AQIP Category Two: Meeting Student and Other key stakeholder needs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Excellence at Northwest Technical College
Advertisements

1 Vision Area of Focus Success Metrics* * All success metrics to be completed by Spring ’08. Commitments to ActionStatus Provide access to quality and.
AQIP Status Report An Overview and Discussion. Timeline for SJC’s AQIP Journey November 2000 AQIP admission 2002 First action projects submitted September.
Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.
1 Data Collection and Data Mining Faculty Research Series February 24, 2006.
WELCOME Strategic Directions Finale May 1, SETTING THE STAGE Planning for BC’s Future 2015—2018.
ASSESSMENT. Assessment is the systematic and on-going process of collecting and reviewing evidence about the College's academic and administrative programs.
Some examples of quality standards and their use for self assessment and planning CINDA Workshop for TEIs Ramallah, May 2007.
Leadership and Management of Education Evaluation of Education at the University of Helsinki 2007 – 2008 EAIR Vilnius 2009 Seppo Saari & Minna Frimodig.
Colorado State University GLOBAL CAMPUS Accessibility Subcommittee.
HLC Criterion One Primer Criterion One. Mission August 27, 2015.
UNC American Indian Center Mission Bridging the richness of North Carolina’s American Indian cultures with the strengths of Carolina in research, education,
College Success Program John Cowles, Ph.D. Dean of Student Success and Retention Grand Rapids Community College Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Jennifer Reeves, Ph.D., Barbara Packer-Muti, Ed.D., & Candace Lacey, Ph.D. Nova Southeastern University Ft Lauderdale, FL.
VoiceGR Jodi Petersen, PhD Director, Community Research Institute.
January 23,  Balance state’s higher education long range plan and agency operations in the required strategic plan;  Involve agency staff in.
Middle States Re-Accreditation Town Hall September 29, :00-10:00 am Webpage
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
Summary of VCU Student Satisfaction Fall 2012
Knowledge Management and Resource Stewardship
Improving Retention with Technology
Creating Faculty Evaluation and Mentoring Programs Using Brightspace
Student Support Services Overview
CAÑADA COLLEGE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK
Indirect and Direct Evidence
Functional Area Assessment
The assessment process For Administrative units
Assessment: Will It Be a “We Have To?” or “We Get To?”
Standard I Systematic Planning.
UAA Effectiveness and Improvement
Sixty percent of the time, it works every time: Peer leaders and data
Jackson College CCSSE & CCFSSE Findings Community College Survey of Student Engagement Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Administered:
INTEGRATING STUDENT SUCCESS THROUGHOUT YOUR COLLEGE: ARE YOUR SYSTEMS, PROCESSES AND EMPLOYEES ALIGNED?
Student Affairs Assessment
Pat Mueller, EEC David Merves, EEC Vitaliy Shyyan, NCEO
Transfer Students as an Integral Part of SEM Planning
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
VCSU’s Assessment of Student Learning
Assessing Library Performance:
Measuring the Heart of Quality: Researching the Impact of QM at Not One, Not Two, but Four Colleges within a University System Sharon Lalla, New Mexico.
Garrett College moving forward
Assessment Cycle and Academic Effect
ATD: Year in Review and What to Expect in Year II
Strategic Planning Update
DE Coordinator’s November 2012 Telephone Meeting
Dr. Mark Allen Poisel July 16, 2013
Factors Influencing Student Selection of a Collegiate Aviation Program
لقاء تعريفي بنظام تقييم مخرجات تعلم البرنامج
How does the Branding fit into ECC Excels???
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
2018 National Policy Summit “Addressing the Adult Learner” Lou Guthrie
Bring the GWP to Your School
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD
Assessment Leadership Day Continuous Program Improvement
Standard Four Program Impact
Data Discussion: What do you want to know? Exploring Data at Mid.
Anne Young Director Planning, Quality and Reporting Kevin McConkey
What to do with your data?
Program Review Presentation March 17th, 2016
AQIP Accreditation Systems Appraisal 2010
Explore – Engage - Evaluate
2018 UNC System Employee Engagement Survey
Supporting Excellence In Academic Departments
A Guide to the Sharing Information on Progress (SIP)
Technical and Advisory Meeting
The Strategic Impact of Effective Scheduling
Director, National Resource Center for FYE&SIT
Curriculum and Programs
Curriculum and Programs
NEASC Self –Study Appraisal.
Presentation transcript:

AQIP Category Two: Meeting Student and Other key stakeholder needs January 2017 Data Discussion

What is Category Two? Meeting Student and Other Key Stakeholder Needs Processes through which the institution serves its external stakeholders. Separate from instructional programs and internal support services. Determining, understanding, and meeting needs of: Current and prospective students Other key stakeholders, such as: Alumni Community partners

Data needs for Category two Wide ranging category From retention to external partnerships What kind of data should we be looking for? Help us get started . . .

2.1 Current and prospective student need Determining , understanding, and meeting the academic and non- academic needs of current and prospective students. Identify at-risk students and their academic support needs. Deploying academic support Faculty availability Student groups Identifying and supporting student sub-groups (online, veterans, seniors, etc.) Providing non-academic support services Assessing changing student needs

Data for 2.1 Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory Student group numbers and participation LLS usage numbers and success rates Veteran Resource Center data

2.2 Retention, Persistence and Completion The approach to collecting, analyzing and distributing data on RPC to stakeholders for decision making. Collecting data Determining targets Analyzing information Meeting targets Selecting tools, methods, and instruments for assessment

Data for 2.2 Historical retention, persistence, and completion numbers (RPC) Data and benchmarks from similar institutions Enrollment Management Plan

2.3 Key stakeholder needs Determining, understanding and meeting needs of key stakeholder groups, including alumni and community partners. Determining key stakeholder groups (alumni, employers, community, etc.) Determining new stakeholders to target for services or partnership Meeting the changing needs of key stakeholders Selecting the tools, methods and instruments to assess key stakeholder needs Assessing degree to which key stakeholder needs are met

Data for 2.3 Campus Master Plan focus group data Surveys Business Alumni Community Input from employees involved in community

2.4 Complaint Processes Collecting, analyzing and responding to complaints from students or key stakeholder groups. Collecting complaint information from students. Collecting complaint information from other key stakeholders. Learning from complaint information and determining actions. Communicating actions to students and other key stakeholders. Selecting tools, methods and instruments to evaluate complaint resolution.

Data for 2.4 Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Maxient data Academic Services complaint data Community feedback from: Surveys Focus groups Casual interactions

2.5 Building collaborations & partnerships Aligning, building and determining the effectiveness of collaborations and partnerships to further the mission of the institution. Selecting partners for collaboration. Building and maintaining partnerships. Selecting the tools, methods and instruments to assess partnership effectiveness. Evaluating the degree to which collaborations and partnerships are effective.

Data for 2.5 List of existing partnerships Number of partnerships formed in previous years Data on partnership strength Length of partnership Mission rich Mutual goals