SDAB HEARINGS ROLE OF THE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Municipal Board Making Your Case to the Board Presented by: William Barlow, Chair Lori Lavoie, Vice Chair.
Advertisements

It was unfair to me It was unfair to me External Student re Assessment by Marker who had never met the student. External Student re Assessment by Marker.
1 FIFTH ANNUAL COAT CONFERENCE NSW CHAPTER DEALING WITH DIFFICULTIES IN THE ABSENCE OF LEGAL REPRESENTATION The Hearing Process In the Absence of Legal.
Last Topic - Natural Justice
Agreement on a Procedure for the Resolution of Grievances Presentation by the The Staff Union Committee 26 May 2000.
Last Topic - Administrative Tribunals
Last Topic - Difference between State and Nation
CAMPUT 2015 Energy Regulation Course Donald Gordon Conference Centre Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario Role of Tribunal Staff, Interveners and Independent.
Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević Session 7.
Administrative Agencies Chapter 4. Copyright © 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning Objectives Identify executive-branch agencies. Explain that administrative.
Democracy: accountability & administrative law ACMA Legal Branch International Training Program Melbourne, 4 September 2006.
1 Conducting Effective Meetings and Hearings. 2 Overview Municipalities must conduct many proceedings to create and maintain an effective land use process.
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. Business Law in Canada, 7/e, Chapter 3 Business Law in Canada, 7/e Chapter 3 Government Regulation and the.
The KwaZulu-Natal Planning and Development Act APPLICATION PROCESS Schedule 1.
Presented by Christopher Msipu Phiri.  Location ◦ South Central part of Africa ◦ Landlocked Country with eight neighbors  Size ◦ Km2  Population.
Roles and Responsibilities in Municipal Land Use.
EPA’s ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION SYSTEM Environmental Appeals Board U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Kathie A. Stein, Judge.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
Planning appeals Peter Ford Head of Development Management Planning Committee Training – 30 th July 2015.
Procedural Safeguards. Purpose Guarantee parents both an opportunity for meaningful input into all decisions affecting their child’s education and the.
PPAL 6120 Ethics, Privacy and Access to Information March 3, 2009 Ian Greene.
 We use the Adversary system of trial.  HOWEVER, the Coroner’s Court, Family Court, Children’s Cases Program, some tribunals and some alternative methods.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada3-1 Chapter 3: The Resolution of Disputes—The Courts and Alternatives to Litigation.
COMMENT ON THE SPATIAL PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT BILL PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND LAND REFORM 21 AUGUST 2012.
Administrative Law The Enactment of Rules and Regulations.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
Mediation with the Information Commissioner’s Office Cory Martinson Appeals and Policy Analyst 25 November 2009.
Conducting an Investigation: a step by step guide Analyzing, Reporting, and Ensuring You Consider Procedural Fairness.
INVESTIGATION KAROLINA KREMENS, LL.M. (Ottawa), Ph.D. International Criminal Procedure.
Nebraska Liquor Control Commission Hobert Rupe Executive Director.
THE ROLE OF COURTS AND TRIBUNALS IN ENHANCING ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN ENVIRONMENTAL LITIGATION SEVENTH ANNUAL COLLOQUIUM OF THE IUCN ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL.
Bylaw Enforcement: Best Practices Guide for Local Governments Presentation to Southern Interior Local Government Association Conference, Kelowna, BC April.
The European Court of Justice EU Institutions The European Commission The European Parliament The Council of the European Union The European Court of.
PUBLIC LAW Fri. Apr. 4, 2008 Prof McLeod-Kilmurray.
Using the Disciplinary Procedure Human Resources.
Last Topic - Factor responsible for development of Administrative Law
The Military Ombudsman Bill [B9 of 2011]
Administrative Agencies
Unit Commanders Course The Complaint Process and Your Responsibility
Administrative law Ch1 scope and Nature of Administrative Law.
Support of the foreign language profile of law tuition at the Faculty of Law in Olomouc CZ.1.07/2.2.00/
THE PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE
PPAL 6120 Ethics, Privacy and Access to Information
Principles of Administrative Law <Instructor Name>
ICASA AMENDMENT BILL Vodacom’s Presentation to the
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments and Arbitral Awards
Council Orientation October 24, 2017
Public Law.
Proposed Rule Changes Overview Stan Floras Tribunal Counsel
SIMAD UNIVERSITY Keyd abdirahman salaad.
LPAT’s Function in the Ontario Planning Process
WARD 5 ETOBICOKE- LAKESHORE TOWN HALL MEETING
Chapter 18: The Federal Court System Section 1
Function of the International Court of Justice (ICJ):
Decision Making in the Context of the Administrative Sanctions Procedure A programme for Inquiry Members of the Financial Service Regulatory Authority.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Legal Requirement on OHSC Complaints Management Presenter: Mr M Tlholoe Director Complaints Centre & Assessment Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Study Guide!.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Appeals.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
ATEM Workshop Conference: Practical Complaints and Misconduct Handling
Chapter 18: The Federal Court System Section 1
NGOS position IN LEGAL PROCEDURES - overview
Approaches to Witness Evidence in International Arbitration
BC Council of Administrative Tribunals ADJUDICATOR BOOT CAMP
LECTURE No 6 - THE EUROPEAN UNION’s JUDICIAL SYSTEM I (courts)
Presentation transcript:

SDAB HEARINGS ROLE OF THE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER Kelsey Becker Brookes

SDAB Statutory body Intended to perform independent adjudicative function Hears complaints and functions like a court

SDAB Mandated by the MGA Created by the municipality to carry out appropriate functions and procedures Independent from municipality

SDAB Challenge a decision on a development application Challenge a decision on a subdivision application, that is not adjacent to a primary highway, a water body, a water or wastewater management facility, or in the green area Challenge the issuance of a Stop Order

SDAB Stay within the legislative job description, as set out by the MGA and Regulations Act fairly and reasonably within the limits imposed by administrative law and principles of natural justice Act in accordance with enabling bylaw

SDAB Not bound to follow previous decisions, except to ensure decisions are consistent with previous decisions made in similar cases

Jurisdiction Jurisdiction Intra vires Ultra Vires

Jurisdiction Loss of jurisdiction / ultra vires: Breaches principles of natural justice or duty to be fair Considers irrelevant evidence Fails to acknowledge relevant evidence Acts from improper motive or malice

Jurisdiction Within jurisdiction / intra vires Proceeds fairly Stay within jurisdiction (because are performing duties which used to be reserved for judges)

Natural Justice Natural Justice (traditionally two parts) a person must know the case being made against him or her and be given an opportunity to respond to it the rule against bias

Natural Justice Every person affected by an administrative decision is entitled to a hearing What form the hearing takes depends on the circumstances Right to oral hearing depends on circumstances

Natural Justice Right to counsel No absolute right to counsel Depends on circumstances Generally permitted where hearing closer to judicial model

Natural Justice Right to request an adjournment Discretionary Refusal by tribunal to grant adjournment may be a denial of procedural fairness if unreasonable in the circumstances

Natural Justice Evidence relied upon must be relevant and reliable Traditional rules of evidence do not apply Still must be relevant and reliable

Natural Justice Hearing before the person making the decision Person who decides must conduct the hearing Person upon whom statutory power has been delegated must preside

Natural Justice Counsel for the tribunal Administrative tribunals may retain legal counsel for advice and assistance in the proceedings before them Decision making must not be delegated to counsel Confined to rule of consultant

Rule Against Bias Rule against bias Right to be heard by an unbiased, independent and impartial decision maker Perception vs. reality

Rule Against Bias Test: is there a reasonable apprehension of bias? Financial interest in outcome Outside knowledge or involvement Relationship with parties Inappropriate comments or behaviour

Subdivision Appeals S. 678 Who can appeal subdivision decision S. 680 Must have regard to statutory plans Must conform with uses of land referred to in LUB

Development Appeals S. 685 Person applying for permit or affected person No appeal on permitted uses unless provision of LUB were relaxed, varied or misinterpreted S. 687 Must comply with statutory plans and LUB (subject to variance power)

Stop Order Appeals Key Decision: was the Stop Order properly issued?

Hearing De Novo Hears an application as if it were new Rather than evaluating the quality of the decision of the development authority or subdivision authority While SDAB hears from development authority, must come to its own conclusion Different variance power

Roles SDAB Secretary Appellant Respondent Applicant Affected Persons Counsel

Respondent Either development authority or subdivision authority Describe steps authority followed to make their decision: State basis of original decision Refer to and explain in plain language municipal planning documents

Respondent (continued) Submit evidence Refer to duties to make a decision Outline requirements or limits in statutory plans, LUB or MGA Photos from site visits Describe variances and conditions

Municipal Planning Documents Provincial Land Use Policies ALSA Regional Plan Statutory Plans LUB Policies

Other Planning Considerations Interconnectivity with existing development and landscape Future considerations for lands Incompatible uses, variety of uses Impacts of proposal Mitigating negative impacts

Role of Development Authority Advocate Neutral party New evidence

SDAB Decision Written decision Within 14 days Leave to appeal to Court of Appeal Record

Kelsey Becker Brookes 780.497.3304 Toll Free: 1.800.661.7673 (RMRF) Questions? Kelsey Becker Brookes 780.497.3304 Toll Free: 1.800.661.7673 (RMRF)