transistors by making the PMOS section wider than the NMOS section to maximize the noise margins and obtain symmetrical characteristics

VM  rVDD/(1 + r) where r = kpVDSATp/knVDSATn Switching Threshold VM where Vin = Vout (both PMOS and NMOS in saturation since VDS = VGS) VM  rVDD/(1 + r) where r = kpVDSATp/knVDSATn Switching threshold set by the ratio r, which compares the relative driving strengths of the PMOS and NMOS transistors Want VM = VDD/2 (to have comparable high and low noise margins), so want r  1 (W/L)p kn’VDSATn(VM-VTn-VDSATn/2) (W/L)n kp’VDSATp(VDD-VM+VTp+VDSATp/2) Assumes: The supply voltage is high enough so that the devices are velocity-saturated (VDSAT < VM – VT) and ignores channel length modulation. Reminder: k = k’W/L and k’ = mu Cox (mu is carrier mobility) Larger r to move VM upwards means making the PMOS wider Smaller r to move VM downwards means making the NMOS wider =

Switch Threshold Example In our generic 0.25 micron CMOS process, using the given process parameters, a VDD = 2.5V, and a minimum size NMOS device ((W/L)n of 1.5) VT0(V) (V0.5) VDSAT(V) k’(A/V2) (V-1) NMOS 0.43 0.4 0.63 115 x 10-6 0.06 PMOS -0.4 -1 -30 x 10-6 -0.1 (W/L)p 115 x 10-6 0.63 (1.25 – 0.43 – 0.63/2) (W/L)n -30 x 10-6 -1.0 (1.25 – 0.4 – 1.0/2) = x = 3.5 For class goal is to have Vm at Vdd/2 3.5 x 1.5 so (W/L)p = 5.25 (W/L)p = 3.5 x 1.5 = 5.25 for a VM of 1.25V

Simulated Inverter VM VM is relatively insensitive to variations in device ratio setting the ratio to 3, 2.5 and 2 gives VM’s of 1.22V, 1.18V, and 1.13V Increasing the width of the PMOS moves VM towards VDD Increasing the width of the NMOS moves VM toward GND VM (V) Plot needs work – but it’s the best I could do with powerpoint graphing Small variations in ratio don’t make a lot of difference To move the VM to 1.5V requires a ratio of 11 !!! Note that the x axis is semilog ~3.4 .1 (W/L)p/(W/L)n Note: x-axis is semilog

Noise Margins Determining VIH and VIL By definition, VIH and VIL are where dVout/dVin = -1 (= gain) VOH = VDD NMH = VDD - VIH NML = VIL - GND Approximating: VIH = VM - VM /g VIL = VM + (VDD - VM )/g So high gain in the transition region is very desirable Vout VM A high gain in the transition region is VERY desirable. In the extreme case of an infinite gain, the noise margins simplify to VOH – VM and VM – VOL for NMH (ideally, VDD – VM) and NML (ideally, VM – GND), respectively, and span the complete voltage swing. VOL = GND Vin A piece-wise linear approximation of VTC

CMOS Inverter VTC from Simulation 0.25um, (W/L)p/(W/L)n = 3.4 (W/L)n = 1.5 (min size) VDD = 2.5V VM  1.25V, g = -27.5 VIL = 1.2V, VIH = 1.3V NML = NMH = 1.2 (actual values are VIL = 1.03V, VIH = 1.45V NML = 1.03V & NMH = 1.05V) Output resistance low-output = 2.4k high-output = 3.3k Vout (V) Note: simulation overestimates the gain – as seen on the next slide, the maximum gain (at VM) is only -17 And piece-wise linear approximation model is optimistic wrt noise margins. Low output resistance is a good measure of the sensitivity of the gate wrt noise induced at the output and should be as low as possible. Vin (V)

Gain Determinates Vin Gain is a strong function of the slopes of the currents in the saturation region, for Vin = VM (1+r) g  ---------------------------------- (VM-VTn-VDSATn/2)(n - p ) Determined by technology parameters, especially channel length modulation (). Only designer influence through supply voltage and VM (transistor sizing). gain

Impact of Process Variation on VTC Curve Good PMOS Bad NMOS Vout (V) Nominal Bad PMOS Good NMOS A good device has a small oxide thickness (-3nm), a small length (-25nm), a higher width (+30nm) and a smaller threshold (-60mV). The opposite is true for a bad device. Vin (V) Process variations (mostly) cause a shift in the switching threshold

Scaling the Supply Voltage Vin (V) Vout (V) Vout (V) Not the best curve for 0.5 supply (but the best I could do in ppt). Observations The gain of the inverter in the transition region increases with a reduction in Vdd. For a fixed r, VM is proportional to Vdd. At a voltage of 0.5V (just 100mV above the threshold of the transistors) the width of the transition region measures only 10% of the supply voltage (and a gain of -35), while it widens to 17% for 2.5V But, reducing the supply Is absolutely detrimental to the performance of the gate The dc characteristics become increasingly sensitive to variations in the device parameters (e.g., VT) Scaling the supply means reduced signal swing making the gate more sensitive to external noise sources that don’t scale Note, in plot on the right, we still obtain an inverter even though the supply voltage is not large enough to turn the transistors on! The subthreshold current is sufficient to switch the gate between low and high levels, as well as to provide enough gain to produce an acceptable VTC. The ultimate show stopper is when the gain in the transition region approaches 1 (as in the green curve on the right plot) – giving the true lower bound on supply scaling (without cooling the chip). Gain=-1 Vin (V) Device threshold voltages are kept (virtually) constant Device threshold voltages are kept (virtually) constant