Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Advertisements

Volume 165, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Judith Bosschieter, André N. Vis, Henk G. van der Poel, Luc M
Volume 71, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 50, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 64, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 70, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Maintenance Bacillus Calmette-Guérin: The Standard of Care for the Prophylaxis and Management of Intermediate- and High-Risk Non–Muscle-Invasive Bladder.
Volume 56, Issue 3, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 73, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 61, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 68, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)
European Urology Oncology
Volume 72, Issue 3, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 71, Issue 6, Pages e171-e172 (June 2017)
Bladder Cancer: Management and Future Directions
Prostate Cancer Epidemic in Sight?
Volume 61, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 68, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 63, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Treatment of Advanced and Metastatic Renal Cancer: A Revolution?
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Bladder Cancer: A Major Public Health Issue
Volume 66, Issue 2, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 71, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 59, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Nomograms for Bladder Cancer
The Importance of Transurethral Resection in Managing Patients With Urothelial Cancer in the Bladder: Proposal for a Transurethral Resection of Bladder.
Quantitative Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization and its Ability to Predict Bladder Cancer Recurrence and Progression to Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer 
Volume 61, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 67, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 56, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
Prostate Cancer Epidemic in Sight?
Volume 53, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 64, Issue 4, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 66, Issue 2, Pages (August 2014)
Long-term Cancer-specific Survival in Patients with High-risk, Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer and Tumour Progression: A Systematic Review  Sven van.
Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 61, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 53, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 64, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Prostate-Specific Antigen Kinetics and Outcomes in Patients with Bone Metastases from Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated with or Without Zoledronic.
Volume 64, Issue 4, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 71, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 53, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
A.H. Gifford  Journal of Cystic Fibrosis 
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 52, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Prognostic Factors in Non–Muscle-Invasive Bladder Tumors
Early Single-Instillation Chemotherapy Has No Real Benefit and Should Be Abandoned in Non–Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer  Sten Holmäng  European Urology.
Clinical Management of Patients Receiving Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma  Jan Roigas  European Urology Supplements  Volume.
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Predictive value of the FGFR3 mutation assay increases with multiple consecutive FGFR3-positive urine samples. Predictive value of the FGFR3 mutation assay.
Nutrition During Trimodality Treatment in Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Not Only Important for Underweight Patients  Barbara S. van der Meij,
Presentation transcript:

Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages 433-441 (September 2010) Molecular Grade (FGFR3/MIB-1) and EORTC Risk Scores Are Predictive in Primary Non–Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer  Bas W.G. van Rhijn, Tahlita C.M. Zuiverloon, André N. Vis, François Radvanyi, Geert J.L.H. van Leenders, Bert C.M. Ooms, Wim J. Kirkels, Gina A. Lockwood, Egbert R. Boevé, Adriaan C. Jöbsis, Ellen C. Zwarthoff, Theo H. van der Kwast  European Urology  Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages 433-441 (September 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.05.043 Copyright © 2010 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 (A) Kaplan-Meier plot for recurrence-free interval for the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) risk score for recurrence based on a weighted score of the variables: grade (World Health Organization 1973), stage, carcinoma in situ, multiplicity, size, and prior recurrence rate [2]. This risk calculator is available online (www.eortc.be/tools/bladdercalculator). The European Association of Urology subsequently adopted this system in its guidelines and, based on these scores, defined patients at low, intermediate, and high risk for recurrence [3]. Our patients had all primary bladder cancer; therefore, prior recurrence rate scored 0 points in all. P(log-rank) was 0.005. (B) Kaplan-Meier plot for progression-free interval of molecular grade (mG), which was based on these parameters: mG1: mutated fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3), low MIB-1; mG2: mutated FGFR3, high MIB-1, and wild-type FGFR3, low MIB-1; mG3: wild-type FGFR3, high MIB-1. Note that the combinations mutated/high and wild-type/low behaved similarly and formed mG2. P(log-rank) was <0.001. (C) Kaplan-Meier plot for progression-free interval of the EORTC risk score for progression based on a weighted score of the six variables listed above. Based on these scores, patients score low, intermediate or high risk for progression [3]. Our patients had all primary bladder cancer; therefore, prior recurrence rate scored 0 points in all. P(log-rank) was <0.001. (D) Kaplan-Meier plot for disease-specific survival of mG (see Fig. 1b for further explanation of mG). P(log-rank) was <0.001. O=observed number of events. European Urology 2010 58, 433-441DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2010.05.043) Copyright © 2010 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Kaplan-Meier plots for progression-free interval of molecular grade (mG) per European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) risk category. The combination of the EORTC risk score [2,3] and mG (mG1–3) [1] led to improved prediction of progression. In the intermediate- and high-risk EORTC groups, mG3 was associated with a 2.5-times higher risk of progression compared to mG1–2. A patient with a high-risk EORTC score accompanied by mG3 had a 50% chance of progressing to muscle-invasive and/or metastatic disease (see Fig. 1 for explanations of mG and EORTC risk score for progression.) (A) MG did not enhance prediction of progression in low-risk EORTC scores (p[log-rank]=0.325). Please note that only four patients with primary low-risk EORTC score progressed. (B) MG significantly enhanced prediction of progression in intermediate-risk EORTC scores (p[log-rank]=0.014). (C) MG significantly enhanced prediction of progression in high-risk EORTC scores (p[log-rank]=0.048). O=observed number of events. European Urology 2010 58, 433-441DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2010.05.043) Copyright © 2010 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions