RPC – status / results Blanco On behalf of HADES RPC Group

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 AHCAL answers IDAG Erika Garutti On behalf of AHCAL analysis team.
Advertisements

Bulk Micromegas Our Micromegas detectors are fabricated using the Bulk technology The fabrication consists in the lamination of a steel woven mesh and.
Frank Geurts Rice University.  Time-of-Flight in STAR ◦ start & stop detectors in Run 9  Time-of-Flight Calibration ◦ upVPD ◦ Barrel TOF ◦ preliminary.
DAQ WS03 Sept 2006Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 DDAQ Trigger o Reminder: DAQ Trigger vs Particle Trigger o DAQ Trigger o Particle Trigger 1) Possible.
2011 HV scan SF6 flow-meter accident 2011 Results comparison RPC HV efficiency scan Pigi Paolucci on behalf of RPC collaboration.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Monitoring & Data Quality Jessica Levêque Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter.
1 RPCs - where do we stand? HARP Collaboration meeting, 7 July 2003 Jörg Wotschack.
HADES coll. meeting, Oct. 31, 2007 Charged pion production in C+C at 1 and 2 A GeV results of data analysis from experiments NOV02 and AUG04 Jehad Mousa.
(Santiago de Compostela-Spain)
Frank Geurts Rice University.  Time-of-Flight in STAR ◦ start & stop detectors in Run 9  Time-of-Flight Calibration ◦ upVPD ◦ barrel TOF ◦ preliminary.
On behalf of joint ITEP / IHEP team: A. Arefiev, N. Filimonov, T. Kvaratskheliya, I. Machikhiliyan, P. Shatalov, T. Zakoryuchkina, A. Zhokhov, S. Zvyagintsev.
The 21st International Conference on Ultrarelativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions, March 30 – April 4, Knoxville, TN Results from cosmics and First LHC.
D0 Status: 01/14-01/28 u Integrated luminosity s delivered luminosity –week of 01/ pb-1 –week of 01/ pb-1 –luminosity to tape: 40% s major.
Time of Flight Detectors at RHIC Time of Flight Measurements at RHIC  TOF detector as a PID devices  PHENIX-TOF and BRAHMS-TOF PHENIX Time-of-Flight.
Hadron production in C+C at 1 and 2 A GeV analysis of data from experiments NOV02 and AUG04 for high resolution tracking (Runge-Kutta tracks) Pavel Tlustý,
PSD upgrade: concept and plans - Why the PSD upgrade is necessary? - Concept and status of the PSD temperature control - Concept of the PSD analog part.
Sensor testing and validation plans for Phase-1 and Ultimate IPHC_HFT 06/15/ LG1.
J.RItman PANDA Collab. Meeting, May 2003 Status of the PANDA Simulations Event Generator UrQMD p A MVD Resolution Time of Flight Estimates of Data Rates.
Radioactive source and cosmic-ray test for the MWPC Davide Pinci on behalf of the Frascati-Roma1 MWPC group.
Status of the PSD upgrade - Problems with PSD in Be runs - Modification of cooling system - New temperature control - Upgrade of HV control system - MAPD.
Systematics on ScECAL 1 st prototype DESY Apr , CALICE Satoru Uozumi for the CALICE collaboration NIM A, 763 (2014) 278.
TEL62 AND TDCB UPDATE JACOPO PINZINO ROBERTO PIANDANI CERN ON BEHALF OF PISA GROUP 14/10/2015.
CGEM-IT project and beam test program G. Felici for the FE-LNF-TO team Partially supported by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs under the Program.
New RPC Front-End Electronics for HADES
1 HBD Commissioning Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, BNL December 13, 2006 Progress from October 3 to November 28, 2006.
PSD upgrade: concept and plans - Why the PSD upgrade is necessary? - Concept of the PSD temperature stabilization and control - Upgrade of HV control system.
Elliptic flow of D mesons Francesco Prino for the D2H physics analysis group PWG3, April 12 th 2010.
Daniel Belver IX Workshop on RPC and Related Detectors, Mumbai February 13-16th 2008 Performances of the Front End Electronics for the HADES RPC wall in.
14/02/2008 Michele Bianco 1 G.Chiodini & E.Gorini ATLAS RPC certification with cosmic rays Università del Salento Facoltà di Scienze MM.FF.NN.
1 Projectile Spectator Detector: Status and Plans A.Ivashkin (INR, Moscow) PSD performance in Be run. Problems and drawbacks. Future steps.
J.Pietraszko, HADES Coll. Meeting, GSI Nov ,  – electron multiplicity measured in HADES W. Koenig, Jerzy Pietraszko, T. Galatyuk, V. Pechenov,
Daniel Belver VIII Workshop on RPC and Related Detectors, Seoul October 10th 2005 The Front End Electronics for the HADES RPC wall (ESTRELA-FEE) Daniel.
Beam detectors in Au+Au run and future developments - Results of Aug 2012 Au+Au test – radiation damage - scCVD diamond detector with strip metalization.
June 4, 2009 STAR TPC review Estimation of TPC Aging Based on dE/dx Measurements Yuri Fisyak.
January 2009 offline detector review - 2 nd go 1 ● Offline – Geometry – Material budget – Simulation – Raw data – OCDB parameters – Reconstruction ● Calibration.
First collisions in LHC
Time-zero evaluation using TOF, T0 and vertex detectors
Michele Faucci Giannelli
SiPM linearization status update
eTOF - status and plan CBM-STAR joint Workshop Outline Introduction
April12 DST calibration status
Detector status and commissioning: LUCID
Status of BESIII and upgrade of BESIII
Performance of the HADES-TOF RPC wall in a Au-Au beam
Beam detectors performance during the Au+Au runs in HADES
The High Voltage problem
Results achieved so far to improve the RPC rate capability
Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Geneva
Future Physics at HERMES
Vertical Slice Test Data
IFR Status Summary W. Baldini on behalf of the IFR Group
Update on Noise Analysis of the DHCal Test Beam at Fermilab
PSD Front-End-Electronics A.Ivashkin, V.Marin (INR, Moscow)
Tracking results from Au+Au test Beam
CMS muon detectors and muon system performance
The Beam Test at Fermilab:
SuperB LNF meeting March 21st 2012 Marcello Piccolo
Noise analysis of the 1m3 DHCal test beam
TPC status - Offline Q&A
Barrel RPC Conditions Database
ScECAL+AHCAL+TCMT Combined Beam FNAL
Status of n-XYTER read-out chain at GSI
BESIII RPC Detector Jiawen Zhang
Participation in the HADES experiment
2003 test beam with 25 ns bunched muons
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
Particle ID Diagnostics in the MICE Beamline
Resistive Plate Chambers performance with Cosmic Rays
Status Report and highlights from workshop II
Presentation transcript:

RPC – status / results Blanco On behalf of HADES RPC Group GSI D. Gonzalez W. Koenig LIP A. Blanco N. Carolino O. Cunha P. Fonte L. Lopes A. Mangiarotti A. Pereira C. Silva C.C. Sousa USC D. Belver P. Cabanelas E. Castro J.A. Garzón G. Kornakov M. Zapata IFIC-Valencia J. Diaz A. Gil In this presentation: hardware notation S1, S2, S3 ,S4, S5, S6

Outlook . . Hardware status Integration status . . Outlook Hardware status Integration status Intrinsic RPC performance Calibration status

Hardware status on Aug11 and today . . Hardware status on Aug11 and today Run for the entire beam time without major problems In S4 all channels in the high polar angle (row >~ 22) in the front part show an strange behavior. They count less in the right side. Most probably correlated with a problem in the low voltage PS (more in next slides).

Hardware status on Aug11 and today . . Hardware status on Aug11 and today Strange behavior. Count less in the right side. May be correlated with LV PS. S4

Hardware status on Aug11 and today . . Hardware status on Aug11 and today Run for the entire beam time without major problems In S4 all channels in the high polar angle (row >~ 22) in the front part show an strange behavior. They count less in the right side. Most probably correlated with a problem in the low voltage PS (more in next slides). Some FEE problems spread over all sectors. Charge measurement is not working in one side (still useful cell). Solvable, replace FEE S1-FR4-R, S3-FC19-R, S3-FC28-R, S4-BC5-R, S4-FR21-R, S4-BR4-R

Hardware status on Aug11 and today . . Hardware status on Aug11 and today Run for the entire beam time without major problems In S4 all channels in the high polar angle (row >~ 22) in the front part show an strange behavior. They count less in the right side. Most probably correlated with a problem in the low voltage PS (more in next slides). Some FEE problems spread over all sectors. Charge measurement is not working in one side (still useful cell). Solvable, replace FEE S1-FR4-R, S3-FC19-R, S3-FC28-R, S4-BC5-R, S4-FR21-R, S4-BR4-R Dead channels. Only solvable with a major intervention. Not foreseen. S4-BL1 disconnected on purpose due to high percentage of streamers. S6-BR5-R disconnected during transport from Coimbra. Still useful for trigger.

Hardware status on Aug11 and today . . Hardware status on Aug11 and today Run for the entire beam time without major problems In S4 all channels in the high polar angle (row >~ 22) in the front part show an strange behavior. They count less in the right side. Most probably correlated with a problem in the low voltage PS (more in next slides). Some FEE problems spread over all sectors. Charge measurement is not working in one side (still useful cell). Solvable, replace FEE S1-FR4-R, S3-FC19-R, S3-FC28-R, S4-BC5-R, S4-FR21-R, S4-BR4-R Dead channels. Only solvable with a major intervention. Not foreseen. S4-BL1 disconnected on purpose due to high percentage of streamers. S6-BR5-R disconnected during transport from Coimbra. Still useful for trigger. Problems with trigger signal in some MBs, which in some sectors is not counting correctly for M1 multiplicity, not affecting high multiplicity triggers. To be check. Solvable, replace MB when necessary.

Hardware status on Aug11 and today . . Hardware status on Aug11 and today M1 multiplicity, S2 Present in S1 & S2 FL BL FC BC FR BR Rate (Hz/cm2) Second MB in back layer ROW

Hardware status on Aug11 and today . . Hardware status on Aug11 and today Low Voltage PS S4 & S2 should be replaced, hardware failure. This happened after beam Time. Although also happened before. To be studied. Solvable, replace PS.

Hardware status on Aug11 and today . . Hardware status on Aug11 and today Anomalous increase of Current & Voltage drop => Permanent failure of LV PS S2, S4. To be understood Voltage Current

Hardware status on Aug11 and today . . Hardware status on Aug11 and today Gas leaks Input Output Diference Flow (cc/min) Time (h)

Hardware status on Aug11 and today . . Hardware status on Aug11 and today Gas leaks Input Output Diference Before After Flow (cc/min) S4 leak reparation Time (h)

Hardware status on Aug11 and today . . Hardware status on Aug11 and today Gas leaks Input Output Diference S1 & S5 leak ~7 cc/min Flow (cc/min) Time (h)

Hardware status on Aug11 and today . . Hardware status on Aug11 and today All these problems will be checked and repaired in January 2012

Integration status . . Basically finished . . Integration status Basically finished Only small details are still missed in the SC, (GUI FEE th, integration of MB temperature sensors and MB trigger signal rates.) Integration of the reference chambers for gas monitoring purposes. 7 small RPCs/sector for monitoring purposes Readout by the same system Signal multiplexer already included in the RPC sector

Intrinsic RPC performance from Aug11 data . . Intrinsic RPC performance from Aug11 data Analysis. No cuts, full multiplicity from raw data. Day 230. Aug11 (Au+Au)@1.1AGeV Overlapped cells t1 t’1 t2 t’2 Time difference T = (t1+t2)/2 – (t’1+t’2)/2 Time resolution σ t= σ(T)/√2 Position difference X = Vprop/2 [(t1-t2)/2 – (t’1-t’2)/2] = Vprop/2[X1-X2] Longitudinal position resolution σ x= σ(X)/√2

Intrinsic RPC performance from Aug11 data . . Intrinsic RPC performance from Aug11 data Position and charge information used to correct time 5 Corrected < σ t> = 111 ps < σ t> = 104 ps No corrected 2.5 ΔT (ns) -0.5 -5 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 1.5 X1 position (ns) X1 position (ns) Corrected No corrected < σ t> = 74 ps 1 0.5 0.5 ΔT (ns) -0.5 -1 Q1 (A.U) Q1 (A.U)

Intrinsic RPC performance from Aug11 data . . Intrinsic RPC performance from Aug11 data Time resolution Two possible overlaps/cell Overlap n->n Overlap n->n+1 σ t (ps) S4 cosmic test @ GSI, one single column showing the 2 possible overlaps Row number Systematic degradation of time resolution for n-n overlap under Row 14, Physical?!?, further investigation needed. σ t (ps) Overlap n->n Overlap n->n+1 S4 Nov10 data and Aug 11, one single column showing the 2 possible overlaps Row number In the following only n->n+1 overlap is shown

Intrinsic RPC performance from Aug11 data . . Intrinsic RPC performance from Aug11 data Time resolution (n->n+1) < σ t Global> = 80 ps < σ t> All channels have a resolution well below 100 ps S1 81 ps S2 80 ps S3 80 ps σ t (ps) S4 79 ps S5 82 ps S6 78 ps Row number

Intrinsic RPC performance from Aug11 data . . Intrinsic RPC performance from Aug11 data Spatial resolution < σ x Global> = 8.9 mm < σ x> S1 8.7 mm 8.9 mm S2 S3 9.1 mm σ x (mm) S4 8.8 mm S5 8.1 mm S6 8.6 mm Row number

(Typical gain in timing resolution ~ 10-15 ps σ) . . Calibration. Status INL correction (fundamental for good timing). OK Calibration of position (inside the cell) and charge. OK Charge correction. OK (although it needs fine tuning) (Typical gain in timing resolution ~ 10-15 ps σ) Time (ns) Time (ns) Parameter Containers Charge (fC) Charge (fC)

Calibration . . INL correction (fundamental for good timing). OK . . Calibration INL correction (fundamental for good timing). OK Calibration of position (inside the cell) and charge. OK Charge correction. OK (although it needs fine tuning) Time calibration (offset of individual cells). Calibration with protons. OK

Calibration. TOF calibration with protons . . Calibration. TOF calibration with protons To avoid some side effects of the previous ±π calibration (low statistics or lack of π´s in some regions), a new proton-calibration was written, as protons covers almost all the detector surface with high statistics.

Raw <TOF> positioned around 8 ns . . Calibration. TOF calibration with protons To avoid some side effects of the previous ±π calibration (low statistics or lack of π´s in some regions), a new proton-calibration was written, as protons covers almost all the detector surface with high statistics. Raw <TOF> positioned around 8 ns S2 BC Raw calibrated TOF from RPC <TOF> (ns) Row number <TOF> (ns)

*assuming all particles protons. . . Calibration. TOF calibration with protons To avoid some side effects of the previous ±π calibration (low statistics or lack of π´s in some regions), a new proton-calibration was written, as protons covers almost all the detector surface with high statistics. Raw calibrated TOF from RPC ToF Calibration constant Momentum (p) and path length (L) from R-K Momentum cut at 0.9 GeV (avoid Mult.Scat) TOF* = L/v = =L*mp/p *assuming all particles protons.

TOFmeasured- TOFestimated for one RPC cell . . Calibration. TOF calibration with protons To avoid some side effects of the previous ±π calibration (low statistics or lack of π in some regions), a new proton-calibration was written, as protons covers all the detector surface with high statistics. Peak due protons Calibration constant Failed mass hypothesis TOFmeasured- TOFestimated for one RPC cell

Calibration. TOF calibration with protons . . Calibration. TOF calibration with protons To avoid some side effects of the previous ±π calibration (low statistics or lack of π´s in some regions), a new proton-calibration was written, as protons covers almost all the detector surface with high statistics. <TOF> after calibration S1 BC Raw calibrated TOF from RPC ToF Calibration constant Momentum (p) and path length (L) from R-K Momentum cut at 0.9 GeV (avoid Mult.Scat) TOF* = L/v = =L*mp/p *supposing all particles protons. <TOF> (ns) Row number

Calibration. TOF calibration with protons . . Calibration. TOF calibration with protons Full PID plot

Calibration. TOF calibration with protons . . Calibration. TOF calibration with protons Full PID plot

Full sector system timing resolution at a level of 170 ps σ . . Calibration. TOF calibration with protons Individual cell system timing resolution at a level of 150 ps σ π – S1 BC13 π + S1 BC13 TOFmeasured- TOFestimated TOFmeasured- TOFestimated Full sector system timing resolution at a level of 170 ps σ π – S1 π + S1 TOFmeasured- TOFestimated TOFmeasured- TOFestimated

Still many “details” to be understood, wok in progress . . Calibration. TOF calibration with protons Still many “details” to be understood, wok in progress PID plots from Tatyana

Calibration . . INL correction (fundamental for good timing). OK . . INL correction (fundamental for good timing). OK Calibration of position (inside the cell) and charge. OK Charge correction. OK (although it needs fine tuning) Time calibration (offset of individual cells). Calibration with protons Fine time calibration (dependence of average time with cell position). Calibration with protons

Calibration. TOF calibration Vs. position . . . . Calibration. TOF calibration Vs. position . . TOFRPC – TOF From momentum Fine time calibration will correct (at a level of ~ 10 ps σ) the position dependence Position

Calibration. TOF calibration Vs. position . . . . Each region will be evaluated individually, following the same procedure as for the full cell.

The RPC is almost fully integrated. Only small details still missed. . . Conclusions . . Hardware is ready for production beam time although small things should be fixed. The RPC is almost fully integrated. Only small details still missed. Calibration procedures are basically implemented, but still lot of work should be done.