National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DRL Induced Glare An Analytical Study of the Effects of Peak Luminous Intensity.
Advertisements

MEETING TC 4-15 “Road Lighting Calculations, Test Data and Measurement” 16 May 2005 / Leon.
CIE and Roadlighting Steve Jenkins Division 4 Representative.
OBTRUSIVE LIGHTING.
Comments on GRE/2012/27 (Lighting & Signalling WG) Headlamp Initial Aiming October 2012 Informal document No. GRE (68th GRE, October 2012,
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Proposal for Amendment to UN Regulation No. 46 (Devices for indirect vision) Proposal for Amendment.
Demonstration of AFS & APL at the 61 st GRE session JAPAN AUTOMOBILE STANDARDS INTERNATIONALIZATION CENTER Demonstration of motorcycle APL (Amber Position.
LED HEADLAMPS DESIGN RESTRICTIVE REQUIREMENT Regulation ECE R48 Document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2015/21. 1 Transmitted by the representative of France Informal.
Analysis of the influence of aiming, on visibility distance and glare Poland 65 GRE, 29 March 2011 Dr EngTomasz Targosinski Informal document No. GRE
AFS Main Beam (Driving Beam) Improvements Presentation to WP th Session November 2008 Informal document No. WP th WP.29, November.
THE SOCIETY OF MOTOR MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS LIMITEDPAGE 1 Poland: comments on OICA comments on GRE/2012/27 Headlamp Initial Aiming and leveling tolerances.
To GRE Comments to GTB draft proposal Tomasz Targosinski Ph. D. Eng Poland 72 GRE October 2014 Transmitted by the expert from Poland Informal.
AP Exam 2006 Open Ended Problem #2 Graphing Calculator Permitted.
19 TH – 20 TH June 2007 GRE IWG Operating Voltage Strategic Plan & Timeline Proposal - Meeting #1 OVIG GRE-OVIG-Working Paper No (1 st.
Traffic Accidents caused by Lane Departure in Japan  Data of Traffic Accidents around Japan Transmitted by the expert from Japan Informal document GRRF
Research on Daytime Running Lamps of 4-wheeled Vehicles Expert from JAPAN Transmitted by the expert from Japan Informal document GRE (74th GRE,
Consideration of PLS testing condition from view point of UN Reg.112 requirement. Material used during the discussion of the revision on PLS requirement.
Explanation of motorcycle AFS Agenda 10(a) The 60 th Session of GRE October 2008 JAPAN AUTOMOBILE STANDARDS INTERNATIONALIZATION CENTER AFS : Adaptive.
Transmitted by the expert from GTB Informal Document No. GRE (64th GRE, 4-7 October 2010, agenda item 5(f)) Proposal for Amendments to Regulations.
1 ALTERNATIVE CO-ORDINATES SYSTEM FOR AFS DRAFT REGULATION Tomasz Targosiński Poland This document is distributed to the Experts on Lighting and Light-Signalling.
Cycle of Vehicle Safety Measures in Japan - Study process before & after rulemaking procedure Issue of safety regulations Enforcement (type approval &
Driver Responsibilities: Adverse Conditions Topic 1 -- Visibility in Adverse Conditions Topic 2 -- Extreme Weather Conditions Topic 3 -- Protecting Occupants.
Status Report about the Investigations to the Test method For the Sun Load Impact Status Report about the Investigations to the Test method For the Sun.
AUTOMATIC HEAD LIGHT PRESENTED BY JAGADEESH CHANDRA BABU K.P
Outcome of 2nd session of the IWG VGL April 04, 2016 in Geneva
Research on Daytime Running Lamps of Motorcycles Expert from JAPAN Transmitted by the expert from Japan Informal document No. GRE (75th GRE, 5-8.
UNECE Regulation 53 DRL auto switch
Transmitted by the expert from India
Simplification of approval markings
Transmitted by the expert from GTB
Evaluation and design of road lighting
Informal document GRB Rev.1
Comments on GRE/2012/27(Lighting & Signalling WG)
Park Jinwoo, Chief Researcher
IIHS headlight ratings
Simplification of Lighting and Light-Signalling Regulations
Informal document No. 9 (50th GRE, 7-11 April 2003, agenda item 3.2.)
Timing to be activated the hazard lights
Analysis of the Polish proposal. GRE2016/18
Sight Distances.
GRE Informal Working Group „Simplification of Regulation“
GRE Informal Working Group „Simplification of Regulation“
SLR IMMA proposal for amendments to informal document GRE rev.1 (79th GRE, April 2018,agenda item 4) In order to clarify the application.
Tomasz Targosinski Ph. D. Eng
Mandatory Application of the Unique Identifier (UI)
SUMMARY OF INITIAL AIMING AND LEVELLING TOLERANCE ISSUE
Additional light source type headlamp
Safety Distance to the front
Additional Explanations to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2016/35
Analysis of the Polish proposal. GRE2016/18
ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2013/57 Alternative aiming/leveling (explanations)
Simplification of the UN Lighting and Light-signalling Regulations
GRE Informal Working Group „Simplification of Regulation“
China Lighting Installation GB XX (1/4 )
Interpretation of 06 series of amendments to Regulation No. 48
SLR Rev.1 GTBWGSL 415 Regulation No. [LSD] – Stage II
Transmitted by the expert from the India
BOX JUSTIFICATION for GRE-81-13
Regulation No. 148 [LSD] – Stage II
Example of cones and signs as traffic control at a roadway incident.
GTB activity report for the 81st GRE session
SLR Light sources in RID.
Walter Schlager, Philipp Plathner 28-June 2019
Walter Schlager, Philipp Plathner 5-July 2019
IMMA proposal for amendments
GTB Substitute Light Sources
List of potential candidate functions for GTRs ( 1/2 )
GRE/2012/27... DRIVERS OPINION POOL
OICA Comments to GRE/2017/17 and GRE/2017/22
Putting Some Reality into the Glare and Visibility Debate
Presentation transcript:

National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory Transmitted by the expert from Japan Informal document No. GRE-76-03 (76th GRE, 25-28 October 2016 agenda item 7 (e)) Analysis of Glare given to oncoming vehicles by Motorcycles DRLs at Night - Based on Actual State of Motorcycles DRLs - 20 June 2016 National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory

Analysis Background * Japan proposed that headlamps of motorcycles equipped with optional daytime running lamps (DRLs) shall automatically be switched ON at night based on “Research on Daytime Running Lamps of Motorcycles (Informal Document No. GRE-75-09)” at the 75th session of GRE. * The following comments were provided for our research by some experts in the last session.   - Installation height of motorcycle DRL is high, compared to the actual state.   - Luminous intensity of motorcycle DRL is high, compared to the actual state. Reevaluate effects concerning the glare at night caused by Motorcycles DRLs suitable for the actual state by numerical analysis.

Analysis Method  A numerical analysis was performed to evaluate effects of motorcycle DRL glare to oncoming vehicle driver, depending on its lighting condition at night.  Model formula of Schmidt-Clausen and Bindels (1), which is often used to calculate De Boer rating scale was used for this analysis.  Glare evaluation rating W = 5.0  2logΣ (E/((1 + (Lh/Cpl)0.5) θ0.46Cpoo) )   (1)    E: Illuminance at driver’s eyes (lx)    Lh: Driver’s adaptation luminance (cd/m2)    θ: Angle between driver’s line of sight and direction of the lamp    Cpl: 4.0 × 10-2 (cd/m2)     Cpoo: 3.0 × 10-3 (lx・min-0.46) If the glare evaluation rating “W” is below 4, it follows that the glare exceeding allowable limit is caused.

Analysis Condition * Sky illuminance: 0lx (Night) * Road luminance: 0.1 cd/m2 (equivalent to the road illumination of urban streets with a little traffic) * Driver’s line of sight: Direction of traveling * Vehicle positions: See the right figure. *Eye-point height of vehicle driver:1.2m *Lamps specifications : as the following table (assuming that vehicles pass each other on a two-way street) DRL Low Beam Number of lamps 2 1 Interval of lamps 40cm Installation height 0.6m to 1.2m 0.87m Maximum luminous intensity 600cd or 1,200cd 9800cd Light distribution patterns Based on UN-R87 Based on UN-R113 In this analysis, “Maximum luminous intensity” and “Installation height” of the motorcycle DRL was varied. The above condition for this numerical analysis was set based on “Research on Daytime Running Lamps of Motorcycles (Informal Document No. GRE-75-09)”.

Glare evaluation ratings Analysis Results Glare evaluation rating of DRL ( DRL central luminous intensity : 1200 cd) Distance (m) Evaluation rating Distance (in the direction of travel) between motorcycle and oncoming vehicle (m) Glare evaluation ratings Imperceptible Tolerable Satisfactory Disturbing Intolerable Installation height 0.6 m Glare ! Installation height of the DRL has little influence on glare evaluation ratings. Figure: Effect of motorcycle DRL on the oncoming vehicle driver at night When DRLs are on at night, glare exceeding the allowable limit (glare evaluation rating < 4) occurs to the oncoming vehicle driver regardless of the DRL installation height.

Glare evaluation ratings Analysis Results Glare evaluation rating of DRL ( DRL central luminous intensity : 600 cd) Evaluation rating Distance (m) Glare evaluation ratings Distance (in the direction of travel) between motorcycle and oncoming vehicle (m) Imperceptible Satisfactory Tolerable Disturbing Intolerable Installation height 0.6 m Glare ! Installation height of the DRL has little influence on glare evaluation ratings. Figure: Effect of motorcycle DRL on the oncoming vehicle driver at night Even when the DRL central luminous intensity is 600 cd, glare exceeding the allowable limit (glare evaluation rating < 4) occurs to the oncoming vehicle driver.

Conclusion Glare exceeding the allowable limit (glare evaluation rating < 4) occurs to the oncoming vehicle driver, even when the motorcycles DRLs is suitable for the actual state. Motorcycles DRLs need to be securely switched to Low Beam at night.