2 Seas Monitoring and Evaluation approach INTERACT seminar – Evaluation Plan workshop Vienna, 12 November 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CARICOM. Ninth EDF Project Caribbean Integration Support Programme (CISP ) Statistics Component 34th MEETING OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE OF CARIBBEAN STATISTICIANS.
Advertisements

Training for Participants Date, Location, Venue 1 Welcome! Welcome to PEM 2 Module!
First Evaluation of Good Governance for Medicines Programme Brief Summary of Findings.
Planning Evaluation 1 Planning evaluation An example - ERDF Berlin Dr. Oliver Schwab IfS Institut für Stadtforschung und Strukturpolitik.
EU-Regional Policy and Cohesion Structural Funds and Accession 1 SPP BUILDING IMPLEMENTATION CAPACITY Training seminar on evaluation Prague February.
Strategic Environmental Assessment and environmental issues in programme evaluation Ivana Capozza Italian Evaluation Units Open Days Roma, July 5, 2006.
Strengthening Nordic-Baltic educational cooperation in development of module “Supervision in social work” Dr. Jolanta Pivoriene Vice dean for projects.
PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND ADMINISTRATION Budget Briefing BRANCH: MONITORING AND EVALUATION Ms Tumi Mketi 07 May 2007.
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland Experience and new arrangements Ministry of Infrastructure and Development, Poland Athens,
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Powerpoint Templates Page 1 Powerpoint Templates Black Sea Basin Directorate – presentation of the scope, responsibilities and project interests Mrs. TANYA.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
Workshop on the Execution of IFAD Projects and Programmes General Recommendations regarding the Action Plan Bamako, 11 March 2005.
Regional Workshop to disseminate Water Supply and Sanitation Standards of Service, adapted to LDCs Préparation to the ISO TC 224 Drafts Standards test.
ELearning Socrates Minerva Concertation Meeting Helsinki 3 July 2006 « Dissemination and Exploitation of Results » Janette Sinclair European Commission.
Northern Periphery and Arctic Programme Programming Process Lead Partner seminar, 18th September 2013 – Skellefteå, Sweden Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
27/04/2017 Strengthening of the Monitoring and Evaluation system for FTPP/FTTP in FAO /SEC December 2015 FTPP/FTFP Workshop, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
ACTED AME Appraisal, Monitoring and Evaluation. Summary 1/ ACTED AME department 2/ AME Responsibilities 3/ AME throughout project cycle 4/ Involvement.
The 7th Framework Programme for Research: Strategy of international cooperation activities Robert Burmanjer Head of Unit, “International Scientific Cooperation.
Results Oriented Monitoring & Evaluation Model (ROMEM) Presented by Shawn Grey Ministry of Transport and Works Jamaica. Model developed by MTW and DPMI.
WP7Joint and sustainable transport in health and care Action plan for the period July-December Dr Snežana Manić AdriHealthMob, Steering Committee.
WP6 – Monitoring and Evaluation 17th November 2014 Rome.
Reporting, Monitoring and Evaluation Giovanni Rum, Chao Xing GEO Secretariat GEO Work Programme Symposium Geneva, 2-4 May 2016.
Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation of Community Projects – A Model Pretoria, South Africa 30 November – 3 December 2009.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions How the ILO works at a national level.
Kick Off Meeting Largs, Scotland
Reporting, Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring and Evaluation
Institutional Strengthening Support
GUIDELINES Evaluation of National Rural Networks
Proposed Organisation of Evaluation of the Romanian NSRF and Operational Programmes, Niall McCann, Technical Assistance Project for Programming,
Development and Energy in Africa
Introduction to the draft GRDP guidelines on partnership
Evaluation : goals and principles
Objectives of the Training
Lithuanian Standards for Evaluation of EU Structural Funds
Mattia Agnetti – INTERACT Programme Secretariat
Gas Regional Initiative
Suggestion for next steps for PGA for REDD+ in Vietnam
Common Monitoring and Evaluation System for Rural Development
Тowards regionally-based standards of qualifications
The Instrument for Pre–accession Assistance
Passenger Mobility Statistics 28 April 2016
Can SEA influence regional planning? The case of indonesia
How to improve their contribution to programme quality?
Statistics Governance and Quality Assurance: the Experience of FAO
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
Financial Instruments under the ESF State of Play & Implementation
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
AMICI WP1 – Management, coordination and dissemination
Eurostat A short introduction
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Passenger Mobility Statistics 21 May 2015
Post-2020 discussions 1. State of play of discussions 2. On-going work 3. Questions for debate.
State of Play Programme level
ESF Evaluation Plan England
The Estonian experience with ex-ante evaluation – set-up and progress
Guidelines on the Mid-term Evaluation
A Sea for Life MSFD related projects under Integrated Maritime Policy
Sylvia Barova Unit B.3 – Nature DG Environment, European Commission
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010
Camp Coordination and Camp Management Global Cluster 2010 …We are pleased to announce the launch of the provisional release of the Collective Centre.
ProZorro : Innovations in Digital Ex-Ante Monitoring Tools for Public Procurement in Ukraine Eliza Niewiadomska
Short and mid-term project needs for MSFD implementation
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
- Kick-off meeting - ERANET Cofund BlueBio WP4 (Leader: AEI)
Presentation transcript:

2 Seas Monitoring and Evaluation approach INTERACT seminar – Evaluation Plan workshop Vienna, 12 November 2015

Evaluation requirements 2014 – 2020 from the regulations: Enhanced focus on result-orientation New obligation of conducting impact evaluations for each Priority axis Develop an Evaluation Plan within one year after C.P adoption Strong input/awareness from the ex-ante evaluators of the need to have an in-depth clear reflection from the Programme authorities  The C.P development process therefore quickly integrated evaluation aspects through workshops and discussions, facilitated by our ex-ante evaluators

Involving MS from a very early stage Initial discussions with MS during preparation of the C.P (1st workshop in September 2013) to: Identify draft evaluation questions feeding the C.P development process (what does the Programme really want to achieve? What concrete and tangible results would you like to see and measure?) Contribute to definition of Result Indicators survey

2 Seas evaluation approach to M&E: MS decisions An external methodological support is needed throughout the programming period. This external methodological support should provide the “framework” for all the evaluation activities and would notably be in charge of supporting the MS (and the JS) in the: Set up and establishment of the Evaluation plan, Planning and preparation of the impact evaluations (data collection, Terms of Reference, evaluation questions etc.) from the beginning of the Programme life cycle.

Call for Tenders As a consequence, a Call for Tenders was launched in July 2015 to hire external consultants to provide this external methodological support. Framework contract covering the entire Programme duration (+ subsequent contracts for each of the tasks below) 4 main tasks foreseen: Methodological support in the design, development and implementation of an integrated evaluation approach within the framework of a robust 2 seas 2014-2020 Monitoring & Evaluation system. – 2015/2016 Programme performance evaluation - Step 1 – 2017 / 2018 Programme performance evaluation - Step 2 – 2019 / 2020 Final Programme performance evaluation and impact evaluation - 2022

Next steps Kick-off meeting with the external consultants Set-up of a dedicated evaluation taskforce (subgroup of the Monitoring Committee) Workshops to further develop the Evaluation Plan Review all Programme tools and procedures to ensure evaluation needs are integrated Design capacity-building tools (upon identification of needs / Projects and Programme partners)

Lessons learnt Important role played by the ex-ante evaluators (both for JS and MS) Important to stress the importance of evaluation towards MS Need to think about M&E as an integrated approach to be reflected in all Programme procedures and templates (reporting etc.) Identify and embed all evaluation needs (data needed, data collection system, level of information requested from projects etc.) from the start of the Programme to ensure evaluation is as relevant and good as possible Find a procurement procedure suited to your needs

Thank you for your attention! More information: Gianluca Ferreri, Project Unit Coordinator g.ferreri@interreg2Seas.eu Edouard Gatineau, Project Officer e.gatineau@interreg2Seas.eu