Grants Management Test for State and Local Educational Agencies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Allowability and Grants Management Test When Working With NonTraditional Providers Tiffany R. Winters, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq.
Advertisements

Grants Management Test for State and Local Educational Agencies
Time and Effort Reporting
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
THE SUPER CIRCULAR – “OMNI CIRCULAR” THE ONE-STOP SHOP FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE OMB Revised Administrative, Cost, Audit Rules Governing All Federal Grants.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Tiffany R. Winters, Time and Effort Documentation Best Practices 1 Mike F. Bender, Esq.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Charter Schools: Allowability and Grants Management Compliance NYSED – May 2013 Tiffany R. Winters, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit,
THE BIGGEST WINNER FISCAL EDITION. Test Your Fiscal Fitness Fiscal Basics Property & Facilities Cost Allocation Nonfederal Share Records & Reports
TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING: THE BASICS Steven Spillan, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2013.
Grants Management Test for Institutions of Higher Education and Nonprofit Organizations Tiffany R. Winters, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq.
Presented by Michael Brustein, Esq. Bonnie L. Graham, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2013.
Grant Requirement Reminders Michigan State Police Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division Ms. Jackie Reese, Audit Unit Manager Mr. Richard.
1 INTERNAL CONTROLS Matthew Pakos School Improvement Grant Programs May 23, 2011.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
Omni Circular Key Area #7: New Responsibilities of the Pass- Through Agency By Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring.
Federal Grant Management Basics Perkins Grant Management WebEx June 21, 2011 Donna Brant Oregon Department of Education Oregon Department of Education.
NRS Financial Jeopardy! The Adult Education Community’s Favorite Game Show.
The Elizabeth Audit A Case Study in Audit Resolution The Elizabeth Audit A Case Study in Audit Resolution Bonnie Little, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC OMNI CIRCULAR KEY AREA #1: TIME AND EFFORT STEVEN SPILLAN, ESQ. MIKE BENDER, ESQ. BRUSTEIN.
PRESENTED BY MICHAEL BRUSTEIN, ESQ. NEVADA AEFLA DIRECTORS A DISCUSSION OF FEDERAL ISSUES NOVEMBER 28, 2012 HYATT PLACE.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC The Effort Required for Compensating Employees Tiffany R Winters, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Subrecipient Monitoring and Common Findings By USDE Kristen Tosh Cowan, EsquireTiffany R. Winters, Esquire
GRANTS MANAGEMENT TEST FOR STATE AND LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES Tiffany R. Winters, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
What Laws Apply to Federal Grants: A Historical Perspective Leigh M. Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.
Timeliness, Indirect Costs and Other Requirements Under Part 75 Leigh Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2015.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Effort Takes Time and Documentation MIKE BENDER, ESQ. BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC SPRING FORUM 2015.
IDEA EQUITABLE SERVICES: SERVING PARENTALLY PLACED PRIVATE SCHOOL STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq. Brustein &
DEVELOPING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum.
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS REGION 3 FISCAL FORUM ATLANTA, GEORGIA APRIL 26-29, 2005.
Schoolwide Funding Consolidation Panel Panelists: Nancy Konitzer, Arizona Department of Education, Rebecca Vogler, Cincinnati Public Schools and Jose Figueroa,
OnTrack Financial and Grant Compliance. Welcome The OnTrack Policies and Procedures is a draft and a living document. It may be changed based on UWGC.
FEDERAL GRANTS MANAGEMENT TEST ERIN AUERBACH JENNIFER CASTILLO BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC FALL FORUM 2015.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION Fiscal Components of Monitoring Stephanie English, Chief Monitoring.
Leigh Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Accounting for Grant Funds, including Documentation for Expenditures.
DISTRICT AUDITING UPDATE INDIRECT COST AND TIME DISTRIBUTION Melissa A. Austin, Audits Manager SC State Department of Education Office of Finance District.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
Shift to Greater Flexibility Under Federal Grants
Office of Special Education TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING
THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FEDERAL GRANTS MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT RESOLUTION
Lessons Learned from Financial Management Reviews
Allowability, Time & Effort Under the New EDGAR
How to Draft & Update Compliant Policies & Procedures
“Are You Ready for WIOA?”
Time and Effort Documentation Flexibility
Your Policies and Procedures are Compliant
Federal Grants Management Test
Understanding Supplement Not Supplant Under ESSA, IDEA, and Perkins
The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring
Time and Effort The Good, the Bad, the Paperwork
Time and Effort Documentation Flexibility
“The Georgia and Maine Stories” Impact on Recent Judicial Precedent on Federal Grants Management Michael Brustein, Esq. Bonnie Graham,
EDGAR OVERVIEW Michael L. Brustein, Esq.
How To Conduct a Control Self-Assessment
Policies & Procedures A How-To Guide Bonnie Graham, Esq.
To Accountability…and Beyond
Drafting Compliant (and Some Newly Required) Policies and Procedures
How to Conduct a Control Self- Assessment
Using Data For cost allocation
Time and Effort Reporting: Documenting Employees’ Personnel Costs
Managing Perkins Funds
Managing Federal grants
EDGAR 201 Steven A. Spillan, Esq.
Fiscal Compliance for Title III
A Tutorial on Grants Management Rules Under EDGAR
What Laws Apply to Federal Grants: A Historical Perspective
Presentation transcript:

Grants Management Test for State and Local Educational Agencies Tiffany Winters, Esq. twinters@bruman.com Erin Auerbach, Esq. eauerbach@bruman.com Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2012

Grants Management Test Welcome Class! Please put all your books away You have 10 minutes to complete your 30 question pop quiz!

EDGAR Plus Book Table of Contents, page iii 34 C.F.R. Part 75, page 31 34 C.F.R. Part 76, page 63 Question 1. The same rules apply whether the grant is awarded directly from the US Department of Education or through the State educational agency. True False

EDGAR Plus Book OMB Circular A-87, Appendix A, Part C(1)(c), page 291 Question 2. If a State’s policy is more restrictive than the Federal regulation, a subgrantee is in compliance as long as it follows the Federal regulation. True False

Question 3. A local educational agency is subject to: EDGAR Plus Book Table of Contents, page iii OMB Circular A-87, page 287 Question 3. A local educational agency is subject to: OMB Circular A-21 OMB Circular A-87 OMB Circular A-122 All of the above

Question 4. The major “systems” in grants management are: EDGAR Plus Book Part 80, Table of Contents, page 101 Question 4. The major “systems” in grants management are: Procurement, Data Reporting, and Contracting. Inventory Management, Procurement, and Financial Management. Data Reporting, Financial Management, and Inventory Management. Inventory Management, Assessment/Evaluation, and Financial Management.

EDGAR Plus Book 34 C.F.R. § 80.20, page 106 Question 5. In order to receive Federal funds, grantees and subgrantees must implement financial management systems that: Include budget controls, such as routinely reconciling actual expenditures to budgeted amounts. Are capable of producing accurate, current and reliable financial reports. Include detailed accounting records that show the source and application of Federal funds. All of the above.

EDGAR Plus Book 34 C.F.R. § 80.20(b)(4), page 107 Question 6. Grantees and subgrantees don’t have to reconcile actual expenditures to budgeted amounts, since the budgeted amounts are only estimates. True False

EDGAR Plus Book 34 C.F.R. § 80.20(b)(6), page 107 Question 7. What forms of source documentation should be maintained as records? Receipts for actual travel Copy of contracts for services performed Payroll registries All of the above

EDGAR Plus Book 34 C.F.R. § 80.32(d)(1), page 114 Question 8. Grantees and subgrantees must maintain detailed property records for all equipment purchased with Federal funds. True False

EDGAR Plus Book 34 C.F.R. § 80.32(d)(2), page 114 Question 9. Pursuant to EDGAR, a physical inventory of all equipment must be taken: Yearly. Once every two years. Once every six months. Whenever you feel like it.

EDGAR Plus Book 34 C.F.R. § 80.32(d)(3), page 114 Question 10. If equipment is missing upon inventory review, the grantee or subgrantee must: Simply remove it off the inventory list. Buy a new piece of equipment quickly. Interview every staff member until one confesses to the theft. Investigate.

EDGAR Plus Book OMB Circular A-87, Part B(8), page 290 Question 11. Contracts supported with Federal funds must be in writing. True False

EDGAR Plus Book 34 C.F.R. § 80.36(b)(3), Page 116 Question 12. A conflict of interest arises when the following persons have a financial interest in a firm or company that is selected for a contract by the grantee: Me (an employee of the grantee). My son/daughter. My husband/wife’s company is selected. All of the above.

EDGAR Plus Book 34 C.F.R. § 80.36(c)(4), Page 118 Question 13. A grantee/subgrantee can sole source a contract as long as the vendor does a good job. True False

EDGAR Plus Book OMB Circular A-133 § __.210, page 358 Question 14. A contractor and a subgrantee have the same legal responsibility when working on Federal programs. True False

Question 15. A subgrant is different from a contract because: EDGAR Plus Book Circular A-133 § __.210(b)(5), page 358 Question 15. A subgrant is different from a contract because: A subgrant provides goods and services that are ancillary to the operation of the Federal program. A subgrant uses the Federal funds to carry out a program as compared to providing goods and services for a program. A subgrant is not subject to compliance requirements of the Federal program. A subgrant and a contract are the same.

Question 16. The goal of an internal control is to ensure: EDGAR Plus Book OMB Circular A-133, § __.105, page 355 Question 16. The goal of an internal control is to ensure: Efficiency of operations. Reliability of financial reporting. Compliance with applicable laws and regulations. All of the above.

Question 17. A grantee/subgrantee must obligate all Federal funds: EDGAR Plus Book 34 C.F.R. § 80.23, page 108 Question 17. A grantee/subgrantee must obligate all Federal funds: Within the statute of limitations. By the end of the period of availability. As soon as possible. None of the above.

EDGAR Plus Book OMB Circular A-87, Appendix A, Part C(3)(c), page 292 Question 18. If there are funds remaining at the end of the project period, they may be used to purchase goods or services to be used in the future. True False

EDGAR Plus Book 34 C.F.R. § 76.707, page 87 Question 19. Expenditures on services performed by an employee of a grantee/subgrantee are obligated to the Federal award: On the date when the subgrantee signs the contract to obtain the services. On the date that the services are performed. On the date the employee signs the time and effort certification. On the date the employee is paid for the services.

EDGAR Plus Book 34 C.F.R. § 76.707, page 87 Question 20. Expenditures for services performed by a contractor are obligated to the Federal award: On the date that the services are performed. On the date that the grantee/subgrantee receives the invoice. On the date that the subgrantee signs the contract for services. At any point during the period of availability.

EDGAR Plus Book 34 C.F.R. § 76.707, page 87 Question 21. An airplane ticket for a business conference obligates to the Federal grant award: On the date the subgrantee decides to make travel arrangements. On the date the travel arrangements are booked and seat assignments are confirmed. On the date the travel arrangements are paid in full. On the date the traveler takes the flight to their destination.

EDGAR Plus Book OMB Circular A-87, Appendix A, Part C, page 291 Question 22. For a cost to be allowable to a Federal grant award, it must meet the following criteria: Necessary and reasonable. Allocable to the Federal grant award. Subtract applicable credits. All of the above.

Question 23. A cost is reasonable if: It is on sale. EDGAR Plus Book OMB Circular A-87, Appendix A, Part C(2), Page 291 Question 23. A cost is reasonable if: It is on sale. It does not cause the grantee or subgrantee to exceed its total Federal allocation. It does not exceed the cost that would be incurred by a prudent person under similar circumstances. None of the above.

Question 24. Costs are allocable to the grant if: EDGAR Plus Book OMB Circular A-87, Appendix A, Part C(3), page 292 Question 24. Costs are allocable to the grant if: The cost of the goods or services is proportionate to the benefits received by the grant. At least 50% of the goods or services will directly benefit the grant. The goods or services, in any way, benefit the grant objectives. The cost of the goods or services was included in the budget proposal.

EDGAR Plus Book OMB Circular A-87, Appendix B(14) & (43), pages 300 & 308 Question 25. Assuming all costs are reasonable, which of the following cost incurred during an overnight business trip is not allowable: Dinner (without any alcoholic beverages). Hotel room. Mileage costs. A ticket to a movie.

EDGAR Plus Book OMB Circular A-87, Appendix B(25), page 304 Question 26. Federal funds may be used for equipment maintenance costs. True False

EDGAR Plus Book OMB Circular A-87, Appendix B(8)(h), page 297 Question 27. As long as an employee’s salary is supported with at least 50% non-Federal funds, the employee does not have to fill out a time and effort certification, even if the other 50% is supported with Federal funds. True False

EDGAR Plus Book OMB Circular A-87, Appendix B(8)(h)(4), page 297 Question 28. An administrator that works approximately half time on IDEA administrative activities and half on Title I, Part A administrative activities is required to keep: A semi-annual certification. A monthly PAR. Is not required to keep track of his/her time. A weekly PAR.

EDGAR Plus Book OMB Circular A-87, Appendix B(8)(h)(3), page 297 Question 29. A teacher that spends 100% of her time teaching in a special education classroom to IDEA-eligible students and whose salary is supported with Federal funds is required to keep: A semi-annual certification. A monthly PAR. Is not required to keep track of his/her time. A weekly PAR.

Question 30. Grantees and subgrantees should retain their records for: EDGAR Plus Book 34 C.F.R. § 81.31(c), page 134 Question 30. Grantees and subgrantees should retain their records for: 1 year from the date of obligation. 3 years from the date of obligation. 5 years from the date of obligation. 10 years from the date of obligation.

The End! What Grade Did You Get?? This presentation is intended solely to provide general information and does not constitute legal advice or a legal service.  This presentation does not create a client-lawyer relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC and, therefore, carries none of the protections under the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct.  Attendance at this presentation, a later review of any printed or electronic materials, or any follow-up questions or communications arising out of this presentation with any attorney at Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC does not create an attorney-client relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC .  You should not take any action based upon any information in this presentation without first consulting legal counsel familiar with your particular circumstances.