Engenharia PAGE 1 Airbus A Tail: PR-AVR MSN: 4941 FH: 6006,00

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
7 Feb 2000JMM1 Editing a GSM spec - tips for experts.
Advertisements

Optimum Round Pool Instructions. Prepare the pool site Remove all the grass on a surface 2’ wider than the size of the pool Level the ground.
Welcome to Hardie 101 Basic Training
NDT INSPECTION A300 / A FR 47 upper radius
The Fuselage and Empennage
Tire Servicing Program. Agenda WorkSafeBC Requirements Definitions Responsibilities General safety.
Heavy-Duty Truck Axle Service and Repair
Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (RVSM)
ADVANCED DRESS-UP FEATURES 39. Once OK has been selected, your part will appear with the filleted area highlighted by orange lines at the boundaries.
Function, Construction and Operation
Bendix® ADB 22X™ Air Disc Brakes “Service Series”
IMP AEROSPACE Sea King Pylon Repair and Overhaul by Anick Chiasson Intermediate Aero/Mechanical Engineer Rotary Wing Engineering IMP AEROSPACE IMP Aerospace,
Chapter 13 Section Views.
An Aerospace Manufacturing Perspective Introduction to Fastener Technology Part 3 1.
An Aerospace Manufacturing Perspective Automated Systems in Fastener Technology 1.
General Design Guidelines
Data Exchange Standards in support of transaction processes 08 November 2004 Bonn, Germany Peggy Quarles Perrin Quarles Associates, Inc.
CHAPTER 16 Engineering Drawings and Symbols
TMT M1CS Actuator Pre-ship Meeting Avasarala Technologies Limited Bangalore, India September 13 th, 2013.
Definitions, Goals and Objectives
Introduction The Gamma Bracing System  Gamma bracing system is a light weight steel, structural truss bracing frame that fits INSIDE the timber studs.
SFOBB East Span Seismic Safety Project Steve Margaris, Specifications Engineer, Caltrans.
STATE WIDE SIGN GUIDE This guide will demonstrate various sign mounting products and procedures for construction and maintenance.
Malte HildebrandtDC Status Report, Dear MEG Committee,PSI, April 14 th 2009 this is the first report concerning the drift chamber status as.
2.3.8 Student Book © 2004 Propane Education & Research CouncilPage Performing Pre-Unloading Cargo Tank Emergency Discharge System & Delivery Hose.
New York State Department of Transportation Accelerated Bridge Program Phase 1B Design-Build Projects Request for Proposals Informational Meeting April.
Inoperative Equipment And Minimum Equipment List
SPS policy – Information Presentation Presentation to ROS June 16, 2004.
COMPOSITE TRANSPORT WORKSHOP ON DAMAGE TOLERANCE AND MAINTENANCE The information presented in this presentation is designated as proprietary to Air Flight.
UTE 25SPECIFICATION Product Name: MIRAENANO TECH. Optical Film Product Name: MIRAENANO TECH. Optical Film Model: UTE 25 Model: UTE 25 Drawn byChecked byApproval.
Jobsite Inspection Checklist
Drawing Abilities Teacher
Copyright  2012 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Engineering Drawing 8e by Boundy 2-1 Chapter Two Dimensioning Drawings: Symbols, Methods, Common.
Hussein Alhashimi. “If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it” Tom DeMarco,
Sub Committee 6 Ballot resolution Summary June 2012 Mike Briggs.
Learning Objectives • Create sweep features. • Create lofted features.
Three Pin Coupling Assembly Grey – Upper Arm Red – Arm Interface Plate with Pins for Coupling Blue – Wrist Interface Plate with Receptacles Wrist – Not.
Overdriven Nails in Structural Sheathings Overview.
MAP Assembly Investigation A project summary for discussion during 4/11/2014 meeting.
4/28/2017 Stress Corrosion Cracking Assessment in Pipeline Mohammed Abu Four October 11, 2010.
Outline of The New Family
Japan’s Proposal and Clarification 57th GRSP Informal Group on Child Restraint System 23rd March 2016 JASIC.
Page 1 TQC Mechanical Model Igor Novitski / Rodger Bossert May 24, 2006 Results of MM#4 and MM#5.
AEROFIX STRUCTURAL SERVICES
Guide Right™ CASE FOR ANGLED IMPLANTS
SCROLL SAW CHAPTER 26.
Update on PANDA solenoid design
Guide Right™ Immediate Placement & Immediate Load
Drawing Abilities Teacher
Global Exotics Board Replacement
Board Replacement for Floating Floors
Chapter 4 Creating Placed Features
Automotive Engines Theory and Servicing
Additional muon stations for the Upgrade of the Elevator Regions in the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. Integration issues Denis Diyakov, Alexander Seletskiy,
The Fuselage and Empennage
Conditions and procedures of Japan research
QSK19 Oil Pan Fillet Change
Gaskets and Packing An introduction to Gaskets Packing
International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting
Correcting Assignment #24 (6, 7, 11-15, 19-24, 27, 29, 31-32)
Introduction The Gamma Bracing System
Please use your resources to answer the following questions.
Please use your resources to answer the following questions.
Correction to COP and clarification to CNLR
Automotive Engines Theory and Servicing
IWG Worn tyres Tyre Industry work status July 17th 2019
IWG Worn tyres Tyre Industry work status July 17th 2019
Introduction The Gamma Bracing System
IWG Worn tyres Tyre Industry work status July 17th 2019
Presentation transcript:

Engenharia PAGE 1 Airbus A320-214 Tail: PR-AVR MSN: 4941 FH: 6006,00 FC: 4002,00 Our Reference: MS/ST-0026-2013/00 Subject: SEVERAL DAMAGES ON THE UPR FUSELAGE SKIN Damage Location: Two damages lacated btw FR 21/22 and STGR 05/06 And Two damages located btw FR 21/23 and btw STRG 24/26 Next Flight Schedule: 10/Jul/2013 – 6AM Local Time MSN 5193 POST MOD 35812K10500 PAGE 1 Background Information: During Daily Check several damages were constated: DAMAGE 1: Abrasion plus Scratches area on the following position: At FR 21 common to STGR 06. DAMAGE 2: Abrasion plus Scratches area on the following position: Btw FR 21/22 and btw STGR 06/07. NOTE: The reason for this request is that the aircraft is POST MOD 35812K10500, resulting in a damage without predicted repair by SRM. NOTE: This allowable damage data is not applicable after Modification 35812K10500 for area defined between FR21 and FR24, and between STGR5 and STGR11 LH/RH (Refer. A320 SRM 53-11-11-101, paragraph 4.A.). DAMAGE 3: Dent on the Skin Fuselage btw FR 21/23 and btw STRG 25/26 DAMAGE 4: Dent on the Skin Fuselage common to Frame 23 and btw STRG 24/25. Engenharia

Damages location on the Upper Shell DAMAGE LOCATION PAGE 2 DAMAGE 1: Abrasion plus Scratches on the Skin fuselage at FR 21 common to STGR 06. DAMAGE 2: Abrasion plus Scratches on the Skin fuselage btw FR 21/22 and btw STGR 06/07. Damages location on the Upper Shell Airbus A320-214 Tail: PR-AVR MSN: 4941 STRG 6 A LAP JOINT FR 20 FR 21 Engenharia

ORIGINAL FASTENERS AFFECTED DAMAGE LOCATION PAGE 3 DAMAGE 1 DAMAGE 2 SKIN UPPER SHELL DOF STRG 6 ORIGINAL FASTENERS AFFECTED ASNA2051DEJ040** (2EA) LAP JOINT DET. A FR 21 Engenharia

MAPPING GRID 10X10mm (DAMAGE 1) DIMENSIONS OF DAMAGE PAGE 4 DAMAGE 1: The reworked area with Dimensions: Original Thickness max. = 2,0mm Remaning Thickness = 1,9mm Removed material = 0.1mm (Y) Original Thickness min. = 1,2mm Remaning Thickness min. = 1,1mm Lenght = 70mm Widht = 62mm (as per Blending/Rework Dimensions Y> = 40T). The affected area was reworked by Blend-out as per A320 SRM 51-73-00, paragraph 5. The affected area by scracth was inspected (DVI) and is free the marks and scratches. The Fasteners on affected area was removed as per A320 SRM 51-42-11. ROTATING PROBE TESTING Performed in the affected hole as per NTM 51-10-01-250-801-A-01 (Procedure A) PB 6 and NO DISCRAPANCY FOUND. EDDY CURRENT (HFEC Inspection) Performed around the holes as per NTM 51-10-08-250-802-A-01 (Procedure A) PB 6 and NO CRACK FOUND. Performed MEASUREMENT OF REMAINING STRUCTURE THICKNESS on skin fuselage as per NTM 51-10-04-270-802-A-01.   1 2 3 4 5 6 A 1,2 2,0 B 1,1 1,9 C D E F G MAPPING GRID 10X10mm (DAMAGE 1) Engenharia

MAPPING GRID 10X10mm (DAMAGE 2) DIMENSIONS OF DAMAGE PAGE 5 DAMAGE 2: The reworked area with Dimensions: Original Thickness min. = 1,2mm Remaning Thickness min. = 1,1mm Removed material = 0.1mm (Y) Lenght = 50mm Widht = 33mm (as per Blending/Rework Dimensions Y> = 40T). The affected area was reworked by Blend-out as per A320 SRM 51-73-00, paragraph 5. The affected area by scracth was inspected (DVI) and is free the marks and scratches. ROTATING PROBE TESTING Performed in the affected hole as per NTM 51-10-01-250-801-A-01 (Procedure A) PB 6 and NO DISCRAPANCY FOUND. EDDY CURRENT (HFEC Inspection) Performed around the holes as per NTM 51-10-08-250-802-A-01 (Procedure A) PB 6 and NO CRACK FOUND. Performed MEASUREMENT OF REMAINING STRUCTURE THICKNESS on skin fuselage as per NTM 51-10-04-270-802-A-01.   1 2 3 4 5 6 A 1,2 1,1 B C D MAPPING GRID 10X10mm (DAMAGE 2) Engenharia

Engenharia REPAIR PROPOSAL PAGE 6 CURRENT SITUATION: NOTE: The reason for this request is that the aircraft is POST MOD 35812K10500, resulting in a damage without predicted repair by SRM. CURRENT SITUATION: Performed Blend-out on the affected area with material removed: For Original thickness = 2.0mm _Remaining thickness= 1,9mm (Depth of Rework as Percentage of Nominal Material Thickness = 5,0%) For Original thickness = 1,2mm _Remaining thickness= 1,1mm (Depth of Rework as Percentage of Nominal Material Thickness = 8,3%) Removed the two Original fasteners ASNA2051DEJ040** (2 EA). Performed ROTATING PROBE TESTING in the affected hole as per NTM 51-10-01-250-801-A-01 (Procedure A) PB 6 and NO DISCRAPANCY FOUND. Performed EDDY CURRENT (HFEC Inspection) around the holes as per NTM 51-10-08-250-802-A-01 (Procedure A) PB 6 and NO CRACK FOUND. Performed MEASUREMENT OF REMAINING STRUCTURE THICKNESS on skin fuselage as per NTM 51-10-04-270-802-A-01. REPAIR PROPOSAL (DAMAGE 1 AND DAMAGE 2): Perform surface protection of the repair area I.A.W. A320 SRM 51-21-11 and SRM 51-23-11. Perform wet assembly of the fasteners repair I.A.W. A320 SRM 51-24-00. Perform installation of 2 new fasteners HL11VF6-3 (2EA) + HL70-6 as per A320 SRM 51-42-00 Perform restored surface protection in accordance with A320 SRM 51-75-12. NOTE: This propose was based on the RDAS AIRTAC Ref. 70577657/033/2013 and 70577895/033/2013 and 70577895/033/2013 and 70579490/003/2013 of a same damage in the same location that occurred recently in the aircraft MSN 3509, 5193, 4942 and 4941. Engenharia

Damages location on the Rear Side Shell DAMAGE LOCATION PAGE 7 DAMAGE 3: Dent on the Skin Fuselage btw FR 21/23 and btw STRG 25/26 DAMAGE 4: Dent on the Skin Fuselage common to Frame 23 and btw STRG 24/25. Airbus A320-214 Tail: PR-AVR MSN: 4941 Damages location on the Rear Side Shell Engenharia

Dented area location on the Rear Side Shell DAMAGE LOCATION PAGE 8 DOF Dented area location on the Rear Side Shell DAMAGE 4 STRG 24 STRG 25 A DAMAGE 3 FR 23 Engenharia

Two Fasteners affected DIMENSIONS OF DAMAGE PAGE 9 DAMAGE 4: A = 0mm B = 0mm L = 100mm W = 50mm D = 2,80mm T= 1,40mm DAMAGE 4 NOTE: The Dented area is common to Skin and Frame and two fasteners affected. Two Fasteners affected DAMAGE 3: A = 7mm B = 10mm L = 60mm W = 60mm D = 1,0mm T= 1,40mm DAMAGE 3 DET. A View from outside Engenharia

Engenharia DAMAGE REPORT DAMAGE 4 DAMAGE 3 PAGE 10 View from inside STRG 25 DAMAGE 4 DAMAGE 3 Performed HFEC on the affected surface of the Frame in accordance with NTM 51-10-08-250-802-A-01 (Procedure A) PB 6 and NO CRACK FOUND. Performed DV inspection on the affected fasteners and NO DISCRAPANCY FOUND. Engenharia

Engenharia DAMAGE REPORT PAGE 11 CURRENT SITUATION: The Dented area caused by impact was inspected (DVI) and adjacent structural no discrepancy found. DAMAGE 3: The Dented area with Dimensions: A = 7mm, B = 10mm, L = 60mm, W = 60mm, D = 1,0mm (Measured from outside) and original Thickness = 1,4mm was assessed as per A320 SRM 53-11-11-101, Paragraph 4.C (Dents out of “nearness/form” Criterion), Diagram 103 and classified as Repair Category “C” Diamond <1> and <3> and must be applied the permanent repair within 3000FC. DAMAGE 4: The Dented area with Dimensions: A = 0mm, B = 0mm, L = 100mm, W = 50mm, D = 2,80mm (Measured from outside) and original Thickness = 1,4mm was assessed as per A320 SRM 53-11-11-101, Paragraph 4.C (Dents out of “nearness/form” Criterion), Diagram 103 and classified as Repair Category “C” Diamond <1> and <3> and must be applied the permanent repair within 3000FC. NOTE: The Dented area is common to Skin and Frame and two fasteners affected. Performed HFEC (internally and externally) on the Skin affected surface in accordance with NTM 51-10-08-250-802-A-01 (Procedure A) PB 6 and NO CRACK FOUND. Performed HFEC on the affected surface of the Frame in accordance with NTM 51-10-08-250-802-A-01 (Procedure A) PB 6 and NO CRACK FOUND. Engenharia

Engenharia REPAIR PROPOSAL PAGE 12 REPAIR PROPOSAL (DAMAGE 3 AND DAMAGE 4): Perform surface protection of the repair area I.A.W. A320 SRM 51-21-11 and SRM 51-23-11. Perform restored surface protection in accordance with A320 SRM 51-75-12. Could the AIB consider the already performed repair as a temporary repair until next C check, that will occur in no more than 6000 FC or 24 months? NOTE: A response within 4 hours is required one time it is an AOG situation. If the temporary repair is considered acceptable, could the AIB provide us the RDAS Number in advanced? Our New Reference for issue the RDAS: MS/ST-0026-2013/00. Engenharia

Engenharia CLARIFICATION PAGE 13 Our new Reference: MS/ST-0026-2013/01 Your reference: 70579891/005 In response to message ref. 70579891/005: AIRBUS request: 1. Please could AVA confirm the Aircraft type & MSN in question? It is noted on the damage report it quotes A320 while within the applied actions it refers to SRM A318. 2. Damages 3 & 4 are shown in relation to AOA Sensor. Has the SRM 53-00-11 been consulted ( Aerodynamic Requirements for Allowable Damage Angle of Attack Probes ) ONE answer: 1. The AVA confirms the serial (MSN: 4941) and type of aircraft (A320-214) and made ​​the necessary corrections regarding current actions on page 11. 2. For 3 damage & 4 were checked the definition of areas (Angle of Attack Sensors - Definition of Areas) according to Figure 106 and this out area of the Angle of Attack sensor center (450mm > 250 = R9) and were checked defining characteristic parameters Damage and Repair and Aerodynamic Requirements and are within the Requirements for allowable damages and repairs (D= 2,8mm > 2,5 (contact Airbus) and d = 450mm > 250mm (Double repair)). NOTE: External Doubler is permited for damaged area. If the temporary repair is considered acceptable, could the AIB provide us the RDAS Number in advanced? Our New Reference for issue the RDAS: MS/ST-0026-2013/01. Engenharia

Engenharia REPAIR FEEDBACK PAGE 14 Our new Reference: MS/ST-0026-2013/01 and MS/ST-0026-2013/02 Your reference: 70579891/005, 70579891/008 and 70579891/011 In response to message ref. 70579891/008 and 70579891/011: AIRBUS request: Additional HFEC inspection (NTM 51-10-08) of STGR25 close to both damages. Replacement of the two fasteners in dent damage 4 if damaged. ONE answer: Performed HFEC on the affected surface, cleat FR23 and STRG25 in accordance with NTM 51-10-08-250-802-A-01 PB 6 and NO CRACK FOUND. Removed two (2EA) fasteners on affected area as per A320 SRM 51-42-11. Enlarged the holes to their final diameter (3/16”) as per A320 SRM 51-44-12. Performed the countersink the fastener holes Chapter 51−44−11. Perform a detailed visual inspection (DVI) on the internal and external surface and on the cleat frame and NO DISCREPANCY FOUND. Performed rototest inspection in holes as per A320 NTM 51-10-01 and NO CRACK FOUND. Perform surface protection in c´sink and holes I.A.W. A320 SRM 51-21-11 and SRM 51-23-11. Performed wet assembly of the fasteners I.A.W. A320 SRM 51-24-00. Performed installation of the fasteners I.A.W. A320 SRM 51-42-00. Performed restored surface protection in accordance with SRM 51-75-12. NOTE: Could the AIB provide us a Permanent Repair Design from Airbus, to be accomplished within 3000FC? If the temporary repair is considered acceptable, could the AIB provide us the RDAS Number in advanced? Our New Reference for issue the RDAS: MS/ST-0026-2013/02. Engenharia