Test of the dressed spoke cavity

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stochastic cooling and 56 MHz SRF update for Run-14 W. Fischer 21 January 2014.
Advertisements

Tom Powers Practical Aspects of SRF Cavity Testing and Operations SRF Workshop 2011 Tutorial Session.
Overview of SMTF RF Systems Brian Chase. Overview Scope of RF Systems RF & LLRF Collaboration LLRF Specifications for SMTF Progress So Far Status of progress.
CW RF System for the ATLAS Efficiency and Beam Intensity Upgrade Speaker: Yong Luo, Physics Division, ANL On Behalf of: Sergey Sharamentov, Peter Ostroumov,
Lorentz force detuning measurements on the CEA cavity
Juliette PLOUIN – CEA/SaclayCARE’08, 3 December /21 Superconducting Cavity activities within HIPPI CARE ‘08 CERN, 2-5 December 2008 Juliette PLOUIN.
Power Requirements for High beta Elliptical Cavities Rihua Zeng Accelerator Division Lunds Kommun, Lund
Lutz Lilje DESY -MPY- XFEL Tuner Lorentz Force Detuning System Setup New Saclay design.
June 15, 2009HIE-Isolde Review1 HIE-Isolde Low Level RF proposal P. Baudrenghien BE/RF/FB.
Alessandro Cappelletti for CTF3 collaboration 5 th May 2010 RESULTS OF BEAM BASED RF POWER PRODUCTION IN CTF3.
SLHC-PP – WP7 Critical Components for Injector Upgrade Plasma Generator – CERN, DESY, STFC-RAL Linac4 2MHz RF source Thermal Modeling Gas Measurement and.
E. KAKO (KEK) 2009' Sept. 30 Albuquerque Global Design Effort 1 Cavity Test Items in S1-G Cryomodule Eiji Kako (KEK, Japan)
ESS cavities interfaces
RF Cavity Simulation for SPL Simulink Model for HP-SPL Extension to LINAC4 at CERN from RF Point of View Acknowledgement: CEA team, in particular O. Piquet.
LLRF Cavity Simulation for SPL
XFEL SRF Accelerating Module Prototypes Tests at DESY Fermilab Seminar, July 21st Denis Kostin, MHF-SL, DESY.
LLRF-05 Oct.10,20051 Digital LLRF feedback control system for the J-PARC linac Shin MICHIZONO KEK, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (JAPAN)
Recent LFD Control Results from FNAL Yuriy Pischalnikov Warren Schappert TTF/FLASH 9mA Meeting on Cavity Gradient Flatness June 01, 2010.
1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 LLRF for the ERL Matthias Liepe.
Tom Powers LLRF Systems for Next Generation Light Sources LLRF Workshop October 2011 Authored by Jefferson Science Associates, LLC under U.S. DOE.
W. 3rd SPL collaboration Meeting November 12, 20091/23 Wolfgang Hofle SPL LLRF simulations Feasibility and constraints for operation with more.
RF system issues due to pulsed beam in ILC DR October 20, Belomestnykh, RF for pulsed beam ILC DR, IWLC2010 S. Belomestnykh Cornell University.
RF Cavity Simulation for SPL
Marc Ross Nick Walker Akira Yamamoto ‘Overhead and Margin’ – an attempt to set standard terminology 10 Sept 2010 Overhead and Margin 1.
ILC FAST TUNER R&D PROGRAM at FNAL Status Report CC2 Piezo Test Preliminary Results Ruben Carcagno (on behalf of the FNAL FAST TUNER Working Group) 4/5/06.
Test plan for SPL short cryomodule O. Brunner, W. Weingarten WW 1SPL cryo-module meeting 19 October 2010.
Cold Tuner test overview S1-Global at KEK 5-9 July 2010.
R.SREEDHARAN  SOLEIL main parameters  Booster and storage ring low level RF system  New digital Booster LLRF system under development  Digital LLRF.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Kirk Davis.
Preliminary Results from First Blade Tuner Tests in HTS Yuriy Pischalnikov Warren Schappert Serena Barbannoti Matteo Scorrano.
SPL waveguide distribution system Components, configurations, potential problems D. Valuch, E. Ciapala, O. Brunner CERN AB/RF SPL collaboration meeting.
Warren Schappert Yuriy Pischalnikov FNAL SRF2011, Chicago.
Overview of long pulse experiments at NML Nikolay Solyak PXIE Program Review January 16-17, PXIE Review, N.Solyak E.Harms, S. Nagaitsev, B. Chase,
FLASH RF gun developments. Sven Pfeiffer for the LLRF team FEL Seminar Hamburg,
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility 6 March.
Matthias Liepe. Matthias Liepe – High loaded Q cavity operation at CU – TTC Topical Meeting on CW-SRF
Andrew Moss STFC, ASTeC Example amplifier control system Example of current STFC copper cavity in operation –Using SF6 insulated waveguide –Conditioning.
Overview Step by step procedure to validate the model (slide 1 and 2) Procedure for the Ql / beam loading study (slide 3 and 4)
Microphonics Suppression in SRF cavities for Project X Yuriy Pischalnikov Warren Schappert Project X Collaboration Meeting Berkeley, April 11, 2012.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 FNAL September 11, 2009 Design Considerations for CW SRF Linacs Claus H. Rode 12 GeV Project Manager.
SRF Cavities Resonance Control. CW mode of operation (FNAL’s experience). Yu. Pischalnikov W. Schappert FNAL TTC CW SRF Meeting, Cornell University, 12June,
ESS SC cavities development G. Devanz TTC meeting, march 1st 2011, Milano.
LLRF regulation of CC2 operated at 4˚K Gustavo Cancelo for the AD, TD & CD LLRF team.
Microphonics Discussion For LLRF Design Review Tom Powers 13 June 2016 Not for release outside of JLAB There are several MSWord documents located at: M:\asd\asddata\C100Microphonics2016.
Microphonics Discussion For LLRF Design Review Tom Powers 13 June 2016 Not for release outside of JLAB There are several MSWord documents located at: M:\asd\asddata\C100Microphonics2016.
Cost Optimization Models for SRF Linacs
R100/C100 Cryomodule Microphonics
Areal RF Station A. Vardanyan
Experience with high loaded Q cavity operation at HZB
WP5 Elliptical cavities
Overview and System Design for ESS LLRF Systems
TTC Topical Workshop - CW SRF, Cornell 12th – 14th June 2013
Test plan of ESS HB elliptical cavity
Mechanical setups Lorentz Force Detuning System Setup
Test plan of ESS HB elliptical cavity
Cavity resonance control
Experience with High Loaded Q cavity Operation at JLAB
Jefferson Lab Low Level RF Controls
Review of the European XFEL Linac System
Test plan of ESS HB elliptical cavity
Test plan of ESS HB elliptical cavity
High gradients in TESLA nine-cell cavities
Resonance Control for Narrow-Bandwidth, SRF Applications
First High Power Test of the ESS Double Spoke Cavity package
An Optimal Procedure for RF Conditionning at the FREIA Laboratory
0L04 Microphonics Test R100 in SL vs 0L04 slot 0L04 trip investigation
Cryomodules Challenges for PERLE
The spoke CM tests at FREIA
Strategic Communications at TRIUMF
Facility for Research Instrumentation and Accelerator Development
Presentation transcript:

Test of the dressed spoke cavity Vitaliy Goryashko on behalf of the FREIA Group October 2014

Cold RF Tests spoke cavity DEDICATED RF TESTS CW, HIGH GRADIENT cavity Q_0 vs Eacc microphonics transfer function of the Lorentz force detuning parameters of mechanical modes BASIC RF TESTS VERY LOW POWER calibration loaded Q cavity spectrum cavity tuning spoke cavity STANDARD RF TESTS PULSED, HIGH PEAK POWER accelerating gradient X-ray emission multipacting barriers cavity tuners ACCELERATOR MODE PULSED, HIGH PEAK POWER nominal voltage profile fast RF feedback feedforward with piezotuners

Equipment and Power Levels DEDICATED RF TESTS CW, up to 100 kW phase-locked LLRF (self-excited loop) high-power amplifier cavity resonance monitor (built in into LLRF) BASIC RF TESTS some mW VNA spectrum analyzer scope spoke cavity STANDARD RF TESTS PULSED, up to 400 kW signal generator high-power amplifier data acquisition system scope with I/Q mode spectrum analyzer ACCELERATOR MODE PULSED, up to 400 kW signal generator high-power amplifier LLRF with feedback and feedforward

Q-slope: can we do it at FREIA? Calorimetrical measurement of Q0: JLab procedure close inlet and outlet valves of the cryomodule record the pressure as a function of time apply a known amount of resistive heat to the helium again record the pressure a function of time build the calibration curve: the rate of pressure rise vs. heat load apply RF to the cavity, record the pressure rise calculate the dynamic RF load using the calibration curve

Lorentz Force Transfer Function for a 325 MHz Spoke; ANL Dangerous frequencies that must be avoided in the cavity environment

Tests of the bare cavity at FREIA

Self-Excited Loop (SEL) no need for frequency tracking during turn-on or amplitude ramping quickly bring up cavity gradient without running the tuners free of electromechanical instability J.R. Delayen, “Phase and Amplitude Stabilization of Super-conducting resonators”, Ph.D. Thesis, Caltech (1978).

Unlocked Self-Excited Loop: an Ideal Resonator

Generator driven configuration SC Resonator Generator driven configuration SEL

Unlocked Self-Excited Loop: FREIA test bench A perfect sinusoidal signal amplifier attenuator A signal from the cavity is sent back to the amplifier through the attenuator. cavity The next step is to close the phase loop.

Self-Excited Loop for the spoke

Test plan

Day 1, zoomed in view

Day 2, zoomed in view Q-circle method: Makes use of the NI system Time-consuming (~10 hours per test) but fully automated by Krish

Cavity re-conditioning: X-ray emission 1 hour

Transmitted signal upon re-conditioning re-conditioning started 15 minutes later

Q-slope measurements

VNA Standard reflective type measurement forward cavity reflected Reflection coefficient S11 Frequency

cavity Self-excited loop cavity reflected signal limiter forward drive signal 10 KHz span phase shifter amplifier The ratio of the reflected signals to the forward one gives S11

Microphonics

Microphonics measurements    

Microphonics spectrum: dissipated power ~ 50 W

Microphonics in the time domain

Microphonics at low and high power dissipated power

Quasi-static Lorentz Force Detuning The loop amplitude is modulated with a 10-sec period.

Quasi-static Lorentz Force Detuning cont’d The loop amplitude is modulated with a 20-sec period. The 7.7 Hz resonance is suppressed and the overall microphonics level is reduced.

Quasi-static Lorentz force detuning: 20-sec Hz/(MV/m)^2  

Dynamic Lorentz Force detuning

Amplitude modulation of the self-excited loop

Cavity voltage and frequency modulation 3 Hz 3 Hz 100 Hz 100 Hz

Cavity voltage and frequency modulation cont’d 318 Hz 318 Hz 600 Hz 600 Hz

Transfer function of the dynamic Lorentz force detuning noise goes up because the cavity voltage modulation goes down

Guillaume’s simulations of the cavity mechanical modes Frequency Mode 1 & 2 212Hz Beam tube on CTS side 3 & 4 265Hz & 275Hz Spoke bar/Helium vessel 5 & 6 285Hz Coupled mode Cavity/Helium vessel 7 313Hz Helium vessel 8 to 11 315Hz to 365Hz 12 396Hz beam tubes Mode 1: 212 Hz Mode 3: 265 Hz Mode 5: 285Hz Mode 12: 396Hz

Comparison with the Argonne double spoke cavity