NWAS—NOAA’s flask program for aircraft missions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GHG Verification & the Carbon Cycle 28 September 2010 JH Butler, NOAA CAS Management Group Meeting Page 1 Global Monitoring, Carbon Cycle Science, and.
Advertisements

Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing Part I Stautzebach Elena.
A direct carbon budgeting approach to infer carbon sources and sinks from the NOAA/ESRL Aircraft Network Colm Sweeney 1, Cyril Crevoisier 2, Wouter Peters.
Climate Change.
FACTORS GOVERNING THE SEASONAL VARIABILITY OF ATMOSPHERIC CARBONYL SULFIDE Parv Suntharalingam Harvard/Univ. of East Anglia A.J. Kettle, S. Montzka, D.
The Atmosphere: Oxidizing Medium In Global Biogeochemical Cycles EARTH SURFACE Emission Reduced gas Oxidized gas/ aerosol Oxidation Uptake Reduction.
Natural Environments: The Atmosphere GE 101 – Spring 2007 Boston University Myneni L27: Radiative Forcing of Climate Change Apr-04 and (1 of 17)
Global simulation of H 2 and HD with GEOS-CHEM Heather Price 1, Lyatt Jaeglé 1, Paul Quay 2, Andrew Rice 2, and Richard Gammon 2 University of Washington,
Evaluating the Impact of the Atmospheric “ Chemical Pump ” on CO 2 Inverse Analyses P. Suntharalingam GEOS-CHEM Meeting, April 4-6, 2005 Acknowledgements.
METO 637 Lesson 16.
METO 737 Lesson 9. Fluorinated Hydrocarbons Developed in 1930 by the General Motors Research laboratories in seqrch for a non-toxic, non-inflammable,
This Week—Tropospheric Chemistry READING: Chapter 11 of text Tropospheric Chemistry Data Set Analysis.
Evaluating the Role of the CO 2 Source from CO Oxidation P. Suntharalingam Harvard University TRANSCOM Meeting, Tsukuba June 14-18, 2004 Collaborators.
Brooks Range, AK HIAPER Pole-to-Pole Observations 2009 (“HIPPO”) Steven C. Wofsy and the HIPPO Science Team Global CH 4 Global fine-grained data: what.
Climate: What we know about it, How we know about it, and What we’re doing to it.]
· Are human activities responsible for the warming? Separating out the impact of human activity from natural climate variation is extremely difficult.
Colorado Front Range Emissions Study Regional study of the impact of oil and gas operations on ambient hydrocarbon levels in the Northern Front Range based.
Trace gases measurements from the Global Hawk Whole Air Sampler during the Airborne Tropical Tropopause Experiment 2013 (ATTREX-2) Maria Navarro 1, E.
Validation of a Satellite Retrieval of Tropospheric Nitrogen Dioxide Randall Martin Dalhousie University Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Daniel Jacob.
Monday, 8/31/091 ATMO Class #2 Monday, August 31, 2009 Chapter 1 Introduction to the Atmosphere.
Le Kuai 1, John Worden 2, Elliott Campbell 3, Susan S. Kulawik 4, Meemong Lee 2, Stephen A. Montzka 5, Joe Berry 6, Ian Baker 7, Scott Denning 7, Randy.
TOP-DOWN CONSTRAINTS ON REGIONAL CARBON FLUXES USING CO 2 :CO CORRELATIONS FROM AIRCRAFT DATA P. Suntharalingam, D. J. Jacob, Q. Li, P. Palmer, J. A. Logan,
(Mt/Ag/EnSc/EnSt 404/504 - Global Change) Biogochemistry & Climate (from IPCC WG-I, Chapter 7) Biogeochemistry & Climate Primary Source: IPCC WG-I Chapter.
Kaitlyn Steele Bryan Duncan, NASA-GSFC Juying Warner, UMBC-JCET Eric Nielsen, NASA-GSFC Research and Discover 2010 Surface [CH 4 ] in NASA GEOS-5 CCM.
Biogenic Contributions to Methane Trends from 1990 to 2004 Arlene M. Fiore 1 Larry W. Horowitz 1, Ed Dlugokencky 2, J. Jason West.
It’s not just about Global Warming… The Problem with the Ozone Layer.
Seasonal variability of UTLS hydrocarbons observed from ACE and comparisons with WACCM Mijeong Park, William J. Randel, Louisa K. Emmons, and Douglas E.
A direct carbon budgeting approach to study CO 2 sources and sinks ICDC7 Broomfield, September 2005 C. Crevoisier 1 E. Gloor 1, J. Sarmiento 1, L.
Objective Data  The outlined square marks the area of the study arranged in most cases in a coarse 24X24 grid.  Data from the NASA Langley Research Center.
The effect of pyro-convective fires on the global troposphere: comparison of TOMCAT modelled fields with observations from ICARTT Sarah Monks Outline:
Source vs. Sink Contributions to Atmospheric Methane Trends:
Global trends in CH 4 and N 2 O Matt Rigby, Jin Huang, Ron Prinn, Paul Fraser, Peter Simmonds, Ray Langenfelds, Derek Cunnold, Paul Steele, Paul Krummel,
1May 14, 2014 Uncertainties in projections of ozone- depleting substances and alternatives Guus Velders The Netherlands (RIVM)
Question 16: Has the Montreal Protocol been successful in reducing ozone-depleting substances in the atmosphere? Deniz Ural.
1 Radiative Forcing The balance between incoming solar radiation and heat radiation leaving the atmosphere.
OVERVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES: Daniel J. Jacob Ozone and particulate matter (PM) with a global change perspective.
Figure 1: Global time series plots of CH 4 and δ 13 C of CH 4 from The recent rise in CH 4 is concurrent with a decrease in δ 13 C of CH 4.
Measurement of the Long-term trends of Methanol (CH 3 OH) and Carbonyl Sulfide (OCS) Both methyl chloride and carbonyl sulfide have strong infrared bands.
NOAA ESRL GMD Carbon Cycle GHG Measurement Program Ed Dlugokencky.
1 START08 Workshop, 8-9 Jan 2008 Understanding our atmosphere from non-CO 2 climate gases during HIPPO: Global network and aircraft profiles James W. Elkins.
Arthur N. Samel Chair, Department of Geography Bowling Green State University & Chief Reader, Advanced Placement Environmental Science Program.
Variability of CO 2 From Satellite Retrievals and Model Simulations Xun Jiang 1, David Crisp 2, Edward T. Olsen 2, Susan S. Kulawik 2, Charles E. Miller.
Atmospheric Methane Distribution, Trend, and Linkage with Surface Ozone Arlene M. Fiore 1 Larry W. Horowitz 1, Ed Dlugokencky.
PKU-LSCE winter shool, 14 October 2014 Global methane budget : The period Philippe Bousquet 1, Robin Locatelli 1, Shushi Peng 1, and Marielle.
Yuqiang Zhang1, Owen R, Cooper2,3, J. Jason West1
ATom’s NOAA-GMD Instrumentation /Dataset/Science Backdrop
Historical GHG concentrations
The Enhanced Greenhouse Effect
Global Annual Emissions / C02 PPM
6.2 & 6.3 Influences on Climate
What can we learn from global measurements of SF6?
East Asian Emissions of Ozone Depleting Substances Observed in Taiwan
Top-down constraints on emissions of biogenic trace gases from North America Dylan Millet with D.J. Jacob, R.C. Hudman, S. Turquety, C. Holmes (Harvard)
Carbon Cycle Observation Advances at NCAR
Chapter 19 Global Change.
Percent of Global GHG Emissions 14%
Greenhouse Gases & Human Activitites
Peter Zoogman, Daniel Jacob
Variability of CO2 From Satellite Retrievals and Model Simulations
“HIAPER Pole-to-Pole Observations”
The Global Carbon Cycle
Variability of CO2 From Satellite Retrievals and Model Simulations
Greenhouse Gases and Climate Change
Asian outflow and chemical evolution of ozone and nitrogen oxides over the Pacific Mathew Evans, Daniel Jacob, Harvard Group, TRACE-P Science Team et al.
The Global Carbon Cycle
Percent of Global GHG Emissions 14%
Nutrient Cycles in Nature Ch. 3-3
Lesson /14/18 SWBAT identify anthropogenic sources of climate change. Do Now: MC Questions.
Earth’s Atmosphere Comic courtesy of Lab-initio.com.
Climatic implications of changes in O3
Presentation transcript:

NWAS—NOAA’s flask program for aircraft missions a.k.a., NOAA’s programmable flask packages (PFPs) Status: * Not yet a funded project for ATom-1 or other ATom deployments * Is currently included in upload planning for ATom-1 in close coordination with PANTHER/UCATS * PFP sampling essentially flight-ready in a configuration similar to that used in HIPPO-- some changes will be made (e.g., pump, computer control) * Analysis instruments will be by: CCGGG MAGGIC (as in HIPPO) INSTAAR (adding 13CH4 in place of CO2 isotopes in HIPPO) GCMS (which instrument still being considered on basis of gases and precision) Needs: * funding to allow participation in the project—  drop-dead date for participation: mid fall, 2015, (know by start of fiscal year) * sampling frequency of flasks is limited by availability of PFPs at NOAA. * as a result, shipping to/from needs to be expedited to minimize time out of service. * rack configuration needs to be finalized with PANTHER and UCATS. S. Montzka C. Sweeney J. Elkins F. Moore NOAA and CIRES Note new addition—regarding INSTAAR contributions, 13CH4 added in place of CO2 isotopes…

Three possible configurations. #1 Preferred and current anticipated. DC-8 layout tight for PANTHER and UCATS #2 PFP’s out of packaging and into low rack. #3 HIPPO configuration use GV full rack and ½ rack side by side. #1 #3 #2

#3 HIPPO configuration use GV full rack and ½ rack side by side.

NWAS—NOAA’s flask program for aircraft missions NWAS PFP’s on ATom will: Supply useful and unique science deliverables, Integrated as part of the PANTHER/UCATS combined NOAA-GMD package. Operated, and maintained by PANTHER/UCATS personnel on DC-8. Science deliverables from pfp’s includes: 1) Measurements of: * 13CH4 with sensitivity to assorted chemical processing. * High precision data for CH3CCl3 (MC) sensitive to global OH. * A wide suite of long-lived trace gases, short-lived halogenated gases, hydrocarbons, carbonyl sulfide, ………. 2) As a result of these measurements: A direct link between data from DC-8 instrumentation and: * WMO calibration scales * Global measurements in the NOAA surface networks. thus providing a broader context to ATom results in time and space.

NWAS—NOAA’s flask program for aircraft missions What is NWAS ? Sample collection during flight in glass flasks: * 24 flasks collected per flight (2 × 12 flask packages) * Up to 240 flasks collected per ATom deployment (20 packages-funding dependent) Subsequent flask analysis at NOAA/GMD and CU/INSTAAR for measurements of: * isotopes of CH4 (13CH4) * the main long-lived greenhouse gases (CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, SF6, PFCs*) * the main ozone-depleting substances (CFCs, HCFCs, halons, CH3Br, methyl chloroform**, CCl4...) * naturally emitted halogenated gases (CH3Cl, CH2Br2, CHBr3*, CH3I) * other gases of interest (CO, COS, CH2Cl2, CHCl3, C2Cl4, C2H2, C2H6*, C3H8, butanes, pentanes, C6H6*...) * Depending on the GCMS instrument used for analysis ** precision varies by instrument. Fred, John Miller let me know that if we wanted flasks analyzed by MAGGIC, GCMS, and for 13CH4, there would likely NOT be enough air for analyzing the flasks for CO2 isotopes, so I took them off this list…

NWAS—NOAA’s flask program for aircraft missions Chemical Instrument CO2 MAGGIC CH4 MAGGIC N2O MAGGIC CO MAGGIC SF6 MAGGIC H2 MAGGIC 13CH4 INSTAAR By GCMS (three choices for analyzing ATom flasks; M2 used for HIPPO): Chemical M3 M2 P1* CFCs -11, -12, and -113 Y Y Y -13 N N Y -115 N Y Y -112 Y N ? HCFCs -22, and -142b Y Y Y -141b** N N N -133a, -21 Y N ? HFCs -134a, 152a, 227ea Y Y Y -32, 125, 143a N Y Y --- -365mfc Y Y ? -23, -236fa N N Y Methyl halides CH3Cl, CH3Br, CH3I Y Y Y Chemical M3 M2 P1* Halons H-1301 N Y Y H-1211 and H-2402 Y Y Y Other chlorinated hydrocarbons CH3CCl3***, CCl4, C2Cl2 Y Y Y --- CHCl3, C2Cl4 Y Y Y Other brominated hydrocarbons CHBr3 Y Y N --- CH2Br2 Y Y Y PFCS CF4, C2F6 N N Y Hydrocarbons C2H2 N Y Y C2H6 N N Y --- C3H8 Y Y Y n-butane Y Y Y i-butane Y N Y n-pentane Y Y Y i-pentane Y Y Y n-hexane Y N Y C6H6 Y Y N Carbonyl Sulfide Y Y Y CH3I Y Y Y NF3 N N ? SO2F2 N N ? Notes: Flasks through Maggic and the standarts associated define surface network WMO and connect back to HIPPO. INSTAR to measur delt 13 ( not enough gas to do CO2 isotopes also) GCMS? M3 oldest most connected and has best MC, P1 newest least connected but has more replacent molecules and hydrocarbons. M2 was used in HIPPO Sicence with most trace gas same as discussed in PANTHER UCATS talk, quick look at what Delta 13 C and MC bring to the table. *Instrument still in testing phases, will be operational by ATom-1 **HCFC-141b isn’t well measured because of the Teflon seals in the flasks ***CH3CCl3 is notably better measured on M3 compared to the others

Globally averaged atmospheric methane (NOAA GMD) Increasing concentration, but decreasing growth rate Renewed increase Approxely steady state The Global Monitoring Division, which is part of NOAA’s Earth System Research Laboratory, has been measuring atmospheric methane from the Cooperative Air Sampling Network since 1983. Since then, there has been a period of increasing methane concentration but decreasing growth rate; a period approximately at steady state, and since 2007, a renewed increase in concentration. The reasons for this recent increase are not well understood. Sylvia E. Michel … AGU 2014

The annual mean of d13CH4 has decreased since 2007 across sites. latitLaude Here is a plot of annual means of d13CH4 at each site. All of these data come from our lab at INSTAAR. The color represents the latitude of the site, shown here, and the error bars represents the standard deviation for the de-seasonalized data. You can see that annual means decrease at all of the sites. The growth rate seems to stabilize at a few of the high latitude sites in 2012 and 2013, and we’re waiting to see what the 2014 data show. S Sylvia E. Michel … AGU 2014

d13CH4 can constrain possible sources of methane -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 ‰ microbes fossil fuels biomass burning Biogenic sources: methanogenic microbes from wetlands, rice paddies, ruminants, landfills, O2-poor reservoirs, manure, etc. Thermogenic sources: natural seeps, mud volcanoes, and exploitation of fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas Pyrogenic sources: incomplete combustion of biomass, soil carbon, and fuel Sinks influence d13CH4. The OH radical reacts more quickly with 12CH4, leaving the atmosphere enriched in 13CH4. Methane isotopes are useful because of the different isotopic signatures of the different source categories. The isotope delta value of biogenic sources, which include methanogenic microbes from wetlands, rice paddies, ruminants is approximately -50 to -70 ‰ relative to PDB Methane produced during extraction of fossil fuels has a wide range, from about -20 to -60 ‰ And methane produced due to incomplete combustion of biomass is approximately -13 to -25 ‰, depending on the fraction of C3 vs C4 plants. The destruction of methane by the OH radical also has a small fractionation factor, as do destruction of methane in the stratosphere and by methanotrophic soil bacteria, and those are known reasonably well. So although individual sources have large ranges and a lot of geographic variability, their average values are valid on large spatical scales. Sylvia E. Michel … AGU 2014

Methyl Chloroform measurements over time (NOAA’s surface network on GCMS M3) Notes: Exponential decay of trop Methyl Chloride, but normalized north south gradient locks in to a well defined value and fixed temporal structure around 1998? Matched decaying N-S source diff with time ( stratospheric north south assemity in mass flux? Or is the gradient driven by natural assemitrys in OH proccessing between the north and the south?.

Methyl Chloroform measurements over Latitude and time (NOAA’s surface network on GCMS M3) Notes: Latitudinal structure locks in at same 1998 time frame and though difficult to see there is evidence of an altitude dependency step function a lat 20 due to both high and low altitude sampling.

Science with MC and 13CH4 constrained primarily by surface measurements. Sparse free trop data for MC and 13CH4 have shown resolvable vertical structure suggesting that: PFP’s on ATom can provide a valuable free trop dataset with vertically resolved seasonal coverage for the trace gasses MC and 13CH4 . They have the potential to substantially advance the field by improving our understanding: * OH distribution and processing of mass flux through that distribution. * How CH4 is processed throughout the troposphere.

NWAS—NOAA’s flask program for aircraft missions Results from HIPPO: Carbon Dioxide in situ vs PFP flasks (H2-H5 only): **Redundant measurements generally improve data quality... **NOAA PFP results allow the data to be more directly comparable to NOAA global network results for the entire suite of measured gases.

NWAS—NOAA’s flask program for aircraft missions Papers published with NOAA flask data collected on HIPPO (model comparisons, satellite validation...): Hossaini, R., et al., The contribution of natural and anthropogenic very short-lived species to stratospheric bromine, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 371-380, doi:10.5194/acp-12-371-2012. Hossaini, R., et al., Evaluating global emission inventories of biogenic bromocarbons, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 11819-11838, doi:10.5194/acp-13-1189-2013. Kuai, L., et al., Characterization of Aura TES carbonyl sulfide retrievals over ocean, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 163-172, doi:10.5194/amt-7-163-2014. Leedham Elvidge, E.C., D. E. Oram, J.C. Laube, A. K. Baker, S. A. Montzka, S. Humphrey, D. A. O’Sullivan, C. A. M. Brenninkmeijer, Increasing concentrations of dichloromethane, CH2Cl2, inferred from CARIBIC air samples collected 1998-2012, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1939-1958, doi:10.5194/acp-15-1939-2015. Park, M., et al., Global variability and trends of CHClF2 (HCFC-22) and CCl3F (CFC-11) estimated from ACE-FTS, HIPPO and WACCM4, in review, 2015. Patra, P.K., et al., Observational evidence for interhemispheric hydroxyl-radical parity, Nature, 513, 219-225, doi:10.1038/nature13721, 2014. Umezawa, T., et al., Methyl chloride in the upper troposphere observed by the CARIBIC passenger aircraft observatory: large-scale distributions and Asian summer monsoon outflow, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 5542-5558, doi:10.1002/2013JD21396, 2014. Waugh, D.W., et al., Tropospheric SF6: Age of air from the northern hemisphere mid-latitude surface, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 11429-11441, doi:10.1002/jgrd.50848, 2013. Xiang, B., et al., Global emissions of refrigerants HCFC-22 and HFC-134a: unforeseen seasonal contributions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 111(49) 17379-17384, doi:10.1073/pnas.1417372111, 2014. END

NOAA’s flask program for aircraft missions Main science deliverables from NWAS: Measurements of 13CH4 1) Measurements from NWAS supplies a direct link for in-situ instruments to WMO calibration scales and ongoing global-scale results. Puts ATom data into a larger context spatially and temporally

Redundant data sets: Sample Volume and rate information: In situ ECD data have even higher data rate of 1 or 2 min ( 2-3 second sample width). (target 0.5% precision) O3 (0.1 Hz) (target 2% +2 ppb precision) H2O (1 Hz) (target 3% + 1 ppb precision) In situ MDS data are similar to flask data except for a higher 3 min. data rate and a sample width of box integration of ~ 150 sec , or about an 80% sample duty cycle. (target 1% precision, ( might do better in ATom) PFP Flask data is altitude targeted (on dives) with ~ 10-20 seconds of sample width. (24 to 36 flask samples per flight). (target precision 0.05% on up depending on species ) Correlate with Fast Data sets. Integrate over Fast Data sets. Redundant data sets: