I-77 High-Occupancy Toll Lanes

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Minnesotas Congestion Pricing Program Road User Charging Conference January, 2009 By Bernie Arseneau Minnesota (USA) Department of Transportation.
Advertisements

Managed Lanes Development Strategy Phase I District Four October 17, 2012.
Managed Lanes in Washington State
Getting Started with Congestion Pricing A Workshop for Local Partners Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations.
HOT Lanes on I-77 An imminent calamity Jan 14, 2013.
Kenneth R. Buckeye, AICP Minnesota Department of Transportation.
CFEE Conference March 23 rd, 2007 By: Jim Madaffer State & Local Authority What We Have, and What We Need.
I-15 Managed Lanes: Building on Success And Lessons Learned I-15 Managed Lanes: Building on Success And Lessons Learned.
SR520 Urban Partnership Project 2008 ITS Washington Annual Meeting November 12th, 2008 – Seattle Jennifer Charlebois, P.E. Tolling and Systems Project.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration Department of Transportation Enabling Congestion Pricing in the.
21 st Century Committee Report Recommendations NC 73 Council of Planning Annual Meeting January 22, 2009.
Developing a Regional Express Lane Network Hercules City Council Meeting April 28, 2009 Doug Kimsey MTC Planning Director.
1 1 Providing New Transportation Choices through Transit Prioritization Strategies BRT ON MANAGED LANES or PARK & RIDE on HOV LANES.
MAKING IT HAPPEN. AASHTO Annual Meeting Pittsburgh, PA November 18, 2012 Expanding the Potential of Tolling: A 21st Century Look Federal Tolling Law under.
Less Stop More Go EXPRESS LANES Travel Choices and Strategies to Relieve Congestion Presentation to FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 2008.
Presentation to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit and the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Peggy Catlin, Deputy Executive Director.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Jennifer Tsien, PBS&J Angela Jacobs, Federal Highway Administration.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Mark Burris, Texas Transportation Institute Jessie Yung, Federal Highway Administration.
Feasibility of a Metropolitan Truck-only Toll Lane Network: The Case of Atlanta, Georgia Michael D. Meyer, P.E., Professor School of Civil and Environmental.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
I-680 Value Pricing: A “Smart Carpool “ Lane Demonstration Project June 2004.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
What are Managed Lanes What are Express Lanes What are HOT Lanes Regional Express Lanes Network I-95 Express I-595 Express I-75 Express.
Center on Tolling Research Technology for Managed Lanes Christopher Poe, Ph.D., P.E. Assistant Agency Director Director, Center on Tolling Research Texas.
Urban Partnership Agreement Summary August 27, 2007.
Urban Road Pricing: US DOT Congestion Initiative and Urban Partnerships 14 th World Congress on ITS IBEC Special Session October 10, 2007 Beijing Exhibition.
Soup to Nuts: Changing Operating Parameters for HOV Facilities Sponsored by the HOV Pooled-Fund Study and the Federal Highway Administration.
1 Senate Transportation & Housing Committee December 13, 2005 Orange County Transportation Authority.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
Modeling HOT Lanes TPB’s Approach AMPO Travel Modeling Group March 21, 2006 I:\ateam\meetings_conf\ampo_tms\ \Hot_Lane_Pres_to_AMPO_Final.ppt.
Interstate 95 Corridor Improvement Program June 20, 2012.
High-Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes Recent Developments Planning and Operations Committee September 9, 2005.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to 12 th Annual TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
Regional HOT Lanes Study Preliminary Findings An Informational Hearing of the Senate Transportation and Housing Committee Toll Roads and Managed Lanes.
FAST Lanes Program Transportation and General Government Policy Committee Association of Metropolitan Municipalities August 16, 2004 Minnesota Department.
B A Y A R E A T O L L A U T H O R I T Y 1 Toll Increase Recommendation for the State-owned Bay Area Bridges BATA Oversight Committee January 13, 2010.
MnPASS I-394 High Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes Case Study 7 group: Brendon Slotterback Chris Romansky Feng Xie Gabe Gubash
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
Weighing the Scenarios: The Costs and Benefits of Future Transit Service Produced for MTDB by The Mission Group © 2000 by The Mission Group. 1 Dave Schumacher.
Modeling Various Tolling Schemes Using Emme: Seattle Experience Andrew Natzel, Parsons Brinckerhoff Bhanu Yerra, Parsons Brinckerhoff Craig Helmann, Puget.
Estimating Volumes for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia Prepared for: 2009 Planning Applications Conference Houston, TX May 18, 2009 Prepared by: Kenneth D.
Managed Lanes and Bus Rapid Transit: Emerging New Financing Opportunities ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Ed Regan Senior Vice President.
Minnesota’s Urban Partnership Agreement UPA Timeline The UPA agreement with the US DOT requires that the project be operational by September 30, 2009,
I-680 Value Pricing: A HOT Lane Demonstration Project of “Smart Carpool Lanes” Sponsor: Alameda County Congestion Management Agency 2003 Sponsor: Alameda.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee Overview of RCTC’s Major Projects December 8, 2015.
HOT Lane Discussion Sept 4, CA 91 (LA Area) I-15 (San Diego) Some HOT Lane Examples.
Interstate 95 Managed Lanes PD&E Study (95 Express) Project Development and Environment Study SE FSUTMS Users Group The Corradino Group November 2, 2007.
HOT Lanes on I-77 Widen I-77 March 3, The Purpose of P3 Legislation Source: I-77 Mobility Partners Brief in Favor of Motion to Strike and In Opposition.
IH-10 Managed Lanes Project: A “Public-Public” Partnership ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Presented at the Value Pricing Conference.
Garden State Parkway HOT Lanes By Matt Lawson October 14, 2010.
I-66 OUTSIDE THE BELTWAY Shrevecrest HOA JUNE 21, Susan Shaw, P. E
Using Public-Private Partnerships to Move More People The Story of HOT Lanes in Northern Virginia January 30, 2017 Morteza Farajian, Ph.D.
Evaluation of a New Approach to Address Metropolitan Congestion
Integrating Transit and Highway Solutions In High Volume Corridors
Macro / Meso / Micro Framework on I-395 HOT Lane Conversion
Charlotte Region Fast Lanes Study
Presented by: Fred Kessler Nossaman LLP
Regional Roads Committee
Sully District Council of Citizens Associations January 25, 2017 Susan Shaw, P.E., Megaprojects Director Virginia Department of Transportation.
21st Century Transportation Committee Finance Subcommittee
Nick Wood, P.E. Texas A&M Transportation Institute
Project Status Update I-680 Southbound HOV Gap Closure Project Environmental Phase September 2011 PARSONS.
CDOT North I-25 Express Lanes Update April 28, 2016
HOT Lanes on I-77 Today vs 2010 May 6, 2013.
Orange County Transportation Authority Citizens Advisory Committee
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
I-81 Corridor Improvement Plan
An Easier Commute Coming Soon
by Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Policy
Major Initiatives in Hampton Roads
Presentation transcript:

I-77 High-Occupancy Toll Lanes Presentation to: Regional Roads Committee August 27, 2010

Managed priced lanes giving preference to HOVs. What are HOT Lanes? I-394 Minneapolis Managed priced lanes giving preference to HOVs. Highest HOVs are typically free. Offers unimpeded travel and reliability benefits during peak periods SR 91, Orange County

Why HOT Lanes Are Important Encourage carpools, vanpools and express bus ridership Charge tolls for travel time savings and reliability Use tolls for revenues to reduce outlays for construction and operating costs

Where HOT Lanes Are Located/Being Planned HOV lanes HOT lanes Proposed 6

HOT Lane Tolling Applications Cashless operation Roadside or overhead radio frequency devices, interoperable throughout the East Coast Toll through transponder or license plate

HOT Lane Tolling Applications On-board vehicle identification units in passing vehicles Vehicle ID is combined with other real-time transaction data (current toll rate) and processed against toll account

Existing I-77 HOV Lanes North Carolina’s only HOV facility Opened in December 2004 Restricted to 2+ occupant vehicles Key Points: Operates safely Used by 250-300 vehicles/peak hour Carries 1500 transit riders daily on 74 bus trips

I-77 Feasibility Study Study limits were I-85 to Griffith Street (Exit 30—Davidson) Conducted Feb 2009 to Feb 2010 Feasibility for Converting HOV to HOT and Extending Lane

I-77 North Study Conclusions HOT Extension HOT Conversion HOT Conversion N Convert existing HOV lanes to HOT and extend to Catawba Northbound HOT lane ends ½-mile south of Catawba Outside GP lane drops at Catawba Southbound HOT lane begins between Catawba & Griffith interchanges 9

I-77 North Study Conclusions HOT lanes project length: 18 miles southbound 14 miles northbound No construction along either causeway Provides travel benefits and improves traffic flow until future I-77 widening

I-77 North Study Conclusions Better use of existing HOV lanes More choices for commuters Longer preferential lanes for CATS buses & vanpools/carpools (1500 daily transit riders now) Funds dedicated to enforcement - current HOV violators become customers Acclimates motorists to tolls as traffic management tool and takes advantage of NCDOT toll technology

I-77 North Study Conclusions Operational/Management Rules 24/7 operation (same as current) 2+ and buses free, single occupant pay toll 2-axle trucks & motorcycles pay toll Assumes same turnpike administrative services for HOT lane revenue collection

I-77 North Study Conclusions Typical section 12-ft lanes, 10-ft inside shoulder Designated buffer (4 ft), no physical barriers or pylons Access restricted to designated breaks in double stripe every 2-3 miles (similar to current restriction) Buffer crossing remains a violation 12 ft (2 ft gravel) HOT lane 4 ft Buffer 12 ft General Purpose Lanes 12 ft, 15 ft w/ GR Paved Shoulder 6:1 C L varies 10 ft paved Enforcement Shoulder

Toll Zone Example 12’ 4’ 10’

Project Costs Construction Costs (2009$) HOT Conversion $ 5M HOT Extension to NC-73 3.6 mi $25M NC-73 to Catawba 3.1 mi $20M Total 6.7 mi $50M Annual O&M Costs (beginning in 2013) Fixed Toll O&M $1.2M Variable Tolling O&M $0.8M Toll Road Operating Costs $2.0M

Financial Feasibility Analysis Gross Annual Toll Revenues $4.2 million in 2013 $8.9 million in 2030 Annual Operating & Maintenance Costs $2.0 million in 2013 $3.5 million in 2030 Net Yearly Project Revenues $2.2 million in 2013 $5.4 million in 2030

Potential Funding Toll Revenue Bonds (over 30 years) $22M CMAQ Funds (MUMPO) $ 5M TIGER II Funds (Federal Stimulus) $30M Subtotal $57M Other Funding Possibilities TIFIA Financing of Toll Bonds $ 9M CMAQ Funds (Statewide) $10M

Institutional Issues/Actions State legislative authority exists for NCDOT to toll interstates subject to Federal approval; revenues must be spent on interstate where collected NCDOT is applying for FHWA approval for single-occupant vehicles to use I-77 HOV lanes & HOT lane extension to Cornelius Synergies to implement in conjunction with Monroe Connector/Bypass

Expressions of Support Lake Norman Chamber of Commerce Lake Norman Regional Economic Development Corporation Lake Norman Transportation Commission Lake Norman Rural Planning Organization Town of Huntersville Town of Cornelius Mecklenburg-Union Metropolitan Planning Organization

For More Information: Barry Moose, PE N.C. Department of Transportation (704) 982-0101 bmoose@ncdot.gov Lynn Purnell, PE Parsons Brinckerhoff (704) 342-5405 purnell@pbworld.com