Wafi Siala1,2, Françoise Van Bambeke1 , Thomas Vanzieleghem2

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Imaging MS MIAPE Working Document Helmholtz Institute, Munich, April 16 th 2012.
Advertisements

A National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center in the MSU College of Engineering Center for Biofilm Engineering INTRODUCTION Peripheral IV Blood.
A National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center in the MSU College of Engineering Center for Biofilm Engineering Bias is defined as the systematic.
ENHANCED SURVIVAL OF E. COLI O157:H7 IN TETRAHYMENA PYRIFORMIS VESICLES Charles T. Pannell Tennessee Technological University Cookeville, TN
Overnight growth of samples E. coli, S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and B. cereus Visual Density check Dilute samples to match turbidity of MacFarlane Standards.
Date of download: 6/28/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Society of Anesthesiologists. All rights reserved. Increased interleukin (IL)-10 release induced.
Bacterial persistence
Setting-up a model of intracellular infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa for the pharmacodynamic evaluation of antibiotic activity. J. Buyck1, O. Jolois2,
Activities of Daptomycin (DAP), Vancomycin (VAN) and Linezolid (LDZ) alone or in combination with Fusidic acid (FUS) in an in vitro dynamic model of.
A-052 Antibiotic (AB) activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) with Normal or Mucoïd Phenotypes in an Artificial Sputum Medium (ASM) in vitro Biofilm.
Activity of tobramycin in combination with clarithromycin
Introduction Results Aim of the study Methods References Conclusion
From: Antimicrobial Efficacy of Contact Lens Care Solutions Against Neutrophil-Enhanced Bacterial Biofilms Trans. Vis. Sci. Tech ;6(2):11. doi: /tvst
Comparison of the intracellular and extracellular activities of approved and novel antistaphylococcal antibiotics using a pharmacodynamic model exploring.
In vitro pharmacodynamic models for the study of antibiotic activity against bacterial biofilms Françoise Van Bambeke, PharmD, PhD Pharmacologie cellulaire.
Type III secretion system (TTSS) INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES
In vitro susceptibility of S
Revealing moxifloxacin activity against biofilms of S
Introduction & Purpose Results Conclusions
FUS, VAN and LZD injected twice (T0 and T12); DAP injected once (T0).
Introduction Results Aim Methods References Conclusion
Co-medications Improve Moxifloxacin (MXF) Activity in Models of Pneumococcal Naïve and Induced Biofilms (BF) N. M. Vandevelde1, M. Van Obbergh1, P.M. Tulkens1,
Inhibitors of type three secretion system [TTSS] protect against Pseudomonas aeruginosa cellular toxicity by inhibiting the transcription of TTSS Mailing.
Mapping French population [1]
Are Vitek2 system and E-test relevant and reliable for determining susceptibility to temocillin? Visée C.1, Frippiat F1, Descy J.2, Meex C.2, Melin P.2,
Julien Buyck, Paul M. Tulkens and Françoise Van Bambeke
Extracellular activity Intracellular activity
Abstract Results Methods Background Conclusions References
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES MATERIAL AND METHODS RESULTS CONCLUSION
Hydrogen Peroxide Influence on Microbial Survivorship
EV0626 Cellular pharmacokinetics of gepotidacin (GSK )
Difference log CFU from time 0
INTRODUCTION METHODS CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES
Microbial Survivorship in River Water
Electron microscopy: intracellular infection of THP-1 by S. aureus
CATALASE2 Coordinates SA-Mediated Repression of Both Auxin Accumulation and JA Biosynthesis in Plant Defenses  Hong-Mei Yuan, Wen-Cheng Liu, Ying-Tang.
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Activity of Moxifloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus in Models of Persistent Infections (Intracellular Survival, Biofilms) Mailing address: P.M. Tulkens.
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Presenter: Giri Narasimhan, Ph.D. E.mail:
Jun Zhu, John J. Mekalanos  Developmental Cell 
Rasmus D. Jahnsen, Evan F. Haney, Henrik Franzyk, Robert E.W. Hancock 
Figure 1. Oxyclozanide enhances aminoglycosides and tetracycline
Enhanced antimicrobial activity of peptide-cocktails against common bacterial contaminants of ex vivo stored platelets  K.V.K. Mohan, S. Sainath Rao,
Setting-up of a 24 h model to evaluate the activity of antibiotics against intracellular forms of S. aureus infection C. Seral, M. Barcia-Macay, F. Van.
Tianhui Maria Ma, J. Scott VanEpps, Michael J. Solomon 
Dinty J. Musk, David A. Banko, Paul J. Hergenrother 
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Anaerobic Respiration in Biofilms
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages (September 2005)
Rasmus D. Jahnsen, Evan F. Haney, Henrik Franzyk, Robert E.W. Hancock 
G. Kronvall  Clinical Microbiology and Infection 
The Effects of Ginseng on Microflora Survivorship
The Constitutive Capacity of Human Keratinocytes to Kill Staphylococcus aureus Is Dependent on β-Defensin 3  Kevin O. Kisich, Michael D. Howell, Mark.
A, Phase-contrast and CSLM of Arabidopsis roots cocultured with the B
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages e5 (October 2017)
The Effects of antibacterial hand soap on bacteria survivorship
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Joe Stern Pittsburgh Central Catholic Grade 9
Volume 22, Issue 24, Pages (December 2012)
CATALASE2 Coordinates SA-Mediated Repression of Both Auxin Accumulation and JA Biosynthesis in Plant Defenses  Hong-Mei Yuan, Wen-Cheng Liu, Ying-Tang.
Biofilm inhibition assay with engineered E. coli.
B. subtilis GS67 Protects C
Role of Apoptosis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pneumonia
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (July 2013)
HGF induced a collagen I–dependent, functionally significant increase in MT1-MMP at the basal surface of polarized, epithelial cells. HGF induced a collagen.
HGF induced a collagen I–dependent, functionally significant increase in MT1-MMP at the basal surface of polarized, epithelial cells. HGF induced a collagen.
Fig. 2. Effect of polyP3 on biofilm formation by P. gulae, P
Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
Naomi Balaban, Yael Gov, Arkady Bitler, Johan R. Boelaert 
Addressing Antibiotic Resistance by Isolation and Characterization of Genus Lysobacter and Genus Unknown Antibiotic-producers in Pittsburgh Soil Miriam.
Presentation transcript:

Wafi Siala1,2, Françoise Van Bambeke1 , Thomas Vanzieleghem2 Removing biofilms from endoscopes: the importance of the cleaning chemistry Wafi Siala1,2, Françoise Van Bambeke1 , Thomas Vanzieleghem2 P1484 1 Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels; 2 OneLIFE S.A., Louvain-la-Neuve - Belgium Introduction Results Several studies have associated the use of endoscopes with several outbreaks of infection in various clinical settings, including gastrointestinal, thoracic, urological, and other endoscopic procedures. The ability of bacteria to form biofilms is a major cause for endoscopes contamination. Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa are the most likely germs to cause these contaminations. We compared the biofilm dispersion activity, against bacterial species mentioned above, of one enzymatic cleaner developed by OneLIFE Sa (enziQure®) and 10 cleaners commonly used for the manual cleaning of endoscopes. PAO1 UNTREATED PAO1 VS CLEANER A PAO1 VS CLEANER J C4 UNTREATED C4 VS CLEANER A C4 VS CLEANER J C4 VS enziQure® PAO1 VS enziQure® Materials and Methods We used 5 reference strains and 10 clinical isolates (C1-C10; infections on medical devices and tissues). Biofilms were grown for 24 h in 96-wells plates. biofilms were exposed for 1h at 40°C to concentrations recommended by manufactures (0.5%-1%) of cleaners prepared in standardized water (WSH :1.25 mM MgCl2, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 3.33 mM NaHCO3). The ability of cleaners to remove biofilm biomass was determined using crystal violet assay as previously described (1). Tridimensional images were performed using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Biofilms were grown on coverslips, washed with distilled water; after which coverslips were transferred into a fresh well and incubated during 30 min at room temperature with LIVE/DEAD kit (1). Image stacks were acquired at a resolution of 700x500 pixels, recorded using Z-Stack module for acquisition of image series from different focus planes, and used to construct three-dimensional images with AxioVision software. Figure 2 – Tridimensional images in confocal laser scanning microscopy of PAO1 and clinical isolate (C4) biofilms. Biofilms were incubated during 1h at 40°C with 1% enziQure®; 0.5% cleaner A or 0.5% cleaner J and labelled with live/dead staining (red: dead; green: live). PAO1 biofilms are shown on the left, C4 biofilms are shown on the right. Figure 1 – Percentage of biomass reduction for 15 biofilms (formed by 3 isolates from 5 different species) after exposure to enziQure® and 10 other cleaners in the absence of mechanical action (* : no enzyme; # : germicidal activity). The dotted line shows the 50 % limit. Dots show the data for individual strains, with mean and 95% confidence intervals shown in black for each cleaner. Means (% ± SD): enziQure®: 62 ± 16; A: 48 ± 20; B: 45.7 ± 31; C: 38 ± 35; D: 18 ± 17; E: 16 ± 23; F: 12 ± 24; G: 12 ± 19; H: 11 ± 17; I: 12 ± 14; J: 8± 12. Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test (cleaner vs enziQure®): *: p < 0.05; ***: p < 0.001 References Acknowledgements Conclusions 1- Siala, W. et al. The antifungal caspofungin increases fluoroquinolone activity against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms by inhibiting N- acetylglucosamine transferase. Nat Commun 2016; 7:13286. WS is post-doctoral fellow of the program first enterprise from the Region Wallonne. This work was also supported by OneLIFE SA. While most of the current cleaning solutions are poorly active on biofilms, the enzymatic formulation of enziQure® allows marked (> 50 %) biofilm dispersion for 80% of tested strains. This effect nevertheless remains strain-dependent, probably related to the nature of the produced biofilm matrix. This poster will be available after the meeting at http://www.facm.ucl.ac.be/posters