Faculty Retreat on General Education GE Taskforce Presentation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The General Education Program at Westmont
Advertisements

Agenda Why the change? What changed?
What is LEAP? Roundtable Discussions October 19 & 20.
College of Engineering Engineering Education Exploring Engineering Education Heidi Diefes-Dux, ENE Graduate Chair ASEE Student Chapter – November 15, 2005.
Bachelor of Applied Science and the Liberal Arts Core.
Core Curriculum Revision Dr. Don Pratt Associate Professor Biology Chair Core Curriculum Advisory Committee.
Southwest Texas Junior College Core Curriculum Dr. Cheryl Sanchez, Dr. Mark Underwood, Dr. Renee Zimmerman, and Bobby Ayala Southwest Texas Junior College.
A New Model for Our General Education Program A New Model for Our General Education Program Presented by Margaret Owens member of the GE Design Team* for.
Core Competencies Student Focus Group, Nov. 20, 2008.
General Education Reform Through the Lens of Student Success Tony Ciccone Bill Keith Jeff Merrick Dev Venugopalan.
ENGAGING STUDENTS: HIGH IMPACT PRACTICES By Mark Stoner and Vanessa Arnaud.
Integrated Core Proposal Team Members –Emmanuel Eneyo, Ind & Mnfg Engineering –Allison Funk, English Language and Literature –Jo Gibson, Office of the.
Final Recommendations.  A well-constructed curriculum:  Achieves the mission and the learning outcomes adopted by the University community  Is achievable.
NMU Towards the 21 st Century Mitchell Klett Alan Willis Ruth Watry Laura Reissner Gary Brunswick.
James Madison University General Education Program
General Education Framework Directors and Chairs Meeting Wednesday, August 25, 2010.
Essential Elements of a Workable Assessment Plan Pat Tinsley McGill, Ph.D. Professor, Strategic Management College of Business Faculty Lead, Assessment.
Undergraduate Core at Doane March 14, Overview of Undergraduate Core at Doane Philosophy of the Undergraduate Core at Doane (aligned with mission)
 Pressures  Considerations  Charge  Progress & Thinking So Far  Feedback.
April 20,  Explain GE taskforce approach to revision process since Nov 2011 retreat  Share feedback UCCS faculty and students  Present new GE.
A Transferable Core Curriculum at IUPUI Program Review and Assessment Committee April 13, 2012.
The Undergraduate Curriculum at Doane A briefing by the General Education Task Force Gerry Allen, John Burney, Alec Engebretson, Kay Hegler, Adam Hunke.
Draft implementation plan for our new purposes and objectives for General Education. Interim report of the Task Force on General Education and the Faculty.
The Pioneer Core PROGRAM. Mission Statement: “Carroll University provides a superior education, rooted in its Presbyterian and liberal arts heritage,
Susan A. Ambrose Senior Vice Provost, Undergraduate Education & Experiential Learning Professor of Education & History NEASC Annual Meeting & Conference.
AAC&U Members on Recent Trends in General Education Design, Learning Outcomes, and Teaching Approaches Key findings from a survey among 325 Chief Academic.
Cultivating Integrative Teaching and Learning at Fairfield University Dr. Kathryn Nantz Acting Director, Center for Academic Excellence Director of Core.
Core Curriculum Workgroup Presentation to UEAC April 16, 2010.
Coding Connections at the Interface of Algebra I and Physical World Concepts Improving Teacher Quality Grant Program Summer 2016.
8/23/ th ACS National Meeting, Boston, MA POGIL as a model for general education in chemistry Scott E. Van Bramer Widener University.
Critical Information Literacy
Board on Science Education Draft released 15 July 2011
Agenda About Middlebury Middlebury’s Mission Assessment Challenges.
An Introduction to the UCA Core The UCA Experience Explore. Enrich
New York State Learning Standards 2011 (Common Core State Standards)
NATIONAL PROCESS FOR DEVELOPMENT
Report from Curriculum Committee 4/3/2017
General Education Review
Helping Students Connect:
2016 CEEDAR Cross-State Convening
General education reform
AACSB’s Standard 9: Curriculum content
COMPLETE REQUIRED INTERNSHIP
Illinois Learning Standards:
First-Stage Draft Plans for Gen Ed Revision
UF Quest: Faculty Senate Presentation 3
Measuring Course Quality: Development of a Micro-Analysis Tool
General Education Assessment at OSU: Past, Present, and Future
Improving the First Year: Campus Discussion March 30, 2009
21st Century Learning Environments Phase 1 Professional Development
Revision of the General Education Curriculum DGE and Department Heads
Duke Kunshan Welcome and Introduction
General Education Curriculum Redesign
UMKC General Education Revision - Background June 7, 2016
Charge from Provost The UMKC General Education Program 2.0 Task Force is charged with the review and re-design of the University’s General Education Program.
We do not need to reinvent the wheel.
First Year Academic Programs Fall Retreat
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
Randy Beach, South Representative Marie Boyd, Chaffey College
General Education Redesign Task Force
Guided Pathways March 9, 2018 Naomi Castro Director Michelle Simotas
The Heart of Student Success
All-Faculty General Education Meeting Jan. 10, 2019
HART RESEARCH A S O T E C I AAC&U Members On Trends In Learning Outcomes, General Education, and Assessment Key findings from online survey among 433 Chief.
The IDEAs in Action Curriculum
LESSONS FROM THE FIELD: MIDDLE SCHOOL FOUNDATIONS ACADEMY GRANT
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH
Using an Electronic Portfolio to Integrate Learning
Share.Shape.Unite. Building our SSU Sonoma State University Academic Senate May 17, 2018 University Budget Office.
Re-Envisioning the Undergraduate Experience
Presentation transcript:

Faculty Retreat on General Education GE Taskforce Presentation November 18, 2011

Phase I: GE Revision Process Revise General Education Mission and Goals Susan Taylor, LAS and Steve Tragesser, ENG Taskforce work and campus dialogue: fall 2009 to fall 2010 Nov 2010: UCCS campus-wide faculty vote approving revised GE Goals (93% approval)

UCCS General Education Goals Vision: General education at UCCS prepares students for success in their majors, professional pursuits, and lives as creative, thoughtful, informed, and engaged members of our diverse, global society. The goals of our general education program focus on three interrelated areas of learning, all of which are essential to an undergraduate education. Through the general education curriculum, students will develop competencies in each area and the ability to integrate these competencies as a foundation for lifelong learning. Evaluate and Create Know and Explore Act and Interact

Phase II: GE Revision Process Christina Jiménez, LAS and Jeff Ferguson, COB Taskforce work began in March 2011, continued through summer and fall 2011 Our charge: to design a structure to implement the faculty-approved GE Goals and a structure of faculty governance for the university-wide general education curriculum

GE Committee Members Chris Bell Sue Byerley Tom Christensen Jenny Dorrington Julaine Field Traci Freeman Lea Gaydos Peter Gorder David Havlick Katie Kaukinen Sherry Moreale Nina Polok Steve Tragesser Kee Warner David Weiss Glen Whitehead Regina Winters

Our goal for today: to get faculty ideas and input Overview of the current GE structure Present preliminary ideas from our committee work No proposal at this point Need faculty ideas, feedback, and input First of many opportunities to dialogue with the faculty about our GE program

Where did we start? Studied our current GE curricula Read the research about effective General Education programs Assessed the strengths and challenges of our current GE curricula

Strengths of our current GE curricula Breadth Strong disciplinary-based course offerings University-wide writing programs Plenty of flexibility for students to choose

Challenges of our current GE curricula Lack of coherence: a list of courses to “get through” Lack of integration Lack of intentionality Transferability of skills from GE course work to a student’s major Ineffective communication about our GE vision to faculty and students

Our key GE challenge to create Intentionality Vision Coherence Integration

What does the research show? AAC&U’s (American Association of Colleges and Universities) LEAP (Liberal Education, America’s Promise) Initiative High-Impact Educational Practices Research report: (http://www.aacu.org/leap/hip.cfm)

High impact practices What is UCCS already doing? How can we build on existing practices? What are other practices to consider?

High impact practices for consideration in UCCS GE program First-Year Seminars and Experiences Capstone Courses and Projects Common Intellectual Experiences --- Core Course --- Themes connecting courses Possible “components”

Some insights: Consider courses and course content, but also the intentional connections made between courses Several “means” exist to get us to our identified “end”

Our current GE curricula at UCCS Varies by college UCCS does not have a university-wide GE curriculum

= current total credit hours in UCCS college-based GE curricula (some examples) Nursing Elementary Education 53-54 cr. LAS Criminal Justice 49 cr. 45-49 cr. Business 48 cr. Engineering 37 cr. 31 cr.

Current Engineering BS GE Curriculum 31 Credits English 1310 portfolio PES 1110 PES 1120 Up to 4 added cr. in Natural Science 2nd Writing Course ENG 2090 3 cr. Hum or Soc. Sci. MATH 1350 Quantitative Reasoning MATH 1360 2nd Quantitative Reasoning

Current LAS Humanities BA GE Curriculum 45 Credits 3 cr. in Natural Sci. 3 cr. in Humanities HUM 3990 3 cr. in Social Sci. portfolio 1 hr. Lab English 1310 2nd Writing Course ENG 1410 Oral Diversity Quantitative Reasoning ID 105 or 200 Global

= existing common GE requirements across the colleges totals 22 credits Nursing Elementary Education 53-54 LAS Criminal Justice 49 45-49 Business 48 Engineering 37 31

Existing common GE requirements across the colleges (22 credit hours) portfolio English 1310 4 cr. Natural Sci. 3 cr. Hum or Soc. Sci. 2nd Writing Course Quantitative Reasoning

= existing common GE requirements across colleges = remaining GE credit hours to be decided by each college = possible additional GE requirements across colleges Nursing Elementary Education 53-54 LAS Criminal Justice 49 45-49 Business 48 Engineering 37 31

High impact practice: first-year experience Gateway Experience: Introduces students to GE vision and goals Explores knowledge of self and the world around us Introduces new perspectives in learning and understanding 1st Year Gateway Experience

High impact practice: capstone experience 4th Year High impact practice: capstone experience Capstone Experience: Requires students to integrate and apply what they have learned Could be a research project, internship, performance, exhibit, or other experience, not necessarily a course Can link GE Goals to major

Capstone Experience 4th Year ? 1st Year Gateway Experience

Capstone Experience Gateway Experience

High impact practice: common intellectual experience Core Integrative Course: Study complex problems from multiple perspectives Learn tools of analysis from multiple disciplines Provide cohesive, intentional linkages to GE goals Core Integrative Course 2nd Year 1st Year Gateway Experience

Gateway Experience Core Integrative Course 3rd Year 2nd Year 1st Year Gateway Experience

Capstone Experience Gateway Experience 4th Year Core Integrative Course 3rd Year Core Integrative Course 2nd Year 1st Year Gateway Experience

College of Letters, Arts, and Sciences’ Distributed List for Area Requirements Natural Sciences Arts or Humanities Social Sciences

“Structured List” of courses for university-wide GE curriculum Natural Sciences Arts or Humanities Social Sciences

the Structured List? One idea How should we organize the Structured List? One idea Know & Explore Act & Interact Create & Evaluate

How should we organize the Structured List? Another Idea Responsibility Engagement Inclusiveness Sustainability

Themes within the Structured List Provide coherence as a common intellectual experience, a high impact practice More clearly show the vision of GE Provide the experience of addressing complex problems using frameworks and methodologies from several disciplines Achieve GE goals in an integrated way

Themes within Structured List Natural Sciences Arts or Humanities Social Sciences Natural Sciences Arts or Humanities Social Sciences Natural Sciences Arts or Humanities Social Sciences Natural Sciences Arts or Humanities Social Sciences Natural Sciences Arts or Humanities Social Sciences Natural Sciences Arts or Humanities Social Sciences Self & Society Gateway Experience

Themes within Structured List Create & Evaluate Know & Explore Act & Interact Create & Evaluate Know & Explore Act & Interact Create & Evaluate Know & Explore Act & Interact Create & Evaluate Know & Explore Act & Interact Create & Evaluate Know & Explore Act & Interact Create & Evaluate Know & Explore Act & Interact Creativity, Art & Innovation Gateway Experience

Themes within Structured List Responsibility Engagement Inclusiveness Sustainability Responsibility Engagement Inclusiveness Sustainability Responsibility Engagement Inclusiveness Sustainability Responsibility Engagement Inclusiveness Sustainability Responsibility Engagement Inclusiveness Sustainability Responsibility Engagement Inclusiveness Sustainability Power Gateway Experience

Existing Common Courses Quantitative Reasoning English 1310 2nd Writing Increase connection to GE Goals? Other ways to increase coherence and intentionality? Participate in themes? Include high impact practice?

Combination of possible components Natural Sciences 3rd Year Arts or Humanities 2nd Year Social Sciences English 1310 2nd Writing Course Quantitative Reasoning portfolio

? ? Social Sciences Social Sciences Sustainability Arts or Humanities English 1310 ? Social Sciences Social Sciences Sustainability Arts or Humanities Social Sciences Natural Sciences 2nd Year 3rd Year Arts or Humanities portfolio Act & Interact ? Natural Sciences Natural Sciences Know & Explore 2nd English Course Arts or Humanities Quantitative Reasoning Inclusiveness

FACULTY CONVERSATION TABLES Discuss possible components with other faculty at your table Provide focused feedback based on group conversations using the “component cards” Also complete your individual feedback form

Where: The Overlook “Nook” COME HAVE A COFFEE BREAK with members of the GE taskforce. Share ideas, ask questions, voice concerns. Wed, Dec 7, 2-4pm Thurs, Dec 8, 2-4pm Fri, Dec 9, 2-4pm Where: The Overlook “Nook” Coffee provided by Provost’s Office. PLEASE COMPLETE THE INDIVIDUAL FEEDBACK FORMS. WE WANT TO HEAR YOUR IDEAS, QUESTIONS, AND CONCERNS.