Witold Groll, Instytut Kolejnictwa Railway Institute Warsaw, Poland

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tackling the Environmental Impact of Transport Presentation by David Jamieson MP to the Institute for Public Policy Research Wednesday 15th October 2003.
Advertisements

AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT IN POLAND - air protection programmes for Silesia region Dorota Kamińska Ministry of the Environment Poland.
Intermodality between air and railway passenger transport in Poland: present situation and perspectives Marcin Wolek Ph. D. Department of Transportation.
UIC/CER - MB/RT - 11/2002 ___________________________ Noise Policy - European perspective Mads Bergendorff Environmental advisor UIC ___________________________.
Shaping the railway of the 21st century 25 October 2005, Paris Rail Freight Noise Abatement in Europe UIC/UIP/CER Action Programme Noise Reduction.
White Paper 2011 and Development Perspectives of Transport System in Latvia Guntars Jansons Manager Development Planning.
Application of Low Noise Road surfaces in the Netherlands: Excellent results but not enough to meet the legal targets Prepared by the Netherlands.
Railway competitiveness Hinne Groot, Netherlands ministry 25th November 2014 UN ECE SC.2 workshop 25 November 2014.
Assessment and future challenges for Pan-European Corridors IV, V, and VII Dr. Vasileios Zeimpekis Design, Operations & Productions Systems Lab Department.
City expectations and SUTRA project results Jadwiga Kopeć Director of Environmental Protection Department Municipality of Gdańsk 8/12 Nowe Ogrody Str.
Road charging and vehicle taxation - the EU perspective
National trends in passenger transport regarding the choice of transport mode Grant Agreement number: Project Acronym: USEmobility Project title:
Rail Freight Noise Abatement in Europe A consensus building workshop for all relevant stakeholders Conclusions and next steps Luc Aliadière, UIC UIC, Paris.
Workshop on Infrastructures Sustainable Infrastructure for Efficient Mobility: the Key Challenges Luc Bourdeau ECTP Secretary General Industrial Technologies.
Challenges and the benefits of interoperability for the railway industry and the rail transport Eric Fontanel UNIFE General Manager.
Making Way for Public Rapid Transit in South Asia and its Impact on Energy and Environment Bangalore, Dhaka and Colombo Ranjan Kumar Bose & Sharad Gokhale.
116 November 2009CER The Voice of European Railways European Commission Communication: «Sustainable future for transport» - a CER perspective UNECE, Geneva,
Bus and coach transport for greening mobility Contribution to the European Bus and Coach Forum 2011 Huib van Essen, 20 October 2011.
1 Silencing freight trains A small country’s perspective Martine Serbruyns BeWag 27 april Brussels.
DG RTDEuropean Commission SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME FOR RESEARCH, TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION ACTIVITIES (FP6) SPECIFIC PROGRAMME.
IMPLEMENTING PRICING POLICIES IN INTERURBAN ROAD TRANSPORT IN NAS COUNTRIES IN THE LIGHT OF PRESENT TRANSPORT POLICY - THE EXAMPLE OF POLAND Monika Bak.
The Diversity of Transport Accessibility in Polish Regions Monika Musiał – Malago’ University of Economics, Cracow, Poland
Safety of Train Traffic in Time of Strike István Gaskó President of Free Trade Union of Railway Workers Hungary Denver 2008 october.
Economic Development Perspectives of the area of the Elbe/Oder Chamber Union (KEO) Dr. Silvia Stiller Brussels 25th June 2013.
Climate Change Mitigation in the Transport Sector May 2006 Axel Friedrich Umweltbundesamt (UBA) Germany Review of experience in Europe.
1 Noise and rail What about Belgium ? Martine Serbruyns Federal Public Service Mobility and Transport Brussels - 28 april 2014.
1 The Voice of European Railways IDEI and Northwestern University - Toulouse 7-8 November 2003 Railroad Industry Structure, Competition and Investment.
EU Transport Policy Regional Meeting on Sustainable Transport Policies in South Eastern Europe Budapest, June Wioletta Szymanska Project Manager.
PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN LATVIA: STRUCTURE AND FINANCING ANNIJA NOVIKOVA D EPUTY D IRECTOR OF R OAD T RANSPORT D EPARTMENT M INISTRY OF T RANSPORT.
Transport The new TEN-T guidelines Results of the legislative procedure Philippe Chantraine (MOVE B1), 24 June 2013.
TRACECA CONSTRUCTION OF INTERMODAL TERMINAL IN THE REGION OF RUSE CITY BULGARIA Infrastructure Working Group Kiev, 11 May 2011.
/department of technology management 1 Comparative logistics capabilities between Europe and Asia Jan C. Fransoo Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
Cross border obstacles in rail transport and interoperability Giordano Rigon European Commission – DG MOVE D2 ERESS Customer Forum Brussels 16 June 2011.
Unit C.2 Maximilian Bauernfeind 23/02/2010 Developing Inland Waterway Transport in the European Union Contributing to a sustainable Transport Network.
Infrastructure and transport in the Black Sea region Opening Remarks Emmanouil Vlachogiannis First Vice President Thessaloniki Chamber of Commerce and.
Urban Transport Priorities and the European Union‘s support to cities through CIVITAS Jerome Simpson, Senior Expert, Green Transport 22 nd Sept, 2011
ELECTRIC CAR INTEGRATION IN VILNIUS Gintare Zorskaite 1, Vita Duminyte 2, Grazvydas-Mykolas Paliulis 3 Vilnius Gediminas technical university, Saulėtekio.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 14 – Transport Bilateral screening:
Noise Mitigation Possibilities for Quieter Cities in Europe CAETS 2012 Zürich Tor Kihlman, Chair CAETS Noise Control Technology Committee Chalmers.
1 COMBINED TRANSPORT A brief view on the UIRR scrl Bratislava Intermodal Transport Conference 18/ Rudy COLLE Director General.
in Croatian Track access charging system
Konstantinos Alexopoulos Transport Division UNECE
Marek Stavinoha Legal officer DG MOVE A4 European Commission
Challenges and solutions for transport in Norway
Joint Presentation of the NCPs from PL, EE, LV and LT
Safety of Train Traffic in Time of Strike
Snejana Markovic-Chénais
ENVIRONMENTALLY SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT THE GOALS OF VIET NAM TO 2030
Bus and coach transport for greening mobility
Transport and Logistic Poland
Feasibility study on infrastructural interventions in Port of Split
Study Trip – Corridor 2 Bottlenecks and The coordination needed to overcome them Eric FEYEN Technical Director 1 BRUSSELS 22 September 2017.
COMBINED TRANSPORT A brief view on the UIRR scrl
Department of Transportation Market
The WHITE PAPER on TRANSPORT– Where do we stand?
Meeting of the WG on Rail Transport Statistics 2-3 April 2009
Railway performance, sustainability and safety in South-East Europe
ASSESSMENT OF THE LATEST PROPOSAL BY THE NETHERLANDS AS PRESENTED
White Paper on Transport:
European Noise Barrier Federation
Task Force on Passenger Mobility Statistics 11 October 2018
Railway Noise Management
EC-­activities and strategy to reduce rail freight noise
Paolo Bolsi DG MOVE - Unit A3 Economic Analysis and Impact Assessment
Update on forthcoming assessments by ETC/ACM
Noise – an operational and economical challenge for wagon keepers BeWag & UIP Workshop, April 28, 2014, Brussels Markus Vaerst Chairman UIP Topical.
Rail transport developments Agenda point 7.2
Marco Polo – Towards a policy revision
Members’ Workshop Wednesday 17th April 2019 Woodhill House Aberdeen
Prof. dr hab. Bogusław Liberadzki,
Presentation transcript:

Witold Groll, Instytut Kolejnictwa Railway Institute Warsaw, Poland Public hearing ‘Transport noise: Harmful to people. How to avoid ?’ European Parliament - Brussels, 11 October 2016 Witold Groll, Instytut Kolejnictwa Railway Institute Warsaw, Poland

NOISE I NOISE II III 2 Warszawa 2016-09-28 Str. 2

density of road infrastructure or railway infrastructure, NOISE Exposure to noise caused by different means of transport varies depending on the place where it is generated (e.g. village, town, local settlement, nature area etc) and it is determined by numerous factors like: density of population, density of road infrastructure or railway infrastructure, intensity of road traffic or railway traffic, type of vehicles passing nearby: trucks or cars, passenger trains ` or freight trains, speed of running vehicles , permissible axle load of running vehicles, quality of infrastructure, 3

NOISE Population densitiy 4 Source: „Working Paper Series in Economics No. 61, September 2014” 4

EXPOSURE TO RAILWAY NOISE ENVIROMENTAL CONDITION INTENSITY AND STRUCTURE OF TRAFFIC CONDITION OF RAILWAY VEHICLE IN USE CONDITON OF TRACK IN USE TRAIN SPEED Str. 5

EXPOSURE TO RAILWAY NOISE Analyzed area - 996.7 km2 22% - towns 78% - villages 20% - residential areas 24,4% - transport areas 11% - industrial areas 21.6% - agricultural areas 22,9% - green belts Distance covered - 1215 km out of total 20 000 km railway network (6% of its overall length) Source: „Acoustic map of PKP PLK ” Urban agglomerations with population > 250 000 approx. 230 000 persons LDWN > 55 dB approx. 168 000 persons LN > 50 Total population 5 855 410 Urban agglomerations with population 100 000 - 250 000 approx. 170 000 persons LDWN > 55 dB approx. 140 000 persons LN > 50 Total population 4 148 629 6 Source: „Report about state of environment ” –National Inspectorate for Environment Protection

EXPOSURE TO RAILWAY NOISE – Mitigation methods Comparative test with wagons fitted with cast iron brake blocks and composite brake blocks. Differences could be higher up to 7 - 10 dB (A). Tread wheel defects increase noise up to 8 dB(A) 7 Source: Railway Institute research

Does the railway noise poses the risk of health hazard in Poland ? The nature of transport noise and its impact on the population in Poland has its own specificity – different from many other Member States: density of population (in Poland: 124 person/km2 vs Netherlands: 395 person/km2), lower speed and lower permissible axle load of railway transport caused by technical characteristics of rolling stock and technical condition of infrastructure well-developed railway network including dedicated freight routes bypassing large cities (eg. Line No. 131 from Silesia to the sea ports of Gdansk and line No.273 from Wroclaw to sea port Szczecin) poorly developed motorways and express road network (in Poland 3 000 vs in Germany 12 500 km) poorly developed road network which runs mainly through the city centers (due to lack of bypass roads) The railway noise is neither a predominant problem … …nor defined as the social problem Conclusions from „Report on acoustic climate in environment” made by National Inspectorate for Environment Protection: „..In this view, on the basis of analyzed acoustic map, the main problem is the road noise outside the towns, coming from the main roads. Exposure on this type of noise is generally higher than average exposure in other EU Member States ….” 8

I II III MARKET 9 Str. 9

OPERATORS OF RAILWAY VEHICLES (VKM) 10 Warszawa 2016-09-28 Str. 10

NATIONAL REGISTER OF RAILWAY VEHICLES (NVR) 108,5 K vehicles 13 % of UE market 11 Str. 11

NATIONAL REGISTER OF RAILWAY VEHICLES (NVR) Others Freight wagons 12 Str. 12

NATIONAL REGISTER OF RAILWAY VEHICLES (NVR) Fleet of freight wagons – 98 643 Number of wagons foreseen for adjustment to TSI Noise requirements – 78 914 Number of wagons complying with TSI Noise requirements – 2367 Number of wagons with monoblock wheels without composite blocks - 16571 Number of wagons with tyred wheels – 59 976 47% of freight wagons with tyred wheels are registered in Poland !!!!!! 13

I II III POSSIBLE SCENARIO

POSSIBLE SCENARIO IDIOSYNCRASY OF POLISH FREIGHT WAGONS: Very high percentage of freight wagons with tyred wheels Installation of composite brake blocks entails use of monoblock wheels Necessity of purchasing monoblock wheels increases wagon adjustment costs to TSI Noise requirements significantly High average lifetime of wagons – sense of investment in old wagons Substantial increase of costs for railway sector Shifting transport of goods to roads Increase of road noise level and decline of safety Polution increase 15 15

FIGHTING RAILWAY NOISE = INCREASE OF ROAD NOISE Currently road transport dominates freight transport in Poland with over 65.7 % share in modal split, while railway accounts for just 23.8 (Eurostat 2014) Fighting railway noise generates huge costs for the railway sector which will need to be recovered from its clients – significant increase of transport rates (up to 400 euro more for an average freight train over average travel distance) Result: increase of road transport share and more road-related noise Road noise is considered much worse than the rail noise: due to density of road network, road noise is generated closer to people road noise is constant over time due to high traffic volumes, while rail noise appears only for a short moment where the train passes 16

Brake block purchase cost COSTS OF ADJUSTMENT No Wagon type Number of wagons Brake block purchase cost Wheels purchase cost Replace -ment cost Overall cost 1 TSI Noise compliant wagons 2 367 2 Wagon with monoblock wheels, without composite brake blocks 16 571 4 000 PLN 958 Euro 320 PLN 76,6 Euro 71,5 mln PLN 17,1 mln Euro 3 Wagons with tyred wheels, without composite brake blocks 59 976 29 500 PLN 7 066 Euro 2 680 PLN 642 Euro 2170 mln PLN 520 mln Euro 4 TOTAL 78 914 2241,5 mln PLN 537 mln Euro Application of TSI Noise 2022 – 89.5 mln Euro/year Application of TSI Noise 2026 – 59,88 mln Euro/year Profit in 2015 7,5 mln Euro 537 mln Euro = 9 100 new silent wagons 17

= 60 vehicles 1 train set = 40 wagons COSTS OF ADJUSTMENT Assumption*): 1 train set = 40 wagons (60 t of load on each) x 40 = 2 400 t of load. . = 60 vehicles *) Requirements of UIC Leaflet IC 421 and 544-1 and Instruction Ir-1 oraz Cw-1. For the assesment of total load of road vehicle taking into account Act of Minister of Infrastructure from 31 December 2002r. (Journal of Law from 2003 No. 32, pos.. 262 with later changes) 18

COSTS OF ADJUSTMENT Dynamics of cargo volume in individual transport segments 2002-2014 Transport performance in individual transport segments 2002-2014 Source: „Assessment of functioning of railway market and safety in railway traffic in 2014” (www.utk.gov.pl) 19

SUSTAINABILITY Str. 20 Warszawa 2016-09-28 20

QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION The European Commissions White Paper on Transport from 2011 among 10 goals for the creation a competitive and resource efficient transport system identifies, that 30% of road freight over 300 km should be shifted to other modes such as rail or waterborne transport by 2030, and more than 50% by 2050. How the costs of revision of the TSI Noise will impact the realization of this goal? The European Court of Auditors recently indicated that despite European actions for promoting rail transport, its market share is declining. Are we really sure that imposing costly obligations for railway transport, will help it regain its market share? How implementation of the TSI Noise will impact ther competitive condition of the railway transport? As the rail noise problem is restricted to specific areas in some Member States, shouldn’t adequate measures be deployed only where they are needed? Do we really need a „one-size-fits-all” approach? 21

Thank you for your attention w.groll@ikolej.pl 22