Longitudinal Dynamics of Charged Particle

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eric Prebys, FNAL. USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture 16 -Negative Mass Instability 2 Consider two particles in a bunch. Below transition.
Advertisements

ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
Bunch compressors ILC Accelerator School May Eun-San Kim Kyungpook National University.
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
Synchrotron Radiation What is it ? Rate of energy loss Longitudinal damping Transverse damping Quantum fluctuations Wigglers Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP)
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
Accelerator Physics  Basic Formalism  Linear Accelerators  Circular Accelerators  Magnets  Beam Optics  Our Accelerator Greg LeBlanc Lead Accelerator.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
LONGITUDINAL DYNAMICS
CAS Chios, September LONGITUDINAL DYNAMICS Frank Tecker based on the course by Joël Le Duff Many Thanks! CAS on Intermediate Level Accelerator.
Introduction to Particle Accelerators Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis CERN & University of Oxford October 2010 Chulalongkorn University Bangkok, Thailand.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  As you’ll show in homework, the synchrotron tune (longitudinal oscillations/turn) is generally
Topic Three: Perturbations & Nonlinear Dynamics UW Spring 2008 Accelerator Physics J. J. Bisognano 1 Accelerator Physics Topic III Perturbations and Nonlinear.
NON-SCALING FFAGs: questions needing answers Andy Wolski The Cockcroft Institute, and the University of Liverpool Department of Physics. BASROC-CONFORM.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Synchrotron radiation R. Bartolini John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science, University of Oxford and Diamond Light Source JUAS February 2015.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
1 Muon acceleration - amplitude effects in non-scaling FFAG - Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 26 April, ffag/machida_ ppt.
Double RF system at IUCF Shaoheng Wang 06/15/04. Contents 1.Introduction of Double RF System 2.Phase modulation  Single cavity case  Double cavity case.
Part III Commissioning. Proof of Principle FFAG (POP) study The world first proton FFAG –Commissioned in March –From 50 keV to 500 keV in 1ms. –Proof.
Effect of nonlinearity on Head-Tail instability 3/18/04.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
Lecture 5 Damping Ring Basics Susanna Guiducci (INFN-LNF) May 21, 2006 ILC Accelerator school.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
R. Bartolini, John Adams Institute, 19 November 20141/39 Electron beam dynamics in storage rings Synchrotron radiation and its effect on electron dynamics.
Chapter 10 Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Darmstadt TU , version E 2.4 Acceleration and longitudinal phase space.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Longitudinal.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
WIR SCHAFFEN WISSEN – HEUTE FÜR MORGEN Pendulum Equations and Low Gain Regime Sven Reiche :: SwissFEL Beam Dynamics Group :: Paul Scherrer Institute CERN.
Professor Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University ACAS School for Accelerator Physics January 2014 Longitudinal Dynamics.
Update on RF parameters A.Lachaize11 th HPPS design meeting04/09/13.
RF manipulations in SIS 18 and SIS 100 O. Chorniy.
Collective Effect II Giuliano Franchetti, GSI CERN Accelerator – School Prague 11/9/14G. Franchetti1.
Lecture A3: Damping Rings
Lecture A3: Damping Rings
Beam Dynamics in Electron Storage Ring
Academic Training Lecture 2 : Beam Dynamics
Beam based measurements
Large Booster and Collider Ring
LONGITUDINAL beam DYNAMICS RECAP
PSB rf manipulations PSB cavities
Lecture 1: Synchrotron radiation Lecture 2: Undulators and Wigglers
Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2011 E. J. N. Wilson.
Longitudinal Dynamics & RF Capture
Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2015 E. J. N. Wilson.
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Monday Week 1 Lecture Jeff Eldred
PHY 554 Fundamentals of Accelerator Physics Lecture 12: Longitudinal Dynamics October 10, 2018 Vladimir N. Litvinenko
G. A. Krafft Jefferson Lab Old Dominion University Lecture 8
Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson
G. A. Krafft Jefferson Lab Old Dominion University Lecture 3
Accelerator Physics Particle Acceleration
Accelerator Physics G. A. Krafft, A. Bogacz, and H. Sayed
Accelerator Physics Coupling Control
G. A. Krafft Jefferson Lab Old Dominion University Lecture 7
Physics 417/517 Introduction to Particle Accelerator Physics
PSB magnetic cycle 900 ms MeV to 2 GeV
Injection design of CEPC
RF Parameters Calculation for JLEIC Colliders (e Ring)
Robinson Instability Criteria for MEIC e Ring
ΑΡΙΣΤΟΤΕΛΕΙΟ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΝΙΚΗΣ
Longitudinal Focusing & The Gamma Transition
Electron Rings 2 Eduard Pozdeyev.
Lecture 8 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson.
Presentation transcript:

Longitudinal Dynamics of Charged Particle

6-D Phase Space Longitudinal dynamics is important in Storage rings A complete description of a charged particle motion with respect to the ‘ideal particle’ must be done in 6D. Longitudinal dynamics is important in Storage rings Beam transport in Linac Applications, such as Free Electron Laser

Charged Particle in RF Cavity Let us consider a ultra-relativistic particle passing a RF cavity, with the field E and voltage V. The energy gain of one charged particle with position z in a bunch: E(s,t)=E_0(s)\sin(\omega t+\phi_s) \Delta U=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}E_0(s=ct+z)\sin(\omega t+\phi_s)cdt \Delta U=e\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}E_0(s)\cos({ks})ds\times\sin(\phi) T(transit time factor)V

Synchrotron Motion in a Storage Ring

RF Synchronization in a ring The frequency of the cavity must satisfy: Circumference:C Revolution frequency:ω0 h is called harmonic number. h Ideal particles can co-exist in the ring, named Synchronous particles

Longitudinal Dynamics I We start with the energy gain of a particle at z: If we use the energy deviation variable: The change of δ in nth to (n+1)th turn in the ring: \Delta U=eV\sin(\phi) \dot{U}=\frac{dU}{dt}=\frac{eV}{T}\cos(kz+\phi_s) \dot{\delta}=\frac{eV}{TE_0}\cos(kz+\phi_s) \delta_{n+1}-\delta_{n}=\frac{eV}{\beta^2E_0}(\sin\phi_n-\sin\phi_s) \phi_n=\omega t_n+\phi_s=-kz_n+\phi_s Now we know, longitudinal coordinate offsetEnergy deviation from the synchronous particle.

Longitudinal Dynamics II Now Let’s consider the consequence of the energy deviation Its velocity changes: And the pass length change The arrival time difference \frac{\Delta v}{v}=\frac{1}{\gamma^2}\delta \frac{\Delta C}{C}=\oint \frac{x(s)}{\rho}ds=\oint \frac{D(s)}{\rho}ds\delta=\alpha_c \delta

Longitudinal Dynamics III Then we can translate the arriving time to the rf phase variable: Change to turn by turn mapping format: Combined with the earlier map, we have the longitudinal map: \Delta \phi=\omega \Delta t+\phi_s {\color[rgb]{0.501961,0.000000,0.250980}\phi_{n+1}-\phi_{n}=}\omega T\eta\delta_{n+1}={\color[rgb]{0.501961,0.000000,0.250980}2\pi\eta\delta_{n+1}}

Fix Points The fix point is trivial by letting: For any nonlinear map, the first knowledge is get by finding fix point(s) of the system. The fix point is trivial by letting: Then the fix points are Next questionAre the fix points stable? The next example will demonstrate

An Example Consider the example with following parameter: Proton beam with 100 GeV or 15 GeV Cavity voltage 5MV, 360 harmonic Compaction factor 0.002 No net acceleration. Initial condition:

Phase stability for 15GeV

Phase stability, cont’d

Phase stability cont’d

Phase stability, cont’d

Phase stability for 100 GeV

MapHamiltonian The energy change is not continuous (only in cavities). Over many turns, we consider the energy change and phase change are continuous and change to maps to two differential equations and change to an effective Hamiltonian \dot\delta=\frac{eV\omega_0}{2\pi\beta^2E_0}\left(\sin\phi-\sin\phi_s\right) H=\frac{1}{2}h\omega_0\eta\delta^2+\frac{eV\omega_0}{2\pi\beta^2E_0}\left[\cos\phi-\cos\phi_s+\sin\phi_s\left(\phi-\phi_s\right)\right] \ddot\phi=\frac{eVh\eta\omega_0^2}{2\pi\beta^2E_0}\left(\sin\phi-\sin\phi_s\right)

Similarity to pendulum @zero accelerating phase ‘MASS’ (not unique) Stable phase H=\frac{1}{2}h\omega_0\eta\delta^2+\frac{eV\omega_0}{2\pi\beta^2E_0}\left(\cos\phi-1\right) \pm\sqrt{\frac{2eV}{\pi\beta^2E_0h\left|\eta\right|}} \omega_0\sqrt{\frac{-eVh\eta\cos\phi_s}{2\pi\beta^2E_0}} Bucket height For stable motion Angular frequency for small oscillation

Small amplitude approximation Stability criterion Back to the 2nd order differential equation Define the angle deviation (small) \ddot{\Delta\phi}=\frac{eVh\eta\cos\phi_s\omega_0^2}{2\pi\beta^2E_0}\Delta\phi Stable condition:

Synchrotron tune Typical Numbers Hadron rings: ~1e-3 The ‘tune’ is extracted as Define synchrotron tune Typical Numbers Hadron rings: ~1e-3 Electron rings: ~1e-1 Q_s=\sqrt{\frac{-eVh\eta\cos\phi_s}{2\pi\beta^2E_0}}\equiv\nu_s\sqrt{\left|\cos\phi_s\right|} \nu_s=\sqrt{\frac{-eVh\eta\cos\phi_s}{2\pi\beta^2E_0}}

Small Amplitude Approximation Hamitonian When the phase is close enough to the synchronous phase: The phase space trajectory will be upright ellipse for fixed ‘energy’ H=\frac{1}{2}h\omega_0\eta\delta^2+\frac{eV\omega_0\cos\phi_s}{4\pi\beta^2E_0}\Delta\phi^2 \left(\frac{\delta}{\left<\delta\right>}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\Delta\phi}{\left<\Delta\phi\right>}\right)^2=1 \frac{\left<\delta\right>}{\left<\Delta\phi\right>}=\sqrt\frac{eV\left|\cos\phi_s\right|}{2\pi h\left|\eta\right|\beta^2E_0}

Transition Transition happens when: Below transition: Faster particle arrives first Above transition: Slower particle arrives first

Physics Picture Above Transition Below Transition

Non-zero acceleration phase In storage rings, we need acceleration for synchronous particle to compensate energy loss. For now, we assume that the energy loss per turn is energy independent, and not net acceleration for synchronous particle. Stable region

Phase space 15 GeV 100 GeV

Longitudinal Phase Space We can define longitudinal phase space area from the conjugate variables. The phase space area remain constant even in acceleration If we stay with, , the phase space area is constant only without net acceleration. \left(t

Longitudinal Phase Space II We may take a Gaussian beam distribution then the rms phase space area is simply: The area is conserved only When the beam distribution matches the bucket When the beam oscillation is very small (linear).

Phase Space Area Examples and Evolution I A Matched case (Perfect injection): Initial condition matches:

Phase Space Area Examples and Evolution II \frac{\left<\delta\right>}{\left<\Delta\phi\right>}=\frac{3Q_s}{h\left|\eta\right|} A Unmatched case

Phase Space Area Examples and Evolution III Time jitter at injection, other wise same as the matched case: The phase error is:

Acceleration Case Assuming no energy loss, there will be net acceleration even with synchronous particle. The frequency of RF need to be synchronized with the increased revolution frequency. So does the magnets. The phase space area (DE-t) conserves

Phase Space

Charged Particle in RF Cavity II We name the synchronous particle’s phase For many good reasons, we don’t want the particle to experience the highest accelerating voltage (on crest). \Delta U=eV\sin(\phi+\phi_s)