Follow-Ups to Gravitational-Wave Signal Candidates

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Searching for Electromagnetic Counterparts of Gravitational-Wave Transients Marica Branchesi (Università di Urbino/INFN) on behalf of LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Advertisements

Sources and Timing A variety of possible source mechanisms motivate this search. Theoretical and numerical models predict nova-like transients from double.
LIGO - Fermi Sub-Threshold Search for the 1 st Advanced LIGO Science Run Jordan Camp NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Moriond Gravitation Meeting March.
Following Up Gravitational Wave Event Candidates Roy Williams (Caltech), Peter Shawhan (U Maryland), for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration.
A SEARCH FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM INSPIRALING NEUTRON STARS AND BLACK HOLES Using data taken between July 2009 and October 2010, researchers from the.
Pi of the Sky – preparation for GW Advance Detector Era Adam Zadrożny Wilga 2014.
1 Science Opportunities for Australia Advanced LIGO Barry Barish Director, LIGO Canberra, Australia 16-Sept-03 LIGO-G M.
LIGO-GXX What is LIGO (LSC/GEO/Virgo/…)? Gabriela González, Louisiana State University For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration.
LIGO Status and Advanced LIGO Plans Barry C Barish OSTP 1-Dec-04.
1 Observing the Most Violent Events in the Universe Virgo Barry Barish Director, LIGO Virgo Inauguration 23-July-03 Cascina 2003.
Gravitational-waves: Sources and detection
The LIGO Project ( Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory) Rick Savage – Scientist LIGO Hanford Observatory.
R. Frey Student Visit 1 Gravitational Waves, LIGO, and UO GW Physics LIGO
Teória relativity začiatok alebo koniec fyziky.
Why search for GWs? New tests of general relativity Study known sources – potential new discoveries that are inaccessible using EM View the universe prior.
Acknowledgements The work presented in this poster was carried out within the LIGO Scientific Collaboration (LSC). The methods and results presented here.
LIGO-G Opening the Gravitational Wave Window Gabriela González Louisiana State University LSC spokesperson For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Peter S. Shawhan (University of Maryland) for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration together with the TAROT, QUEST and Pi of the.
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
Pi of the Sky telescope contribution to the LSC-Virgo Electromagnetic Follow-up project Adam Zadrożny Spała 2014.
PI OF THE SKY AND GRAVITATIONAL WAVES SEARCHES Adam Zadrożny.
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS
Gravitational-wave (GW) detectors in the nexus of multi-messenger astrophysics Isabel Leonor (University of Oregon) For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Searches for Compact Binary Coalescences in LIGO and Virgo data Gabriela González For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration APS.
1 Status of Search for Compact Binary Coalescences During LIGO’s Fifth Science Run Drew Keppel 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 California Institute.
LIGO-G v5 5/2/09Joshua Smith, Syracuse University1 Low-latency search for gravitational-wave transients with electromagnetic follow-up Joshua Smith,
LIGO- G D Experimental Upper Limit from LIGO on the Gravitational Waves from GRB Stan Whitcomb For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Informal.
LIGO-G All-Sky Burst Search in the First Year of the LSC S5 Run Laura Cadonati, UMass Amherst For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration GWDAW Meeting,
Introduction Coalescing binary compact objects for a 1.4 M  neutron star inspiralling into a 10 M  black hole would be in-band for ~200 s. We could detect.
LIGO G M Intro to LIGO Seismic Isolation Pre-bid meeting Gary Sanders LIGO/Caltech Stanford, April 29, 2003.
G Z The LIGO gravitational wave detector consists of two observatories »LIGO Hanford Observatory – 2 interferometers (4 km long arms and 2 km.
LIGO-G M Press Conference Scientific Operation of LIGO Gary H Sanders Caltech (on behalf of a large team) APS April Meeting Philadelphia 6-April-03.
GW – the first GW detection ! Is it a start of GW astronomy ? If “yes” then which ? «Счастлив, кто посетил сей мир в его минуты роковые !...» Ф.Тютчев.
Steering Astronomy Toward Gravitational Wave-Supernova Science Kiranjyot (Jasmine) Gill, 1 Dr. Michele Zanolin 1 With support from Marek Szczepanczyk 1.
Searching the LIGO data for coincidences with Gamma Ray Bursts Alexander Dietz Louisiana State University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.
Bose, APS-Denver, 2008/05/04 Estimating the parameters of coalescing black hole binaries (non-spinning) using ground-based detectors Sukanta Bose Washington.
24 th Pacific Coast Gravity Meeting, Santa Barbara LIGO DCC Number: G Z 1 Search for gravitational waves from inspiraling high-mass (non-spinning)
LIGO-G Z Results from LIGO Observations Stephen Fairhurst University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
GRB triggered Inspiral Searches in the fifth Science Run of LIGO Alexander Dietz Cardiff University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.
Online all-sky burst searches during the joint S6/VSR2 LIGO-Virgo science run Igor Yakushin LIGO Livingston Observatory, Caltech For the LIGO Scientific.
Search for compact binary systems in LIGO data Thomas Cokelaer On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Cardiff University, U.K. LIGO-G Z.
The Quest for Gravitational Waves: a global strategy
The search for those elusive gravitational waves
Brennan Hughey MIT Kavli Institute Postdoc Symposium
Electromagnetic Follow-ups of LIGO/Virgo Triggers
Low-latency Selection of Gravitational-wave Event Candidates
The Search for Gravitational Waves with Advanced LIGO
Gravitational Waves: On the Brink of a New Astronomy
The first detection of gravitational waves with LIGO
Searching for gravitational-wave transients with Advanced detectors
Finding Optical Transients with LIGO and Virgo Data
Real-time Astronomy with LIGO and Virgo: Status and Prospects Erik Katsavounidis LIGO-MIT for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration.
All-Sky Burst Searches for Gravitational Waves at High Frequencies
Astrophysics: 2016 highlights and the way forward
The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO
Is there a future for LIGO underground?
Coherent wide parameter space searches for gravitational waves from neutron stars using LIGO S2 data Xavier Siemens, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Advanced VIRGO Experiment
LIGO detectors: past, present and future
GW150914: The first direct detection of gravitational waves
Detection of gravitational waves from binary black hole mergers
Brennan Hughey for the LSC May 12th, 2008
An improved method for estimating the efficiency of GW detectors
On Behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and VIRGO
DIRECT DETECTION OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM NEUTRON STARS
Gravitational wave detection and the quantum limit
Status of LIGO Patrick J. Sutton LIGO-Caltech
The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory
Update on Status of LIGO
Detection of Gravitational Waves with Interferometers
Presentation transcript:

Follow-Ups to Gravitational-Wave Signal Candidates Ryan Quitzow-James (University of Oregon) for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration 432.27 AAS 217 13 Jan 2011 LIGO-G1001056 Introduction General Relativity predicts the existence of gravitational waves (GWs), which are perturbations in the geometry of space-time emitted when massive objects change their shape or orientation rapidly. Indirect evidence for GWs has been observed already with the timing measurements of binary pulsar PSR 1913+16. The aim of LIGO and Virgo is to directly detect GW emissions from energetic astrophysical events such as mergers of neutron stars and black holes, core collapse of massive stars, quasinormal modes of disturbed neutron stars, cosmic string cusps, and more. Towards this end, LIGO [1] and Virgo [2] utilize complex laser interferometers, the largest and most sensitive gravitational wave detectors used to date, with “arms” up to 4 km long that function by measuring changes in length on the order of 10-18 m, a thousandth the diameter of a proton. Many sources predicted to generate gravitational waves are likely to give off electromagnetic (EM) radiation. If GW candidates are found with well determined positions, the EM detectors can be employed in near real-time to look for accompanying electromagnetic signals. These EM follow-ups would lower the threshold for confident detection and act as an additional confirmation of a GW. LUMIN and GEM are software programs that handle the alerts for possible GW candidates, generated by the search algorithms Omega Pipeline [3], coherent WaveBurst (cWB) [3, 4] and Multi-Band Template Analysis (MTBA) [5], as well as pass information to the telescopes. GEM handles alerts for Swift’s X-ray Telescope (XRT) and UV-Optical Telescope (UVOT) and LUMIN handles alerts for the other telescopes: ROTSE, TAROT, SkyMapper, QUEST, Pi of the sky, Zadko Telescope, Liverpool Telescope and PTF (Palomar Transient Factory) with fields of view ranging from 0.3x0.3 degrees to 20x20 degrees. In addition to X-ray and optical images, follow-ups using radio telescopes are also being developed (LOFAR). Diagram of LIGO Detector The LIGO Hanford Observatory in Washington State Find Event Candidates One challenge of successfully getting EM follow-ups to GW candidates is to find them in the first place. The data from the three detectors must be transferred and analyzed in near-real time; as the data becomes available three search algorithms run over the data and generate triggers for event candidates. During the S6/VSR3 science run, it typically took ~10 minutes for the software to generate the triggers to be checked by team members. Credit: TAROT ~100 megaparsecs Limit Search to Nearby Galaxies We can also constrain our search to galaxies within the range of the detectors to narrow our search [7]. For example, in S6/VSR3 a stellar-mass black hole / neutron star binary inspiral could be detected out to a maximum distance of ~50 Mpc (expected to be ~500 Mpc in the advanced detector era). Therefore, we could focus on galaxies within 50 Mpc when selecting coordinates for follow-up imaging. Analyze Data! Images are analyzed to check for transients by comparing with reference images taken earlier or later. In principle, if an optical transient can be identified quickly, then larger-aperture telescopes with various instruments could be brought to bear. Few (possibly none) of the GW candidates are expected to be confirmed as real events at the current sensitivity level.  All significant gravitational wave candidates are subject to considerable scrutiny and the extra information available from the EM images justifies the effort. Two of the search algorithms, Omega Pipeline and coherent WaveBurst, search for unmodeled transients (bursts), while the third, Multi-Band Template Analysis, searches for compact binary inspirals. An event candidate must have power above certain thresholds calculated from the distribution of background events as well as be coincident in the three detectors. Different telescopes require the candidates to be below different false alarm rates (FAR); once every four days for most telescopes, with once every ten days for PTF and once every thirty-five days for Swift. Above: Artist's impression of gravitational waves from two orbiting black holes. [Image: K. Thorne (Caltech) and T. Carnahan (NASA GSFC)] Illustration of the anticipated "reach" of Advanced LIGO. Each small dot in the figure represents a galaxy. Credit: Swift Right: Position reconstruction for a simulated GW event is shown as a function of sky position. The most likely positions for the GW source are dark red. Black crosses indicate locations of known galaxies within 50 Mpc. Rectangles indicate telescope fields chosen to maximize chance of catching the optical transient (assuming there is one coming from a galaxy) for three pointings of the QUEST (top) and TAROT (bottom) cameras. The position reconstruction was performed by the coherent WaveBurst software. Best three galaxy-weighted target fields for QUEST field of view : 4.1º × 4.6º (dithered pair of images), chosen from predetermined grid Project Status LOOC-UP and GEM were implemented and run in late 2010 and successfully sent triggers to participating telescopes, which included Swift, LOFAR, TAROT and QUEST. Images from follow-ups to event candidates are still being analyzed and will be presented at a later date. A major goal of this effort was to gain experience in preparation for the Advanced LIGO (aLIGO) / Advanced Virgo era. LIGO is currently being decommissioned in preparation for installation of the components of aLIGO, which is expected to begin taking data in 2014-2015, ultimately with a factor of 10 improvement in sensitivity. A similar improvement and timeline is expected for the Advanced Virgo project. LIGO-Australia is a proposed fourth detector*. It’s position would compliment the existing detectors and the uncertainty in source sky position would be 5 to 10 times smaller [8]. The NSF approved providing LIGO-Australia with the components of one of the three Advanced LIGO interferometers. Australia must still find funding for the operation and infrastructure of the observatory: staff, buildings, roads, vacuum chamber, etc. Determine GW Source Sky Position Triple coincidence among the three detectors is required to (1) reduce greatly the number of spurious event candidates and (2) reconstruct the position of the candidate event, which is done mostly by the timing delays. Strong signals can be localized to just 1-2 degrees, while signals that are near threshold are localized to about 5-10 degrees, possibly in several disconnected patches [6]. For this reason, telescopes with wide fields of view (FOVs) are useful for analysis. Check Data and Request EM Images After an event candidate is found, team members are notified through GEM for Swift and LUMIN for the other telescopes. If the candidate passes the software and sanity checks performed by team members, imaging requests are sent to telescopes determined to be in good observation positions by the software. This entire process would typically be completed within 30 minutes. Best three galaxy-weighted target fields for TAROT field of view : 1.85º × 1.85º Table 1: Notable Parameters Latency ~ 30 min GW Sky Localization (LIGO + Virgo) ~1-2 degrees for strong signal, ~5-10 degrees near threshold GW Distance Sensitivity (BNS) LIGO: ≤ 50 Mpc aLIGO: ≤ 500 Mpc [1] B. Abbott et al., Rept. Prog. Phys. 72, 076901 (2009) [2] F. Acernese et al., Class.Quantum Grav. 25, 184001 (2008) [3] J. Abadie et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 81, 102001 (2010) [4] S.Klimenko et al, Classical Quantum Gravity 25, 114029 (2008) [5] D Buskulic et al 2010 Class. Quantum Grav. 27 194013 [6] Erik Katsavounidis for the LVC, talk at the14th Gravitational Wave Data Analysis Workshop, http://www.roma1.infn.it/GWDAW14/ [7] J. Kanner et al., “LOOC UP: locating and observing optical counterparts to gravitational wave bursts”, Classical and Quantum Gravity 25, 184034 (2008) [8] LIGO Document T1000251, https://dcc.ligo.org/cgi-bin/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=11604 REFERENCES * See poster 432.23. The Benefits for Multi-Messenger Gravitational Wave Astronomy with a LIGO-Australia Detector, Aidan F. Brooks, Linqing Wen, Stan Whitcomb