Challenges in University Technology Transfer in Russia

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Patents Systems and Knowledge Policies Dominique Guellec Chief economist - EPO National Academy – January 2005 Advancing Knowledge and the Knowledge.
Advertisements

May ICSTI Conference Alexandria-Egypt Amir Wassef Egyptian Industry and Academic Research An Industry Perspective By Amir Wassef.
CENTRAL OCTOBER 2012 EXPERTS MANAGEMENT KNOWLEDGE EUROPEAN IN.
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
Intellectual Property Rights Regulations in Russia: Case of Government-Supported R&D Irina Dezhina Leading Researcher, Ph.D. Institute for the Economy.
Division of Research & Economic Development Report to the URI Faculty Senate April 19, 2012 Peter Alfonso, Ph.D. Vice President for Research & Economic.
1 Fiscal Federalism in Iraq: OIL and GAS. The oil situation: a snapshot.
23 rd November 2011 MCST Conference: Amplifying the Competitiveness of Manufacturing in Malta Industry’s views of Research for Competitiveness Ing. Ray.
Universities and Patents From Open Science to Open Innovation Gilles Capart Chairman of ProTon Europe.
Iberian Universities technology transfer conference Technology Licensing SMBR and Walkinsense 29th November 2010, Ayamonte.
Technology Transfer and Industry Sponsored Research Challenges Prepared for Karina Edmonds May 27, 2010 Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Management.
1 Trade Facilitation A narrow sense –A reduction/streamlining of the logistics of moving goods through ports or the documentation requirements at a customs.
MIIE activities are supported by a grant from the C.S. Mott Foundation. 1 Michigan Initiative for Innovation and Entrepreneurship (MIIE) Pilot Program.
Main Legal Aspects of the Choice of TTO Model N.Romanova Saratov State University named after N.G.Chernyshevsky.
Vilnius Lithuania BSc.: Biochemistry Neuropsychology J.D.: University of Oregon LL.M.:University College London Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Universities and Governments: The Commercialization & Innovation Agenda Sitting Beside the Elephant –AUTM Metrics and Performance Anxiety AUCC and Federal.
THE ROLE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN PROTECTING TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE The Philippine Experience Presented by: Marga C. Domingo-Morales Senior Policy.
Center for Organic Photonics and Electronics Thoughts on Tech Transfer, Patents, and Export Control Seth R. Marder School of Chemistry and Biochemistry.
Management of Intellectual Property at Iowa State University Contributing to Economic Development Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State.
B284 ENTREPRENEURSHIP Unit 2 Notes. Entrepreneurship Today  Knowledge of economics contributes to an understanding of how entrepreneurs and customers.
Joanna Nyga Magdalena Maciejska-Szlaps Patent Office of the Republic of Poland Rome, October 2010 New and improved activities of supporting SMEs – efficient.
New movement for innovation :technology transfer Science and Technology Policy in Japan Masahiro HASHIMOTO Japan External Trade Organization.
1 Promoting Science and Research for developing Innovations and Entrepreneurs OGADA Tom WIPO National Roving Workshops on Intellectual Property Strategy,
1 National innovation systems Sub-regional seminar on the commercialization and enforcement of intellectual property rights Skopje, Macedonia April.
PUBLIC R&D POLICY IN RUSSIA Restructuring Government S&T Institutions Tatiana Kuznetsova STATE UNIVERSITY – HIGHER SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS Institute for Statistical.
YOUR RELIABLE PARTNER. “Taxation of intellectual property, research & development in Russian Federation”
Organizing a Technology Licensing Office (TLO) Jon Sandelin Senior Associate Emeritus
Technology Foundation STW Funding agency Finance research at universities and some selected knowledge institutes Applied sciences in NL 2/17 Nereda ®
April 2003Takuji Hara, Kobe University 1 Roles of Technology Licensing Organizations (TLOs) in the Commercialization of Life Sciences ~ Japan ’ s Situation.
IP Audit Prelude to IP Strategy June, 2005 Maputo, Mozambique Intellectual Property and New Technologies Division.
Identifying the Impacts of Technology Transfer Beyond Commercialization FPTT National Meeting, June 12, 2007.
Anvar Ibragimov International Conference ‘EastLink: the way to knowledge economy’. October 20-21, 2010, Lithuania, Klaipeda Technology Transfer Agency.
Knowledge Transfer Accelerating Innovation. slide 1 The Knowledge Transfer Group at the HR Induction Program (session II) 2 nd of December 2014 Giovanni.
Financing Innovation March 25, 2004 Knowledge Economy Forum III Budapest, Hungary NATIONAL INNOVATION FUND KAZAKHSTAN.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
1 Innovation Nation UK Government White Paper on Science and Innovation David Evans Director for Innovation.
Technology transfer – The Hungarian experience Legal background Innovation Act: - Public R&D institutions are required to establish IP policy - IP created.
Intellectual Property as Integral Part of S&T Strategy Dr. Nadya Reingand Patent Hatchery LLC Washington DC, USA © Nadya Reingand.
Federal state-funded institution of higher professional education “Russian State Academy of Intellectual Property” (RSAIP) Federal Service for Intellectual.
Here or There? A Survey on the Factors in Multinational R&D Location and IP Protection Jerry Thursby Goodrich C. White Professor & Chair, Department of.
BioMedical Cluster New opportunities for innovators and investors with Bio-Medical Cluster of Skolkovo Foundation Innovation in Medical Technologies Conference,
Competition and Intellectual Property Protection in the Pharmaceutical Sector Alexey Ivanov Director, HSE-Skolkovo Institute for Law and Development Director,
2016/6/24 All rights Reserved. Copyright (c) 2008 The University of Tokyo University Corporate Relations, Intellectual Property Management and Technology.
1 INTERNATIONAL LEVEL STRATEGY WHY FIRMS GO INTERNATIONAL?? 1.DOMESTIC MARKET SATURATION Oversupply and excess capacity Indigenous Demand Slackening Declining.
iHEA 9th World Congress Sydney, July 8, 2013
Design of foresight-based evaluation in Tekes Activities
Innovation Development Strategy
IP-INITIAL® द्वारा प्रस्तुत IP-INITIAL®
What can we expect from the lawyers ?
Massachusetts Clean Energy Center Budget Overview
Intellectual Property 101
Globalization and International Business
Iyad Alzaharnah, PhD – Director Innovation Center
— Creative india, innovative indiA
Towards a roadmap for collaborative R&D
Electron Government Education and Training Center,
Gilbert Nicolaon Kiev June 10, 2008
Globalization and International Business
Networking: Engineering, Mathematics and Statistics
Optimizing Your Regulatory Compliance Program
Economics EOC Review Part 2.
Intellectual Property 101
Welcome to IST e-Lab Entrepreneurship Lab, 3rd Session, 06 November 2017.
Partnering with Business and Industry
Jakob Wested and Helen Yu and Timo Minssen
COMMERCILIZATION ISSUES AND CHALLANGES
University patenting and possible measures to increase patenting
Managing Human Resources Globally
What can we expect from the lawyers ?
Prof. Kiran Kalia, Director NIPER Ahmedabad
Presentation transcript:

Challenges in University Technology Transfer in Russia 6th International Conference on “Managing Intellectual Property Rights in Universities” Ilia Dubinsky, PhD Challenges in University Technology Transfer in Russia

Despite substantial decline, Russian science and engineering are still capable of producing highest quality R&D results However, this does not translate into strong economic performance in technologically advanced industries Deficiencies in tech transfer system contribute to this situation Deficiencies in legal system Lack of incentives for the researchers Lack of tech transfer expertise and resources at vast majority of universities University leadership not interested in tech transfer State ownership of R&D results Heavy state control of the use of IP developed at universities Good news – Russian university tech transfer is developing, new laws and regulations are enacted Skolkovo Institute of Sc. and Tech.(Skoltech) – successful pilot of a univ. tech transfer

Disproportionately small economic return on a substantial research effort… Total amount of grants and contracts in support of R&D in Russia in 2007- 2016 has been 2.25 Trillion rubles (approx. $35B). 35766 patents have been filed However, only 68 transactions involving this IP have been done (less than 0.2%) and their materiality is questionable

Challenges in university tech transfer in Russia (I) Deficiencies in legal system, e.g., No instruments to license IP quickly (e.g., no way to license IP before the patent is granted, no provisional patents, etc.) Lack of incentives for the researchers No link between the commercialization/tech transfer outcome and researcher’s compensation Lack of tech transfer expertise and resources at vast majority of universities In majority of the universities there is no “western-style” tech transfer, only a patent-filing office. Very limited budget. Wrong goals, incentives, skills… Custom of “funding in exchange for IP ownership”, supported by state laws and practices

Challenges in university tech transfer in Russia (II) Heavy state control of the use of IP developed at universities IP ownership by the state – in case of state R&D sponsorship. Recent positive changes – research org. can take ownership of the developed IP State ownership of research institutions is still a major challenge. State fiscal and budget committees oversee how the institutions deal with their properties and may press criminal charges for “incorrect” handling of IP As a consequence, university leadership is not interested in tech transfer State ownership and control increase costs, complexity Risks and decrease positive payback

In recent years university tech transfer has been undergoing positive changes Legal changes recently are taking place Universities can take ownership of IP developed in contract research projects Universities can grant exclusive IP license or sell IP to a company, in which the university maintains a particular (state-defined) share Still, for state-owned universities (absolute majority) state oversight makes tech transfer difficult Several universities have made development of world-class tech transfer a goal Skoltech, ITMO… Skoltech has been at the front, leading and championing the change, transferring the knowledge, skills and practices Skoltech KTO has been set and trained by MIT TLO (special gratitude to Chris Noble) KTO it the center of all legal deals of the University, helped develop clear IP policies) First in Russia cross-border IP licensing deals

University tech transfer in Russia is in transition… Tech transfer from research organizations is a necessary element of innovation-based economy Today in Russia tech transfer does not support growth of economy Recent positive changes in legal laws and regulations and emergence of institutions interested in development of tech transfer make us believe the situation will change in near future First international licenses (Skoltech) and sales of university-owned shares in startups (ITMO) are the first harbingers of change State authorities appear to be genuinely interested in learning and spreading best practices in tech transfer to a broad list of organizations. Skoltech is an admitted leader