Using satellite data and data fusion techniques

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Spatial point patterns and Geostatistics an introduction
Advertisements

Matthew Hendrickson, and Pascal Storck
AP Statistics Chapters 3 & 4 Measuring Relationships Between 2 Variables.
Basic geostatistics Austin Troy.
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Geographic Information Science Geography 625 Intermediate Geographic Information Science Instructor: Changshan Wu Department.
PREV ’AIR : An operational system for large scale air quality monitoring and forecasting over Europe
Spatial Analysis Longley et al., Ch 14,15. Transformations Buffering (Point, Line, Area) Point-in-polygon Polygon Overlay Spatial Interpolation –Theissen.
Parallel Kriging Jeff Pedelty NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland Invasive Species Science Team Meeting 13 November, 2003.
Applied Geostatistics
Deterministic Solutions Geostatistical Solutions
Maps of PM2.5 over the U.S. Derived from Regional PM2.5 and Surrogate Visibility and PM10 Monitoring Data Stefan R. Falke and Rudolf B. Husar Center for.
Jenny Stocker, Christina Hood, David Carruthers, Martin Seaton, Kate Johnson, Jimmy Fung The Development and Evaluation of an Automated System for Nesting.
Near Real Time analyzed maps of air quality in Europe Cécile Honoré, Laurence Rouïl.
Nynke Hofstra and Mark New Oxford University Centre for the Environment Trends in extremes in the ENSEMBLES daily gridded observational datasets for Europe.
Spatial Interpolation of monthly precipitation by Kriging method
$88.65 $ $22.05/A profit increase Improving Wheat Profits Eakly, OK Irrigated, Behind Cotton.
Gridding Daily Climate Variables for use in ENSEMBLES Malcolm Haylock, Climatic Research Unit Nynke Hofstra, Mark New, Phil Jones.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
Geog. 579: GIS and Spatial Analysis - Lecture 21 Overheads 1 Point Estimation: 3. Methods: 3.6 Ordinary Kriging Topics: Lecture 23: Spatial Interpolation.
Declustering in the Spatial Interpolation of Air Quality Data Stefan R. Falke and Rudolf B. Husar.
Development and evaluation of Passive Microwave SWE retrieval equations for mountainous area Naoki Mizukami.
Geographic Information Science
1 Estimating Forest Biomass Using Geostatistics Techniques: a case Study of Rondônia, Southern Brazilian Amazon Marcio Sales Carlos Souza Phaedon Kyriakids.
Quality control of daily data on example of Central European series of air temperature, relative humidity and precipitation P. Štěpánek (1), P. Zahradníček.
| Folie 1 Assessment of Representativeness of Air Quality Monitoring Stations Geneva, Wolfgang Spangl.
Uncertainty assessment in European air quality mapping and exposure studies Bruce Rolstad Denby, Jan Horálek 2, Frank de Leeuw 3, Peter de Smet 3 1 Norwegian.
Analysis of station classification and network design INERIS (Laure Malherbe, Anthony Ung), NILU (Philipp Schneider), RIVM (Frank de Leeuw, Benno Jimmink)
M. Houssiau | EIONET AQ | Ljubljana – 5 October 2015 Cross analysis between urban system and air quality Provisional results ETC/Urban Land Soil systems.
Interpolation and evaluation of probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) patterns using different methods by: tarun gill.
Exposure Assessment for Health Effect Studies: Insights from Air Pollution Epidemiology Lianne Sheppard University of Washington Special thanks to Sun-Young.
Possible use of Copernicus MACC-II modeling products in EEAs assessment work Leonor Tarrasón, Jan Horálek, Laure Malherbe, Philipp Schneider, Anthony Ung,
Barcelona Toward an error model for radar quantitative precipitation estimation in the Cévennes- Vivarais region, France Pierre-Emmanuel Kirstetter, Guy.
20 th EIONET Workshop on Air Quality Assessment and Management Mapping BaP concentrations and estimation of population exposure and health impacts Cristina.
The ENSEMBLES high- resolution gridded daily observed dataset Malcolm Haylock, Phil Jones, Climatic Research Unit, UK WP5.1 team: KNMI, MeteoSwiss, Oxford.
By Russ Frith University of Alaska at Anchorage Civil Engineering Department Estimating Alaska Snow Loads.
The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.
Evaluation of pollution levels in urban areas of selected EMEP countries Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov Meteorological Synthesizing Centre - East.
Exposure Prediction and Measurement Error in Air Pollution and Health Studies Lianne Sheppard Adam A. Szpiro, Sun-Young Kim University of Washington CMAS.
1 Černikovský, Krejčí, Volná (ETC/ACM): Air pollution by ozone in Europe during the summer 2012 & comparison with previous years 17th EIONET Workshop on.
7. Air Quality Modeling Laboratory: individual processes Field: system observations Numerical Models: Enable description of complex, interacting, often.
Skudnik M. 1*, Jeran Z. 2, Batič F. 3 & Kastelec D. 3 1 Slovenian Forestry Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia 2 Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Joint EMEP/WGE meeting, Geneva, 2016 Evaluation of B[a]P pollution in the EMEP region: temporal trends and spatial variability Alexey Gusev, Olga Rozovskaya,
Ann Mari Fjæraa Philipp Schneider Tove Svendby
SAMIRA Andrei Diamandi
N Engl J Med Jun 29;376(26): doi: 10
Chapter 4: Basic Estimation Techniques
Spatial statistics: Spatial Autocorrelation
NAM in D-INSITU Slovenia.
Basic Estimation Techniques
What is in our head…. Spatial Modeling Performance in Complex Terrain Scott Eichelberger, Vaisala.
Instrumental Surface Temperature Record
Lecture 19: Spatial Interpolation II
DATA FUSION & the CAAQS.
Meng Lu and Edzer Pebesma
Basic Estimation Techniques
Spatial Analysis Longley et al..
Estimating PM2.5 using MODIS and GOES aerosol optical depth retrievals in IDEA Hai Zhang , Raymond M. Hoff1 , Shobha Kondragunta2.
Stefano Grassi WindEurope Summit
Instrumental Surface Temperature Record
Jan Horálek (CHMI) Peter de Smet, Frank de Leeuw (RIVM),
Air Quality Assessment and Management
Instrumental Surface Temperature Record
Environmental Statistics
Facultad de Ingeniería, Centro de Cálculo
Update on 2016 AQ Modeling by EPA
TFMM trend analysis: use of AirBase. Preliminary results
PM observations in Europe a review of AirBase information
EMEP case studies on HMs: State of the art
Summary: TFMM trends analysis
PM10 trends in Switzerland using random forest models
Presentation transcript:

Using satellite data and data fusion techniques for air quality mapping (WP4000) Jan Horálek

1. Data fusion methodology 2. Description of WP4000 3. Data used and discussion on technical details

Linear regression model followed by kriging of its residuals (residual kriging) The supplementary data for linear regression model (LRM) selected based on their relation with measured AQ data. kriging – spatial interpolation geostatistical method (i.e. knowledge of the spatial structure of air quality field is utilized, using variogram) η(si) are the residuals of the LRM at the stations λ i are the weights estimated based on the variogram

Linear regression model followed by kriging of its residuals (residual kriging) – continuation variogram - measure of a spatial correlation parameters: sill, nugget, range Empirical variogram needs to be fitted by an analytical function, e.g. spherical. For some pollutants, both monitoring and modelling data may be logarithmically transformed, due to the lognormal distribution of these data.

Routine evaluation cross-validation – the spatial interpolation is calculated for every measurement point based on all available information except from the point in question. These estimated values are compared with the measured ones by scatter-plot (including R2 and regression equation) and by statistical indicators, espec. RMSE and bias (MPE). Occasionally also MAE and other ones. where Z(si) is the measured value in point si Ż(si) is the estimation in the point s i using other points N is the number of the stations

PM10 annual average 2010 – rural areas In-situ data EMEP model Linear regression model (log. transformed): adj. R2 SEE EMEP 0.33 0.324 EMEP, altitude 0.41 0.306 EMEP, altitude, wind speed 0.44 0.295

PM10 annual average 2010 – rural areas Rural map (applicable for rural areas only) cross-validation RMSE = 4.5 µg. m-3 Bias = 0.2 µg. m-3

PM10 annual average 2010 – urban areas In-situ data EMEP model Linear regression model (log. transformed): adj. R2 SEE EMEP 0.38 0.292

PM10 annual average 2010 – urban areas Urban map (applicable for urban areas only) cross-validation RMSE = 6.6 µg. m-3 Bias = -0.1 µg. m-3

PM10 annual average 2010 Final merged map

Analysis of the use of different dispersion models Outputs of different models, PM10, annual average 2009 Statistical indicators against in-situ data at rural stations Different results for different dispersion models

Analysis of the use of different dispersion models DF mapping using different models, PM10, annual average 2009, rural Statistical indicators using cross-validation at rural stations Similar (in fact no) bias for mapping using different dispersion models

1. Data fusion methodology 2. Description of WP4000 3. Data used and discussion on technical details

WP4000 overall description To examine, test and apply the use of data fusion techniques for combining satellite datasets related to air quality with ground‐level observations and chemical transport model information. Combination of three data inputs using data fusion: in-situ measurement data (highly accurate point- based observations, but large spatial gaps) chemical transport model data (spatially continuous data, but high uncertainties and, for some pollutants, bias) satellite data (near real time observations of spatial patterns)

Combination of in-situ, model and satellite data Source: Schneider et al. (2012). ETC/ACM Technical Paper 2012/9.

WP4000 overall description Work sub-packages: 4100 Implementation of the data flow 4200 Data fusion based on the historical data 4300 Data fusion based on the near real time data 4400 Web presentation of the maps Leading organization: CHMI Partner organizations: IDEA-ENVI (4100, 4400), NILU

WP4000 schedule

1. Data fusion methodology 2. Description of WP4000 3. Data used and discussion on technical details

In-situ monitoring data used Historical data: AirBase/e-reporting database (Europe) CAQR (Czech Republic) … Other national data?? Near real time data: AirBase/e-reporting database (Europe) Pollutants: PM10, PM2.5, NO2, SO2 Time step: annual (all), daily (all?), hourly (all?) Year(s): 2015 (Czech Republic only) 2014(? ) + ? – in coordination with other WPs

Modelling data used Models: CAMx (4.7 x 4.7 km, Czech Republic) – runs on HPC cluster 480cores (30 TB disk space) – coupled with ALADIN WRF-Chem (? x ? km/deg., major part of Europe) – Which data format? – Which time step? Hourly? Near real time data: How will be WRF-Chem data transmitted? Pollutants: PM10, PM2.5, NO2, SO2 Year(s): 2015 (Czech Republic only) 2014(? ) + ? – in coordination with other WPs

Satellite data used data used Satellite data: NO2, SO2 – Which satellite data? – Which data format??? – Which time step? – Which geographical coverage? PM2.5 ( + PM10 ?) Near real time data: How will be satelite data transmitted? Year(s): ? – in coordination with other WPs

Web presentation of the maps Historical data Near real time data

Thank you for your attention.