The Public View Of Affirmative Action

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Affirmative Action. DISCLAIMER This presentation does not imply any racial agenda or discrimination. The views that are going to be presented in this.
Advertisements

Affirmative Action in Higher Education A Case Study of the Effects the Courts Have Had on the Admissions Processes of Higher Education Institutions.
Chapter 5 Civil Rights. 14 th Amendment Equal Protection ◦ Supreme Court’s Standards  Race and Ethnicity (inherently suspect/strict/difficult to meet)*
Affirmative Action. Under Federal Affirmative Action laws and regulations, public universities receiving federal funds must: o Maintain minority admissions.
Selected Data for West Virginia Higher Education National Center for Higher Education Management Systems Presented on June 4, 2003 National Collaborative.
What do you think is the most important problem facing the country today? August , 2005 Gallup Poll.
and its effect on “ white ” students in the college admissions process.
1. Enrollment Report Academic and Student Affairs Committee December 1, 2009.
Affirmative Action Debate 2009 Topic: A pro and a con position on the question of affirmative action as a tool for making college admission decisions will.
[June 23, 2003] By Wayland Goode.   Historic injustices on minority groups promoted this state program.  It applies not only to college applications,
Undergraduate Admissions & Affirmative Action Maintaining Excellence In A Changing Environment Fall Executive Board Meeting August 19, 2003.
SUPREME COURT CASES AFFIRMATIVE ACTION. WHAT IS IT?? Affirmative action refers to policies that take factors including "race, color, religion, gender,
Perceptions of Faith Groups Survey of over 2,000 American Adults.
Enrollment Services. The Role of Diversity in Admissions U.S. Supreme Court rules on affirmative action case in Michigan Fisher vs. University of Texas.
Point systems – Affirmative action Thomas R. Stewart, Ph.D. Center for Policy Research Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy University at Albany.
The Supreme Court. V. Our courts work on an adversarial process: – Two sides “fight” each other with their arguments – The Plaintiff is bringing the case,
THE CRITICAL ROLE OF GENERAL EDUCATION An Inside Higher Ed webinar Wednesday, May 11 at 2 p.m. Eastern 1.
WHAT COMMUNITY COLLEGE LEADERS THINK A webinar on the Inside Higher Ed/Gallup survey of community college presidents Wednesday, May 4 at 2 p.m. Eastern.
Affirmative Action and Mismatch at Selective Colleges Tameka Porter, Associate Researcher Research Question: To what extent do academic qualifications.
WHAT PRESIDENTS THINK Webinar on the 2016 Inside Higher Ed/Gallup Survey of College and University Presidents Thursday, April 7, p.m. Eastern 1.
What keeps you up at night: a Survey of Campus Leaders
Lifelong learning Through Alternative Credentials
1 Online, But Skeptical Results of Inside Higher Ed/Gallup 2013 Survey of Faculty Attitudes on Technology Quality Matters Conference, Nashville, Tenn.
Online Ed Ambivalence, Doubts About Data: Faculty Views of Technology
Social Studies: Class, Cultural Capital & Upward Mobility
Sexual Harrassment & Affirmative Action
The 2017 Survey of College and University Business Officers
What Admissions dEANs think
An Inside Higher Ed webcast Tuesday, October 17 2 p.m. Eastern
Technology and the evolving Business Model in Higher Education
The 2017 Survey of CHIEF ACADEMIC OFFICERS
Making the Cut: Getting Hired for Academic Positions
Evolving Economic Models for Higher Education
New Directions in Online Education
Teaching Today’s Students
An Inside Higher Ed webinar Wednesday, November 2 at 2 p.m. Eastern
New era of digital Accessibility
Challenges in Enrollment
Admissions, Retention, Success: Tools Colleges Need
The Evolving Quest For Student Success
An Inside Higher Ed webcast Tuesday, February 6 2 p.m. Eastern
Sexual Harrassment & Affirmative Action
Affordability in Higher Education
Higher Ed Economics: Beyond Tuition
Coping With Uncertainty: American Colleges and International Students
An Inside Higher Ed webcast Thursday, May 17 2 p.m. Eastern
Korematsu V. United States
New Strategies for Online Education
Web Pedagogies Week 12: Transactional Distance and Polling
Innovation in Higher Ed
Student Learning and Course Materials
An Inside Higher Ed webinar Thursday, October 13, 2 p.m. Eastern
Pressure on Provosts Webcast on Inside Higher Ed/Gallup Survey of Chief Academic Officers Thursday, February 22, p.m. Eastern.
Financial Viability, academic programs, & the faculty role: a Survey of CBO’s Webinar on Inside Higher Ed/Gallup 2016 Survey of College and University.
The 2017 Survey of Community College Presidents
Teaching With Technology
An Inside Higher Ed webcast Tuesday, July 18 2 p.m. Eastern
2018 Survey of Community College Presidents
An Inside Higher Ed webcast Tuesday, June 27 2 p.m. Eastern
An Inside Higher Ed webcast Tuesday, July 18 2 p.m. Eastern
An Inside Higher Ed webinar Tuesday, September 13 at 2 p.m. Eastern
The Next Generation of Students
Recruitment, Diversity, Success
New Models for Educational Materials
The 2018 Survey of College and University Business Officers
What Keeps You Up at Night: A Survey of Presidents
Flipping the Classroom and Other Techniques to Improve Teaching
Evolving Faculty Careers
Efficiency in Higher Ed
An Inside Higher Ed webcast Thursday, January 10 at 2 p.m. Eastern
Presentation transcript:

The Public View Of Affirmative Action Webinar on poll results by Gallup/Inside Higher Ed Thursday, August 4, at 2 p.m. Eastern

Presenters Scott Jaschik, editor, Inside Higher Ed, scott.jaschik@insidehighered.com Doug Lederman, editor, Inside Higher Ed, doug.lederman@insidehighered.com

Methodology Questions prepared by Inside Higher Ed and Gallup. Polling conducted June 29-July 1 as part of Gallup’s nightly polls of the public. Responses from a nationally representative sample of 3,270 adults (aged 18 or older). 95% confidence level that margin of error is plus/minus 3 percentage points.

The Supreme Court and Affirmative Action 1978: Regents of the University of California v. Bakke 2003: Gratz v. Bollinger 2003: Grutter v. Bollinger 2013: Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin 2016: Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin

The Second Fisher Ruling The majority decision The dissent

Challenges in Polling on Affirmative Action Definitions Wording General trends Our approach

Context Major higher education associations and presidents who spoke out on Fisher case overwhelmingly backed U of Texas (the position in favor of considering race and ethnicity). Voters in six states have barred public colleges from considering race in admissions. The states: Arizona, California, Michigan, Nebraska, Oklahoma and Washington State. Only one state referendum to bar the consideration of race in admissions – in Colorado -- has been defeated.

Poll: Do You Agree With Decision? Yes: 31% No: 65% No opinion: 4%

Poll: Support for Ruling, by Educational Attainment Some graduate education: 46% Undergraduate degree: 35% Without college degree: 27%

Poll: What Should Colleges Consider

Poll: Should Race Be Factor, by Race

Issues Ahead Will colleges be vulnerable to continued challenges? Will campus protests resume in the fall, and what impact might they have? How will changing demographics in American society change the debate over affirmative action? Will more focus on Asian-American applicants undercut support for affirmative action? Do American colleges need to increase efforts to enroll and graduate low-income students? Does it hurt higher education that academic leaders have one view of affirmative action and the public another?

Inside Higher Ed/Gallup Conference For more information: http://ihenow.com/2b0LJhN

Your Questions --Questions --Suggestions for future coverage