Current and future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
Advertisements

Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
LIGO-G PLIGO Laboratory 1 Advanced LIGO The Next Generation Philip Lindquist, Caltech XXXVIII Moriond Conference Gravitational Waves and Experimental.
G v1Advanced LIGO1 Status of Ground-Based Gravitational-wave Interferometers July 11, 2012 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory Astrod 5, Bangalore,
Transportation of Ultra-Stable Light via Optical Fiber Emily Conant Bard College, California Institute of Technology Mentors: Evan Hall, Rana Adhikari,
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
1 Science Opportunities for Australia Advanced LIGO Barry Barish Director, LIGO Canberra, Australia 16-Sept-03 LIGO-G M.
LIGO Status and Advanced LIGO Plans Barry C Barish OSTP 1-Dec-04.
LIGO-G W Is there a future for LIGO underground? Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
1 What can gravitational waves do to probe early cosmology? Barry C. Barish Caltech “Kavli-CERCA Conference on the Future of Cosmology” Case Western Reserve.
1 Observing the Most Violent Events in the Universe Virgo Barry Barish Director, LIGO Virgo Inauguration 23-July-03 Cascina 2003.
Gravitational-waves: Sources and detection
TeV Particle Astrophysics August 2006 Caltech Australian National University Universitat Hannover/AEI LIGO Scientific Collaboration MIT Corbitt, Goda,
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects David Ottaway – for Nergis Mavalvala Australia-Italy Workshop October 2005.
Advanced LIGO project status: getting ready to listen to the universe Giacomo Ciani for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO- G
Gravitational Wave Detectors: new eyes for physics and astronomy Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University.
What are GW’s ?? Fluctuation in the curvature of space time, propagating outward form the source at the speed of light Predicted by Einstein’s GTR Gravitational.
Paik-1 Search for Gravitational Waves Ho Jung Paik University of Maryland and Seoul National University January 12, 2006 Seoul, Korea KIAS-SNU Physics.
GW Detectors noise and sensitivity
White Light Cavity Ideas and General Sensitivity Limits Haixing Miao Summarizing researches by several LSC groups GWADW 2015, Alaska University of Birmingham.
Advanced LIGO: our future in gravitational astronomy K.A. Strain for the LIGO Science Collaboration NAM 2008 LIGO-G K.
LIGO-G Opening the Gravitational Wave Window Gabriela González Louisiana State University LSC spokesperson For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v1.
Advanced interferometers for astronomical observations Lee Samuel Finn Center for Gravitational Wave Physics, Penn State.
18 th - 22 nd May 2015 LIGO-G GWADW Alaska Suspension Upgrades for Enhanced Interferometers Giles Hammond (Institute for Gravitational Research,
Thermal Noise performance of advanced gravitational wave detector suspensions Alan Cumming, on behalf of the University of Glasgow Suspension Team 5 th.
DECIGO – Japanese Space Gravitational Wave Detector International Workshop on GPS Meteorology January 17, Tsukuba Center for Institutes Seiji Kawamura*
Gravitational Wave Observatories By: Matthew Fournier.
LIGO-G D Upper Limits on the Stochastic Background of Gravitational Waves from LIGO Vuk Mandic Einstein2005 Conference Paris, July
G R LIGO Laboratory1 The Future - How to make a next generation LIGO David Shoemaker, MIT AAAS Annual Meeting 17 February 2003.
LIGO-G M Scientific Operation of LIGO Gary H Sanders LIGO Laboratory California Institute of Technology APS Meeting APR03, Philadelphia Gravitational-Wave.
LIGO G M Intro to LIGO Seismic Isolation Pre-bid meeting Gary Sanders LIGO/Caltech Stanford, April 29, 2003.
LIGO-G M Press Conference Scientific Operation of LIGO Gary H Sanders Caltech (on behalf of a large team) APS April Meeting Philadelphia 6-April-03.
ALIGO 0.45 Gpc 2014 iLIGO 35 Mpc 2007 Future Range to Neutron Star Coalescence Better Seismic Isolation Increased Laser Power and Signal Recycling Reduced.
LIGO G PLIGO Laboratory 1 Advanced LIGO The Next Generation Philip Lindquist, Caltech XXXVIII Moriond Conference Gravitational Waves and Experimental.
GW – the first GW detection ! Is it a start of GW astronomy ? If “yes” then which ? «Счастлив, кто посетил сей мир в его минуты роковые !...» Ф.Тютчев.
THE NEXT GENERATIONS OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVE DETECTORS (*) Giovanni Losurdo INFN Firenze – Virgo collaboration (*) GROUND BASED, INTERFEROMETRIC.
ET-ILIAS_GWA joint meeting, Nov Henning Rehbein Detuned signal-recycling interferometer unstableresonance worsesensitivity enhancedsensitivity.
Mike Cruise University of Birmingham Searches for very high frequency gravitational waves.
Michele Punturo INFN Perugia and EGO 1MGR13- ET.
Searches for Gravitational Waves Barry Barish Caltech IPA London – Aug 2014 “Merging Neutron Stars“ (Price & Rosswog)
The search for those elusive gravitational waves
Advanced Detector Status Report and Future Scenarios
Dawn II, July 8, 2016 GaTech Organizing the international community: issues, open questions, opportunities Dave Reitze LIGO Laboratory, Caltech LIGO Laboratory.
Critical Technology Giant leaps Near-term steps Non-IFO methods
GW Policy: The Future: G3 Detectors
The Search for Gravitational Waves with Advanced LIGO
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005
Is there a future for LIGO underground?
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects
GW150914: The first direct detection of gravitational waves
Detection of gravitational waves from binary black hole mergers
Brennan Hughey for the LSC May 12th, 2008
Spokesperson, LIGO Scientific Collaboration
Nergis Mavalvala (age 47)
Exploring the New Frontier of Gravitational-Wave Astronomy
Advanced LIGO Quantum noise everywhere
Squeezed states in GW interferometers
Gravitational wave detection and the quantum limit
Albert Lazzarini California Institute of Technology
LIGO, ground-based Gravitational Wave Detectors
Stochastic gravitational wave and its spectral property
David Shoemaker AAAS Conference 17 February 2003
Status of LIGO Patrick J. Sutton LIGO-Caltech
Quantum noise of white light cavity using double-gain medium
Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection
RF readout scheme to overcome the SQL
Advanced Optical Sensing
The ET sensitivity curve with ‘conventional‘ techniques
Presentation transcript:

Current and future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors Haixing Miao University of Birmingham Key reference: LIGO Instrument Science White Paper (2015-2016) LAAC Tutorial Glasgow

Outline Background Gravitational waves and their detection Basic of noise Noise spectral density and transfer function Environmental noise Passive isolation and active cancellation Thermal noise Fluctuation-dissipation theorem How to reduce thermal noise Quantum noise Standard Quantum Limit Frequency-dependent squeezing Current and future detectors Timeline and sensitivity LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 1

Outline Background Gravitational waves and their detection Basic of noise Noise spectral density and transfer function Environmental noise Passive isolation and active cancellation Thermal noise Fluctuation-dissipation theorem How to reduce thermal noise Quantum noise Standard Quantum Limit Frequency-dependent squeezing Current and future detectors Timeline and sensitivity LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 2

Gravitational waves and their detection Quantum fluctuations in early universe Supermassive black holes binary mergers Compact objects captured by supermassive black holes Compact binary mergers Supernovae, neutron star Wave period Age of universe years hours sec ms Log(frequency) -16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 2 Cosmic Microwave Background polarization Space-based interferometers Ground-based interferometers Pulsar timing array LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 3

Gravitational waves and their detection Quantum fluctuations in early universe Supermassive black holes binary mergers Compact objects captured by supermassive black holes Compact binary mergers Supernovae, neutron star Wave period Age of universe years hours sec ms Log(frequency) -16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 2 Cosmic Microwave Background polarization Space-based interferometers Ground-based interferometers Pulsar timing array LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 3

A Global Network GEO600 LIGO VIRGO KAGRA LIGO-India LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 4

Different stages of Advanced LIGO strain LSC, Living Reviews in Relativity 19, 1 (2016) LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 5

Design sensitivity of Advanced LIGO strain LSC, Class. Quantum Grav. 32, 074001 (2015) LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 6

Outline Background Gravitational waves and their detection Basic of noise Noise spectral density and transfer function Environmental noise Passive isolation and active cancellation Thermal noise Fluctuation-dissipation theorem How to reduce thermal noise Quantum noise Standard Quantum Limit Frequency-dependent squeezing Current and future detectors Timeline and sensitivity LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 7

Signal and noise Time Domain Frequency Domain LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 8

Noise spectral density (spectrum) LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 9

Noise spectral density (spectrum) LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 10

Noise spectral density (spectrum) LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 11

Noise spectral density (spectrum) LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 12

Noise spectral density (spectrum) Linear version: resolution bandwidth Order of magnitude: Chap 6: Random Process in Applications of Classical Physics by Blandford & Thorne LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 13

Noise spectral density (spectrum) strain 100Hz signal (1sec long): In general: (with matched filtering) LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 14

Transfer function Physical System Transfer Function LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 15

Outline Background Gravitational waves and their detection Basic of noise Noise spectral density and transfer function Environmental noise Passive isolation and active cancellation Thermal noise Fluctuation-dissipation theorem How to reduce thermal noise Quantum noise Standard Quantum Limit Frequency-dependent squeezing Current and future detectors Timeline and sensitivity LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 16

Environmental noise Seismic noise Newtonian noise Acoustic noise EM interference LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 17

18

- How to reduce environmental noise 1. Passive isolation: source Test mass 2. Active cancelation: (on-line or off-line) Noise source Test mass - Sensors LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 19

Example: Seismic noise 1. Passive isolation: Noise source Test mass Advanced LIGO quadruple suspension: Seven orders of magnitude passive isolation LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 20

- Example: Seismic noise 2. Active cancelation: (on-line or off-line) source Test mass - Sensors Similar technique can be used for cancelling Newtonian noise LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 21

Outline Background Gravitational waves and their detection Basic of noise Noise spectral density and transfer function Environmental noise Passive isolation and active cancellation Thermal noise Fluctuation-dissipation theorem How to reduce thermal noise Quantum noise Standard Quantum Limit Frequency-dependent squeezing Current and future detectors Timeline and sensitivity LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 22

Fluctuation-dissipation theorem (FDT) LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 23

Fluctuation-dissipation theorem (FDT) LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 24

Fluctuation-dissipation theorem (FDT) Susceptibility: H. Callen, and T. Welton, Phys. Rev. 83, 34 (1951) LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 25

Fluctuation-dissipation theorem (FDT) Susceptibility: (Equipartition) LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 26

Outline Background Gravitational waves and their detection Basic of noise Noise spectral density and transfer function Environmental noise Passive isolation and active cancellation Thermal noise Fluctuation-dissipation theorem How to reduce thermal noise Quantum noise Standard Quantum Limit Frequency-dependent squeezing Current and future detectors Timeline and sensitivity LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 27

Sources of thermal noise Our hope Our life Suspension wire Test mass Laser Coating Thermal noises are ubiquitous. Dominant: suspension and coating. LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 28

How to reduce thermal noise 1. Using low temperature KAGRA in JAPAN will operated at cryogenic temperature. Some designs of future detectors also incorporates cryogenic. LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 29

How to reduce thermal noise 2. Using high-quality material FDT Concentrating thermal energy; pushing noise outside band of interest. LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 30

How to reduce thermal noise 3. Using larger beam size Averaging out the thermal fluctuation. LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 31

Outline Background Gravitational waves and their detection Basic of noise Noise spectral density and transfer function Environmental noise Passive isolation and active cancellation Thermal noise Fluctuation-dissipation theorem How to reduce thermal noise Quantum noise Standard Quantum Limit Frequency-dependent squeezing Current and future detectors Timeline and sensitivity LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 32

Origin of quantum noise LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 33

Radiation pressure noise Standard quantum limit GW tidal force Test Mass Optical Field Quantum fluctuation in optical phase Shot noise Power fluctuation Radiation pressure noise In optical amplitude Standard Quantum Limit: LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 34

Frequency-dependent squeezing strain J. Kimble, et al. Conversion of conventional GW interferometers into QND by modifying their input and/or output optics, PRD 65, 022002 (2001) LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 35

State-of-the-art MIT proof-of-principle demonstration E. Oelker et al., Audio-Band Frequency-Dependent Squeezing for Gravitational-Wave Detectors, PRL 116, 041102 (2016) LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 36

Outline Background Gravitational waves and their detection Basic of noise Noise spectral density and transfer function Environmental noise Passive isolation and active cancellation Thermal noise Fluctuation-dissipation theorem How to reduce thermal noise Quantum noise Standard Quantum Limit Frequency-dependent squeezing Current and future detectors Timeline and sensitivity LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 37

Timeline of current and future detectors Cosmic Explorer / ET (new facility with longer baseline) LIGO Voyager (current facility) aLIGO Plus Design study LIGO-India Experiments KAGRA Installation aVIRGO Data taking aLIGO 2016 (now) 2020 2025 2030 LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 38

Sensitivity of future detectors LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 39

Science enabled by Cosmic Explorer GW150914 LIGO-DCC: P1600143-v14 (2016) LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 40

References for further reading Advanced LIGO: LSC, Class. Quantum Grav. 32, 074001 (2015) Advanced LIGO plus: M. Evans et al, Phys. Rev. D 88, 022002 (2013) J. Miller et al, Phys. Rev. D 91, 062005 (2015) LIGO Voyager: R. X. Adhikari et al, LIGO-DCC: T1400226 –v7 (2016) Einstein Telescope (ET): ET science team, Einstein GW Telescope conceptual design study Cosmic Explorer: S. Dwyer et al, Phys. Rev. D 91, 082001 (2015) LSC, LIGO-DCC: P1600143-v14 (2016) Finally, refer to LIGO Instrument Science White Paper (2015-2016) LAAC Tutorial Glasgow 41

Outline Background Gravitational waves and their detection Basic of noise Noise spectral density and transfer function Environmental noise Passive isolation and active cancellation Thermal noise Fluctuation-dissipation theorem How to reduce thermal noise Quantum noise Standard Quantum Limit Frequency-dependent squeezing Current and future detectors Timeline and sensitivity LAAC Tutorial Glasgow