Downtown Valdosta Truck Traffic Mitigation Study

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CENTRAL CORRIDOR TRANSIT ACCESS STUDY Citizens for Modern Transit March 27, 2014.
Advertisements

January 8, 2014 FMATS College Road Corridor Study FMATS Technical Committee Update.
City of Omak Central Avenue Bridge Replacement Project Prepared by Highlands Associates Photos by FlyBy Photos.
South Side Red River Bridge Corridor Study Phase III Preliminary Geotechnical Study Phase IV New Alignment Alternatives Evaluation.
I-95 Corridor Coalition December 14, 2001 I-95 Corridor Coalition Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study — An Integrated Strategy to Eliminate Choke Points.
Joe Olson SW Region Director December 8,  History/Background  Next Steps (Planning & Environmental Linkages (PEL)  PEL Process  Schedule  Questions.
Transportation Planning Analysis UnitPNREC 2006 Transportation Modeling in Oregon: Overview of ODOT Statewide Integrated Model Pacific Northwest Regional.
Chapter 5 1 Chapter 5. The Transportation- Planning Process 1.Explain how travel demand modeling fits into the transportation-planning process 2.Explain.
Program Update Baltimore MPO November 25, Internal Draft AGENDA  Program Overview  Alternatives Development  Stakeholder and Public Outreach.
NE 203 rd Street & NE 215 th Street Intersection Improvements between US 1 & West Dixie Highway Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Upcoming Project Development.
Page Avenue What has it done for the region? A comparison of traffic volumes from Fall 2003 to Fall 2004 What has it done for the region? A comparison.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
Jeff’s slides. Transportation Kitchener Transportation Master Plan Define and prioritize a transportation network that is supportive of all modes of.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
Interstate 95 Corridor Improvement Program June 20, 2012.
Transportation and Transit Committee 4 December 2002 Albion Road Corridor Study.
Metro South Planning MetroLink in South St. Louis County Metro South MetroLink Extension Alternatives Analysis and Draft Environmental.
Southern Bridge Project Brown County Executive
Presentation Outline  Recommendation  Project Background  Public Involvement  Proposed Design  Citizen Comments/Questions  Summary and Recommendation.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. North Country Access Improvements Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting No. 9 January 19, 2016.
CITY OF RAINIER RAILROAD CROSSINGS 1. Team Members Matthew DeGeorge Robert Acevedo Josh Crain Jim Harvey Heather Wenstrand 2.
Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.
Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. North Country Access Improvements Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting No. 8 December 3, 2015.
City of Joliet - Sustainability City of Joliet Sustainability Initiatives American Planning Association National Conference April 16, 2013.
District VI, Florida Department of Transportation SE 2 nd Avenue and SE 4 th Street/Biscayne Boulevard Way March 25 th, 2014 Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory.
SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE MEASURES, RANKING AND PRIORITIZATION CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PLANS INCORPORATION INTO STIP & TIP STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION MONITOR.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
Project Development and Environmental Study (PD&E) S.R. 30 (U.S.) 98 Gregory Street and Bayfront Parkway at 17 th Avenue Intersection Project Development.
County Road 19(Manning Road) & County Road 22 Improvements Environmental Study/ Preliminary Design Report November 2008.
Pioneer Road Relocation and Reconstruction Project
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
Nixon Road Corridor Study: Findings & Options
City of New Braunfels Regional Transportation Planning Garry Ford, P.E., PTOE City Engineer June 13, 2017.
32 Transportation Midway City 2016 General Plan
Community Amenity Versus Economic Productivity
Project Management Team Meeting #3
Center City Connector 101.
Downtown Truck Traffic Study
NGTA Halton Planning and Public Works Committee
Gateway Specific Plan Concepts
PROJECT LOCATION Project begins at Garden Lane (East of I-4)
Transportation Planning Applications Conference Sheldon Harrison
VicRoads – Movement & Place
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
River to Sea TPO Meeting US 92/International Speedway Boulevard
Integrating Travel Demand Management into the Long-Range Planning Process 2017 AMPO October 19, 2017.
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
Ohio Rail Development Commission November 15, 2017 Meeting
9th & Colorado Redevelopment Impacts Denver Public Works - Traffic Safety recommendations Community feedback Survey Results Conducted by: Colorado.
VicRoads – Movement & Place
D Line Station Plan Overview
Chisinau-Gurgiulesti Motorway, Construction of Comrat Bypass
Chapter 5. The Transportation-Planning Process
Bi-County Parkway Evaluation of Impacts on Fairfax County Roads
Downtown Valdosta Truck Traffic Mitigation Study
Endorsement of the Recommended Design Concept (Preferred Alternative) for Transforming I-66 Outside the Beltway Board Transportation Committee October.
Emily Guenther Zach Olson Laura Scott Cameron Wein
Southern Bridge Project Brown County Executive
I-85 Corridor Light Rail Transit Feasibility Study
M14A/D Select Bus Service
KEYNOTE STAGE SPONSOR.
Parks Highway Reconstruction: Lucas Road to Big Lake Road
3 November 2017 Fraserburgh and Peterhead to Aberdeen Strategic Transport Study: STAG Part 1 Plus Bob Nicol: Project Director David Murtagh: Project Manager.
MPO Board Meeting Briefing
Bus Network Analysis for Potential Transit Priority
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
STATE ROAD 61/369 CRAWFORDVILLE HIGHWAY
Histon Road LLF Resolutions and Programme
Presentation transcript:

Downtown Valdosta Truck Traffic Mitigation Study Final Study Presentation Southern Georgia Regional Commission Dike Ahanotu and Christopher Lindsey June 21, 2016

Agenda Review of Alternatives Presentation of Model Results Discussion of a Potential Path Forward

Review of Alternatives Five alternatives evaluated Do Nothing Western Perimeter Bypass South Bypass James Road Route St. Augustine Road Route (NEW) Savannah Avenue Parkway Bypass All Vehicles Trucks Only Four Lanes South of Savannah Avenue Bypass

Alternatives Near Downtown

Evaluation of Alternatives Travel demand model estimated traffic volume changes at 8 locations. Alternatives evaluated based on: Truck traffic diverted away from downtown Traffic impacts on passenger vehicles Impacts of the alternatives on downtown businesses, residents, and visitors Consistency with current long-range plans Planning level cost considerations Safety implications

Model Results – Truck Traffic Savannah Avenue Parkway South Bypass Location Daily Truck Volumes (2010) 2040 Do- Nothing 2040 All Vehicles 2040 Trucks Only 2040 Four Lanes 2040 South of Savannah Ave. 2040 James Road Route 2040 S. A. Road Route West Central Ave. 1,200 27% -11% -68% -15% -33% -100% East Central Ave. 790 57% 11% -54% -22% -20% West Hill Ave. 1,270 14% -29% -85% -62% -56% East Hill Ave. 600 50% 2% -93% -66% -65% West Savannah Ave. 200 55% 850% 2,670% 1,310% -80% 220% 325% East Savannah Ave. 32% 282% 823% 450% -18% 228% 235% To some degree, all of the alternatives decrease truck traffic in downtown. The Savannah Avenue and South Bypass alternatives, however, are projected to remove the most trucks from downtown. The new alternative, South Bypass (St. Augustine Road Route) has similar performance as the James Road Route. However, it is projected to increase the amount of truck traffic on Savannah Avenue above the prediction for the James Road Route. The Savannah Avenue Trucks Only alternative removes the most trucks without a truck ban on downtown roads South of Savannah Alternative removes a significant amount of trucks

Model Results – Passenger Traffic Savannah Avenue Parkway South Bypass Location 2010 Daily Pax Vehicle Volumes 2040 Do- Nothing 2040 All Vehicles 2040 Trucks Only 2040 Four Lanes 2040 South of Savannah Avenue 2040 James Road Route 2040 S. A. Road Route West Central Ave. 5,610 31% -2% 49% 3% -13% 42% 51% East Central Ave. 3,560 33% -1% 50% -41% -32% 41% 57% West Hill Ave. 5,830 23% -17% 39% -34% -33% 34% 44% East Hill Ave. 3,030 52% 79% -50% 64% 86% W. Savannah Ave. 1,350 18% 537% -100% 801% -91% -19% 7% E. Savannah Ave. 2,890 286% 429% -6% 0.3% 10% Many alternatives likewise decrease passenger vehicle traffic in downtown. However, the South Bypass and the trucks-only Savannah Avenue alternative would increase passenger traffic on Central and Hill Avenues. The St. Augustine Route subalternative increases passenger traffic above the prediction for the James Road Route. Passenger traffic increases substantially with the Savannah Avenue Trucks Only alternative The four-lane alternatives remove passenger traffic from downtown

Evaluation of Other Impacts Savannah Avenue Parkway South Bypass Potential Impacts Do Nothing All Vehicles Trucks Only 4 Lanes South of Savannah Avenue James Road Route S. A. Road Route Western Perimeter Impact to Downtown Businesses ○   Vehicle Safety Pedestrian Safety Federal & State Approval  Impact to EJ Areas  Right-of-Way Needs Consistent with Previous Plans Time/Impact of Construction Wetlands “” = Very positive impact; “” = Positive impact; “ “ = Negative impact; “ “ = Very negative impact; “○” = Likely minimal impact

Potential Path Forward

Alternative Strategy Short-term Strategy Long-term Strategy An alternative that can be implemented relatively quickly, at low cost, and offer immediate relief to downtown businesses and residents Savannah Avenue alternatives Long-term Strategy An alternative that requires a greater investment of time and financial resources, but may complement other regional goals and be more sustainable New alignments Hybrid Strategy Implement a short-term fix while pursuing a longer-term solution

Hybrid Strategy Implement Savannah Ave. Trucks-Only alternative in the short-term while pursuing the South of Savannah Avenue alternative for the long-term Benefits Offers immediate truck relief for downtown at relatively low cost Provides flexibility for managing truck and auto movements in case growth differs from forecast Preserves options in case Savannah Avenue Trucks Only alternative is sufficient Challenges Requires higher investment of time and financial resources

Next Steps Develop recommendations based on community feedback Confirm path forward with GDOT Complete final report

Appendix

Modeled Alternatives Description Do-Nothing – No significant change in downtown roadway Savannah Ave. Pkwy (All Vehicles) - connect to Wells and Forrest Streets, make 2- way for entire stretch. Increase design speed from 25 mph to 35 mph Savannah Ave. Pkwy (Trucks-Only) – same as above, but for trucks only Savannah Ave. Pkwy (4-lanes, all vehicles) – Upgrade to a four-lane state route (new U.S. 84) South of Savannah Ave. – Build new 4-lane roadway south of Savannah Avenue Parkway with design speed on 45 mph (new U.S. 84). South Bypass (James Road Route) – 4-lane roadway. Mix of existing and new lanes. Restricts truck traffic from Central Ave. and Hill Ave. (new U.S. 84) South Bypass (St. Augustine Road Route) – same as above, but uses St. Augustine Road to connect to Hill Ave. as opposed to a new roadway

Summary Results by Alternative Do-Nothing – Truck and auto volumes on Central and Hill increase substantially Savannah Ave. Pkwy (All Vehicles) – Holds truck and auto volumes relatively constant Savannah Ave. Pkwy (Trucks-Only) – Removes most trucks (about 66%) from Central and Hill. Auto volumes on Central and Hill grow substantially Savannah Ave. Pkwy (4-lanes, all vehicles) – Removes high fraction of trucks from Central and Hill. Decreases autos on Central and Hill South of Savannah Ave. – Slight improvement over Savannah Ave. Pkwy in terms of autos and trucks removed from Central and Hill South Bypass (James Road Route) – Removes trucks from Central and Hill. Autos increase substantially South Bypass (Saint Augustine Road Route) – Removes trucks from Central and Hill. Autos increase more substantially than in the James Road Route alternative, which was noted as important to some stakeholders

Criteria for Selecting a Preferred Alternative Alternatives were selected based on their ability to alleviate downtown truck traffic and other criteria including: Vehicle and Pedestrian Safety Impact to Passenger Vehicle Volumes Federal and State Approval Impacts to Environmental Justice Areas Cost to Local Governments Environmental Impacts Time to Implementation Based on these criteria, some alternatives are more well- suited for either short- or long-term strategies for managing truck traffic

Short-term Strategy Implement the Savannah Ave. Parkway Trucks-Only alternative Benefits It can be implemented relatively quickly and at low cost Requires only modest infrastructure upgrades Minimal environmental and community impacts Does not require significant state or federal coordination Challenges Effectiveness of the Trucks-Only alternative strongly depends on enforcement of Savannah Ave. as an exclusive truck facility It would also require significant outreach to and cooperation from motor carriers

Long-term Strategy Implement either of the South Bypass alternatives Benefits Potential to divert U.S. 84 to one of the South Bypass routes and implement truck restrictions on Central and Hill Avenues Potential to convert Central and Hill Avenues to two-way streets, improving the pedestrian experience downtown Complements broader regional initiatives such as linking industrial clusters and spurring freight-related economic development Challenges High cost and time-intensive Multiple at-grade rail crossings would likely have to be separated for state and federal officials to consider re-routing U.S. 84 Local government to take on cost of maintaining and operating Central and Hill Avenues