Search for A’ from p0  A’ g

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recent Results on Radiative Kaon decays from NA48 and NA48/2. Silvia Goy López (for the NA48 and NA48/2 collaborations) Universitá degli Studi di Torino.
Advertisements

LAV contribution to the NA62 trigger Mauro Raggi, LNF ONLINE WG CERN 9/2/2011.
Search for B     with SemiExclusive reconstruction C.Cartaro, G. De Nardo, F. Fabozzi, L. Lista Università & INFN - Sezione di Napoli.
Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.
1 BaBar Collaboration Randall Sobie Institute for Particle Physics University of Victoria.
Study of e + e  collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar Michel Davier (LAL-Orsay) for the BaBar collaboration TM.
Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University NA48/2 Semileptonics Meeting 22 nd February 2005 Update Kmu3 Branching Ratio measurement A. Dabrowski, February.
 Candidate events are selected by reconstructing a D, called a tag, in several hadronic modes  Then we reconstruct the semileptonic decay in the system.
POLENKEVICH IRINA (JINR, DUBNA) ON BEHALF OF THE NA62 COLLABORATION XXI INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS AND QUANTUM FIELD THEORY (QFTHEP'2013)
25/07/2002G.Unal, ICHEP02 Amsterdam1 Final measurement of  ’/  by NA48 Direct CP violation in neutral kaon decays History of the  ’/  measurement by.
Spasimir Balev /CERN/ mrad 3 LKr simulation: – very slow, so only events with interesting topology are fully simulated: –  + with.
Rare B  baryon decays Jana Thayer University of Rochester CLEO Collaboration EPS 2003 July 19, 2003 Motivation Baryon production in B decays Semileptonic.
NA48-2 new results on Charged Semileptonic decays Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Kaon 2005 Workshop 14 June 2005.
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
E. De LuciaNeutral and Charged Kaon Meeting – 7 May 2007 Updates on BR(K +  π + π 0 ) E. De Lucia.
Status of K S   e analysis C. GattiT. Spadaro Selection on data Selection on MC Efficiencies from data, K L   e, K S    ,      , bhabha.
Feb. 7, 2007First GLAST symposium1 Measuring the PSF and the energy resolution with the GLAST-LAT Calibration Unit Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test.
Detection of electromagnetic showers along muon tracks Salvatore Mangano (IFIC)
Study of neutrino oscillations with ANTARES J. Brunner.
Study of neutrino oscillations with ANTARES J. Brunner.
Experimental Search for the Decay K. Mizouchi (Kyoto University) (1) Physics Motivation (2) Detector (3) Selection Criteria (4) Branching Ratio (5) Background.
Preliminary results for the BR(K S  M. Martini and S. Miscetti.
Dynamics of  →       F. Ambrosino T. Capussela F. Perfetto.
Muon detection in NA60  Experiment setup and operation principle  Coping with background R.Shahoyan, IST (Lisbon)
Study of pair-produced doubly charged Higgs bosons with a four muon final state at the CMS detector (CMS NOTE 2006/081, Authors : T.Rommerskirchen and.
Status of the hadronic cross section (small angle) Federico Nguyen February 22 nd 2005  the 2002 data sample and available MC sets  trigger efficiency.
JPS 2003 in Sendai Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation ~ Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment ~ 2. Event selection 3. mass.
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
Search for the  + in photoproduction experiments at CLAS APS spring meeting (Dallas) April 22, 2006 Ken Hicks (Ohio University) for the CLAS Collaboration.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
D. LeoneNovosibirsk, , 2006Pion Form KLOE Debora Leone (IEKP – Universität Karlsruhe) for the KLOE collaboration International Workshop.
Heavy stable-particle production in NC DIS with the ZEUS detector Takahiro Matsumoto, KEK For the ZEUS collaboration.
Status report on analysis of BR(K S  p + p - p 0 ) A. Antonelli, M. Moulson, Second KLOE Physics Workshop, Otranto, June 2002.
LAV efficiency studies with photons T. Spadaro* *Frascati National Laboratory of INFN.
L0 trigger update Bruno Angelucci INFN & University of Pisa.
V. Pozdnyakov Direct photon and photon-jet measurement capability of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC Valery Pozdnyakov (JINR, Dubna) on behalf of the HI.
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
Status of the measurement of K L lifetime - Data sample (old): ~ 440 pb -1 ( ) - MC sample: ~125 pb -1 ( mk0 stream ) Selection: standard tag (|
Status of K± p±p0 E. De Lucia.
Update on Trigger simulation
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
The New CHOD detector for the NA62 experiment at CERN S
the charged kaon lifetime
Matteo Negrini Frascati, Jan 19, 2006
Prospects for K+ p+ n n Observation at CERN in NA62
LKr inefficiency measurement
Converted photons efficiency
SAC/IRC data analysis Venelin Kozhuharov for the photon veto working group NA62 photon veto meeting
Search For Pentaquark Q+ At HERMES
Progress on Pion Form Factor at KLOE (large photon polar angle)
p0 life time analysis: general method, updates and preliminary result
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Quarkonium production in ALICE
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
Background understanding and detector inefficiency
Study of e+e- pp process using initial state radiation with BaBar
Prospects for quarkonium studies at LHCb
Study of e+e collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar
Background rejection in P326 (NA48/3)
Samples and MC Selection
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Experimental Search for the Decay
Measurement of DE and INT in K±→±0g with NA48/2
Search for Lepton Flavour Violation in the decay  → BaBar
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Reconstruction and calibration strategies for the LHCb RICH detector
Status of the cross section analysis in e! e
Presentation transcript:

Search for A’ from p0  A’ g T. Spadaro M. Mirra G. Rovelli

Goal of the present analysis Detect dark photons, feebly coupled to SM g via: L = e Amn Fmn Produce dark photons from the decay chain: K+  p+p0, p0  A’ g Assume invisible decay of the A’ (or extremely long-lived A’) Signature: one photon, missing mass peaking around the A’ mass Data sample: 4 runs of period A (6610, 6614, 6625, 6670) Reconstruction revision r1421 MC sample: private production, 11 mass bins from 30 to 130 MeV Reconstruction revision r1421 + physics-list bug fix 06/04/17 Exotic physics meeting - CERN

Status of A’ invisible searches Recent results: NA64, Babar; in future, expect results from Belle/Belle-II 06/04/17 Exotic physics meeting - CERN

Selection algorithm: “p0 tag” pnn L0 trigger used for signal search control trigger used to normalize signal counts to the p0 produced One-track-selection One good quality downstream track connected to CHOD candidate, 15 < p < 35 GeV Association to 1 and only 1 upstream track from GTK: |TGTK – TEvent(RICH)| < 400 ps Upstream and downstream tracks approach each other to better than 5 mm Point of closest approach: 115 < Zvertex < 165 m, to reduce early-decay effect Kaon momentum cut: 72 < pK < 78 GeV Pion positive identification: RICH: single ring association !MUV3: no hit connected in time and space wrt expected impact LKr, MUV1, MUV2 combined info: R. Aliberti’s tool, P(p) > 0.8 06/04/17 Exotic physics meeting - CERN

Selection algorithm: “p0 tag” Cut on the squared missing mass 0.013 < (PK - Pπ)2 < 0.023 GeV2 (PK - Pπ)2 (GeV2) Total number of events selected with control trigger: 518444 -> considering the downscale factor this leads to ~207 × 106 p0 06/04/17 Exotic physics meeting - CERN

Selection algorithm: “one g” One-photon selection: No signal from the LAV, SAC and IRC systems must be present with a time consistent with the TEvent(RICH) (standard tools) Exactly one standard cluster with E > 1.5 GeV and -5 ns < TLKr – TEvent(RICH) < 10 ns Missing momentum pmiss = pK – pp - pg must point to LKr Cut on additional veto: No activity in the LKr corresponding to auxiliary clusters of total energy above 1 GeV around the expected missing momentum extrapolated point; No RICH hits in time in addition to pion track hits Isolation: distance photon-expected vs photon found > 20 cm Remain with 166518 events from PNN trigger corresponding to a single photon inefficiency ~ 8 × 10-4 06/04/17 Exotic physics meeting - CERN

Data control trigger: 2 γ on LKr, simulate 1g loss Expected signal Search for signal in missing mass windows, from pmiss = pK – pπ - pγ Mmiss2 = Emiss2 – pmiss2 Data control trigger: 2 γ on LKr, simulate 1g loss MC: - mA’ = 30 MeV - mA’ = 60 MeV - mA’ = 90 MeV Mmiss2 (GeV2) 06/04/17 Exotic physics meeting - CERN

Exotic physics meeting - CERN Master formula Determine number of signal events: Correct for one-photon selection (esel) and trigger (etrg) efficiencies Count number of signal events (nsig) in a mass-dependent Mmiss2 window Account for mass-window acceptance (emass) Normalize to number of p0 counts from control trigger, downscale corrected Assumptions under above formula: Acceptance for single-track selection exactly cancels (that must be true) Assume control trigger efficiency for one-track events = 1 Assume nominal downscale when correcting (control trigger “re-start” to be checked) To evaluate e, account for phase space factor ~(p*)3 = (1 – mA’2/mp02)3 06/04/17 Exotic physics meeting - CERN

Efficiency corrections: one-g selection Efficiency to detect one g cluster with missing momentum towards LKr Drop at 130 MeV, understood from kinematics consideration General behavior reproduced using toy-MC simulation Multiple energy scales because of: g in LKr acceptance + isolation wrt p cluster + missing momentum pointing to LKr Include 12% inefficiency from IRC, SAC, LKr random veto losses Efficiency from MC MA’ (MeV) 06/04/17 Exotic physics meeting - CERN

Efficiency corrections: LKr veto Require no additional LKr cluster from auxiliary reconstruction: |dt| < 8 ns, distance to the expected g impact point < 40 cm, Ematch > 1 GeV Reject 53% of remaining background (events with |M2miss| < 0.001 GeV2), dominated by loss of low-energy clusters 2% random veto evaluated from control trigger + pp0 selection with p0  gg Fraction of matched events Fake veto probability Standard reconstruction Present default Auxiliary reconstruction Expected (GeV) Eaux threshold (GeV) 06/04/17 Exotic physics meeting - CERN

Efficiency corrections: vetoes Require no additional hit from RICH in time with the event Effect: reject 5.5% of the residual background (events with |M2miss| < 0.001 GeV2) Random loss at 1% checked with data From MC, inefficiency 0.5% 1.5% for MA’ = 30 MeV  130 MeV In time RICH data hits to within 800 ps distance to p ring center normalized to p ring radius 06/04/17 Exotic physics meeting - CERN

Efficiency corrections: Isolation cut To avoid LKr-energy sharing issues, require > 20 cm distance between g and expected impact from pmiss to LKr: Extremely effective for background in the negative tail (~ x10 wrt peak) Pay a price in terms of efficiency, particularly at high A’ masses (as expected) Fraction of rejected events Efficiency from MC Mmiss2 (GeV2) MA’ (MeV) 06/04/17 Exotic physics meeting - CERN

Efficiency corrections: trigger Trigger efficiency for signal obtained by reweighting MC kinematics: 1. Use data spectrum for pion energy release in LKr in momentum bins 2. Use probability from data for a photon to fire a newCHOD sector in energy bins 3. Combine g and p to simulate QX or !QX condition, apply L0 efficiency from data Fraction of events with pnn trigger bit Particles in !QX 0-g sample: two g’s on LAV 1-g sample: 1-g on LAV, !LAV12, 1g on LKr 2-g sample: !LAV, 2g on LKr, exclude condition with g’s in QX For a given total energy, efficiency depends on number of particles in the LKr Particles in QX Total energy in the LKr (MeV) 06/04/17 Exotic physics meeting - CERN

Efficiency corrections: trigger Linear dependence on the A’ mass: Higher A’ masses, lower photon energy  higher efficiency for LKr L0 Positive bias from LKr-L0 malfunctioning important at low A’ masses Efficiency from MC (reweighted w data input) MA’ (MeV) 06/04/17 Exotic physics meeting - CERN

Exotic physics meeting - CERN Expected background Evaluate expected background from negative Mmiss2 side band Assume purely symmetric resolution effects Tested using data from control trigger with p0  gg: looks OK  Use data for bkg estimate: same trigger, detector, and beam conditions  Statistics of background subtraction same order of data Data Symmetrized data Data – symmetrized data Mmiss2 (GeV2) Mmiss2 (GeV2) 06/04/17 Exotic physics meeting - CERN

Signal determination: the concept To extract signal use “CLS method”: Count data and background expected in 1-s windows around each A’ mass hypothesis Statistics: Poisson(data | signal + background) / Poisson( data | background) Vary the signal strength, evalute 90% CL coverage using toy-MC integration To evaluate compatibility of limit wrt expected fluctuations: “Expected” limit: assume no signal, vary data observed in toy-MC, evaluate limit spread Example, MA’ = 90 MeV: Count in 0.007 < Mmiss2 < 0.0095 GeV2 12 observed in data 8 background expected CLS = probability that signal is > S Limit found Median expected limit 1-s limit band 2-s limit band 90% CL coverage Signal S 06/04/17 Exotic physics meeting - CERN

Signal determination: results Limits observed are statistically compatible with fluctuations from the background-only hypothesis e Limit if Nobs = Nbkg Limit found 1-s limit band 2-s limit band MA’ (MeV) 06/04/17 Exotic physics meeting - CERN

Upper limit determination NA62 limits in an interesting region (4 runs only used) NA62 06/04/17 Exotic physics meeting - CERN

Exotic physics meeting - CERN To-do list Write extended documentation including all analysis details Checking master formula assumptions can be synergic with pnn using newly produced MC from dedicated data-based studies Check other background sources using newly produced MC do not expect relevant contribution Go for publication approval 06/04/17 Exotic physics meeting - CERN