Group 10 Rachel Martin David Mount Leah Strickman Emma Wendt Choosing Atrium Lighting in the new Graduate School of Business Knight Management Center Group 10 Rachel Martin David Mount Leah Strickman Emma Wendt

Overview Existing atrium decision process Atrium lighting as project focus Recommended decision process: MACDADI Organizations Goals Preferences Options Analysis Value Innovations

We speculate atrium selection is problematic Midterm: Pre-data Atrium Current State Narrative No Stakeholder goals up front Few options provided Stakeholders engaged late; act as designers Midterm: Pre-data

We focus our project on lighting Actual atrium selection is even more problematic than we suspected Atrium Current State Narrative Atrium appears in the architect’s plans We changed our project to a more detailed decision The Atrium Lighting Decision Midterm: Post-data

Narrator model from architect Thorough atrium lighting design process, but stakeholders not included Architect’s Atrium Lighting Decision

Our Future State Narrative Stakeholders matter Atrium Lighting Decision Future State Narrative Narrator link

MACDADI Model Organizations Students Faculty Staff Designers Donors Owners Community Stakeholders Owner Stakeholders matter MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Value

MACDADI Model Clarify goals to clarify design decision Promotion of Academic Excellence Inspire Visual Wow Factor Aesthetic Appropriate Lighting Level Functionality Library Feel Accessibility Study Space Economic Responsibility Ease to Construct Proven Design Time To Build Time to Design Code Compliant Environmental Sustainability LEED Platinum Get Daylighting Credit Comfort Innovative MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Value

MACDADI Model Weighting preferences shows economics and owners matter most MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Value 9

MACDADI Model Designers generate 3 options 0 Sawtoothes 3 Sawtoothes 6 Sawtoothes MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Value

MACDADI Model Analysis - Outlined ratings for 3 goals Promotion of Academic Excellence MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Value

MACDADI Model Analysis – 6 and 3 panels similarly and better MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Value 12

MACDADI Model Value MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Weights * Value 13

Innovation Weighted the opinions of different stakeholders to acknowledge the relative importance of each MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Value

Weight stakeholders – owners and economics become more important Innovation Weight stakeholders – owners and economics become more important MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Value 15

Weight stakeholders – final design doesn’t change Innovation Weight stakeholders – final design doesn’t change MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Value 16

Summary Consider stakeholders Choose 6-sawtooth option Weight stakeholder preferences Recognize economics can still be most important goal Choose 6-sawtooth option